Neuropathic PainNCT06252116
Study of Analgesic Action of Pregabalin, Duloxetine and Tramadol in Patients With Different Neuropathic Pain Phenotypes
An observational study of Neuropathic Pain, run by Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki at 1 site in Greece.
Trial summary
Chronic pain is the most frequent cause from which millions of patients suffer worldwide, which makes them unable to work but also greatly affects their quality of life. Chronic pain is a condition in itself. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Neuropathic Pain
- What is being tested?
- Pregabalin group and Duloxetine group
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGreece
- Study dates
- 5 Mar 2018to 7 Sep 2024
- How long will I take part?
- 3 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: patients suffering from neuropathic pain (initial assessment with DN4 questionnaire)
Who may be able to join
- neuropathic pain
Who cannot join
- under 18 years old
- cancer pain
- patients receiving pregabalin, duloxetine, tramadol
- drug or alcohol abuse
- psychiatric decease
- renal failure, heart failure, liver failure, thrombocytopenia, closed-angle glaucoma
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Greece1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
AHEPA University General of Thessaloniki, Chronic Pain Unit
Thessaloniki, 54636
Ekaterini Amaniti, MD, PhD, +306937248827, amanitik@gmail.com
Ioannis Dalakakis, MD
About this study
Official title: Study of Analgesic Action of Pregabalin, Duloxetine and Tramadol in Patients With Different Neuropathic Pain Phenotypes. Clinical Study
Chronic pain is the most frequent cause from which millions of patients suffer worldwide, which makes them unable to work but also greatly affects their quality of life. Chronic pain is a condition in itself. Neuropathic pain is a consequence of damage or disease of the peripheral or central nervous system and presents a heterogeneous clinical profile. A large number of pharmaceutical and non-pharmacological agents, as well as various complementary therapies, have been used in the treatment of neuropathic pain. However, their effectiveness is considered moderate and limited and is under investigation because a significant proportion of patients do not respond satisfactorily to treatment.
Purpose: The purpose of the study is to investigate the effectiveness of analgesics in the different phenotypes of neuropathic pain.
Read the detailed description
The existence of somatosensory nervous system damage and the consequent occurrence of neuropathic pain is an important factor in the development of many painful syndromes, both benign and cancerous pain. A particular feature of this syndrome is that patients with the same pathology (eg painful diabetic neuropathy) exhibit a different spectrum of symptoms and clinical signs whereas patients with different pathologies (such as diabetic neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia) often have the same clinical picture. This phenomenon has been attributed to the different pathophysiological mechanisms involved in each case, regardless of the initial causative agent that induced the nerve damage. Among these mechanisms the occurrence of ectopic electrical activity in the periphery, the development of central sensitization, spinal cord remodeling as well as the phenotypic differentiation of neurons are included. In the treatment of neuropathic pain, a large number of agents have been used, such as antiepileptics, antidepressants, topical anesthetics, opioids, capsaicin etc. Among these, the highest efficacy, based on existing evidence, is proved with gabapentinoids (Gabapentin and Pregabalin) and antidepressants (serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors) as well as Tramadol. The distinction of different phenotypes of neuropathic pain is done either by using specific questionnaires or by laboratory assessment. Regarding the use of questionnaires, the PAIN DETECT questionnaire has been used to distinguish 5 different phenotypes of neuropathic pain in patients with diabetic neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia and back pain, and is considered as an acceptable method despite its limitations in the detection of different phenotypes of neuropathic painStudy protocol
Patients meeting the inclusion criteria are informed for and included in the study after written consent. Patients should note that this is an observational study and that the treatment they will receive is appropriate for their case, as documented in international guidelines. None will not receive an experimental or other medicine other than the medically accepted ones in their case and their treatment will be the same whether they are participating in the study or not. An initial assessment will be made to patients. During the initial assessment, demographic data, pain intensity with Numerical rating scale (NRS) and Short Form McGill Pain questionnaire, as well as location, reflections and periodicity are recorded. Additionally, patients are assessed on the basis of SOPA SF and PAIN Catastrophising scale questionnaires. Patients are then assessed for neuropathic pain with the DN4 and PAIN DETECT questionnaires. Since the latter are diagnostic of neuropathic pain, patients are divided into 2 groups. Group A begins to administer Pregabalin 50 mg daily with a gradual increase of 50 mg every 5 days to a dose of 300 mg daily or the highest tolerated dose based on adverse reactions. In group B, Duloxetin is administered at a dose of 30 mg, increasing to 60 mg daily after 15 days, in the absence of adverse events. Patients are re-evaluated after a 30-day NRS, McGill Pain questionnaire and PAIN DETECT scale for the range of sensory symptoms and signs. Since the reduction in pain intensity is less than 50% in the NRS, the second therapeutic agent is added as follows: Group A addition of Duloxetine at a dose of 30 mg, increasing to 60 mg daily after 15 days, in the absence of adverse effects. Group: Add Pregabalin 50mg with a gradual increase of 50mg per 5 days to a daily dose of 300mg or up to the maximum tolerated dose. Patients are re-evaluated 30 days after the addition of the second agent based on the NRS scale, McGill Pain Questionnaire and PAIN DETECT on the range of sensory symptoms and signs. Since the reduction in pain intensity is less than 50% in the NRS, the combination of the two agents in the two groups is added Tramadol 50 mg twice a day. Patients are re-evaluated after the latency of one month after the addition of Tramadol, and the final values in the NRS, PAIN DETECT SF McGill ranges are obtained. If at any stage of the treatment one of the drugs is not tolerated, it is discontinued, the patients are withdrawn from the study and by further measurements the case is recorded and the patient's alternative treatment methods are discussed with the patient.
Ethics
The study is a prospective cohort-type observational study and will include the recording of patients' clinical parameters without affecting their health, influencing the diagnostic or therapeutic approach, affecting the outcome of their health or violating their legal rights. Patient data will be recorded anonymously, and any publication of the results will take place in the form of aggregated tables, which does not contradict the personal or religious beliefs of patients.
- Conditions
- Neuropathic Pain
- Being tested
- Pregabalin group, Duloxetine group
- Medical subject headings
- Neuralgia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pregabalin groupDrug
Pregabalin group
Duloxetine groupDrug
Duloxetine group
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Neuropathic pain patients | Patients were randomized to pregabalin (group A) and duloxetine (group B). Those patients who did not have a 50% reduction in pain levels received duloxetine (group A) and pregabalin (group B). Then, those patients who did not have a 50% reduction in pain levels received tramadol. Receives: Drug: Pregabalin group; Drug: Duloxetine group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
NRS Scale assessment
The initial assessment of the patients will be performed with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS scale). NRS pain scale is a measure of pain intensity, in which the respondent selects a number from 0-10 that best reflects the intensity of his/her pain.
Measured: 1 month
Secondary outcomes (1)
Phenotype assessment
Pregabalin, duloxetine and tramadol that are prescribed for patients suffering from neuropathic pain affect different phenotypes of neuropathic pain regardless of the initial cause of pain. In this study we will examine and measure the affect of these agents on different symptoms of neuropathic pain burning sensation, tingling or prickling, pain touching, electric shock attacks, painful cold or heat water, numbness sensation, slight pressure pain. (scale from "NEVER" to "VERY STRONGLY".
Measured: 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Feb 2024
- Study start5 Mar 2018
- Primary completion20 Jul 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion7 Sep 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neuropathic PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Aristotle University Of ThessalonikiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 3 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ekaterini Amaniti, MD, PhD, Study director, AHEPA University Hospital of Thessaloniki, Greece
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06252116
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 3/28
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 21 Jan 2024
- Last updated
- 9 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Campbell JN, Meyer RA. Mechanisms of neuropathic pain. Neuron. 2006 Oct 5;52(1):77-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.021.
PubMed 17015228Freeman R, Baron R, Bouhassira D, Cabrera J, Emir B. Sensory profiles of patients with neuropathic pain based on the neuropathic pain symptoms and signs. Pain. 2014 Feb;155(2):367-376. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.10.023. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
PubMed 24472518
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study of Analgesic Action of Pregabalin, Duloxetine and Tramadol in Patients With Different Neuropathic Pain Phenotypes. Clinical Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06252116
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 3/28
- Conditions
- Neuropathic Pain
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Aristotle University Of ThessalonikiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Jul 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 7 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Chronic pain is the most frequent cause from which millions of patients suffer worldwide, which makes them unable to work but also greatly affects their quality of life. Chronic pain is a condition in itself. Neuropathic pain is a consequence of damage or disease of the peripheral or central nervous system and presents a heterogeneous clinical profile. A large number of pharmaceutical and non-pharmacological agents, as well as various complementary therapies, have been used in the treatment of neuropathic pain. However, their effectiveness is considered moderate and limited and is under investigation because a significant proportion of patients do not respond satisfactorily to treatment.
Purpose: The purpose of the study is to investigate the effectiveness of analgesics in the different phenotypes of neuropathic pain.
Detailed description
The existence of somatosensory nervous system damage and the consequent occurrence of neuropathic pain is an important factor in the development of many painful syndromes, both benign and cancerous pain. A particular feature of this syndrome is that patients with the same pathology (eg painful diabetic neuropathy) exhibit a different spectrum of symptoms and clinical signs whereas patients with different pathologies (such as diabetic neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia) often have the same clinical picture. This phenomenon has been attributed to the different pathophysiological mechanisms involved in each case, regardless of the initial causative agent that induced the nerve damage. Among these mechanisms the occurrence of ectopic electrical activity in the periphery, the development of central sensitization, spinal cord remodeling as well as the phenotypic differentiation of neurons are included. In the treatment of neuropathic pain, a large number of agents have been used, such as antiepileptics, antidepressants, topical anesthetics, opioids, capsaicin etc. Among these, the highest efficacy, based on existing evidence, is proved with gabapentinoids (Gabapentin and Pregabalin) and antidepressants (serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors) as well as Tramadol. The distinction of different phenotypes of neuropathic pain is done either by using specific questionnaires or by laboratory assessment. Regarding the use of questionnaires, the PAIN DETECT questionnaire has been used to distinguish 5 different phenotypes of neuropathic pain in patients with diabetic neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia and back pain, and is considered as an acceptable method despite its limitations in the detection of different phenotypes of neuropathic painStudy protocol
Patients meeting the inclusion criteria are informed for and included in the study after written consent. Patients should note that this is an observational study and that the treatment they will receive is appropriate for their case, as documented in international guidelines. None will not receive an experimental or other medicine other than the medically accepted ones in their case and their treatment will be the same whether they are participating in the study or not. An initial assessment will be made to patients. During the initial assessment, demographic data, pain intensity with Numerical rating scale (NRS) and Short Form McGill Pain questionnaire, as well as location, reflections and periodicity are recorded. Additionally, patients are assessed on the basis of SOPA SF and PAIN Catastrophising scale questionnaires. Patients are then assessed for neuropathic pain with the DN4 and PAIN DETECT questionnaires. Since the latter are diagnostic of neuropathic pain, patients are divided into 2 groups. Group A begins to administer Pregabalin 50 mg daily with a gradual increase of 50 mg every 5 days to a dose of 300 mg daily or the highest tolerated dose based on adverse reactions. In group B, Duloxetin is administered at a dose of 30 mg, increasing to 60 mg daily after 15 days, in the absence of adverse events. Patients are re-evaluated after a 30-day NRS, McGill Pain questionnaire and PAIN DETECT scale for the range of sensory symptoms and signs. Since the reduction in pain intensity is less than 50% in the NRS, the second therapeutic agent is added as follows: Group A addition of Duloxetine at a dose of 30 mg, increasing to 60 mg daily after 15 days, in the absence of adverse effects. Group: Add Pregabalin 50mg with a gradual increase of 50mg per 5 days to a daily dose of 300mg or up to the maximum tolerated dose. Patients are re-evaluated 30 days after the addition of the second agent based on the NRS scale, McGill Pain Questionnaire and PAIN DETECT on the range of sensory symptoms and signs. Since the reduction in pain intensity is less than 50% in the NRS, the combination of the two agents in the two groups is added Tramadol 50 mg twice a day. Patients are re-evaluated after the latency of one month after the addition of Tramadol, and the final values in the NRS, PAIN DETECT SF McGill ranges are obtained. If at any stage of the treatment one of the drugs is not tolerated, it is discontinued, the patients are withdrawn from the study and by further measurements the case is recorded and the patient's alternative treatment methods are discussed with the patient.
Ethics
The study is a prospective cohort-type observational study and will include the recording of patients' clinical parameters without affecting their health, influencing the diagnostic or therapeutic approach, affecting the outcome of their health or violating their legal rights. Patient data will be recorded anonymously, and any publication of the results will take place in the form of aggregated tables, which does not contradict the personal or religious beliefs of patients.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 3 Months
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Neuropathic pain patients | – | Drug: Pregabalin group, Drug: Duloxetine groupPatients were randomized to pregabalin (group A) and duloxetine (group B). Those patients who did not have a 50% reduction in pain levels received duloxetine (group A) and pregabalin (group B). Then, those patients who did not have a 50% reduction in pain levels received tramadol. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- patients suffering from neuropathic pain (initial assessment with DN4 questionnaire)
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- neuropathic pain
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- under 18 years old
- cancer pain
- patients receiving pregabalin, duloxetine, tramadol
- drug or alcohol abuse
- psychiatric decease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pregabalin groupPregabalin group | Drug | Neuropathic pain patients |
| Duloxetine groupDuloxetine group | Drug | Neuropathic pain patients |
Primary outcome
NRS Scale assessment
Time frame: 1 month
The initial assessment of the patients will be performed with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS scale). NRS pain scale is a measure of pain intensity, in which the respondent selects a number from 0-10 that best reflects the intensity of his/her pain.
1 secondary outcome
Phenotype assessment
Time frame: 1 month
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Feb 2024.
- Background: PubMed 17015228Campbell JN, Meyer RA. Mechanisms of neuropathic pain. Neuron. 2006 Oct 5;52(1):77-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.021.
- Background: PubMed 24472518Freeman R, Baron R, Bouhassira D, Cabrera J, Emir B. Sensory profiles of patients with neuropathic pain based on the neuropathic pain symptoms and signs. Pain. 2014 Feb;155(2):367-376. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.10.023. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
- Peripheral neuropathic pain: from mechanisms to symptomsLink provided by the sponsor.
- Usefulness and limitations of quantitative sensory testing: clinical and research application in neuropathic pain statesLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Neuropathic Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
Low Dose Naltrexone Therapy for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Chronic Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
Effectiveness of Phenotype-based Pain Management Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer Related Pain: a Pilot Study
Cancer Pain, Orofacial Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
A Master Protocol Study (LY900028) of Multiple Intervention-Specific-Appendices (ISAs) in Participants With Chronic Pain
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Diabetic Neuropathic Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Trigeminal Neuralgia Electrophysiology
Trigeminal Neuralgia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ekaterini Amaniti, MD, PhD study director
AHEPA University Hospital of Thessaloniki, Greece
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Neuropathic Pain, run by Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki at 1 site in Greece.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ioannis Dalakakis, MD, MSc (+306948536554, idalakakis@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
NRS Scale assessment (time frame: 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06252116, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Feb 2024.