Health Risk BehaviorsNCT06260540
Core Endurance in Healthy Young Adults
An observational study of Health Risk Behaviors, run by Karabuk University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This study aimed to examine the effect of core endurance levels on upper extremity function, muscle strength and reaction time in healthy young adults. The "core" region functions as a connection point between the upper and lower extremities and enables the transfer of force from this region to the extremities. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 25 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Health Risk Behaviors
- How many people
- 104 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2024to 29 Apr 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 25 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Study population: 104 Healthy young adults
Who may be able to join
- Individuals between the ages of 18-25.
- Individuals who volunteer to participate in the research.
- Individuals with normal joint movement.
Who cannot join
- Individuals with orthopedic or neurological diseases.
- Individuals who have suffered fractures, dislocations, surgeries, etc. in the upper extremities.
- Individuals with diseases that may affect upper extremity performance
- Individuals who exercise regularly
- Individuals who play any musical instrument
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Investigation of the Effect of Core Endurance Levels on Upper Extremity Function, Muscle Strength and Reaction Time in Healthy Young Adults
This study aimed to examine the effect of core endurance levels on upper extremity function, muscle strength and reaction time in healthy young adults. The "core" region functions as a connection point between the upper and lower extremities and enables the transfer of force from this region to the extremities. This region is a basic structure where the force required for all movements is generated and transmitted from the proximal segments to the distal segments. "Core" stabilization has a significant impact on limb functionality, and stabilization of the proximal segments is necessary to maintain the mobility and function of the distal segments. To establish a stable base during functional activities, the "core" muscles are activated before the upper and lower extremity muscles. This ensures force production and transfer of resulting forces, thus supporting the mobility of the distal segments. Increasing core stabilization increases force production in the extremities, and control of core strength, balance and movement maximizes upper and lower extremity functions. Any impairment in core stabilization reduces the quality of movement and increases the risk of injury to the upper extremity. Therefore, it has been stated that "core" stabilization has a significant effect on athletic performance and upper extremity functions. There are not enough studies in the literature investigating this effect in healthy young adults. Most existing studies focus on the role of core endurance on athlete performance.
The aim of this study is not only to investigate core endurance levels in healthy young adults but also to examine the effect of core endurance levels on upper extremity function, muscle strength and reaction time.
Read the detailed description
The "core" region is depicted as a box or cylinder and includes the spine, hips, pelvis, proximal lower extremities, and abdominal structures. This region consists of the abdominals, gluteals, paraspinals, diaphragm, oblique abdominals, pelvic floor and hip girdle muscles. These muscles provide stabilization on the trunk and spine during movement or at rest. The "core" region consists of 29 pairs of muscles and these muscles are classified according to their anatomical and functional features. Bergmark developed a model by categorizing the "core" muscles as local and global. Local muscles provide stabilization between spinal segments, while global muscles are activated according to the direction of movement. The coordinated work of local and global muscles affects the quality of movements and "core" stability. "Core" muscles influence functional activities and functioning of the extremities by providing a stable basis for extremity movements and force transmission.
While core strength is defined as the muscular control mechanism that ensures functional stabilization of the spinal column, core endurance refers to the continuity of this control. Core endurance, a component of core stabilization, occurs when the lumbo-pelvic-hip muscles perform core contraction for a certain period of time or repeatedly. Although core strength plays a role by increasing internal-abdominal pressure to create resistance, core endurance allows muscles and muscle groups to remain in a stable position for a certain period of time. According to Lehman, core endurance affects spinal stabilization more than muscular strength due to the capacity of local core muscles to stabilize the lumbar spine. The "core" region functions as a connection point between the upper and lower extremities and enables the transfer of force from this region to the extremities. This region is a basic structure where the force required for all movements is generated and transmitted from the proximal segments to the distal segments.
During childhood and adolescence, physical and physiological changes vary suddenly depending on age and gender and last between the ages of 15-17. After the age of 18, change becomes regulated and physiological and performance values reach their maximum between the ages of 20-30. After the age of 30, functional capacity and other physical-physiological characteristics begin to decrease. The most important of these changes is the change in the skeletal-muscular system. Muscles develop from birth and reach their maximum level at the age of 25-30. As age progresses, the strength and cross-sections of muscle groups decrease. This decrease occurs faster in people who live sedentary lives.
The upper extremity is the primary tool humans use to manipulate the environment and has a wide range of capabilities with the same basic anatomical structures as the arm, forearm, hand, and fingers. In the upper extremity, mobility is more important than stability, and therefore the coordinated interaction of the shoulder complex, the functional unit of the upper extremity that enables movement relative to the trunk, provides sufficient stability despite high degrees of mobility. The primary function of the shoulder complex is to position the upper extremity so that the hand can function. The primary role of the elbow joint is to shorten or lengthen the length of the upper extremity. The hand is the structure responsible for performing the functions of the upper extremity and can perform many different activities as a manipulator and a means of communication. These activities require various characteristics such as positioning, strength, and precision, increasing their structural complexity compared to other joints of the upper extremity. However, there is a remarkable degree of synergy between these structures.
Reaction is the process by which an organism perceives and responds to stimuli. This process includes the stages in which muscles transmit impulses to the central nervous system (CNS) via afferent nerves, after the CNS decides which response to give, it sends this information back to the muscles via efferent nerves, and the muscles take action based on this information. Reaction time refers to the time between the moment a stimulus reaches the organism and the organism's response to this stimulus. Reaction time refers to the time it takes for an organism to respond to a particular stimulus and is generally divided into two main categories: simple and complex (complex) reaction time. Simple reaction time refers to the process of responding to a single stimulus. It can affect important physical parameters such as core endurance, upper extremity muscle strength, function and reaction time. However, there are not enough studies in the literature investigating this effect in healthy young adults. Most existing studies focus on the role of core endurance on athlete performance. The relationship between core endurance levels and upper extremity muscle strength, function and reaction time in healthy young adults has not yet been examined. The aim of our research is to examine the effect of core endurance levels on upper extremity function, muscle strength and reaction time in healthy young adults.
- Conditions
- Health Risk Behaviors
- Keywords
- core endurance, upper extremity function, muscle strength, reaction time
- Medical subject headings
- Health Risk Behaviors
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Side bridge test
It is used to evaluate the endurance of the muscles (especially the obliques) located on the lateral side of the body. The individual lies sideways on the dominant side. When he is ready, he lifts his hips and stands on his forearm as long as he can, with his body in a single line, without any command. He puts his free hand on the opposite shoulder. The time period during which the position is maintained is recorded in seconds.
Measured: Day 1
Prone bridge test (plank) test
It is used to evaluate the endurance of all core stabilization muscles together. The individual lies face down on his knees and forearms. When he is ready, he raises his knees so they are parallel to the ground and stands on his forearms and fingertips, without commands. The time it maintains the position is recorded in seconds.
Measured: Day 1
Trunk flexion endurance test
It is used to evaluate the endurance of the trunk flexors, especially the abdominal muscles. The individual is in a supine position. When he is ready, he pulls his knees to his stomach so that they are parallel to the ground, without any command, and at the same time, with his arms tied, he lifts his upper body so that the lower end of the scapula lifts off the ground. The time it can maintain the position is recorded in seconds.
Measured: Day 1
Sorensen test
It is used to evaluate the endurance of the back extensors. The individual lies face down on a stretcher high off the ground, with the upper body hanging off the bed. The individual's body part that comes into contact with the bed is positioned so that the anterior superior iliac spine is located. He maintains his balance with the help of a chair with his hands. The physiotherapist stabilizes the patient's legs. When the individual is ready, he crosses both hands on his shoulders and takes a position parallel to the ground, without taking any commands. The time it can maintain the position is recorded in seconds.
Measured: Day 1
Secondary outcomes (3)
Purdue Pegboard test
The Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT) is a test developed by J. Tiffin at Purdue University in 1948 to measure gross and fine motor skills of the hand, fingers, and arm. For the test, a test board with dimensions of 58.5x 29x 2.2 cm, 50 nails, 40 metal washers, small pipes through which the nails can pass and a stopwatch are used. The test board has four compartments and holes to insert the nails. The test consists of four subtests: Right hand, left hand, two hands and two hand team building. In each subtest, nails are placed into the holes within 30 seconds, starting with the dominant hand. In the last subtest, nails, washers and rings are placed as a set with both hands within 1 minute.
Measured: Day 1
Isometric hand dynamometer for muscle strength
A digital dynamometer will be used to measure muscle strength. Individuals are placed in standard positions and the dynamometer will be placed at standard points. Individuals will be asked to show maximum resistance against the dynamometer. For this purpose, a trial application will be made first. A 1-minute rest period will be given after each measurement. Measurements will be repeated 3 times and the highest value will be recorded. Measurements will be made for shoulder flexion and shoulder abduction muscle strength in both upper extremities. The average of the measurements will be used as data. To evaluate shoulder flexion muscle strength, the patient lies in a sitting position on a chair, with the shoulder in 90° flexion, the elbow and wrist in neutral, and the forearm in pronation. To assess shoulder abduction, the patient sits on the examination table or chair and the arm is held in 90° abduction from the body midline.
Measured: Day 1
Nelson hand reaction test
Nelson hand reaction test is a test that measures hand reaction time using a ruler. In the test, the participant sits and holds his hand on the table and spreads his fingers 8-10 centimeters away from the table, with his thumb and index fingers parallel. The tester holds the ruler at the level of the participant's thumb and index finger and asks the participant to look at the middle of the ruler. When ready, he puts the ruler down and asks the participant to catch the ruler. The point where the ruler is captured indicates the participant's reaction time. The test is repeated five times and the two highest and lowest values are subtracted. Reaction time is calculated by taking the average of the remaining three values.
Measured: Day 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Feb 2024
- Study start1 Feb 2024
- Primary completion29 Feb 2024
- Study completion29 Apr 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Health Risk BehaviorsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 104 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Karabuk University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, METEHAN YANA, Karabuk University
- Investigators
- Agabek ORUNBAYEV Msc, Study chair, Karabuk UniversityFeruza JUMAYEVA Physiotherapist, Study chair, Karabuk UniversityMusa GÜNEŞ Msc, Study director, Karabuk UniversityMetehan YANA PhD, Principal investigator, Karabuk Univeristy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06260540
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Core Endurance
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 6 Feb 2024
- Last updated
- 18 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Bliss LS, Teeple P. Core stability: the centerpiece of any training program. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2005 Jun;4(3):179-83. doi: 10.1007/s11932-005-0064-y.
PubMed 15907272TIFFIN J, ASHER EJ. The Purdue pegboard; norms and studies of reliability and validity. J Appl Psychol. 1948 Jun;32(3):234-47. doi: 10.1037/h0061266. No abstract available.
PubMed 18867059Moreau CE, Green BN, Johnson CD, Moreau SR. Isometric back extension endurance tests: a review of the literature. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001 Feb;24(2):110-22. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2001.112563.
PubMed 11208223Kibler WB, Press J, Sciascia A. The role of core stability in athletic function. Sports Med. 2006;36(3):189-98. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200636030-00001.
PubMed 16526831
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Investigation of the Effect of Core Endurance Levels on Upper Extremity Function, Muscle Strength and Reaction Time in Healthy Young Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06260540
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Core Endurance
- Conditions
- Health Risk Behaviors
- Keywords
- core endurance, upper extremity function, muscle strength, reaction time
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 104 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Karabuk UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Apr 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aimed to examine the effect of core endurance levels on upper extremity function, muscle strength and reaction time in healthy young adults. The "core" region functions as a connection point between the upper and lower extremities and enables the transfer of force from this region to the extremities. This region is a basic structure where the force required for all movements is generated and transmitted from the proximal segments to the distal segments. "Core" stabilization has a significant impact on limb functionality, and stabilization of the proximal segments is necessary to maintain the mobility and function of the distal segments. To establish a stable base during functional activities, the "core" muscles are activated before the upper and lower extremity muscles. This ensures force production and transfer of resulting forces, thus supporting the mobility of the distal segments. Increasing core stabilization increases force production in the extremities, and control of core strength, balance and movement maximizes upper and lower extremity functions. Any impairment in core stabilization reduces the quality of movement and increases the risk of injury to the upper extremity. Therefore, it has been stated that "core" stabilization has a significant effect on athletic performance and upper extremity functions. There are not enough studies in the literature investigating this effect in healthy young adults. Most existing studies focus on the role of core endurance on athlete performance.
The aim of this study is not only to investigate core endurance levels in healthy young adults but also to examine the effect of core endurance levels on upper extremity function, muscle strength and reaction time.
Detailed description
The "core" region is depicted as a box or cylinder and includes the spine, hips, pelvis, proximal lower extremities, and abdominal structures. This region consists of the abdominals, gluteals, paraspinals, diaphragm, oblique abdominals, pelvic floor and hip girdle muscles. These muscles provide stabilization on the trunk and spine during movement or at rest. The "core" region consists of 29 pairs of muscles and these muscles are classified according to their anatomical and functional features. Bergmark developed a model by categorizing the "core" muscles as local and global. Local muscles provide stabilization between spinal segments, while global muscles are activated according to the direction of movement. The coordinated work of local and global muscles affects the quality of movements and "core" stability. "Core" muscles influence functional activities and functioning of the extremities by providing a stable basis for extremity movements and force transmission.
While core strength is defined as the muscular control mechanism that ensures functional stabilization of the spinal column, core endurance refers to the continuity of this control. Core endurance, a component of core stabilization, occurs when the lumbo-pelvic-hip muscles perform core contraction for a certain period of time or repeatedly. Although core strength plays a role by increasing internal-abdominal pressure to create resistance, core endurance allows muscles and muscle groups to remain in a stable position for a certain period of time. According to Lehman, core endurance affects spinal stabilization more than muscular strength due to the capacity of local core muscles to stabilize the lumbar spine. The "core" region functions as a connection point between the upper and lower extremities and enables the transfer of force from this region to the extremities. This region is a basic structure where the force required for all movements is generated and transmitted from the proximal segments to the distal segments.
During childhood and adolescence, physical and physiological changes vary suddenly depending on age and gender and last between the ages of 15-17. After the age of 18, change becomes regulated and physiological and performance values reach their maximum between the ages of 20-30. After the age of 30, functional capacity and other physical-physiological characteristics begin to decrease. The most important of these changes is the change in the skeletal-muscular system. Muscles develop from birth and reach their maximum level at the age of 25-30. As age progresses, the strength and cross-sections of muscle groups decrease. This decrease occurs faster in people who live sedentary lives.
The upper extremity is the primary tool humans use to manipulate the environment and has a wide range of capabilities with the same basic anatomical structures as the arm, forearm, hand, and fingers. In the upper extremity, mobility is more important than stability, and therefore the coordinated interaction of the shoulder complex, the functional unit of the upper extremity that enables movement relative to the trunk, provides sufficient stability despite high degrees of mobility. The primary function of the shoulder complex is to position the upper extremity so that the hand can function. The primary role of the elbow joint is to shorten or lengthen the length of the upper extremity. The hand is the structure responsible for performing the functions of the upper extremity and can perform many different activities as a manipulator and a means of communication. These activities require various characteristics such as positioning, strength, and precision, increasing their structural complexity compared to other joints of the upper extremity. However, there is a remarkable degree of synergy between these structures.
Reaction is the process by which an organism perceives and responds to stimuli. This process includes the stages in which muscles transmit impulses to the central nervous system (CNS) via afferent nerves, after the CNS decides which response to give, it sends this information back to the muscles via efferent nerves, and the muscles take action based on this information. Reaction time refers to the time between the moment a stimulus reaches the organism and the organism's response to this stimulus. Reaction time refers to the time it takes for an organism to respond to a particular stimulus and is generally divided into two main categories: simple and complex (complex) reaction time. Simple reaction time refers to the process of responding to a single stimulus. It can affect important physical parameters such as core endurance, upper extremity muscle strength, function and reaction time. However, there are not enough studies in the literature investigating this effect in healthy young adults. Most existing studies focus on the role of core endurance on athlete performance. The relationship between core endurance levels and upper extremity muscle strength, function and reaction time in healthy young adults has not yet been examined. The aim of our research is to examine the effect of core endurance levels on upper extremity function, muscle strength and reaction time in healthy young adults.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 25 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- 104 Healthy young adults
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Individuals between the ages of 18-25.
- Individuals who volunteer to participate in the research.
- Individuals with normal joint movement.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Individuals with orthopedic or neurological diseases.
- Individuals who have suffered fractures, dislocations, surgeries, etc. in the upper extremities.
- Individuals with diseases that may affect upper extremity performance
- Individuals who exercise regularly
- Individuals who play any musical instrument
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Side bridge test
Time frame: Day 1
It is used to evaluate the endurance of the muscles (especially the obliques) located on the lateral side of the body. The individual lies sideways on the dominant side. When he is ready, he lifts his hips and stands on his forearm as long as he can, with his body in a single line, without any command. He puts his free hand on the opposite shoulder. The time period during which the position is maintained is recorded in seconds.
Prone bridge test (plank) test
Time frame: Day 1
It is used to evaluate the endurance of all core stabilization muscles together. The individual lies face down on his knees and forearms. When he is ready, he raises his knees so they are parallel to the ground and stands on his forearms and fingertips, without commands. The time it maintains the position is recorded in seconds.
Trunk flexion endurance test
Time frame: Day 1
It is used to evaluate the endurance of the trunk flexors, especially the abdominal muscles. The individual is in a supine position. When he is ready, he pulls his knees to his stomach so that they are parallel to the ground, without any command, and at the same time, with his arms tied, he lifts his upper body so that the lower end of the scapula lifts off the ground. The time it can maintain the position is recorded in seconds.
Sorensen test
Time frame: Day 1
It is used to evaluate the endurance of the back extensors. The individual lies face down on a stretcher high off the ground, with the upper body hanging off the bed. The individual's body part that comes into contact with the bed is positioned so that the anterior superior iliac spine is located. He maintains his balance with the help of a chair with his hands. The physiotherapist stabilizes the patient's legs. When the individual is ready, he crosses both hands on his shoulders and takes a position parallel to the ground, without taking any commands. The time it can maintain the position is recorded in seconds.
3 secondary outcomes
Purdue Pegboard test
Time frame: Day 1
Isometric hand dynamometer for muscle strength
Time frame: Day 1
Nelson hand reaction test
Time frame: Day 1
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jun 2024.
- Background: PubMed 15907272Bliss LS, Teeple P. Core stability: the centerpiece of any training program. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2005 Jun;4(3):179-83. doi: 10.1007/s11932-005-0064-y.
- Background: PubMed 18867059TIFFIN J, ASHER EJ. The Purdue pegboard; norms and studies of reliability and validity. J Appl Psychol. 1948 Jun;32(3):234-47. doi: 10.1037/h0061266. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 11208223Moreau CE, Green BN, Johnson CD, Moreau SR. Isometric back extension endurance tests: a review of the literature. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001 Feb;24(2):110-22. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2001.112563.
- Background: PubMed 16526831Kibler WB, Press J, Sciascia A. The role of core stability in athletic function. Sports Med. 2006;36(3):189-98. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200636030-00001.
Related trials for Health Risk Behaviors
RecruitingObservational study
Targeted Health Dialogues in Primary Care
Health Behaviors, Risk Factors
Active, not recruiting
Growing Healthy Children and Families in Rural Arkansas
Pediatric Obesity, Health Behavior, Risky
Active, not recruiting
E-Bike Commuting and Health in Overweight College Students
Obesity &Amp; Overweight, Sedentary Behaviors
Recruiting
SMART GOALS for Youth With Prediabetes
PreDiabetes, Adolescent Obesity
Not yet recruiting
BRE-13: Mediterranean Diet
Dietary Assessment, Dietary and Lifestyle Behaviour Change
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Agabek ORUNBAYEV Msc study chair
Karabuk University
Feruza JUMAYEVA Physiotherapist study chair
Karabuk University
Musa GÜNEŞ Msc study director
Karabuk University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Health Risk Behaviors, run by Karabuk University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Side bridge test (time frame: Day 1). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06260540, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jun 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.