Elderly PatientsPhase 4NCT06251999
Efficacy and Safety of Fospropofol for Same-day Bidirectional Endoscopy in Elderly Patients
A Phase 4 study testing fospropofol sedation and Propofol in people with Elderly Patients, run by Shanghai 6th People's Hospital.
Trial summary
Introduction: Fospropofol disodium is a novel prodrug that has improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties compared with propofol. This trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of fospropofol versus propofol sedation for same-day bidirectional endoscopy in elderly patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Elderly Patients
- What is being tested?
- fospropofol sedation and Propofol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 256 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2024to 31 Aug 2028
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 65 years or older
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III
- Body mass index (BMI) 18-30 kg/m2
- Scheduled for same-day bidirectional endoscopy under sedation
Who cannot join
- Severe cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, or liver diseases
- Previous hypotension (systolic blood pressure ≤90 mmHg), bradycardia (heart rate <50 beats/min), or hypoxemia (SpO2 <90%)
- Neurocognitive or psychiatric disorders
- Contraindications to gastroscopy (gastric retention, long-term aspirin administration, etc.)
- Hypersensitivity to study medications
- Drug or alcohol misuse
- Definite upper respiratory tract infection
- Refusal for participation
About this study
Official title: Efficacy and Safety of Fospropofol Disodium Sedation for Same-day Bidirectional Endoscopy in Elderly Patients: a Prospective, Single-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Non-inferiority Trial
Introduction: Fospropofol disodium is a novel prodrug that has improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties compared with propofol. This trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of fospropofol versus propofol sedation for same-day bidirectional endoscopy in elderly patients.
Methods and analysis: This is a prospective, single-center, double-blind, randomized, propofol-controlled, non-inferiority trial. A total of 256 adult patients scheduled for same-day bidirectional endoscopy under sedation will be randomly allocated, in a 1:1 ratio, to a fospropofol group or a propofol group (n=128 in each group). All patients will receive analgesic pretreatment with sufentanil 5 μg. Two minutes later, an initial bolus dose of fospropofol 6.5 mg/kg or 1.5 mg/kg propofol and supplemental doses of fospropofol 1.6 mg/kg or 0.5 mg/kg propofol will be titrated as needed to the target sedation levels during the procedures. The primary outcome is the success rate of same-day bidirectional endoscopy. Secondary outcomes include the time to successful induction of sedation, duration, time to being fully alert, time to patient discharge, endoscopist satisfaction, patient satisfaction, and the top-up frequency and dosage of sedative medications. The safety endpoints consist of adverse events (AEs) concerning cough reflex, gag reflexes, body movement, muscular tremor, pain on injection. Sedation-related AEs, including episodes of desaturation, severe desaturation (SpO2 < 90%), hypotension, severe hypotension (decrease in mean blood pressure ≥30% of baseline), and bradycardia, will be also recorded. Data will be analyzed on the intention-to-treat basis.
Discussion: The investigators hypothesize that the efficacy and safety of fospropofol sedation for elderly patients undergoing same-visit bidirectional endoscopy will not be inferior to that of propofol. The findings will provide daily practice of sedation regimens for same-day bidirectional endoscopy in elderly patients.
- Conditions
- Elderly Patients
- Being tested
- fospropofol sedation, Propofol
- Keywords
- fospropofol, propofol, sedation, elderly, bidirectional endoscopy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
fospropofol sedationDrug
Fospropofol sedation for same-day bidirectional endoscopy in elderly patients
PropofolDrug
propofol
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| fospropofol | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: fospropofol sedation |
| propofol | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Propofol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The success rate of same-day bidirectional endoscopy
The success rate of the gastrointestinal endoscopy was assessed according to the following criteria : 1) completion of the gastrointestinal endoscopy; 2) no need for rescue sedative/anesthetic, which means the top-up doses of the experimental drugs were administered no more than five times within any 15-min window from the initial administration to the end of the procedure.
Measured: Immediate time after sedation emergence
Secondary outcomes (12)
The time to successful induction of sedation
the time counted from the start of drug administration to the achievement of a sedation score (MOAA/S ) ≤ 1
Measured: Immediate time after sedation emergence
Time to being fully alert
the time from gastrointestinal endoscopy extraction or/and the time from the last drug administration to a MOAA/S score of 5 on three consecutive measurements;
Measured: Immediate time after sedation emergence
Time to patient discharge
Time to patient discharge
Measured: Immediate time of hospital discharge
Endoscopist's satisfaction questionnaire
Endoscopist's satisfaction
Measured: Immediate time after sedation procedure completion
Patient's satisfaction questionnaire
Patient's satisfaction
Measured: Immediate time of hospital discharge
The top-up frequency and dosage of sedative medications
The top-up frequency and dosage of sedative medications
Measured: Immediate time after sedation emergence
Incidence of adverse events (AEs) at timepoint 1
Episodes of desaturation, severe desaturation (SpO2 < 90%), hypotension, severe hypotension (decrease in mean blood pressure ≥30% of baseline), and bradycardia.
Measured: baseline (Prior to sedation)
Incidence of adverse events (AEs) at timepoint 2
Episodes of desaturation, severe desaturation (SpO2 < 90%), hypotension, severe hypotension (decrease in mean blood pressure ≥30% of baseline), and bradycardia.
Measured: Intraoperative (during sedation)
Incidence of adverse events (AEs) at timepoint 3
Episodes of desaturation, severe desaturation (SpO2 < 90%), hypotension, severe hypotension (decrease in mean blood pressure ≥30% of baseline), and bradycardia.
Measured: Intraoperative (the timepoint of sedation emergence)
Incidence of adverse events (AEs) at timepoint 4
Episodes of desaturation, severe desaturation (SpO2 < 90%), hypotension, severe hypotension (decrease in mean blood pressure ≥30% of baseline), and bradycardia.
Measured: 15 min in post-anesthesia care unit
Incidence of adverse events (AEs) at timepoint 5
Episodes of desaturation, severe desaturation (SpO2 < 90%), hypotension, severe hypotension (decrease in mean blood pressure ≥30% of baseline), and bradycardia.
Measured: 30 min in post-anesthesia care unit
Incidence of adverse events (AEs) at timepoint 6
Episodes of desaturation, severe desaturation (SpO2 < 90%), hypotension, severe hypotension (decrease in mean blood pressure ≥30% of baseline), and bradycardia.
Measured: Immediate time of hospital discharge
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Feb 2024
- Study start1 Aug 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 May 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Aug 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Elderly PatientsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 256 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai 6th People's Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Xiaofeng WANG, Shanghai 6th People's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06251999
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- XWANG
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 21 Jan 2024
- Last updated
- 9 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy and Safety of Fospropofol Disodium Sedation for Same-day Bidirectional Endoscopy in Elderly Patients: a Prospective, Single-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Non-inferiority Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06251999
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- XWANG
- Conditions
- Elderly Patients
- Keywords
- fospropofol, propofol, sedation, elderly, bidirectional endoscopy
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 256 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai 6th People's HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Introduction: Fospropofol disodium is a novel prodrug that has improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties compared with propofol. This trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of fospropofol versus propofol sedation for same-day bidirectional endoscopy in elderly patients.
Methods and analysis: This is a prospective, single-center, double-blind, randomized, propofol-controlled, non-inferiority trial. A total of 256 adult patients scheduled for same-day bidirectional endoscopy under sedation will be randomly allocated, in a 1:1 ratio, to a fospropofol group or a propofol group (n=128 in each group). All patients will receive analgesic pretreatment with sufentanil 5 μg. Two minutes later, an initial bolus dose of fospropofol 6.5 mg/kg or 1.5 mg/kg propofol and supplemental doses of fospropofol 1.6 mg/kg or 0.5 mg/kg propofol will be titrated as needed to the target sedation levels during the procedures. The primary outcome is the success rate of same-day bidirectional endoscopy. Secondary outcomes include the time to successful induction of sedation, duration, time to being fully alert, time to patient discharge, endoscopist satisfaction, patient satisfaction, and the top-up frequency and dosage of sedative medications. The safety endpoints consist of adverse events (AEs) concerning cough reflex, gag reflexes, body movement, muscular tremor, pain on injection. Sedation-related AEs, including episodes of desaturation, severe desaturation (SpO2 < 90%), hypotension, severe hypotension (decrease in mean blood pressure ≥30% of baseline), and bradycardia, will be also recorded. Data will be analyzed on the intention-to-treat basis.
Discussion: The investigators hypothesize that the efficacy and safety of fospropofol sedation for elderly patients undergoing same-visit bidirectional endoscopy will not be inferior to that of propofol. The findings will provide daily practice of sedation regimens for same-day bidirectional endoscopy in elderly patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| fospropofol | Experimental | Drug: fospropofol sedation |
| propofol | Placebo comparator | Drug: Propofol |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- 65 years or older
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III
- Body mass index (BMI) 18-30 kg/m2
- Scheduled for same-day bidirectional endoscopy under sedation
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Severe cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, or liver diseases
- Previous hypotension (systolic blood pressure ≤90 mmHg), bradycardia (heart rate <50 beats/min), or hypoxemia (SpO2 <90%)
- Neurocognitive or psychiatric disorders
- Contraindications to gastroscopy (gastric retention, long-term aspirin administration, etc.)
- Hypersensitivity to study medications
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| fospropofol sedationFospropofol sedation for same-day bidirectional endoscopy in elderly patients | Drug | fospropofol |
| Propofolpropofol | Drug | propofol |
Primary outcome
The success rate of same-day bidirectional endoscopy
Time frame: Immediate time after sedation emergence
The success rate of the gastrointestinal endoscopy was assessed according to the following criteria : 1) completion of the gastrointestinal endoscopy; 2) no need for rescue sedative/anesthetic, which means the top-up doses of the experimental drugs were administered no more than five times within any 15-min window from the initial administration to the end of the procedure.
12 secondary outcomes
The time to successful induction of sedation
Time frame: Immediate time after sedation emergence
Time to being fully alert
Time frame: Immediate time after sedation emergence
Time to patient discharge
Time frame: Immediate time of hospital discharge
Endoscopist's satisfaction questionnaire
Time frame: Immediate time after sedation procedure completion
Patient's satisfaction questionnaire
Time frame: Immediate time of hospital discharge
The top-up frequency and dosage of sedative medications
Time frame: Immediate time after sedation emergence
Incidence of adverse events (AEs) at timepoint 1
Time frame: baseline (Prior to sedation)
Incidence of adverse events (AEs) at timepoint 2
Time frame: Intraoperative (during sedation)
Incidence of adverse events (AEs) at timepoint 3
Time frame: Intraoperative (the timepoint of sedation emergence)
Incidence of adverse events (AEs) at timepoint 4
Time frame: 15 min in post-anesthesia care unit
Incidence of adverse events (AEs) at timepoint 5
Time frame: 30 min in post-anesthesia care unit
Incidence of adverse events (AEs) at timepoint 6
Time frame: Immediate time of hospital discharge
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Feb 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Elderly Patients
Recruiting
Comparıson of the Effıcacy of Conventıonal Exercıse and Pılates ın Pre-fraıl and Fraıl Older Adults
Frailty Syndrome, Prefrail Elderly
RecruitingPhase 4
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
MF-300 for Treatment of Age-Related Sarcopenia
Sarcopenia in Elderly
Not yet recruiting
The Aim of the Study is to Decipher the Alterations in Signalling Pathways of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells (Satellite Cells (SCs)) in Individuals With COPD, as Well as to Examine the Effect of Exercise Training on SCs.
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Sarcopenia in Elderly
Recruiting
Effects of Breathing Exercises on Cognition in Older Adults
Older Adults (65 Years and Older), Cognition
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing fospropofol sedation and Propofol in people with Elderly Patients, run by Shanghai 6th People's Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The success rate of same-day bidirectional endoscopy (time frame: Immediate time after sedation emergence). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Feb 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.