Chronic PainPhase 2NCT06273462
Palmitoylethanolamide for Chronic Inflammatory Pain Conditions
A Phase 2 study testing Palmitoylethanolamide 600mg twice a day in people with Chronic Pain, run by Navy Medical Center San Diego at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate if a supplement called palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) is effective in reducing the pain in patients with chronic inflammatory pain conditions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Pain
- What is being tested?
- Palmitoylethanolamide 600mg twice a day
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 5 Aug 2024to 30 Oct 2025
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Chronic Inflammatory Pain of greater than 3 months duration and greater than or equal to 5/10 intensity that has not responded to other conservative therapies such as rest, ice, compression or other oral medications.
Who cannot join
- Severe allergy to any specific food component such as nut, egg or soy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Naval Medical Center San Diego
San Diego, California, 92118
Naval Medical Center Institutional Review Board, 619-532-9927, kristina.m.umali.civ@health.mil
Brian McLean COL, USA MC, MD
About this study
Official title: Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Palmitoylethanolamide for Chronic Inflammatory Pain Conditions
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate if a supplement called palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) is effective in reducing the pain in patients with chronic inflammatory pain conditions. The main question the trial aims to answer is if PEA works better at treating a patients pain and improving their function better than a placebo.
Participants will be divided into two equal groups and asked to take either PEA or a placebo for 8 weeks.
Read the detailed description
Chronic inflammatory pain conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, and neuropathic pain syndromes, present a significant burden on individuals and healthcare systems worldwide. Despite advancements in pain management, many patients continue to experience inadequate relief, and the long-term use of conventional analgesics can be associated with adverse effects.
Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) is a naturally occurring fatty acid amide that has garnered attention in recent years for its potential therapeutic properties in managing chronic inflammatory pain. PEA is an endogenous lipid mediator and a member of the N-acylethanolamine family. It exerts its effects primarily by interacting with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-α) and through other molecular pathways involved in neuroinflammation and immune responses.
In Europe where nutraceuticals are more commonly used in conventional practice, research on PEA has shown significant promise in studies on inflammatory pain conditions such as chronic pelvic pain, irritable bowel syndrome, temporomandibular joint arthritis and knee osteoarthritis. Similar studies have not been completed in the United States.
- Anti-Inflammatory Effects:
- PEA has demonstrated anti-inflammatory properties by modulating immune responses, inhibiting mast cell activation, and reducing the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. These effects suggest its potential in attenuating the underlying inflammation in chronic pain conditions.
- Analgesic Effects:
- Several animal studies have reported that PEA can alleviate pain in models of neuropathic pain, inflammatory pain, and even in more complex pain conditions like fibromyalgia. These findings suggest that PEA may have a role as an analgesic agent.
- Safety and Tolerability:
- PEA is generally well-tolerated with a favorable safety profile. Clinical trials and real-world studies have reported minimal side effects, making it a potentially attractive option for long-term use in chronic pain management.
- Clinical Trials:
- Some clinical trials have explored the use of PEA in specific chronic pain conditions. While results have been promising, larger, well-controlled trials are needed to establish its efficacy conclusively.
- Mechanisms of Action:
- Beyond PPAR-α activation, PEA may also influence other cellular pathways involved in pain modulation, such as TRPV1 channels and GPR55 receptors, although the exact mechanisms are still being elucidated.
Summary of previous trials:
A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of no US studies suggests that PEA is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for chronic pain. The literature search identified 253 unique articles with 11 included in the meta-analysis. The 11 articles had a combined sample size of 774 patients with diverse chronic pain conditions who took a dose of 400-1200 mg of a PEA supplement or a placebo over periods ranging from 2 to 12 weeks. The studies showed significantly better pain reduction compared to placebo with no adverse effects.
Given the growing interest in PEA as a potential therapeutic agent for chronic inflammatory pain, and the lack of any known side effects of this supplement, this randomized placebo-controlled trial aims to contribute valuable data to the existing body of research. By rigorously evaluating the efficacy and safety of PEA in a controlled clinical setting, the investigators seek to provide evidence-based insights into its role in managing chronic inflammatory pain conditions and further inform clinical practice.
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Being tested
- Palmitoylethanolamide 600mg twice a day, placebo
- Keywords
- chronic pain, supplement, alternative therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Palmitoylethanolamide 600mg twice a dayDrug
Also called PEA
600mg palmitoylethanolamide twice a day
placeboOther
visually identical placebo capsule
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Palmitoylethanolamide | Experimental | Participants randomized to the experimental arm will receive the supplement Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) at a dose of 600mg twice a day Receives: Drug: Palmitoylethanolamide 600mg twice a day |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants randomized to the placebo arm will receive a visually identical placebo capsule Receives: Other: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain Level
Pain level will be assessed using the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) Where the minimum value is 0 indicating no pain and the maximum value is 10 indicating worst possible pain
Measured: 4 and 8 weeks
Secondary outcomes (3)
Pain interference and function
Daily Pain Impact (interference with activity, sleep, mood, stress) (0-10 scale with 0 being the best and 10 being the worst outcome)
Measured: 4 and 8 weeks
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) (Helplessness; Magnification; Rumination) (0-52 scale with 0 being the best and 52 being the worst outcome)
Measured: 4 and 8 weeks
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) (Pain interference, Social satisfaction; Physical function)
PROMIS (Pain interference, Social satisfaction; Physical function) (0-10 each with 0 being the worst and 10 being the best outcome)
Measured: 4 and 8 Weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Feb 2024
- Study start5 Aug 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Oct 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Chronic PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Prospective Randomize Double Blind Placebo Controlled study comparing the supplement palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) to a visually identical placebo
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Navy Medical Center San Diego
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06273462
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NMCSD.2024.0006
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 6 Feb 2024
- Last updated
- 15 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Palmitoylethanolamide for Chronic Inflammatory Pain Conditions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06273462
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NMCSD.2024.0006
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Keywords
- chronic pain, supplement, alternative therapy
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Navy Medical Center San DiegoUS federal agency
- Study start
- 5 Aug 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate if a supplement called palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) is effective in reducing the pain in patients with chronic inflammatory pain conditions. The main question the trial aims to answer is if PEA works better at treating a patients pain and improving their function better than a placebo.
Participants will be divided into two equal groups and asked to take either PEA or a placebo for 8 weeks.
Detailed description
Chronic inflammatory pain conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, and neuropathic pain syndromes, present a significant burden on individuals and healthcare systems worldwide. Despite advancements in pain management, many patients continue to experience inadequate relief, and the long-term use of conventional analgesics can be associated with adverse effects.
Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) is a naturally occurring fatty acid amide that has garnered attention in recent years for its potential therapeutic properties in managing chronic inflammatory pain. PEA is an endogenous lipid mediator and a member of the N-acylethanolamine family. It exerts its effects primarily by interacting with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-α) and through other molecular pathways involved in neuroinflammation and immune responses.
In Europe where nutraceuticals are more commonly used in conventional practice, research on PEA has shown significant promise in studies on inflammatory pain conditions such as chronic pelvic pain, irritable bowel syndrome, temporomandibular joint arthritis and knee osteoarthritis. Similar studies have not been completed in the United States.
- Anti-Inflammatory Effects:
- PEA has demonstrated anti-inflammatory properties by modulating immune responses, inhibiting mast cell activation, and reducing the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. These effects suggest its potential in attenuating the underlying inflammation in chronic pain conditions.
- Analgesic Effects:
- Several animal studies have reported that PEA can alleviate pain in models of neuropathic pain, inflammatory pain, and even in more complex pain conditions like fibromyalgia. These findings suggest that PEA may have a role as an analgesic agent.
- Safety and Tolerability:
- PEA is generally well-tolerated with a favorable safety profile. Clinical trials and real-world studies have reported minimal side effects, making it a potentially attractive option for long-term use in chronic pain management.
- Clinical Trials:
- Some clinical trials have explored the use of PEA in specific chronic pain conditions. While results have been promising, larger, well-controlled trials are needed to establish its efficacy conclusively.
- Mechanisms of Action:
- Beyond PPAR-α activation, PEA may also influence other cellular pathways involved in pain modulation, such as TRPV1 channels and GPR55 receptors, although the exact mechanisms are still being elucidated.
Summary of previous trials:
A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of no US studies suggests that PEA is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for chronic pain. The literature search identified 253 unique articles with 11 included in the meta-analysis. The 11 articles had a combined sample size of 774 patients with diverse chronic pain conditions who took a dose of 400-1200 mg of a PEA supplement or a placebo over periods ranging from 2 to 12 weeks. The studies showed significantly better pain reduction compared to placebo with no adverse effects.
Given the growing interest in PEA as a potential therapeutic agent for chronic inflammatory pain, and the lack of any known side effects of this supplement, this randomized placebo-controlled trial aims to contribute valuable data to the existing body of research. By rigorously evaluating the efficacy and safety of PEA in a controlled clinical setting, the investigators seek to provide evidence-based insights into its role in managing chronic inflammatory pain conditions and further inform clinical practice.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Prospective Randomize Double Blind Placebo Controlled study comparing the supplement palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) to a visually identical placebo
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Palmitoylethanolamide | Experimental | Drug: Palmitoylethanolamide 600mg twice a dayParticipants randomized to the experimental arm will receive the supplement Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) at a dose of 600mg twice a day |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: placeboParticipants randomized to the placebo arm will receive a visually identical placebo capsule |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Chronic Inflammatory Pain of greater than 3 months duration and greater than or equal to 5/10 intensity that has not responded to other conservative therapies such as rest, ice, compression or other oral medications.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Severe allergy to any specific food component such as nut, egg or soy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Palmitoylethanolamide 600mg twice a dayAlso: PEA600mg palmitoylethanolamide twice a day | Drug | Palmitoylethanolamide |
| placebovisually identical placebo capsule | Other | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Pain Level
Time frame: 4 and 8 weeks
Pain level will be assessed using the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) Where the minimum value is 0 indicating no pain and the maximum value is 10 indicating worst possible pain
3 secondary outcomes
Pain interference and function
Time frame: 4 and 8 weeks
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Time frame: 4 and 8 weeks
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) (Pain interference, Social satisfaction; Physical function)
Time frame: 4 and 8 Weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Aug 2024.
Related trials for Chronic Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Psilocybin With Psychotherapy for Improving Chronic Pain in Cancer Patients Requiring Opioids
Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System Neoplasm, Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Recruiting
Marine Lipids Ease Painful TMD
Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Master Protocol Study (LY900028) of Multiple Intervention-Specific-Appendices (ISAs) in Participants With Chronic Pain
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Diabetic Neuropathic Pain
Recruiting
Rewiring the Chronic Pain Experience: Single-Session Model of Pain Reprocessing Therapy (PRT) at The Ottawa Hospital
Chronic Pain
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Subtalar Mobilization With and Without Foot Core Strengthening in Chronic Plantar Heel Pain
Chronic Plantar Heel Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Palmitoylethanolamide 600mg twice a day in people with Chronic Pain, run by Navy Medical Center San Diego at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Brian McLean Pain Physician, MD (619-532-8495, brian.c.mclean.mil@health.mil), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain Level (time frame: 4 and 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Aug 2024.