Psychological StressNCT06264791
Stress-motivated Alcohol Use as a Value-based Decision-making Process
A study testing Stress and Alcohol in people with Psychological Stress and Alcohol Intoxication, run by University of Washington at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this experimental study is to improve our understanding of the effects of stress on the decision to consume (more) alcohol in regular drinkers. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: Does psychological stress affect the decision to consume (more) alcohol? How does psychological stress affect the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Psychological Stress, Alcohol Intoxication
- What is being tested?
- Stress and Alcohol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 160 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2024to 31 Aug 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 50 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Drinking alcohol at least once a week
- Consuming 4 (female) or 5 (male) drinks in one occasion at least once a month
Who cannot join
- Currently pregnant or trying to become pregnant
- Past or current diagnosis of an anxiety disorder, such as Generalized Anxiety Disorder or Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
- Past or current treatment for alcohol use
- Past or current medical condition that contraindicates alcohol use
- Past or current reaction to alcohol that contraindicates alcohol use
- Past or current medication that contraindicates alcohol use
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The goal of this experimental study is to improve our understanding of the effects of stress on the decision to consume (more) alcohol in regular drinkers. The main question[s] it aims to answer are:
- Does psychological stress affect the decision to consume (more) alcohol?
- How does psychological stress affect the decision to consume (more) alcohol? Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four conditions (stress alcohol, stress no alcohol, no stress alcohol, no stress no alcohol) and complete a value-based decision-making task twice (once before and once after the manipulations).
Read the detailed description
In this study, the investigators will explore whether and how the decision between consuming an alcoholic or non-alcoholic drink is influenced by a stressful event and by being already intoxicated.
Behavioral data:
Our first set of hypotheses tests whether the decision is influenced by stress and alcohol intoxication:
H1a: Stress affects the decision between alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks, so that participants in the stress conditions choose alcoholic over non-alcoholic drinks more often compared to participants in the no stress conditions.
H1b: Alcohol intoxication does not affect the decision between alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks.
H1c: The effect of stress on the decision between alcohol and non-alcoholic drinks is modulated by alcohol intoxication, so that the effect of stress is stronger for participants that are intoxicated.
H2a: Stress affects the reaction time for decisions between alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks, so that participants in the stress condition make choices between alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks faster compared to participants in the no stress condition.
H2b: Alcohol intoxication affects the reaction time for decisions between alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks, so that participants in the alcohol condition make choices between alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks faster compared to participants in the no alcohol condition.
H2c: The effect of stress on the reaction time for decisions between alcohol and on-alcoholic drinks is modulated by alcohol intoxication, so that the effect of stress is stronger for participants that are intoxicated.
Drift diffusion modeling:
Our second set of hypotheses test how the decision might be influenced by stress and intoxication. The investigators do not have directional hypotheses for these analyses but the following global predictions:
H3a: Stress affects at least one of three DDM (drift diffusion model) parameters (drift rate, boundary, bias). The investigators have no a priori prediction which parameter will be most affected by stress.
H3b: Alcohol intoxication affects at least one of three DDM parameters (drift rate, boundary, bias). The investigators have no a priori prediction which parameter will be most affected by alcohol intoxication.
H3c: Stress and alcohol intoxication have an interactive effect on the DDM parameter(s) most affected by stress and alcohol. The investigators have no a priori prediction which parameter will be most affected by the interaction.
The investigators will do a 2x2 between-subjects experiment. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four groups (stress and alcohol condition, no stress and alcohol condition, stress and no alcohol condition, no stress and no alcohol condition). This is the experimental procedure:
- Participants will perform an image rating task, value-based decision-making task, and psychomotor vigilance task (described below).
- Participants will undergo the beverage administration (alcohol vs no alcohol; described below).
- Participants will undergo the stress induction (stress vs no stress; described below).
- Participants will perform the value-based decision-making task and psychomotor vigilance task again and will perform the alcohol purchase task.
Block randomization will be used to randomly assign participants to conditions while ensuring balanced sample sizes in all 4 conditions.
Participants will be recruited from the community via advertisements in public places around Seattle as well as online ads.
Upon responding to one of our ads, participants will complete an online screening survey to check for our inclusion/exclusion criteria. Eligibility will be confirmed via a phone call to the participant. If assigned to the stress condition, next they will perform the stress induction interview (described below). All participants will then come to the bar lab to complete the lab session.
The investigators explored power for a 2x2 between-subjects ANOVA (with the ANOVA_exact Shiny app) with the following means (sd = 0.1 for all cells), which creates two main effects and an interaction:
a1_b1 = 1.5 a1_b2 = 1.35 a2_b1 = 1.55 a2_b2 = 1.5 These are reasonable values chosen (for drift rate) based on our previous work and create an effect size of eta-squared = .06 for the interaction effect, which The investigators consider a medium-sized effect. This gives us power = 87.86 with N = 40 per condition.
Intoxication: Participants randomly assigned to the alcohol condition will be administered 100-proof Vodka mixed with orange juice (1:3 ratio) to induce a BAC (Blood Alcohol Concentration) of .06% (based on Widmark's formula). They will be breathalyzed every 5 minutes until they reach peak BAC, at which point they will continue with the experiment. Participants randomly assigned to the no alcohol condition will be administered water mixed with orange juice (1:3 ratio). Each participant in the no alcohol condition will be yoked to a participant in the alcohol condition and will complete the same number of breath tests. Once participants in the alcohol condition reach peak BAC and participants in the no alcohol condition performed the same number of breath tests as the participant they are yoked to, participants will continue to the stress induction.
Stress: To manipulate stress, The investigators follow the personalized imagery script procedure developed by Sinha and colleagues. Participants randomly assigned to the stress condition will be interviewed about one week prior to the lab session. The participants will share a detailed description of a stressful event from their life (last 12 months) with the interviewer. Based on this interview, the experimenter will write a script (~500 words), that will then be audiotaped. Participants will listen to this personalized audiotape during the experiment, and will be asked to imagine this event as vividly as possible. Participants randomly assigned to the no stress condition will listen to a generic audiotape that describes a non-stressful event (~500 words). The participants will not be interviewed. During the lab session, participants will first complete a 3-min color counting task. The participant will then listen to the audiotape (personalized stressful audiotape in stress condition, generic non-stressful audiotape in no stress condition). The stress induction will be checked via two self-report items that ask the participant to report their current experience of stress and mood before and after listening to the audiotape.
Image rating task: Participants will view 30 images of alcoholic drinks and 30 images of non-alcoholic drinks and will indicate for each item how much the participants like to consume them (1 = not at all, 2 = not really, 3 = a little bit, 4 = a lot). These ratings will be used to create the VBDM (value-based decision-making) trials. Participants will perform this task twice, once before and once after the manipulations.
Value-based decision-making task: On each trial, participants will be presented with one alcoholic drink and one non-alcoholic drink image side-by-side. Participants will never be presented with two images the participants gave the same initial rating. The difference in value will be balanced (there will be an equal number of trials where the initial rating difference is 3, 2, and 1 in favor of alcohol and non-alcoholic drink respectively). The side on which the correct choice appears will be randomized. Participants will have 4 seconds to decide which one the participants would rather like to consume right now by pressing a corresponding button on their keyboard ('Z' for left and 'M' for right option). Participants will complete a total of 360 trials, with a short break after 180 trials. The participants will be instructed to respond as quickly as possible while making sure the participants choose the one the participants would rather want to consume in that moment. Trials will be separated by the display of a fixation cross for 250ms. Participants will perform this task twice, once before and once after the manipulations.
Psychomotor vigilance task: After the VBDM task, participants will perform a 3-minute PVT (psychomotor vigilance task). A stimulus will appear on the screen in random intervals between 2 and 10 seconds. Participants are instructed to press the spacebar in response to the stimulus appearing as quickly as possible. Participants will perform this task twice, once before and once after the manipulations.
Alcohol purchase task: For exploratory purposes, participants will complete the Alcohol Purchase Task. Participants will report how many drinks the participants would consume right now if they cost $0-$15 (increments of $1).
- Conditions
- Psychological Stress, Alcohol Intoxication
- Being tested
- Stress, Alcohol
- Keywords
- alcohol administration, stress induction, value-based decision-making
- Medical subject headings
- Stress, Psychological, Alcoholic Intoxication
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
StressOther
To manipulate stress, we follow the personalized imagery script procedure developed by Sinha and colleagues. Participants randomly assigned to the stress condition will be interviewed about one week prior to the lab session. They will share a detailed description of a stressful event from their life (last 12 months) with the interviewer. Based on this interview, the experimenter will write a script (~500 words), that will then be audiotaped. Participants will listen to this personalized audiotape during the experiment, and will be asked to imagine this event as vividly as possible. Participants randomly assigned to the no stress condition will listen to a generic audiotape that describes a non-stressful event (~500 words). They will not be interviewed. During the lab session, participants will first complete a 3-min color counting task. The participant will then listen to the audiotape (personalized stressful audiotape in stress condition, generic non-stressful audiotape in no stress c
AlcoholOther
Intoxication: Participants randomly assigned to the alcohol condition will be administered 100-proof Vodka mixed with orange juice (1:3 ratio) to induce a BAC of .06% (based on Widmark's formula). They will be breathalyzed every 5 minutes until they reach peak BAC, at which point they will continue with the experiment. Participants randomly assigned to the no alcohol condition will be administered water mixed with orange juice (1:3 ratio). Each participant in the no alcohol condition will be yoked to a participant in the alcohol condition and will complete the same number of breath tests. Once participants in the alcohol condition reach peak BAC and participants in the no alcohol condition performed the same number of breath tests as the participant they are yoked to, participants will continue to the stress induction.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Stress alcohol | Experimental | These participants will undergo a stress induction and receive alcoholic beverages to raise their BAC to .06% Receives: Other: Stress; Other: Alcohol |
| Stress no alcohol | Experimental | These participants will undergo a stress induction and receive non-alcoholic beverages Receives: Other: Stress |
| No stress alcohol | Experimental | These participants will undergo a neutral induction and receive alcoholic beverages to raise their BAC to .06% Receives: Other: Alcohol |
| No stress no alcohol | No intervention | These participants will undergo a neutral induction and receive non-alcoholic beverages |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of choices for alcoholic over non-alcoholic drinks.
Each participant will complete a two alternative forced-choice task in which they make repeated decisions between alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks.
Measured: 5 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Feb 2024
- Study start1 Feb 2024
- Primary completion31 Aug 2024
- Study completion31 Aug 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Psychological StressStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of WashingtonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Washington
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jonas Dora, University of Washington
- Investigators
- Kevin M King, PhD, Study director, University of Washington
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06264791
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00018516
- Other IDs
- K99AA030591
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 25 Jan 2024
- Last updated
- 30 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Anonymized data needed to reproduce our analyses will be shared on the Open Science Framework once the study has been completed.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Stress-motivated Alcohol Use as a Value-based Decision-making Process
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06264791
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY00018516
- Conditions
- Psychological Stress, Alcohol Intoxication
- Keywords
- alcohol administration, stress induction, value-based decision-making
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of WashingtonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this experimental study is to improve our understanding of the effects of stress on the decision to consume (more) alcohol in regular drinkers. The main question[s] it aims to answer are:
- Does psychological stress affect the decision to consume (more) alcohol?
- How does psychological stress affect the decision to consume (more) alcohol? Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four conditions (stress alcohol, stress no alcohol, no stress alcohol, no stress no alcohol) and complete a value-based decision-making task twice (once before and once after the manipulations).
Detailed description
In this study, the investigators will explore whether and how the decision between consuming an alcoholic or non-alcoholic drink is influenced by a stressful event and by being already intoxicated.
Behavioral data:
Our first set of hypotheses tests whether the decision is influenced by stress and alcohol intoxication:
H1a: Stress affects the decision between alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks, so that participants in the stress conditions choose alcoholic over non-alcoholic drinks more often compared to participants in the no stress conditions.
H1b: Alcohol intoxication does not affect the decision between alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks.
H1c: The effect of stress on the decision between alcohol and non-alcoholic drinks is modulated by alcohol intoxication, so that the effect of stress is stronger for participants that are intoxicated.
H2a: Stress affects the reaction time for decisions between alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks, so that participants in the stress condition make choices between alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks faster compared to participants in the no stress condition.
H2b: Alcohol intoxication affects the reaction time for decisions between alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks, so that participants in the alcohol condition make choices between alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks faster compared to participants in the no alcohol condition.
H2c: The effect of stress on the reaction time for decisions between alcohol and on-alcoholic drinks is modulated by alcohol intoxication, so that the effect of stress is stronger for participants that are intoxicated.
Drift diffusion modeling:
Our second set of hypotheses test how the decision might be influenced by stress and intoxication. The investigators do not have directional hypotheses for these analyses but the following global predictions:
H3a: Stress affects at least one of three DDM (drift diffusion model) parameters (drift rate, boundary, bias). The investigators have no a priori prediction which parameter will be most affected by stress.
H3b: Alcohol intoxication affects at least one of three DDM parameters (drift rate, boundary, bias). The investigators have no a priori prediction which parameter will be most affected by alcohol intoxication.
H3c: Stress and alcohol intoxication have an interactive effect on the DDM parameter(s) most affected by stress and alcohol. The investigators have no a priori prediction which parameter will be most affected by the interaction.
The investigators will do a 2x2 between-subjects experiment. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four groups (stress and alcohol condition, no stress and alcohol condition, stress and no alcohol condition, no stress and no alcohol condition). This is the experimental procedure:
- Participants will perform an image rating task, value-based decision-making task, and psychomotor vigilance task (described below).
- Participants will undergo the beverage administration (alcohol vs no alcohol; described below).
- Participants will undergo the stress induction (stress vs no stress; described below).
- Participants will perform the value-based decision-making task and psychomotor vigilance task again and will perform the alcohol purchase task.
Block randomization will be used to randomly assign participants to conditions while ensuring balanced sample sizes in all 4 conditions.
Participants will be recruited from the community via advertisements in public places around Seattle as well as online ads.
Upon responding to one of our ads, participants will complete an online screening survey to check for our inclusion/exclusion criteria. Eligibility will be confirmed via a phone call to the participant. If assigned to the stress condition, next they will perform the stress induction interview (described below). All participants will then come to the bar lab to complete the lab session.
The investigators explored power for a 2x2 between-subjects ANOVA (with the ANOVA_exact Shiny app) with the following means (sd = 0.1 for all cells), which creates two main effects and an interaction:
a1_b1 = 1.5 a1_b2 = 1.35 a2_b1 = 1.55 a2_b2 = 1.5 These are reasonable values chosen (for drift rate) based on our previous work and create an effect size of eta-squared = .06 for the interaction effect, which The investigators consider a medium-sized effect. This gives us power = 87.86 with N = 40 per condition.
Intoxication: Participants randomly assigned to the alcohol condition will be administered 100-proof Vodka mixed with orange juice (1:3 ratio) to induce a BAC (Blood Alcohol Concentration) of .06% (based on Widmark's formula). They will be breathalyzed every 5 minutes until they reach peak BAC, at which point they will continue with the experiment. Participants randomly assigned to the no alcohol condition will be administered water mixed with orange juice (1:3 ratio). Each participant in the no alcohol condition will be yoked to a participant in the alcohol condition and will complete the same number of breath tests. Once participants in the alcohol condition reach peak BAC and participants in the no alcohol condition performed the same number of breath tests as the participant they are yoked to, participants will continue to the stress induction.
Stress: To manipulate stress, The investigators follow the personalized imagery script procedure developed by Sinha and colleagues. Participants randomly assigned to the stress condition will be interviewed about one week prior to the lab session. The participants will share a detailed description of a stressful event from their life (last 12 months) with the interviewer. Based on this interview, the experimenter will write a script (~500 words), that will then be audiotaped. Participants will listen to this personalized audiotape during the experiment, and will be asked to imagine this event as vividly as possible. Participants randomly assigned to the no stress condition will listen to a generic audiotape that describes a non-stressful event (~500 words). The participants will not be interviewed. During the lab session, participants will first complete a 3-min color counting task. The participant will then listen to the audiotape (personalized stressful audiotape in stress condition, generic non-stressful audiotape in no stress condition). The stress induction will be checked via two self-report items that ask the participant to report their current experience of stress and mood before and after listening to the audiotape.
Image rating task: Participants will view 30 images of alcoholic drinks and 30 images of non-alcoholic drinks and will indicate for each item how much the participants like to consume them (1 = not at all, 2 = not really, 3 = a little bit, 4 = a lot). These ratings will be used to create the VBDM (value-based decision-making) trials. Participants will perform this task twice, once before and once after the manipulations.
Value-based decision-making task: On each trial, participants will be presented with one alcoholic drink and one non-alcoholic drink image side-by-side. Participants will never be presented with two images the participants gave the same initial rating. The difference in value will be balanced (there will be an equal number of trials where the initial rating difference is 3, 2, and 1 in favor of alcohol and non-alcoholic drink respectively). The side on which the correct choice appears will be randomized. Participants will have 4 seconds to decide which one the participants would rather like to consume right now by pressing a corresponding button on their keyboard ('Z' for left and 'M' for right option). Participants will complete a total of 360 trials, with a short break after 180 trials. The participants will be instructed to respond as quickly as possible while making sure the participants choose the one the participants would rather want to consume in that moment. Trials will be separated by the display of a fixation cross for 250ms. Participants will perform this task twice, once before and once after the manipulations.
Psychomotor vigilance task: After the VBDM task, participants will perform a 3-minute PVT (psychomotor vigilance task). A stimulus will appear on the screen in random intervals between 2 and 10 seconds. Participants are instructed to press the spacebar in response to the stimulus appearing as quickly as possible. Participants will perform this task twice, once before and once after the manipulations.
Alcohol purchase task: For exploratory purposes, participants will complete the Alcohol Purchase Task. Participants will report how many drinks the participants would consume right now if they cost $0-$15 (increments of $1).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Stress alcohol | Experimental | Other: Stress, Other: AlcoholThese participants will undergo a stress induction and receive alcoholic beverages to raise their BAC to .06% |
| Stress no alcohol | Experimental | Other: StressThese participants will undergo a stress induction and receive non-alcoholic beverages |
| No stress alcohol | Experimental | Other: AlcoholThese participants will undergo a neutral induction and receive alcoholic beverages to raise their BAC to .06% |
| No stress no alcohol | No intervention | –These participants will undergo a neutral induction and receive non-alcoholic beverages |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Drinking alcohol at least once a week
- Consuming 4 (female) or 5 (male) drinks in one occasion at least once a month
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Currently pregnant or trying to become pregnant
- Past or current diagnosis of an anxiety disorder, such as Generalized Anxiety Disorder or Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
- Past or current treatment for alcohol use
- Past or current medical condition that contraindicates alcohol use
- Past or current reaction to alcohol that contraindicates alcohol use
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| StressTo manipulate stress, we follow the personalized imagery script procedure developed by Sinha and colleagues. Participants randomly assigned to the stress condition will be interviewed about one week prior to the lab session. They will share a detailed description of a stressful event from their life (last 12 months) with the interviewer. Based on this interview, the experimenter will write a script (~500 words), that will then be audiotaped. Participants will listen to this personalized audiotape during the experiment, and will be asked to imagine this event as vividly as possible. Participants randomly assigned to the no stress condition will listen to a generic audiotape that describes a non-stressful event (~500 words). They will not be interviewed. During the lab session, participants will first complete a 3-min color counting task. The participant will then listen to the audiotape (personalized stressful audiotape in stress condition, generic non-stressful audiotape in no stress c | Other | Stress alcohol, Stress no alcohol |
| AlcoholIntoxication: Participants randomly assigned to the alcohol condition will be administered 100-proof Vodka mixed with orange juice (1:3 ratio) to induce a BAC of .06% (based on Widmark's formula). They will be breathalyzed every 5 minutes until they reach peak BAC, at which point they will continue with the experiment. Participants randomly assigned to the no alcohol condition will be administered water mixed with orange juice (1:3 ratio). Each participant in the no alcohol condition will be yoked to a participant in the alcohol condition and will complete the same number of breath tests. Once participants in the alcohol condition reach peak BAC and participants in the no alcohol condition performed the same number of breath tests as the participant they are yoked to, participants will continue to the stress induction. | Other | No stress alcohol, Stress alcohol |
Primary outcome
Proportion of choices for alcoholic over non-alcoholic drinks.
Time frame: 5 minutes
Each participant will complete a two alternative forced-choice task in which they make repeated decisions between alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jan 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Anonymized data needed to reproduce our analyses will be shared on the Open Science Framework once the study has been completed.
Related trials for Psychological Stress
Recruiting
Heat and Mental Health - PART 2
Depressed Mood, Young Adults
Recruiting
The Coma Family Program (COMA-F): A Resilience Program for Caregivers of Patients With Severe Acute Brain Injury
Caregiver Distress, Emotional Distress
Active, not recruiting
AI Ambient Scribe in Psychiatry
Therapeutic Alliance, Empathy
Not yet recruiting
Negotiation Training for Family Caregivers of People With Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease (AD), Dementia
RecruitingObservational study
Friends/Family of Individuals at Risk of Suicide Training Program
Caregiver, Caregiver Mental Health
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kevin M King, PhD study director
University of Washington
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Stress and Alcohol in people with Psychological Stress and Alcohol Intoxication, run by University of Washington at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of choices for alcoholic over non-alcoholic drinks. (time frame: 5 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2026.