Post ERCP PancreatitisPhase 1/2NCT06252441
Comparative Clinical Study to Evaluate the Possible Efficacy and Safety of Oral N-Acetyl Cysteine Versus Rectal Diclofenac in the Prevention of Post Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis
A Phase 1/2 study testing Rectal Diclofenac and Oral N-acetyl cysteine in people with Post ERCP Pancreatitis, run by Tanta University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
The aim of the current study is to compare the efficacy and safety of oral NAC and rectal diclofenac in preventing Post Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis. . Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Post ERCP Pancreatitis
- What is being tested?
- Rectal Diclofenac and Oral N-acetyl cysteine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 46 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 16 Mar 2024to 25 Jun 2025
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age more than 18 years old.
- Gender: males and females.
- Patients with suitable indications for ERCP due to suspected pancreato-biliary disorders.
- Blood amylase and lipase levels before ERCP are within the normal limits.
Who cannot join
- Age of less than 18 years old.
- Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM).
- Severe bleeding tendency.
- Impaired renal function (serum creatinine > 2 mg/dL), (creatinine clearance <30 ml/min).
- Patients with severe heart disease.
- Currently pregnant or nursing.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Admission due to established pancreatitis before ECRP.
- Unwillingness to undergo ERCP.
- Previously documented allergy to NAC or diclofenac or any other NSAIDs.
- History of NSAIDs intake one week before the procedure.
- Recent Active bleeding, ulcer, or asthma.
- Patients with rectal disease (hemorrhoids, fissures, abscesses, and incontinence).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Egypt1 site
Obstructive Jaundice Clinic in the National Liver Institute, Menoufia University , Shebin Elkoom
Menofia
About this study
The aim of the current study is to compare the efficacy and safety of oral NAC and rectal diclofenac in preventing Post Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis. .
Read the detailed description
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) , a key tool that is used in diagnosis and treatment of pancreato-biliary diseases. Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common and serious complication that can occur following this procedure and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. A variety of patient-related and procedure-related factors have been associated with higher rates of PEP.
Two definitions were used for diagnosis of PEP. In both definitions, PEP is diagnosed if two of the three criteria are found in the patient .The consensus criteria that was developed by Cotton and Colleagues in 1991 defined PEP as the presence of a new pancreatic-type abdominal pain associated with at least a threefold elevation in pancreatic enzyme concentration occurring 24 hours following the ERCP procedure, with the necessity for a new or extended hospitalization for at least two nights. Severity of pancreatitis is defined based on the number of hospitalized days following ERCP as mild (< 4 days), moderate (4 to 10 days), or severe (>10 days). The revised Atlanta Classification in 2012 lists abdominal pain consistent with acute pancreatitis, amylase or lipase elevation to more than 3 times the upper limit of normal, and abdominal imaging that reveals pancreatic inflammation.
Several potential triggers can contribute to PEP. Mechanical trauma caused by ERCP instrumentation can harm the papilla and pancreatic duct, affecting pancreatic drainage. Thermal injury can occur during biliary or pancreatic sphincterotomy electrosurgical current. Chemical damage can occur when contrast medium is introduced into the pancreatic duct. Hydrostatic damage can occur when injecting contrast media into the pancreatic duct or infusing fluids such as water or saline solution during sphincter manometry. Regardless of the cause, the initial injury sets in motion a chain of events that include premature activation of proteolytic enzymes, autodigestion of pancreatic tissue, and impaired secretion from acinar cells. These events result in pancreatitis clinical symptoms, which have an influence both locally and systemically. Most PEP prevention techniques try to disrupt one or more steps in this cascade.
While the precise mechanism of PEP remains unknown, it is most likely induced by a proinflammatory cascade initiated by pancreatic acinar cell damage, which results in systemic cytokine release. Cytokines play a major role in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis as part of the underlying systemic inflammatory response, tissue damage, and organ dysfunction. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that promotes the inflammatory response, whereas Interleukin-10 (IL-10) is an immunosuppressive cytokine that inhibits inflammation. These markers can be used in measurement of the degree of systemic inflammation as predictors of the development of PEP.
Phospholipase A2 is essential in this signaling cascade. Diclofenac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that effectively inhibits phospholipase A2 activity. According to this notion, anti-inflammatory drugs such as diclofenac can stop or attenuate the first cascade that leads to clinical PEP.
Previous meta-analyses have suggested that NSAIDs are effective in preventing PEP. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines recommend routine rectal administration of 100 mg of diclofenac or indomethacin immediately before ERCP procedure in all patients without contraindications to NSAIDs administration. Rectal administration route of diclofenac is the most effective in the prevention of PEP. Rectal diclofenac is a cheap, widely available agent with easy administration method and favorable side effect profile.
Oxidative stress and active oxygen species can activate inflammatory cascade and immune responses. N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), an antioxidant drug with anti-inflammatory properties can inhibit oxidative stress as well as inflammatory intermediates, suggesting that it could aid in the prevention of PEP. Despite the failure of intravenous N-acetyl cysteine studies, 2013 pilot research revealed that oral NAC may be useful in reducing PEP. This would be due to the different pharmacokinetics of NAC followed in different studies. In a multicenter global randomized controlled trial investigation, It is reported that oral NAC is more effective than indomethacin in the prevention of PEP.
Although both oral NAC and rectal diclofenac are widely used pharmacological agents, till now no study has evaluated their comparative safety and efficacy in preventing PEP. Hence this study is planned to evaluate and compare their efficacy and safety in preventing PEP.
- Conditions
- Post ERCP Pancreatitis
- Being tested
- Rectal Diclofenac, Oral N-acetyl cysteine
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Rectal DiclofenacDrug
100 mg Rectal Diclofenac Before ERCP
Oral N-acetyl cysteineDrug
1200 mg N-acetyl cysteine in 150 cc water orally before ERCP.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Rectal Diclofenac | Active comparator | This Group will include 23 patients who will receive 100 mg rectal diclofenac before ERCP. Receives: Drug: Rectal Diclofenac |
| Oral N-acetyl cysteine | Active comparator | This Group will include 23 patients who will receive 1200 mg N-acetyl cysteine in 150 cc water orally before ERCP. Receives: Drug: Oral N-acetyl cysteine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The development of pancreatitis after the procedure according to consensus criteria
Briefly in this criteria PEP will be diagnosed if the patient met two of the three following criteria after ERCP:
A- New onset or increased abdominal pain consistent with acute pancreatitis B- Pancreatic enzyme elevation to at least three times the upper limit of normal at twenty four (24) hours after the procedure C- Necessity for new or continued hospitalization for at least two nights
Measured: Before performing ERCP, baseline serum amylase and lipase levels will be measured in all patients. After twenty four ( 24) hours post ERCP procedure, patients' serum amylase and lipase levels will be measured.
The change in the serum levels of Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and Interleukin-10 (IL-10 )before and after ERCP procedure
These markers measure the degree of systemic inflammation as predictors of the development of PEP.
Measured: Biomarkers will be measured at baseline before the ERCP procedure and twenty four (24 ) hours after the procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Feb 2024
- Study start16 Mar 2024
- Primary completion14 May 2025
- Study completion25 Jun 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Post ERCP PancreatitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tanta University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mariam Tarek Mohammed Tabana, Tanta University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06252441
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Post ERCP Pancreatitis
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 31 Jan 2024
- Last updated
- 18 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Clinical Study to Evaluate the Possible Efficacy and Safety of Oral N-Acetyl Cysteine Versus Rectal Diclofenac in the Prevention of Post Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06252441
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Post ERCP Pancreatitis
- Conditions
- Post ERCP Pancreatitis
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Tanta UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 May 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Jun 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the current study is to compare the efficacy and safety of oral NAC and rectal diclofenac in preventing Post Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis. .
Detailed description
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) , a key tool that is used in diagnosis and treatment of pancreato-biliary diseases. Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common and serious complication that can occur following this procedure and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. A variety of patient-related and procedure-related factors have been associated with higher rates of PEP.
Two definitions were used for diagnosis of PEP. In both definitions, PEP is diagnosed if two of the three criteria are found in the patient .The consensus criteria that was developed by Cotton and Colleagues in 1991 defined PEP as the presence of a new pancreatic-type abdominal pain associated with at least a threefold elevation in pancreatic enzyme concentration occurring 24 hours following the ERCP procedure, with the necessity for a new or extended hospitalization for at least two nights. Severity of pancreatitis is defined based on the number of hospitalized days following ERCP as mild (< 4 days), moderate (4 to 10 days), or severe (>10 days). The revised Atlanta Classification in 2012 lists abdominal pain consistent with acute pancreatitis, amylase or lipase elevation to more than 3 times the upper limit of normal, and abdominal imaging that reveals pancreatic inflammation.
Several potential triggers can contribute to PEP. Mechanical trauma caused by ERCP instrumentation can harm the papilla and pancreatic duct, affecting pancreatic drainage. Thermal injury can occur during biliary or pancreatic sphincterotomy electrosurgical current. Chemical damage can occur when contrast medium is introduced into the pancreatic duct. Hydrostatic damage can occur when injecting contrast media into the pancreatic duct or infusing fluids such as water or saline solution during sphincter manometry. Regardless of the cause, the initial injury sets in motion a chain of events that include premature activation of proteolytic enzymes, autodigestion of pancreatic tissue, and impaired secretion from acinar cells. These events result in pancreatitis clinical symptoms, which have an influence both locally and systemically. Most PEP prevention techniques try to disrupt one or more steps in this cascade.
While the precise mechanism of PEP remains unknown, it is most likely induced by a proinflammatory cascade initiated by pancreatic acinar cell damage, which results in systemic cytokine release. Cytokines play a major role in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis as part of the underlying systemic inflammatory response, tissue damage, and organ dysfunction. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that promotes the inflammatory response, whereas Interleukin-10 (IL-10) is an immunosuppressive cytokine that inhibits inflammation. These markers can be used in measurement of the degree of systemic inflammation as predictors of the development of PEP.
Phospholipase A2 is essential in this signaling cascade. Diclofenac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that effectively inhibits phospholipase A2 activity. According to this notion, anti-inflammatory drugs such as diclofenac can stop or attenuate the first cascade that leads to clinical PEP.
Previous meta-analyses have suggested that NSAIDs are effective in preventing PEP. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines recommend routine rectal administration of 100 mg of diclofenac or indomethacin immediately before ERCP procedure in all patients without contraindications to NSAIDs administration. Rectal administration route of diclofenac is the most effective in the prevention of PEP. Rectal diclofenac is a cheap, widely available agent with easy administration method and favorable side effect profile.
Oxidative stress and active oxygen species can activate inflammatory cascade and immune responses. N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), an antioxidant drug with anti-inflammatory properties can inhibit oxidative stress as well as inflammatory intermediates, suggesting that it could aid in the prevention of PEP. Despite the failure of intravenous N-acetyl cysteine studies, 2013 pilot research revealed that oral NAC may be useful in reducing PEP. This would be due to the different pharmacokinetics of NAC followed in different studies. In a multicenter global randomized controlled trial investigation, It is reported that oral NAC is more effective than indomethacin in the prevention of PEP.
Although both oral NAC and rectal diclofenac are widely used pharmacological agents, till now no study has evaluated their comparative safety and efficacy in preventing PEP. Hence this study is planned to evaluate and compare their efficacy and safety in preventing PEP.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Rectal Diclofenac | Active comparator | Drug: Rectal DiclofenacThis Group will include 23 patients who will receive 100 mg rectal diclofenac before ERCP. |
| Oral N-acetyl cysteine | Active comparator | Drug: Oral N-acetyl cysteineThis Group will include 23 patients who will receive 1200 mg N-acetyl cysteine in 150 cc water orally before ERCP. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age more than 18 years old.
- Gender: males and females.
- Patients with suitable indications for ERCP due to suspected pancreato-biliary disorders.
- Blood amylase and lipase levels before ERCP are within the normal limits.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Age of less than 18 years old.
- Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM).
- Severe bleeding tendency.
- Impaired renal function (serum creatinine > 2 mg/dL), (creatinine clearance <30 ml/min).
- Patients with severe heart disease.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rectal Diclofenac100 mg Rectal Diclofenac Before ERCP | Drug | Rectal Diclofenac |
| Oral N-acetyl cysteine1200 mg N-acetyl cysteine in 150 cc water orally before ERCP. | Drug | Oral N-acetyl cysteine |
Primary outcome
The development of pancreatitis after the procedure according to consensus criteria
Time frame: Before performing ERCP, baseline serum amylase and lipase levels will be measured in all patients. After twenty four ( 24) hours post ERCP procedure, patients' serum amylase and lipase levels will be measured.
Briefly in this criteria PEP will be diagnosed if the patient met two of the three following criteria after ERCP: A- New onset or increased abdominal pain consistent with acute pancreatitis B- Pancreatic enzyme elevation to at least three times the upper limit of normal at twenty four (24) hours after the procedure C- Necessity for new or continued hospitalization for at least two nights
The change in the serum levels of Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and Interleukin-10 (IL-10 )before and after ERCP procedure
Time frame: Biomarkers will be measured at baseline before the ERCP procedure and twenty four (24 ) hours after the procedure
These markers measure the degree of systemic inflammation as predictors of the development of PEP.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Mar 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Post ERCP Pancreatitis
Not yet recruiting
Cold Water Papillary Irrigation Plus Rectal NSAIDs vs Rectal NSAIDs Alone for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis (COLD)
Post ERCP Pancreatitis, Acute Pancreatitis (AP)
RecruitingPhase 3
Comparative Effectiveness Between Indomethacin and Pancreatic Stenting in the Prevention of Post ERCP Pancreatitis
Post ERCP Pancreatitis
Not yet recruiting
Rectal Indomethacin With or Without Papillary Ice Water Irrigation to Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
Pancreatitis
Not yet recruiting
Prophylactic Sphincterotomy in Acute Biliary Pancreatitis Patients Unfit for Surgery
Acute Biliary Pancreatitis
Recruiting
Cold and NSAID Trial for Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
Pancreatitis, Acute
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Rectal Diclofenac and Oral N-acetyl cysteine in people with Post ERCP Pancreatitis, run by Tanta University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The development of pancreatitis after the procedure according to consensus criteria (time frame: Before performing ERCP, baseline serum amylase and lipase levels will be measured in all patients. After twenty four ( 24) hours post ERCP procedure, patients' serum amylase and lipase levels will be measured.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Mar 2026.