AzTrials
AzTrials

Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtypeRECMAPNCT06273176

The RECMAP-study: Resection With or Without Intraoperative Mapping for Recurrent Glioblastoma

An observational study of Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype and Glioblastoma, run by Erasmus Medical Center at 8 sites in 5 countries.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Resection of glioblastoma in or near functional brain tissue is challenging because of the proximity of important structures to the tumor site. To pursue maximal resection in a safe manner, mapping methods have been developed to test for motor and language function during the operation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 90 years
What is being tested?
Awake mapping under local anesthesia, Asleep mapping under general anesthesia and Resection under general anesthesia without mapping
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
225 participants
Where
8 sitesin 5 countries
Study dates
1 Jan 2023to 1 Jan 2028
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with recurrent glioblastoma will be recruited from the neurosurgical or neurological outpatient clinic or through referral from general hospitals of the participating neurosurgical hospitals, located in Europe and the United States. The study is carried out by centers from the ENCRAM Consortium.

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥18 years and ≤90 years
  • Tumor recurrence according to the RANO criteria of a previously diagnosed glioblastoma based on the WHO 2021 classification for glioma
  • Tumors situated in or near eloquent areas; motor cortex, sensory cortex, subcortical pyramidal tract, speech areas or visual areas as indicated on MRI (Sawaya Grading II and II)19
  • The tumor is suitable for resection (according to neurosurgeon)
  • Written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Tumors of the cerebellum, brainstem, or midline
  • Multifocal contrast-enhancing lesions
  • Medical reasons precluding MRI (e.g., pacemaker)
  • Inability to give written informed consent
  • Secondary high-grade glioma due to malignant transformation from low-grade glioma
  • Clinical data unavailable for the newly diagnosed setting

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 5 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Jasper Gerritsen, MD PhD contact

+31107036130

j.gerritsen@erasmusmc.nl

Arnaud Vincent, MD PhD contact

+31107034211

a.vincent@erasmusmc.nl

8 sites in 5 countries

United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

    Brian Nahed, MD PhD

    Recruiting
  • University of California, San Francisco

    San Francisco, California, 94143

    Mitchel Berger, MD PhD

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

Germany2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg

    Heidelberg

    Christine Jungk, MD PhD

    Sandro Krieg, MD PhD

    Recruiting
  • Technical University Munich

    Munich

    Arthur Wagner, MD

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in Germany

Netherlands2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Erasmus Medical Center

    Rotterdam, South Holland, 3015 GD

    Jasper Gerritsen, MD PhD

    Recruiting
  • Haaglanden Medical Center

    The Hague

    Marike Broekman, MD PhD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Netherlands

Belgium1 site, 1 recruiting
  • University Hospital Leuven

    Leuven

    Steven De Vleeschouwer, MD PhD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Belgium

Switzerland1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Inselspital Universitätsspital Bern

    Bern

    Philippe Schucht, MD PhD

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: The RECMAP-study: Resection With or Without Intraoperative Mapping for Recurrent Glioblastoma: Study Protocol for An International Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study (ENCRAM 2301)

Resection of glioblastoma in or near functional brain tissue is challenging because of the proximity of important structures to the tumor site. To pursue maximal resection in a safe manner, mapping methods have been developed to test for motor and language function during the operation. Previous evidence suggests that these techniques are beneficial for maximum safe resection in newly diagnosed grade 2-4 astrocytoma, grade 2-3 oligodendroglioma, and recently, glioblastoma. However, their effects in recurrent glioblastoma are still poorly understood. The aim of this study, therefore, is to compare the effects of awake mapping and asleep mapping with no mapping in resections for recurrent glioblastoma.

This study is an international, multicenter, prospective 3-arm cohort study of observational nature. Recurrent glioblastoma patients will be operated with mapping or no mapping techniques with a 1:1 ratio. Primary endpoints are: 1) proportion of patients with NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) deterioration at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery and 2) residual tumor volume of the contrast-enhancing and non-contrast-enhancing part as assessed by a neuroradiologist on postoperative contrast MRI scans. Secondary endpoints are: 1) overall survival (OS), 2) progression-free survival (PFS), 4) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery, and 4) frequency and severity of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in each arm. Estimated total duration of the study is 5 years. Patient inclusion is 4 years, follow-up is 1 year.

The study will be carried out by the centers affiliated with the European and North American Consortium and Registry for Intraoperative Mapping (ENCRAM).

Read the detailed description

This is an international, multicenter, prospective, 3-arm cohort study. Eligible patients are operated with or without mapping techniques with a 1:1 ratio with a sequential computer-generated random number as subject ID. Patients with motor-eloquent tumors will be treated in all study arms, while speech-eloquent tumors will only be treated in either the awake mapping or no mapping arm. The RECMAP study is similar to the SAFE-trial24 (awake craniotomy versus craniotomy under general anesthesia for glioblastoma patients, NCT03861299) and is initiated by the same center, however, the presented study will be different in various ways: the RECMAP study (1) will be an observational, prospective cohort study, (2) will include asleep mapping as an additional treatment arm, (3) will evaluate the extent of resection of the non-contrast-enhancing part of the tumor as well, (4) only includes recurrent tumors (5) will include neurosurgical centers in the United States and is part of the ENCRAM Research Consortium18. The RECMAP study is also similar to the PROGRAM study25 (awake mapping versus asleep mapping versus no mapping for high-grade glioma patients, NCT04708171), with the difference that the RECMAP study includes recurrent tumors (while the PROGRAM study includes newly diagnosed tumors), and that the RECMAP study includes recurrent glioblastoma, while the PRGORAM study includes WHO grade 3 and 4 gliomas.

Study patients are operated with either awake mapping, asleep mapping or no mapping and will undergo evaluation at presentation (baseline) and during the follow-up period at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Motor function will be evaluated using the NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) and MRC (Medical Research Council) scales. Language function will be evaluated using a standard neurolinguistic test-battery consisting of the Aphasia Bedside Check (ABC), Shortened Token test, Verbal fluency, Picture description and Object naming. This neurolinguistic test-battery is the result of a consensus between the participating centers. Cognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). Overall patient functioning with be assessed with the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and the ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status classification system for comorbidities. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) will be assessed with the EQ-5D questionnaire and the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BN20 questionnaires. Overall survival and progression-free survival will be assessed. We expect to complete patient inclusion in 4 years. The estimated duration of the study, including follow-up, will be 5 years.

The primary study objective is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of resections with or without mapping techniques (neurological morbidity and residual CE and NCE tumor volume) in recurrent glioblastoma patients as expressed by NIHSS scores and volumetric data. Secondary study objectives are to study the overall survival (OS), progressive-free survival (PFS), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) after resections with or without mapping techniques as expressed by survival data, progression on follow up MRI scans based on the RANO criteria26 for tumor progression, quality of life questionnaires (EORTC QLQ C30, EORTC QLQ BN20, EQ-5D), and registration of SAEs.

Patients will be recruited from the neurosurgical or neurological outpatient clinic or through referral from general hospitals of the participating neurosurgical hospitals, located in Europe and the United States. The study is carried out by centers from the ENCRAM Consortium.

Being tested
Awake mapping under local anesthesia, Asleep mapping under general anesthesia, Resection under general anesthesia without mapping
Keywords
Glioblastoma, Recurrent, Re-resection, Resection, Intraoperative mapping, Awake mapping, Awake craniotomy, Asleep mapping, Motor mapping, Language mapping, Overall survival, Progression-free survival, Neurological morbidity, Quality of life, Functional area, Eloquent, Extent of resection, Residual tumor volume
Medical subject headings
Glioblastoma, Astrocytoma, Brain Neoplasms, Recurrence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Awake mapping under local anesthesiaProcedure or surgery

    Also called Awake craniotomy

    During an awake craniotomy, the patient is awake and cooperative during the resection of the tumor while the surgeon uses electro(sub)cortical mapping to prevent damage to eloquent areas.

  • Asleep mapping under general anesthesiaProcedure or surgery

    Also called Asleep motor mapping, Continous dynamic mapping, Evoked potentials

    During asleep mapping under general anesthesia, the surgeon uses electro(sub)cortical mapping with evoked potentials (MEPs, SSEPs or continuous dynamic mapping) to prevent damage to eloquent areas.

  • Resection under general anesthesia without mappingProcedure or surgery

    During resection under general anesthesia without mapping, the surgeon does not use any intraoperative stimulation mapping techniques to identify eloquent areas.

Study groups in NCT06273176
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Awake mappingAwake mapping: Tumor resection with intraoperative awake motor or language mapping
Receives: Procedure: Awake mapping under local anesthesia
Asleep mappingAsleep mapping: Tumor resection with intraoperative asleep motor mapping
Receives: Procedure: Asleep mapping under general anesthesia
No mappingNo mapping: Tumor resection without intraoperative mapping
Receives: Procedure: Resection under general anesthesia without mapping

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Residual volume

    Residual tumor volume of the contrast-enhancing and non-contrast enhancing part, as assessed by a neuroradiologist on postoperative MRI scan (T1 with contrast and FLAIR sequences) using manual or semi-automatic volumetric analyses (Brainlab Elements iPlan CMF Segmentation, Brainlab AG, Munich, Germany; or similar software)

    Measured: Within 72 hours postoperatively

  2. Neurological morbidity at 6 weeks

    NIHSS deterioration of 1 point or more at 6 weeks after surgery

    Measured: 6 weeks postoperatively

Secondary outcomes (18)
  1. Overall survival

    Time from diagnosis to death from any cause.

    Measured: Up to 5 years postoperatively

  2. Progression-free survival

    Time from diagnosis to disease progression (occurrence of a new tumor lesions with a volume greater than 0.175 cm3, or an increase in residual tumor volume of more than 25%) or death, whichever comes first

    Measured: Up to 5 years postoperatively

  3. Onco-functional outcome (OFO)

    According to the OFO classification, consisting of the combination of presence/absence of functional deterioration with gross-total resection

    Measured: 6 weeks postoperatively

  4. Serious Adverse Events

    Serious Adverse Events within 6 weeks postoperatively

    Measured: 6 weeks postoperatively

  5. Neurological morbidity at 3 months

    NIHSS deterioration of 1 point or more at 3 months after surgery

    Measured: 3 months postoperatively

  6. Neurological morbidity at 6 months

    NIHSS deterioration of 1 point or more at 6 months after surgery

    Measured: 6 months postoperatively

  7. Overall functioning at 6 weeks

    KPS deterioration at 6 weeks after surgery

    Measured: 6 weeks postoperatively

  8. Overall functioning at 3 months

    KPS deterioration at 3 months after surgery

    Measured: 6 months postoperatively

  9. Overall functioning at 6 months

    KPS deterioration at 6 months after surgery

    Measured: 6 months postoperatively

  10. Quality of life at 6 weeks (EORTC QLQ C30)

    Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire

    Measured: 6 weeks postoperatively

  11. Quality of life at 3 months (EORTC QLQ C30)

    Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire

    Measured: 3 months postoperatively

  12. Quality of life at 6 months (EORTC QLQ C30)

    Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire

    Measured: 6 months postoperatively

  13. Quality of life at 6 weeks (EORTC QLQ BN20)

    Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ BN20 questionnaire

    Measured: 6 weeks postoperatively

  14. Quality of life at 3 months (EORTC QLQ BN20)

    Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ BN20 questionnaire

    Measured: 3 months postoperatively

  15. Quality of life at 6 months (EORTC QLQ BN20)

    Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ BN20 questionnaire

    Measured: 6 months postoperatively

  16. Quality of life at 6 weeks (EQ-5D)

    Quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D questionnaire

    Measured: 6 weeks postoperatively

  17. Quality of life at 3 months (EQ-5D)

    Quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D questionnaire

    Measured: 3 months postoperatively

  18. Quality of life at 6 months (EQ-5D)

    Quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D questionnaire

    Measured: 6 months postoperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Feb 2024
  2. Study start1 Jan 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
225 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06273176
Sponsor's protocol ID
MEC-2020-0812
Acronym
RECMAP
Status last verified
Feb 2024
First submitted
29 Jan 2023
Last updated
22 Feb 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype and Glioblastoma, run by Erasmus Medical Center at 8 sites in 5 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in United States, Germany, Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jasper Gerritsen, MD PhD (+31107036130, j.gerritsen@erasmusmc.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Residual volume (time frame: Within 72 hours postoperatively). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Feb 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in