AzTrials
AzTrials

Respiratory Rhythm DisorderABE-SNCT06265818

The Effect of Active Breathing Exercises in Stroke Patients With Respiratory Rhythm Disorder

A study testing Rehabilitation training and Active Breathing Exercises in people with Respiratory Rhythm Disorder, run by Zeng Changhao at 1 site in South Korea.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to explore The Effect of Active Breathing Exercises in Stroke Patients With Respiratory Rhythm Disorder. Patients will be randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, all receiving routine rehabilitation treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Respiratory Rhythm Disorder
What is being tested?
Rehabilitation training and Active Breathing Exercises
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
1 Mar 2024to May 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • diagnosed with Respiratory Rhythm Disorder
  • age ≥ 18 years;
  • meeting the diagnostic criteria of stroke;
  • any degree of dysphagia at admission;
  • steady vital signs, without severe cognitive impairment or sensory aphasia, able to cooperate with the assessment.
  • transferred out within three weeks of hospitalization in the neurology department.

Who cannot join

  • complicated with other neurological diseases;
  • tracheostomy tube plugged;
  • unfeasible to the support of parenteral nutrition;
  • simultaneously suffering from liver, kidney failure, tumors, or hematological diseases.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Zhefeng Wang, Master contact

19501376864

zhengzhouzhj@qq.com

Weiji Zhao, Master contact

17839973473

zwjww2009@163.com

South Korea1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Center Rehabilitation Hospital

    Seoul

    Wei Liu, Master

    Recruiting

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Explore The Effect of Active Breathing Exercises in Stroke Patients With Respiratory Rhythm Disorder

The goal of this clinical trial is to explore The Effect of Active Breathing Exercises in Stroke Patients With Respiratory Rhythm Disorder. Patients will be randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, all receiving routine rehabilitation treatment. On this basis, the observation group will be given Active Breathing Exercises. Researchers will compare dysphagia of two groups.

Read the detailed description

A growing body of literature indicates the existence of a highly stable, coordinative relation between respiration and oropharyngeal swallowing in healthy adults. The goal of this clinical trial is to explore The Effect of Active Breathing Exercises in Stroke Patients With Respiratory Rhythm Disorder. Patients will be randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, all receiving routine rehabilitation treatment. On this basis, the observation group will be given Active Breathing Exercises. Researchers will compare dysphagia of two groups.

Being tested
Rehabilitation training, Active Breathing Exercises

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Rehabilitation trainingBehavioural

    Including 1) Basic treatment, including corresponding control of risk factors and education on healthy lifestyles. 2)Swallowing training, including lemon ice stimulation, mendelson maneuver, empty swallowing training, and pronunciation training.

  • Active Breathing ExercisesBehavioural

    Active breathing exercises aim to enhance the strength and flexibility of respiratory muscles through a series of exercises, improving breathing patterns and increasing respiratory efficiency. The following are common components of active breathing exercises: 1) Deep Breathing. 2) Chest Expansion. 3) Diaphragmatic Breathing. 4) Coughing Techniques. 5) Expiratory Resistance Training. 6) Gradual Increase in Activity.

Study groups in NCT06265818
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
The experimental groupExperimentalAssigned by the random number table. During the treatment, all patients were provided with comprehensive rehabilitation therapy as follows: Basic treatment, including corresponding control of risk factors and education on healthy lifestyles. Swallowing training, including lemon ice stimulation, mendelson maneuver, empty swallowing training, and pronunciation training. Based on this, this group was given Active Breathing Exercises
Receives: Behavioral: Rehabilitation training; Behavioral: Active Breathing Exercises
The control groupActive comparatorAssigned by the random number table. During the treatment, all patients were provided with comprehensive rehabilitation therapy as follows: Basic treatment, including corresponding control of risk factors and education on healthy lifestyles. Swallowing training, including lemon ice stimulation, mendelson maneuver, empty swallowing training, and pronunciation training.
Receives: Behavioral: Rehabilitation training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The Penetration-Aspiration Scale

    The Penetration-Aspiration Scale is used to assess the severity of airway invasion during swallowing. The score ranges from 1 to 8, with higher scores indicating more severe penetration or aspiration events. A lower score indicates better swallowing function and less risk of airway invasion, while a higher score suggests more significant impairment and increased risk of aspiration.

    Measured: day 1 and day 15

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. The Functional Oral Intake Scale

    The Functional Oral Intake Scale is used to measure the level of oral intake and diet consistency in individuals with dysphagia. The score ranges from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating better functional oral intake and tolerance to a wider variety of food textures. A higher score indicates improved swallowing function and the ability to consume a better range of food consistencies, while a lower score suggests more significant impairments and a limited intake of oral food and liquids.

    Measured: day 1 and day 15

  2. Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale

    The Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale is used to assess the severity of pharyngeal residue after swallowing. The scale ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating worse severity of pharyngeal residue. A higher score on the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale indicates a larger amount of residue remaining in the pharynx after swallowing, while a lower score suggests less residue and better swallowing efficiency.

    Measured: day 1 and day 15

  3. Fiberoptic Endoscopic Dysphagia Severity Scale

    The Fiberoptic Endoscopic Dysphagia Severity Scale is used to assess the severity of swallowing disorders based on fiberoptic endoscopic examination. The score ranges from 1 to 8, with higher scores indicating more severe swallowing impairment.

    Measured: day 1 and day 15

  4. Murray Secretion Scale

    The Murray Secretion Scale is used to assess the amount and tenacity of tracheobronchial secretions. The score ranges from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating a greater amount and/or thicker consistency of secretions. A higher score indicates a higher volume or thicker consistency of tracheobronchial secretions, while a lower score suggests minimal secretion accumulation and easier secretion management.

    Measured: day 1 and day 15

  5. Swallowing Quality of Life

    Swallowing Quality of Life is a self-report questionnaire designed to assess the impact of dysphagia on an individual's quality of life. The score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better swallowing-related quality of life. A higher score indicates a better quality of life related to swallowing function, while a lower score suggests a poorer quality of life and greater negative impact of dysphagia on daily activities and well-being.

    Measured: day 1 and day 15

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Feb 2024
  2. Study start1 Mar 2024
  3. Primary completionMay 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06265818
Sponsor's protocol ID
2024-KY-0126
Acronym
ABE-S
Status last verified
Mar 2024
First submitted
26 Jan 2024
Last updated
6 Mar 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Rehabilitation training and Active Breathing Exercises in people with Respiratory Rhythm Disorder, run by Zeng Changhao at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Zhefeng Wang, Master (19501376864, zhengzhouzhj@qq.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The Penetration-Aspiration Scale (time frame: day 1 and day 15). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Mar 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in