Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtypeRECMAPNCT06273176
The RECMAP-study: Resection With or Without Intraoperative Mapping for Recurrent Glioblastoma
An observational study of Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype and Glioblastoma, run by Erasmus Medical Center at 8 sites in 5 countries.
Trial summary
Resection of glioblastoma in or near functional brain tissue is challenging because of the proximity of important structures to the tumor site. To pursue maximal resection in a safe manner, mapping methods have been developed to test for motor and language function during the operation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, Glioblastoma, Glioblastoma Multiforme of Brain
- What is being tested?
- Awake mapping under local anesthesia, Asleep mapping under general anesthesia and Resection under general anesthesia without mapping
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 225 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesin 5 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2023to 1 Jan 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with recurrent glioblastoma will be recruited from the neurosurgical or neurological outpatient clinic or through referral from general hospitals of the participating neurosurgical hospitals, located in Europe and the United States. The study is carried out by centers from the ENCRAM Consortium.
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥18 years and ≤90 years
- Tumor recurrence according to the RANO criteria of a previously diagnosed glioblastoma based on the WHO 2021 classification for glioma
- Tumors situated in or near eloquent areas; motor cortex, sensory cortex, subcortical pyramidal tract, speech areas or visual areas as indicated on MRI (Sawaya Grading II and II)19
- The tumor is suitable for resection (according to neurosurgeon)
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Tumors of the cerebellum, brainstem, or midline
- Multifocal contrast-enhancing lesions
- Medical reasons precluding MRI (e.g., pacemaker)
- Inability to give written informed consent
- Secondary high-grade glioma due to malignant transformation from low-grade glioma
- Clinical data unavailable for the newly diagnosed setting
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 5 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
8 sites in 5 countries
United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Brian Nahed, MD PhD
- Recruiting
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143
Mitchel Berger, MD PhD
Germany2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg
Christine Jungk, MD PhD
Sandro Krieg, MD PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Technical University Munich
Munich
Arthur Wagner, MD
Netherlands2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3015 GD
Jasper Gerritsen, MD PhD
- Recruiting
Haaglanden Medical Center
The Hague
Marike Broekman, MD PhD
Belgium1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University Hospital Leuven
Leuven
Steven De Vleeschouwer, MD PhD
Switzerland1 site, 1 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Inselspital Universitätsspital Bern
Bern
Philippe Schucht, MD PhD
About this study
Official title: The RECMAP-study: Resection With or Without Intraoperative Mapping for Recurrent Glioblastoma: Study Protocol for An International Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study (ENCRAM 2301)
Resection of glioblastoma in or near functional brain tissue is challenging because of the proximity of important structures to the tumor site. To pursue maximal resection in a safe manner, mapping methods have been developed to test for motor and language function during the operation. Previous evidence suggests that these techniques are beneficial for maximum safe resection in newly diagnosed grade 2-4 astrocytoma, grade 2-3 oligodendroglioma, and recently, glioblastoma. However, their effects in recurrent glioblastoma are still poorly understood. The aim of this study, therefore, is to compare the effects of awake mapping and asleep mapping with no mapping in resections for recurrent glioblastoma.
This study is an international, multicenter, prospective 3-arm cohort study of observational nature. Recurrent glioblastoma patients will be operated with mapping or no mapping techniques with a 1:1 ratio. Primary endpoints are: 1) proportion of patients with NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) deterioration at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery and 2) residual tumor volume of the contrast-enhancing and non-contrast-enhancing part as assessed by a neuroradiologist on postoperative contrast MRI scans. Secondary endpoints are: 1) overall survival (OS), 2) progression-free survival (PFS), 4) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery, and 4) frequency and severity of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in each arm. Estimated total duration of the study is 5 years. Patient inclusion is 4 years, follow-up is 1 year.
The study will be carried out by the centers affiliated with the European and North American Consortium and Registry for Intraoperative Mapping (ENCRAM).
Read the detailed description
This is an international, multicenter, prospective, 3-arm cohort study. Eligible patients are operated with or without mapping techniques with a 1:1 ratio with a sequential computer-generated random number as subject ID. Patients with motor-eloquent tumors will be treated in all study arms, while speech-eloquent tumors will only be treated in either the awake mapping or no mapping arm. The RECMAP study is similar to the SAFE-trial24 (awake craniotomy versus craniotomy under general anesthesia for glioblastoma patients, NCT03861299) and is initiated by the same center, however, the presented study will be different in various ways: the RECMAP study (1) will be an observational, prospective cohort study, (2) will include asleep mapping as an additional treatment arm, (3) will evaluate the extent of resection of the non-contrast-enhancing part of the tumor as well, (4) only includes recurrent tumors (5) will include neurosurgical centers in the United States and is part of the ENCRAM Research Consortium18. The RECMAP study is also similar to the PROGRAM study25 (awake mapping versus asleep mapping versus no mapping for high-grade glioma patients, NCT04708171), with the difference that the RECMAP study includes recurrent tumors (while the PROGRAM study includes newly diagnosed tumors), and that the RECMAP study includes recurrent glioblastoma, while the PRGORAM study includes WHO grade 3 and 4 gliomas.
Study patients are operated with either awake mapping, asleep mapping or no mapping and will undergo evaluation at presentation (baseline) and during the follow-up period at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Motor function will be evaluated using the NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) and MRC (Medical Research Council) scales. Language function will be evaluated using a standard neurolinguistic test-battery consisting of the Aphasia Bedside Check (ABC), Shortened Token test, Verbal fluency, Picture description and Object naming. This neurolinguistic test-battery is the result of a consensus between the participating centers. Cognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). Overall patient functioning with be assessed with the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and the ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status classification system for comorbidities. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) will be assessed with the EQ-5D questionnaire and the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BN20 questionnaires. Overall survival and progression-free survival will be assessed. We expect to complete patient inclusion in 4 years. The estimated duration of the study, including follow-up, will be 5 years.
The primary study objective is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of resections with or without mapping techniques (neurological morbidity and residual CE and NCE tumor volume) in recurrent glioblastoma patients as expressed by NIHSS scores and volumetric data. Secondary study objectives are to study the overall survival (OS), progressive-free survival (PFS), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) after resections with or without mapping techniques as expressed by survival data, progression on follow up MRI scans based on the RANO criteria26 for tumor progression, quality of life questionnaires (EORTC QLQ C30, EORTC QLQ BN20, EQ-5D), and registration of SAEs.
Patients will be recruited from the neurosurgical or neurological outpatient clinic or through referral from general hospitals of the participating neurosurgical hospitals, located in Europe and the United States. The study is carried out by centers from the ENCRAM Consortium.
- Conditions
- Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, Glioblastoma, Glioblastoma Multiforme of Brain, Astrocytoma, Malignant, Brain Neoplasms, Brain Neoplasms, Adult, Malignant
- Being tested
- Awake mapping under local anesthesia, Asleep mapping under general anesthesia, Resection under general anesthesia without mapping
- Keywords
- Glioblastoma, Recurrent, Re-resection, Resection, Intraoperative mapping, Awake mapping, Awake craniotomy, Asleep mapping, Motor mapping, Language mapping, Overall survival, Progression-free survival, Neurological morbidity, Quality of life, Functional area, Eloquent, Extent of resection, Residual tumor volume
- Medical subject headings
- Glioblastoma, Astrocytoma, Brain Neoplasms, Recurrence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Awake mapping under local anesthesiaProcedure or surgery
Also called Awake craniotomy
During an awake craniotomy, the patient is awake and cooperative during the resection of the tumor while the surgeon uses electro(sub)cortical mapping to prevent damage to eloquent areas.
Asleep mapping under general anesthesiaProcedure or surgery
Also called Asleep motor mapping, Continous dynamic mapping, Evoked potentials
During asleep mapping under general anesthesia, the surgeon uses electro(sub)cortical mapping with evoked potentials (MEPs, SSEPs or continuous dynamic mapping) to prevent damage to eloquent areas.
Resection under general anesthesia without mappingProcedure or surgery
During resection under general anesthesia without mapping, the surgeon does not use any intraoperative stimulation mapping techniques to identify eloquent areas.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Awake mapping | Awake mapping: Tumor resection with intraoperative awake motor or language mapping Receives: Procedure: Awake mapping under local anesthesia | |
| Asleep mapping | Asleep mapping: Tumor resection with intraoperative asleep motor mapping Receives: Procedure: Asleep mapping under general anesthesia | |
| No mapping | No mapping: Tumor resection without intraoperative mapping Receives: Procedure: Resection under general anesthesia without mapping |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Residual volume
Residual tumor volume of the contrast-enhancing and non-contrast enhancing part, as assessed by a neuroradiologist on postoperative MRI scan (T1 with contrast and FLAIR sequences) using manual or semi-automatic volumetric analyses (Brainlab Elements iPlan CMF Segmentation, Brainlab AG, Munich, Germany; or similar software)
Measured: Within 72 hours postoperatively
Neurological morbidity at 6 weeks
NIHSS deterioration of 1 point or more at 6 weeks after surgery
Measured: 6 weeks postoperatively
Secondary outcomes (18)
Overall survival
Time from diagnosis to death from any cause.
Measured: Up to 5 years postoperatively
Progression-free survival
Time from diagnosis to disease progression (occurrence of a new tumor lesions with a volume greater than 0.175 cm3, or an increase in residual tumor volume of more than 25%) or death, whichever comes first
Measured: Up to 5 years postoperatively
Onco-functional outcome (OFO)
According to the OFO classification, consisting of the combination of presence/absence of functional deterioration with gross-total resection
Measured: 6 weeks postoperatively
Serious Adverse Events
Serious Adverse Events within 6 weeks postoperatively
Measured: 6 weeks postoperatively
Neurological morbidity at 3 months
NIHSS deterioration of 1 point or more at 3 months after surgery
Measured: 3 months postoperatively
Neurological morbidity at 6 months
NIHSS deterioration of 1 point or more at 6 months after surgery
Measured: 6 months postoperatively
Overall functioning at 6 weeks
KPS deterioration at 6 weeks after surgery
Measured: 6 weeks postoperatively
Overall functioning at 3 months
KPS deterioration at 3 months after surgery
Measured: 6 months postoperatively
Overall functioning at 6 months
KPS deterioration at 6 months after surgery
Measured: 6 months postoperatively
Quality of life at 6 weeks (EORTC QLQ C30)
Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire
Measured: 6 weeks postoperatively
Quality of life at 3 months (EORTC QLQ C30)
Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire
Measured: 3 months postoperatively
Quality of life at 6 months (EORTC QLQ C30)
Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire
Measured: 6 months postoperatively
Quality of life at 6 weeks (EORTC QLQ BN20)
Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ BN20 questionnaire
Measured: 6 weeks postoperatively
Quality of life at 3 months (EORTC QLQ BN20)
Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ BN20 questionnaire
Measured: 3 months postoperatively
Quality of life at 6 months (EORTC QLQ BN20)
Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ BN20 questionnaire
Measured: 6 months postoperatively
Quality of life at 6 weeks (EQ-5D)
Quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D questionnaire
Measured: 6 weeks postoperatively
Quality of life at 3 months (EQ-5D)
Quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D questionnaire
Measured: 3 months postoperatively
Quality of life at 6 months (EQ-5D)
Quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D questionnaire
Measured: 6 months postoperatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Feb 2024
- Study start1 Jan 2023
- Primary completion1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jan 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtypeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Erasmus Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 225 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Erasmus Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Haaglanden Medical Centre, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven, University Hospital Heidelberg, Technical University of Munich, Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern, Massachusetts General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jasper Gerritsen, Erasmus Medical Center
- Investigators
- Jasper Gerritsen, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Erasmus Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06273176
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MEC-2020-0812
- Acronym
- RECMAP
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 29 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 22 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The RECMAP-study: Resection With or Without Intraoperative Mapping for Recurrent Glioblastoma: Study Protocol for An International Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study (ENCRAM 2301)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06273176
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RECMAP / MEC-2020-0812
- Conditions
- Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, Glioblastoma, Glioblastoma Multiforme of Brain, Astrocytoma, Malignant, Brain Neoplasms, Brain Neoplasms, Adult, Malignant
- Keywords
- Glioblastoma, Recurrent, Re-resection, Resection, Intraoperative mapping, Awake mapping, Awake craniotomy, Asleep mapping
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 225 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Erasmus Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Haaglanden Medical Centre, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven, University Hospital Heidelberg, Technical University of Munich, Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern, Massachusetts General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Resection of glioblastoma in or near functional brain tissue is challenging because of the proximity of important structures to the tumor site. To pursue maximal resection in a safe manner, mapping methods have been developed to test for motor and language function during the operation. Previous evidence suggests that these techniques are beneficial for maximum safe resection in newly diagnosed grade 2-4 astrocytoma, grade 2-3 oligodendroglioma, and recently, glioblastoma. However, their effects in recurrent glioblastoma are still poorly understood. The aim of this study, therefore, is to compare the effects of awake mapping and asleep mapping with no mapping in resections for recurrent glioblastoma.
This study is an international, multicenter, prospective 3-arm cohort study of observational nature. Recurrent glioblastoma patients will be operated with mapping or no mapping techniques with a 1:1 ratio. Primary endpoints are: 1) proportion of patients with NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) deterioration at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery and 2) residual tumor volume of the contrast-enhancing and non-contrast-enhancing part as assessed by a neuroradiologist on postoperative contrast MRI scans. Secondary endpoints are: 1) overall survival (OS), 2) progression-free survival (PFS), 4) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery, and 4) frequency and severity of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in each arm. Estimated total duration of the study is 5 years. Patient inclusion is 4 years, follow-up is 1 year.
The study will be carried out by the centers affiliated with the European and North American Consortium and Registry for Intraoperative Mapping (ENCRAM).
Detailed description
This is an international, multicenter, prospective, 3-arm cohort study. Eligible patients are operated with or without mapping techniques with a 1:1 ratio with a sequential computer-generated random number as subject ID. Patients with motor-eloquent tumors will be treated in all study arms, while speech-eloquent tumors will only be treated in either the awake mapping or no mapping arm. The RECMAP study is similar to the SAFE-trial24 (awake craniotomy versus craniotomy under general anesthesia for glioblastoma patients, NCT03861299) and is initiated by the same center, however, the presented study will be different in various ways: the RECMAP study (1) will be an observational, prospective cohort study, (2) will include asleep mapping as an additional treatment arm, (3) will evaluate the extent of resection of the non-contrast-enhancing part of the tumor as well, (4) only includes recurrent tumors (5) will include neurosurgical centers in the United States and is part of the ENCRAM Research Consortium18. The RECMAP study is also similar to the PROGRAM study25 (awake mapping versus asleep mapping versus no mapping for high-grade glioma patients, NCT04708171), with the difference that the RECMAP study includes recurrent tumors (while the PROGRAM study includes newly diagnosed tumors), and that the RECMAP study includes recurrent glioblastoma, while the PRGORAM study includes WHO grade 3 and 4 gliomas.
Study patients are operated with either awake mapping, asleep mapping or no mapping and will undergo evaluation at presentation (baseline) and during the follow-up period at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Motor function will be evaluated using the NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) and MRC (Medical Research Council) scales. Language function will be evaluated using a standard neurolinguistic test-battery consisting of the Aphasia Bedside Check (ABC), Shortened Token test, Verbal fluency, Picture description and Object naming. This neurolinguistic test-battery is the result of a consensus between the participating centers. Cognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). Overall patient functioning with be assessed with the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and the ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status classification system for comorbidities. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) will be assessed with the EQ-5D questionnaire and the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BN20 questionnaires. Overall survival and progression-free survival will be assessed. We expect to complete patient inclusion in 4 years. The estimated duration of the study, including follow-up, will be 5 years.
The primary study objective is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of resections with or without mapping techniques (neurological morbidity and residual CE and NCE tumor volume) in recurrent glioblastoma patients as expressed by NIHSS scores and volumetric data. Secondary study objectives are to study the overall survival (OS), progressive-free survival (PFS), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) after resections with or without mapping techniques as expressed by survival data, progression on follow up MRI scans based on the RANO criteria26 for tumor progression, quality of life questionnaires (EORTC QLQ C30, EORTC QLQ BN20, EQ-5D), and registration of SAEs.
Patients will be recruited from the neurosurgical or neurological outpatient clinic or through referral from general hospitals of the participating neurosurgical hospitals, located in Europe and the United States. The study is carried out by centers from the ENCRAM Consortium.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Awake mapping | – | Procedure: Awake mapping under local anesthesiaAwake mapping: Tumor resection with intraoperative awake motor or language mapping |
| Asleep mapping | – | Procedure: Asleep mapping under general anesthesiaAsleep mapping: Tumor resection with intraoperative asleep motor mapping |
| No mapping | – | Procedure: Resection under general anesthesia without mappingNo mapping: Tumor resection without intraoperative mapping |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with recurrent glioblastoma will be recruited from the neurosurgical or neurological outpatient clinic or through referral from general hospitals of the participating neurosurgical hospitals, located in Europe and the United States. The study is carried out by centers from the ENCRAM Consortium.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age ≥18 years and ≤90 years
- Tumor recurrence according to the RANO criteria of a previously diagnosed glioblastoma based on the WHO 2021 classification for glioma
- Tumors situated in or near eloquent areas; motor cortex, sensory cortex, subcortical pyramidal tract, speech areas or visual areas as indicated on MRI (Sawaya Grading II and II)19
- The tumor is suitable for resection (according to neurosurgeon)
- Written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Tumors of the cerebellum, brainstem, or midline
- Multifocal contrast-enhancing lesions
- Medical reasons precluding MRI (e.g., pacemaker)
- Inability to give written informed consent
- Secondary high-grade glioma due to malignant transformation from low-grade glioma
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Awake mapping under local anesthesiaAlso: Awake craniotomyDuring an awake craniotomy, the patient is awake and cooperative during the resection of the tumor while the surgeon uses electro(sub)cortical mapping to prevent damage to eloquent areas. | Procedure or surgery | Awake mapping |
| Asleep mapping under general anesthesiaAlso: Asleep motor mapping, Continous dynamic mapping, Evoked potentialsDuring asleep mapping under general anesthesia, the surgeon uses electro(sub)cortical mapping with evoked potentials (MEPs, SSEPs or continuous dynamic mapping) to prevent damage to eloquent areas. | Procedure or surgery | Asleep mapping |
| Resection under general anesthesia without mappingDuring resection under general anesthesia without mapping, the surgeon does not use any intraoperative stimulation mapping techniques to identify eloquent areas. | Procedure or surgery | No mapping |
Primary outcome
Residual volume
Time frame: Within 72 hours postoperatively
Residual tumor volume of the contrast-enhancing and non-contrast enhancing part, as assessed by a neuroradiologist on postoperative MRI scan (T1 with contrast and FLAIR sequences) using manual or semi-automatic volumetric analyses (Brainlab Elements iPlan CMF Segmentation, Brainlab AG, Munich, Germany; or similar software)
Neurological morbidity at 6 weeks
Time frame: 6 weeks postoperatively
NIHSS deterioration of 1 point or more at 6 weeks after surgery
18 secondary outcomes
Overall survival
Time frame: Up to 5 years postoperatively
Progression-free survival
Time frame: Up to 5 years postoperatively
Onco-functional outcome (OFO)
Time frame: 6 weeks postoperatively
Serious Adverse Events
Time frame: 6 weeks postoperatively
Neurological morbidity at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months postoperatively
Neurological morbidity at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months postoperatively
Overall functioning at 6 weeks
Time frame: 6 weeks postoperatively
Overall functioning at 3 months
Time frame: 6 months postoperatively
Overall functioning at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months postoperatively
Quality of life at 6 weeks (EORTC QLQ C30)
Time frame: 6 weeks postoperatively
Quality of life at 3 months (EORTC QLQ C30)
Time frame: 3 months postoperatively
Quality of life at 6 months (EORTC QLQ C30)
Time frame: 6 months postoperatively
Quality of life at 6 weeks (EORTC QLQ BN20)
Time frame: 6 weeks postoperatively
Quality of life at 3 months (EORTC QLQ BN20)
Time frame: 3 months postoperatively
Quality of life at 6 months (EORTC QLQ BN20)
Time frame: 6 months postoperatively
Quality of life at 6 weeks (EQ-5D)
Time frame: 6 weeks postoperatively
Quality of life at 3 months (EQ-5D)
Time frame: 3 months postoperatively
Quality of life at 6 months (EQ-5D)
Time frame: 6 months postoperatively
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Feb 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Ultrasound-based Blood-brain Barrier Opening and Albumin-bound Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for Recurrent Glioblastoma
Glioblastoma, Gliosarcoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Temozolomide, With or Without WSD0922-FU, for the Treatment of EGFR-Mutant, IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma
Glioblastoma, IDH-Wildtype
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Testing the Effect of Immunotherapy (Ipilimumab and Nivolumab) in Patients With Recurrent Glioma With Elevated Mutational Burden
Astrocytoma, IDH-Mutant, Grade 4, Diffuse Glioma
RecruitingPhase 1
Locoregional Administration of Genetically Engineered Cells (EGFR/IL13Rα2 Pool-CAR T Cells) for the Treatment of Recurrent or Progressive High-Grade Gliomas
Recurrent Astrocytoma, IDH-Mutant, Grade 4, Recurrent Glioblastoma, IDH-Wildtype
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Testing the Addition of an Anti-cancer Drug, Selinexor, to the Usual Chemotherapy Treatment (Temozolomide) for Brain Tumors That Have Returned After Previous Treatment
Recurrent Glioblastoma, IDH-Wildtype, Recurrent MGMT-Methylated Glioblastoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Jasper Gerritsen, MD PhD principal investigator
Erasmus Medical Center
8 sites in 5 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype and Glioblastoma, run by Erasmus Medical Center at 8 sites in 5 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 8 sites in United States, Germany, Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jasper Gerritsen, MD PhD (+31107036130, j.gerritsen@erasmusmc.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Residual volume (time frame: Within 72 hours postoperatively). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Feb 2024.