AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseaseCERROS - PilotNCT06252350

CERROS Pilot Study

An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease and Myocardial Infarction, run by Angiowave Imaging at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether a reduced radiation protocol (RRP) in which angiograms are acquired at ultralow radiation doses and then processed using spatiotemporal enhancement software can produce similar quality angiographic images as compared with standard techniques. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
22 Feb 2024to 8 Mar 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients suspected to have coronary artery disease (CAD) who are undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography with or without possible percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Who may be able to join

  • Referred for clinically indicated coronary angiography
  • ≥18 years of age
  • Not pregnant
  • English speaking
  • Not imprisoned
  • Able to provide written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Hemodynamically or electrically unstable.
  • Indication for coronary angiography is emergent, including ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
  • History of coronary artery bypass grafting
  • An eGFR <60
  • Pregnant or lactating
  • A BMI of 45 or greater
  • Any other factor that the investigator feels would put the patient at increased risk or otherwise make the patient unsuitable for participation in the protocol.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Corewell Health West

    Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Clinical Evaluation of Radiation Reduction for Optimized Safety - Pilot Study

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether a reduced radiation protocol (RRP) in which angiograms are acquired at ultralow radiation doses and then processed using spatiotemporal enhancement software can produce similar quality angiographic images as compared with standard techniques.

Read the detailed description

Coronary angiography is an essential diagnostic tool for determining the presence and severity of coronary artery disease, a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. While the basic techniques of coronary angiography have remained unchanged, the field of medical imaging has undergone significant advancements in hardware and software, offering new possibilities for enhanced visualization of the coronary arteries, better diagnostic accuracy, and improved patient and staff safety. However, the use of radiation during coronary angiography, which is necessary for image acquisition, exposes patients, physicians, and staff to potential risks, including radiation-induced tissue damage and an increased long-term risk of cancer. While the risks to patients attributable to the relatively low radiation doses they receive during single catheterization procedures are minimal, the cumulative risks of occupational radiation exposure are higher among physicians and staff, who are repetitively exposed to scattered radiation on a daily basis and accumulated over the course of years working in the catheterization laboratory. This occupational radiation exposure has been associated with an increased risk of cataracts, premature atherosclerosis, and certain cancers among physicians and staff. There is therefore a pressing need to explore strategies to minimize radiation doses used during coronary angiography without compromising the diagnostic accuracy of coronary artery disease detection.

Recent advancements in computational power and image processing algorithms provide opportunities for substantial reductions in radiation doses used during coronary angiography. One such advancement is spatiotemporal enhancement processing (STEP) which improves the signal to noise ratio of time sequenced angiographic data and enhances the visibility of vascular structure. This innovative STEP technique has the promise of minimizing patient and operator radiation exposure while maintaining adequate image quality. The purpose of this pilot study is to investigate a novel strategy of radiation dose reduction and data processing in coronary angiography. This pilot study will be performed in patients undergoing clinically-indicated diagnostic coronary angiography.

The study will compare angiograms acquired at ultralow radiation doses and processed with spatiotemporal enhancement software (STEP-angiograms) to standard of care angiograms (SOC-angiograms) acquired with normal radiation dose settings and no additional processing. The objectives are to assess offline whether the low radiation STEP-angiograms are of equivalent diagnostic quality as SOC-angiograms. In future research studies, the STEP software will be tested in the clinical setting to evaluate how the software may improve patient safety, enhance the overall quality of care, promote the responsible use of radiation in coronary angiography procedures, and reduce occupational radiation doses among physician and staff in the catheterization laboratory.

Keywords
CAD, Coronary, Angina, PCI, Angiography
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease, Myocardial Infarction, Coronary Disease, Coronary Stenosis, Angina Pectoris, Chest Pain

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Segment-level percent diameter stenosis (%DS)

    Segment-level quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) determination of percent diameter stenosis (%DS)

    Measured: Periprocedural

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Stenosis severity

    Agreement in reader-adjudication of segment-level identification of mild/intermediate/severe stenosis

    Measured: Periprocedural

  2. Diagnostic quality

    Percent of coronary segments qualitatively determined to be of adequate diagnostic image quality

    Measured: Periprocedural

  3. Radiation dose - SOC

    Radiation dose (air kerma and dose-area product) for SOC-angiograms

    Measured: Periprocedural

  4. Radiation dose - STEP

    Radiation dose (air kerma and dose-area product) for STEP-angiograms

    Measured: Periprocedural

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Feb 2024
  2. Study start22 Feb 2024
  3. Primary completion8 Mar 2024
  4. Study completion8 Mar 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06252350
Sponsor's protocol ID
CLN-PLAN-101v1
Acronym
CERROS - Pilot
Status last verified
Mar 2024
First submitted
2 Feb 2024
Last updated
12 Mar 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Ryan TJ. The coronary angiogram and its seminal contributions to cardiovascular medicine over five decades. Circulation. 2002 Aug 6;106(6):752-6. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000024109.12658.d4. No abstract available.

    PubMed 12163439
  • The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):1-332. doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003.

    PubMed 18082557
  • Valentin J. Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. Ann ICRP. 2000;30(2):7-67. doi: 10.1016/S0146-6453(01)00004-5.

    PubMed 11459599
  • Andreassi MG, Cioppa A, Botto N, Joksic G, Manfredi S, Federici C, Ostojic M, Rubino P, Picano E. Somatic DNA damage in interventional cardiologists: a case-control study. FASEB J. 2005 Jun;19(8):998-9. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-3287fje. Epub 2005 Mar 31.

    PubMed 15802491
  • Karatasakis A, Brilakis HS, Danek BA, Karacsonyi J, Martinez-Parachini JR, Nguyen-Trong PJ, Alame AJ, Roesle MK, Rangan BV, Rosenfield K, Mehran R, Mahmud E, Chambers CE, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES. Radiation-associated lens changes in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: Results from the IC-CATARACT (CATaracts Attributed to RAdiation in the CaTh lab) study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar 1;91(4):647-654. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27173. Epub 2017 Jul 14.

    PubMed 28707381

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease and Myocardial Infarction, run by Angiowave Imaging at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Segment-level percent diameter stenosis (%DS) (time frame: Periprocedural). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06252350, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Mar 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in