AzTrials
AzTrials

Post ERCP PancreatitisPhase 1/2NCT06252441

Comparative Clinical Study to Evaluate the Possible Efficacy and Safety of Oral N-Acetyl Cysteine Versus Rectal Diclofenac in the Prevention of Post Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis

A Phase 1/2 study testing Rectal Diclofenac and Oral N-acetyl cysteine in people with Post ERCP Pancreatitis, run by Tanta University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the current study is to compare the efficacy and safety of oral NAC and rectal diclofenac in preventing Post Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis. . Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Post ERCP Pancreatitis
What is being tested?
Rectal Diclofenac and Oral N-acetyl cysteine
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
46 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
16 Mar 2024to 25 Jun 2025
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age more than 18 years old.
  • Gender: males and females.
  • Patients with suitable indications for ERCP due to suspected pancreato-biliary disorders.
  • Blood amylase and lipase levels before ERCP are within the normal limits.

Who cannot join

  • Age of less than 18 years old.
  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM).
  • Severe bleeding tendency.
  • Impaired renal function (serum creatinine > 2 mg/dL), (creatinine clearance <30 ml/min).
  • Patients with severe heart disease.
  • Currently pregnant or nursing.
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Admission due to established pancreatitis before ECRP.
  • Unwillingness to undergo ERCP.
  • Previously documented allergy to NAC or diclofenac or any other NSAIDs.
  • History of NSAIDs intake one week before the procedure.
  • Recent Active bleeding, ulcer, or asthma.
  • Patients with rectal disease (hemorrhoids, fissures, abscesses, and incontinence).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Obstructive Jaundice Clinic in the National Liver Institute, Menoufia University , Shebin Elkoom

    Menofia

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

The aim of the current study is to compare the efficacy and safety of oral NAC and rectal diclofenac in preventing Post Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis. .

Read the detailed description

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) , a key tool that is used in diagnosis and treatment of pancreato-biliary diseases. Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common and serious complication that can occur following this procedure and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. A variety of patient-related and procedure-related factors have been associated with higher rates of PEP.

Two definitions were used for diagnosis of PEP. In both definitions, PEP is diagnosed if two of the three criteria are found in the patient .The consensus criteria that was developed by Cotton and Colleagues in 1991 defined PEP as the presence of a new pancreatic-type abdominal pain associated with at least a threefold elevation in pancreatic enzyme concentration occurring 24 hours following the ERCP procedure, with the necessity for a new or extended hospitalization for at least two nights. Severity of pancreatitis is defined based on the number of hospitalized days following ERCP as mild (< 4 days), moderate (4 to 10 days), or severe (>10 days). The revised Atlanta Classification in 2012 lists abdominal pain consistent with acute pancreatitis, amylase or lipase elevation to more than 3 times the upper limit of normal, and abdominal imaging that reveals pancreatic inflammation.

Several potential triggers can contribute to PEP. Mechanical trauma caused by ERCP instrumentation can harm the papilla and pancreatic duct, affecting pancreatic drainage. Thermal injury can occur during biliary or pancreatic sphincterotomy electrosurgical current. Chemical damage can occur when contrast medium is introduced into the pancreatic duct. Hydrostatic damage can occur when injecting contrast media into the pancreatic duct or infusing fluids such as water or saline solution during sphincter manometry. Regardless of the cause, the initial injury sets in motion a chain of events that include premature activation of proteolytic enzymes, autodigestion of pancreatic tissue, and impaired secretion from acinar cells. These events result in pancreatitis clinical symptoms, which have an influence both locally and systemically. Most PEP prevention techniques try to disrupt one or more steps in this cascade.

While the precise mechanism of PEP remains unknown, it is most likely induced by a proinflammatory cascade initiated by pancreatic acinar cell damage, which results in systemic cytokine release. Cytokines play a major role in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis as part of the underlying systemic inflammatory response, tissue damage, and organ dysfunction. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that promotes the inflammatory response, whereas Interleukin-10 (IL-10) is an immunosuppressive cytokine that inhibits inflammation. These markers can be used in measurement of the degree of systemic inflammation as predictors of the development of PEP.

Phospholipase A2 is essential in this signaling cascade. Diclofenac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that effectively inhibits phospholipase A2 activity. According to this notion, anti-inflammatory drugs such as diclofenac can stop or attenuate the first cascade that leads to clinical PEP.

Previous meta-analyses have suggested that NSAIDs are effective in preventing PEP. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines recommend routine rectal administration of 100 mg of diclofenac or indomethacin immediately before ERCP procedure in all patients without contraindications to NSAIDs administration. Rectal administration route of diclofenac is the most effective in the prevention of PEP. Rectal diclofenac is a cheap, widely available agent with easy administration method and favorable side effect profile.

Oxidative stress and active oxygen species can activate inflammatory cascade and immune responses. N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), an antioxidant drug with anti-inflammatory properties can inhibit oxidative stress as well as inflammatory intermediates, suggesting that it could aid in the prevention of PEP. Despite the failure of intravenous N-acetyl cysteine studies, 2013 pilot research revealed that oral NAC may be useful in reducing PEP. This would be due to the different pharmacokinetics of NAC followed in different studies. In a multicenter global randomized controlled trial investigation, It is reported that oral NAC is more effective than indomethacin in the prevention of PEP.

Although both oral NAC and rectal diclofenac are widely used pharmacological agents, till now no study has evaluated their comparative safety and efficacy in preventing PEP. Hence this study is planned to evaluate and compare their efficacy and safety in preventing PEP.

Being tested
Rectal Diclofenac, Oral N-acetyl cysteine

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Rectal DiclofenacDrug

    100 mg Rectal Diclofenac Before ERCP

  • Oral N-acetyl cysteineDrug

    1200 mg N-acetyl cysteine in 150 cc water orally before ERCP.

Study groups in NCT06252441
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Rectal DiclofenacActive comparatorThis Group will include 23 patients who will receive 100 mg rectal diclofenac before ERCP.
Receives: Drug: Rectal Diclofenac
Oral N-acetyl cysteineActive comparatorThis Group will include 23 patients who will receive 1200 mg N-acetyl cysteine in 150 cc water orally before ERCP.
Receives: Drug: Oral N-acetyl cysteine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The development of pancreatitis after the procedure according to consensus criteria

    Briefly in this criteria PEP will be diagnosed if the patient met two of the three following criteria after ERCP:

    A- New onset or increased abdominal pain consistent with acute pancreatitis B- Pancreatic enzyme elevation to at least three times the upper limit of normal at twenty four (24) hours after the procedure C- Necessity for new or continued hospitalization for at least two nights

    Measured: Before performing ERCP, baseline serum amylase and lipase levels will be measured in all patients. After twenty four ( 24) hours post ERCP procedure, patients' serum amylase and lipase levels will be measured.

  2. The change in the serum levels of Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and Interleukin-10 (IL-10 )before and after ERCP procedure

    These markers measure the degree of systemic inflammation as predictors of the development of PEP.

    Measured: Biomarkers will be measured at baseline before the ERCP procedure and twenty four (24 ) hours after the procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Feb 2024
  2. Study start16 Mar 2024
  3. Primary completion14 May 2025
  4. Study completion25 Jun 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
46 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06252441
Sponsor's protocol ID
Post ERCP Pancreatitis
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
31 Jan 2024
Last updated
18 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Rectal Diclofenac and Oral N-acetyl cysteine in people with Post ERCP Pancreatitis, run by Tanta University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The development of pancreatitis after the procedure according to consensus criteria (time frame: Before performing ERCP, baseline serum amylase and lipase levels will be measured in all patients. After twenty four ( 24) hours post ERCP procedure, patients' serum amylase and lipase levels will be measured.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Mar 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in