Chronic Kidney DiseasesODYSSEE-KHNCT06274710
ODYSSEE Kidney Health Trial
A study testing ODYSSEE-KH in people with Chronic Kidney Diseases, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
INTRODUCTION Severe CKD is defined as a risk of greater than 10% for progressing to RRT [home hemodialysis (HHD), home peritoneal dialysis (HPD), and transplantation] within 2 years. There is a need to improve access to CKD self-care counselling and RRT education for patients with severe CKD. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Kidney Diseases
- What is being tested?
- ODYSSEE-KH
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 344 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 13 Dec 2023to 13 Apr 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- CKD patients who are at least 18 years old, that have a greater than a 10% risk of requiring dialysis within 2 years, using the 4-variable 2-year Kidney Failure Risk Equation,1,2 and are registered in a nephrology clinic (including an in-center dialysis clinic) at a participating hospital
- Confirmation from a referring nephrologist that the CKD has been stable for at least 1 month at the time of enrollment
- Oral and written comprehension of English or French
- Informed written consent
- At least a basic level of self-reported computer literacy
- Access to the internet and a computer
Who cannot join
- Previous kidney transplant or waitlisted for organ transplant at the time of enrollment
- Severe co-morbidities that prohibit full participation (e.g., dementia, clinically severe depression)
- Diagnosis of a medical condition for which the life expectancy is less than 2 years.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, M2N 7A2
Robert P Nolan, PhD, (416) 340-4800 ext. 6400, rob.nolan@uhnresearch.ca
Karly Gunson, HBA, BHSc, (416) 340-4800 ext. 6400, karly.gunson2@uhn.ca
About this study
Official title: Open Access Digital CommunitY Promoting Self-Care, Peer Support, and HEalth LitEracy (ODYSSEE) for Kidney Health (KH) Trial
INTRODUCTION
Severe CKD is defined as a risk of greater than 10% for progressing to RRT [home hemodialysis (HHD), home peritoneal dialysis (HPD), and transplantation] within 2 years. There is a need to improve access to CKD self-care counselling and RRT education for patients with severe CKD. Trials of CKD self-care education have achieved therapeutic benefits with moderate to high patient-provider contact. There is high potential for a trial of digital counselling for CKD self-care and RRT education to enhance patient health and quality of life.
Read more
HYPOTHESES
The primary hypothesis is that ODYSSEE-KH versus usual care (UC) will significantly increase the incidence of home RRT, measured by a composite index of HHD, HPD, and preemptive kidney transplant at trial completion (median = 19 months; range: 12 to 27 months).
The secondary hypothesis is that ODYSSEE-KH for CKD self-care and RRT education improves Home RRT, RRT preparation, annual hospitalization rate, engagement with CKD self-care resources at months 6 and 12 and trial completion and scores on outcome measures.
RECRUITMENT
Patients diagnosed with CKD who are 18 years of age or older were recruited from University Health Network (UHN), Sunnybrook Hospital, Scarborough Health Network, and The Ottawa Hospital.
DESIGN
ODYSSEE-KH is a double-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial that has assessments at baseline, months 6 and 12, and trial completion (median = 19 months; range: 12 to 27 months). This is a single-blind design with research personnel masked.
ODYSSEE-KH combines automated digital counselling of CKD self-care with renal replacement therapy (RRT) education. UC enhances the standard of usual care by providing patients with conventional digital CKD education. Over 27 months, patients will be emailed on a weekly basis with a digital link to log on to their respective program using a password-protected, personal account.
ANALYSIS
Separate GLMs will evaluate if Digital Counselling versus UC is independently associated with outcomes at months 6 and 12 and trial completion (median = 19; range: 12 to 27 months). Dependent variables include the KDQOL-SF, SF-36, EUROIA, PHQ-9, GAD-7, MIDLS, ESSI, PWB, BMPN, AI, as well as a modified SEMCD-6. Multivariable models will adjust for baseline assessments of each outcome and potential baseline covariates (noted above). In all GLMs, significant interactions will be followed by subgroup analyses with Bonferroni post hoc tests.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND
In Canada, severe CKD prevalence is 14.9 per 1000 persons. The mortality risk is greatest for pre-dialysis patients with stage 4 or 5 CKD (182 deaths per 1000). The annual cost of medical services for Canadians with CKD is $32 billion, with an annual cost per patient of $20 124 and $23 303 at stages 4 and 5, respectively. Persons with stage 4 or 5 CKD also report a lower quality of life and experience the greatest decrement in quality-adjusted life years projected over time.
Kidney transplantation is recognized as the gold standard for RRT due to its benefit for improving clinical outcomes and quality of life. However, the median wait time in Canada for kidney transplantation is 4 years. Approximately 80% of patients with severe CKD are suitable to receive dialysis. Most CKD patients (76%) receive in-center hemodialysis (ICHD), while only 17% receive home hemodialysis (HHD) and 2.5% receive home peritoneal dialysis (HPD). When considering the systemic and patient burden of CKD, it is important to note that ICHD does not offer added survival benefits, and patients who receive home dialysis report greater quality of life. There is also a lower cost for providing HHD and HPD versus ICHD.
Task force statements and reviews advocate for informed patient choice about HHD and HPD, and patients who receive RRT education are more likely to select home dialysis. However, 38% of CKD patients on dialysis report that they were not informed or involved in the decision to select their dialysis modality, and 64% report that education on managing CKD was inadequate or not provided. During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, in-hospital dialysis was associated with a 3- to 4-fold increased risk of virus infection and a high mortality rate of 21-34%, which further supports HHD and HPD.
Task force committees concede that patients with severe CKD require specialized nephrology services that include (i) education to promote informed decision-making about RRT and (ii) counselling to improve quality of life and CKD self-care (i.e., attending medical appointments and adhering to medications, dialysis, fluid and dietary guidelines, monitoring symptoms, engaging in an active lifestyle, and refraining from smoking). A Cochrane review of 40 longitudinal cohort studies (pooled N = 63 887) reported that early access to specialized services predicted shorter hospitalization for initial admission [-9.1 days; 95% confidence interval (CI): -11 to -7], and reduced mortality at 12 months (RR =0.65; 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.69) and 5 years (RR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.60 to 0.71). Corroborating findings from a meta-analysis (pooled N = 648) and a recent randomized trial (N = 130) show that CKD self-care education with telehealth services is associated with reduced hospital admissions and emergency department visits. A further meta-analysis (pooled N = 1647) reported improved quality of life with CKD self-care education or counselling. It is, therefore, vital to commence a CKD self-care and RRT initiative that is evidence-based, scalable, and patient-centred.
RATIONALE
Trials of CKD self-care education have achieved therapeutic benefits with moderate to high patient-provider contact. Direct contact time with individual patients has been estimated in a systematic review of behavioural counselling to range up to 6 hours, which limits the scalability of conventional programs. Moreover, current CKD patient education programs are infrequent and not standardized. CKD patients have reported in several studies that they are not adequately informed or involved in decision-making about their care. In addition, patient barriers that influence informed decision-making about home-based RRT are not adequately addressed. Importantly, patients with severe CKD express marked interest in counselling that extends beyond information about procedures or medical outcomes. Patient interests include ways to improve quality of life and psychosocial well-being, control of care, safety, ability to maintain daily activities, and communication with health care providers. There is high potential for a trial of digital counselling for CKD self-care and RRT education to enhance patient health and quality of life. The risk for mortality decreases in a stepwise manner with incremental adherence to self-care[PR1] . A digital strategy is feasible to promote CKD self-care since 90% of Canadians report internet access, which includes 81 to 93% of persons in the 2 lowest income quartiles, 87% of individuals aged 50 to 64 years, and 66% of those equal to or greater than 65 years.
HYPOTHESES
The primary hypothesis is that ODYSSEE-KH versus UC will significantly increase the incidence of home RRT, measured by a composite index27 of HHD, HPD, and preemptive kidney transplant at trial completion (median = 19 months; range: 12 to 27 months).
The secondary hypothesis is that ODYSSEE-KH versus UC will significantly improve the following:
- Home RRT (composite index of HHD, HPD, and preemptive kidney transplant at trial completion)27
- RRT preparation [incidence of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft (AVG), or PD catheter] at trial completion (median = 19 months; range: 12 to 27 months)
- Annual hospitalization rate, calculated as a rate per patient per year, at trial completion (median = 19 months; range: 12 to 27 months)
- Engagement with CKD self-care resources at months 6 and 12 and trial completion (median = 19 months; range: 12 to 27 months), defined by the sum of logon minutes, the sum of logons, and the number of logon days prior to a lapse of equal to or greater than 2 months (taken from CHF-CePPORT49-52 and the former pilot study).
- The following patient-reported outcome measures of HRQL at baseline, months 6 and 12, and trial completion (median = 19 months; range: 12 to 27 months):
- HRQL (KDQOL-SF and SF-36)
- Engagement in activities for living well (EUROIA)
- Depression (PHQ-9)
- Anxiety (GAD-7)
- Mattering in life domains (MIDLS)
- Social support (ESSI)
- Psychological well-being (PWB)
- Psychological needs (BMPN)
- Extrinsic and intrinsic aspirations (AI)
- Self-efficacy in managing a chronic disease (SEMCD-6)
POTENTIAL RISKS
There is a potential risk that patients in the intervention arm will feel uncomfortable while using ODYSSEE-KH because they are not familiar with the software. Participants may also feel uncomfortable answering certain questions posed in the questionnaire packages, such as those pertaining to mental health, social support, loneliness, and disease burden.
SAFETY PARAMETERS
This is a non-invasive, digital (behavioural) counselling trial. It is complementary in nature and patients will be aware that they can withdraw at any time based on the informed consent procedure. Therefore, there are no significant safety issues associated with this trial.
Personal accounts on the ODYSSEE program will be password-protected. The website itself is hosted on the secure UHN server.
Some of the items presented in the self-report measures of HRQL pertain to mental, physical, social, and occupational functioning. If participants have any concerns about answering one or more questions posed in the questionnaire package, they may contact our office by email or telephone so that their concerns may be addressed. A refusal to respond to any questionnaire item will be accommodated for.
STATISTICAL PLAN
A time-to-event analysis at trial completion (median = 19; range: 12 to 27 months) will be performed using a multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards (PH) model. It will evaluate if Digital Counselling versus UC significantly improves the likelihood for home-based RRT, based on a composite endpoint of first of HPD, HHD, or preemptive kidney transplant. Potential confounders (e.g., age, gender) will be selected using forward (p < 0.05) and backward (p < 0.10) stepwise selection.
A multivariable Cox PH model will assess if Digital Counselling versus UC significantly improves the likelihood for the composite endpoint of incidence of AVF, or AVG, or PD catheter at trial completion (median = 19; range: 12 to 27 months).
At trial completion (median = 19; range: 12 to 27 months), log-linear Poisson models will be conducted for hospitalization rate, per patient, per year. A multivariable Cox PH model will then evaluate if Digital Counselling versus UC significantly increases time to hospitalization.
Separate Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) will evaluate if Digital Counselling versus UC evokes greater CKD self-care program adherence at months 6 and 12- and trial completion (median = 19; range: 12 to 27 months). The dependent variable will be the sum of logon time and the predictors will include age, gender, and trial arm (Digital Counselling or UC), as well as potential baseline confounders (noted above). The GLM for the endpoints will be repeated using the sum of logons as the dependent variable. Finally, for these endpoints, a multivariable Poisson model will evaluate whether Digital Counselling versus UC is associated with greater duration of engagement (defined as the sum of logons, sum of logon hours, and number of logon days prior to a logon lapse of equal to or greater than 1 month), adjusting for sex, age, and potential confounding variables (noted above).
Separate GLMs will evaluate if Digital Counselling versus UC is independently associated with outcomes at months 6 and 12 and trial completion (median = 19; range: 12 to 27 months). Dependent variables include the KDQOL-SF, AI, EUROIA, ESSI, PHQ-9, GAD-7, BMPN, PWB, MIDLS and SF-36, as well as a modified SEMCD-6. Multivariable models will adjust for baseline assessments of each outcome and potential baseline covariates (noted above). In all GLMs, significant interactions will be followed by subgroup analyses with Bonferroni post-hoc tests.
After testing interactions between Digital Counselling versus UC and gender in the primary and secondary outcome analyses, separate exploratory analyses will be performed for gender categories sufficiently represented in the sample. Separate competing risk models will be employed to evaluate time to each of the following outcomes: HPD, HHD, and preemptive kidney transplant.
DEVIATIONS FROM STATISTICAL PLAN
A need to deviate from the original statistical plan is not anticipated because exploratory analyses are included. Nevertheless, the Statistical Analyses and Methodology Committee will be consulted regularly throughout the trial.
SAMPLE SIZE
The sample estimate for the ODYSSEE-KH trial, with monitoring over 19 months, is only 64 patients, type 1 error = 5% and power = 80%.The CKD pilot study achieved moderate program adherence, similar to the CHF-CEPPORT trial whereby the median proportion of sessions access was 61%. The sample estimate to detect this effect with a double-group design, type 1 error of 5%, and power of 80% is N = 114. In sum, the conservative sample estimate used for our primary outcome will ensure appropriate statistical power to evaluate our secondary outcomes of hospitalization and usability. The final sample estimate is N = 344, with a type 1 error of 5% and a power of 80%.
COMPLIANCE
Participation will be supported by senior clinical staff members to ensure that trial activities are presented as complementary to a patient's healthcare. The research team will promote adherence to online assessments via REDCap® with email, telephone, and in-person reminders.
WITHDRAWAL
This trial does not include invasive procedures or changes to medications that could trigger a significant clinical event. Therefore, the need to actively withdraw subjects from this complementary, behavioural (digital) counselling program is not anticipated.
CRITERIA FOR TRIAL TERMINATION
The ODYSSEE-KH trial would have been terminated prematurely in the event of a recurrent adverse event that was related to our trial procedures or content.
QUALITY CONTROL AND ASSURANCE
Daily management and monitoring of recruitment and assessment activities will be completed by the research coordinator.
Responsibility for quality control will remain with the full team. The multidisciplinary research team holds senior administrative, clinical, and research appointments at participating institutions
CONSENT
Initial contact with the patient will be made only by members of the circle of care, who will not attempt to obtain informed consent from the patients. Clinical staff in participating outpatient nephrology clinics will identify patients who meet trial criteria and will obtain verbal consent to be approached by the research team. Informed consent will be obtained either in person or virtually. Regardless of the method, A follow-up email will be sent to the participant by the research team containing the participant's onboarding information (i.e., hyperlink to ODYSSEE platform, username, and temporary password), as well instructions and tutorial videos on how to access the ODYSSEE platform.
In-person, a trained research team member will approach the potential participant during their clinic appointment and will provide them with a hard copy of the Informed Consent Form. The trained research team member will discuss the content of the Informed Consent Form with the patient and will address any questions and/or concerns relating to the trial that the patient may have. Patients will be informed that their participation is voluntary and that it will have no bearing on their healthcare. Moreover, this message is clearly conveyed in the Informed Consent Form. The trained research team member will provide the patient with as much time as they require to make an informed decision about participating in the trial.If the patient decides to consent to participate in the trial, informed consent will be obtained in person via double signatures on hard copies. One copy will be kept on file by the research team and the other copy will be retained by the participant.
Virtually, a trained research team member will contact the patient by telephone to confirm their interest in the trial. The trained research team member will email the patient a hyperlink to the Informed Consent Form, housed on the UHN REDCap server ®. The patient will be asked to refrain from signing the Informed Consent Form until they have had an opportunity to discuss the trial, as well as any questions and/or concerns they may have, with the research team. The trained research team member will discuss the content of the Informed Consent Form with the patient over the telephone and will address any questions and/or concerns relating to the trial that the patient may have. Patients will be informed that their participation is voluntary and that it will have no bearing on their healthcare. Moreover, this message is clearly conveyed in the Informed Consent Form. The trained research team member will provide the patient with as much time as they require to make an informed decision about participating in the trial. If the patient decides to consent to participate in the trial, informed consent will be obtained virtually via electronic signatures on PDF copies. A copy will be kept on file by the research team and the other copy will be sent to the participant by email.
DATA STORAGE
All data will be stored on secure servers within the UHN digital environment, ensuring that security measures are well-developed to protect the data from external intrusion. Data will be stored for 10 years as per UHN Research procedure.
The digital forms and materials will be retained on the secure UHN server for at least 10 years from the completion of the trial.
Data will be available from the corresponding author pending approval of research ethics boards of participating institutions and on a reasonable request received from qualified researchers trained in human subject confidentiality protocols.
PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY
Subjects are issued a tracking number when data involving identifying information is transmitted for analysis. Subject anonymity and confidentiality have been preserved. Only aggregate data will be published.
All research personnel have signed an employee confidentiality agreement ensuring that confidential information is not disclosed to any other person or entity. All source documents containing personal identifiers are stored in filing cabinets under lock and key. The database is stored electronically on the firewall-protected server, making it inaccessible externally. Access to the room containing the research file server is restricted to designated persons who are employed by the Behavioural Cardiology Research Unit at the UHN.
Discussion of the trial with persons outside the research team will never reveal the personal identifiers of participants. All-access to data is denied to persons outside the research team. Data transmission occurs via encrypted storage material over the Internet.
- Conditions
- Chronic Kidney Diseases
- Being tested
- ODYSSEE-KH
- Keywords
- Cognitive behavioural therapy, Motivational interviewing, eHealth, Self-care behaviours, Clinical Trial, Health-related quality of life, Digital health, Digital counselling, Clinical outcomes
- Medical subject headings
- Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ODYSSEE-KHBehavioural
Automated digital counselling program
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ODYSSEE-KH | Experimental | Participants in the intervention arm of the trial will have full access to digital counselling materials for CKD self-care and RRT education. Program engagement is dynamic with videos, digital handouts, animated charts, infographics, interactive digital trackers, and self-assessment forms. Patients will receive weekly email links to digital sessions (Supplements 1 and 2). Initial sessions will build motivation for therapeutic change. Subsequent sessions follow CBT guidelines. Finally, a monthly video posted on ODYSSEE will address common challenges and patient comments or queries. Receives: Behavioral: ODYSSEE-KH |
| Usual care (UC) | No intervention | UC is the standard of usual care which provides patients with conventional digital CKD education |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of home RRT
The primary objective is to determine whether an automated digital counselling program for CKD self-care and RRT education improves RRT or preemptive renal transplant over a median of 19 months. As in our previous research,45-47 assessment of RRT includes documentation of incident home dialysis (HPD or HHD) or preemptive kidney transplant (before dialysis) in a composite index, using data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI).48
Measured: Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Secondary outcomes (18)
Improvement of Home RRT
The secondary objective is to determine whether an automated digital counselling program for CKD self-care and RRT education improves home RRT (measured by a composite index of documented HHD, HPD, or pre-emptive kidney transplantation)
Measured: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Improvement of RRT preparation with planned dialysis access
RRT preparation with planned dialysis access, based on the incidence of arteriovenous fistula (AVF), arteriovenous graft (AVG), or peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter
Measured: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Incidence of annual hospitalization rate
Obtained using CIHI databases,48 assessed as the rate, per patient, per year, and defined from date of randomization to the earliest of death, start of dialysis
Measured: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Engagement with RRT education and CKD self-care counselling resources
Measured by the sum of logons, sum of logon hours, and number of logon days prior to a logon lapse of equal to or greater than 1 month (data is obtained using backend analytic tools of ODYSSEE, as in CHF-CePPORT49-52 and the previous pilot study)53-55
Measured: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported engagement in activities for living well
Evaluation of Goal-Directed Activities to Promote Well-Being and Health (EUROIA), developed by the principal investigator
Measured: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported assessment for health-related quality of life due to kidney disease
36-Item Kidney Disease Quality of Life - Short Form (KDQOL-SF)
Measured: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported assessment of people's aspirations and goals
Aspirations Index (AI)
Measured: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported measure of overall health (e.g. pain, mental health, physical, role and social functioning)
36-Item Short Form (SF-36)
Measured: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported depression
9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Measured: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported perceived social support
ENRICHD Social Support Instrument (ESSI)
Measured: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported psychological wellbeing
Flourishing Scale (FS)
Measured: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported anxiety
7-Item Generalized Anxiety Disorder instrument (GAD-7)
Measured: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported feeling of value to self and others
9-Item Mattering in Domains of Life Scale (MIDLS)
Measured: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported measure of psychological wellbeing and happiness
18-Item Psychological Wellbeing Scale (PWB)
Measured: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported measure of overall life experience
18-Item Balanced Measure of Psychological Needs (BMPN)
Measured: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported measure of well-being
WHO-5 Item Well-Being Index
Measured: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported readiness for change (motivation)
Patient-reported readiness to initiate renal replacement therapy
Measured: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported confidence in doing life activities
Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Diseases 6-item Scale (SEMCD-6)
Measured: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Feb 2024
- Study start13 Dec 2023
- Primary completion13 Apr 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion13 Apr 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (75)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Kidney DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Health Network, TorontoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 344 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Health Network, Toronto
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Scarborough General Hospital, The Ottawa Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Robert Nolan, PhD, Principal investigator, University Health Network, Toronto
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06274710
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 23-5554
- Acronym
- ODYSSEE-KH
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 19 Oct 2023
- Last updated
- 12 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Tangri N, Stevens LA, Griffith J, Tighiouart H, Djurdjev O, Naimark D, Levin A, Levey AS. A predictive model for progression of chronic kidney disease to kidney failure. JAMA. 2011 Apr 20;305(15):1553-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.451. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
PubMed 21482743Tangri N, Grams ME, Levey AS, Coresh J, Appel LJ, Astor BC, Chodick G, Collins AJ, Djurdjev O, Elley CR, Evans M, Garg AX, Hallan SI, Inker LA, Ito S, Jee SH, Kovesdy CP, Kronenberg F, Heerspink HJ, Marks A, Nadkarni GN, Navaneethan SD, Nelson RG, Titze S, Sarnak MJ, Stengel B, Woodward M, Iseki K; CKD Prognosis Consortium. Multinational Assessment of Accuracy of Equations for Predicting Risk of Kidney Failure: A Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016 Jan 12;315(2):164-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.18202.
PubMed 26757465Bello AK, Ronksley PE, Tangri N, Kurzawa J, Osman MA, Singer A, Grill A, Nitsch D, Queenan JA, Wick J, Lindeman C, Soos B, Tuot DS, Shojai S, Brimble S, Mangin D, Drummond N. Prevalence and Demographics of CKD in Canadian Primary Care Practices: A Cross-sectional Study. Kidney Int Rep. 2019 Jan 21;4(4):561-570. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2019.01.005. eCollection 2019 Apr.
PubMed 30993231Manns B, Hemmelgarn B, Tonelli M, Au F, So H, Weaver R, Quinn AE, Klarenbach S; for Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease. The Cost of Care for People With Chronic Kidney Disease. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2019 Apr 4;6:2054358119835521. doi: 10.1177/2054358119835521. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31057803Inker LA, Astor BC, Fox CH, Isakova T, Lash JP, Peralta CA, Kurella Tamura M, Feldman HI. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 May;63(5):713-35. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.01.416. Epub 2014 Mar 16.
PubMed 24647050Gorodetskaya I, Zenios S, McCulloch CE, Bostrom A, Hsu CY, Bindman AB, Go AS, Chertow GM. Health-related quality of life and estimates of utility in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2005 Dec;68(6):2801-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00752.x.
PubMed 16316356Landreneau K, Lee K, Landreneau MD. Quality of life in patients undergoing hemodialysis and renal transplantation--a meta-analytic review. Nephrol Nurs J. 2010 Jan-Feb;37(1):37-44.
PubMed 20333902Vinson AJ, Perl J, Tennankore KK. Survival Comparisons of Home Dialysis Versus In-Center Hemodialysis: A Narrative Review. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2019 Jul 13;6:2054358119861941. doi: 10.1177/2054358119861941. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31321065Eneanya ND, Maddux DW, Reviriego-Mendoza MM, Larkin JW, Usvyat LA, van der Sande FM, Kooman JP, Maddux FW. Longitudinal patterns of health-related quality of life and dialysis modality: a national cohort study. BMC Nephrol. 2019 Jan 8;20(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-1198-5.
PubMed 30621634Klarenbach S, Tonelli M, Pauly R, Walsh M, Culleton B, So H, Hemmelgarn B, Manns B. Economic evaluation of frequent home nocturnal hemodialysis based on a randomized controlled trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Mar;25(3):587-94. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013040360. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
PubMed 24231665Chan CT, Wallace E, Golper TA, Rosner MH, Seshasai RK, Glickman JD, Schreiber M, Gee P, Rocco MV. Exploring Barriers and Potential Solutions in Home Dialysis: An NKF-KDOQI Conference Outcomes Report. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Mar;73(3):363-371. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.09.015. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
PubMed 30545707Dahlerus C, Quinn M, Messersmith E, Lachance L, Subramanian L, Perry E, Cole J, Zhao J, Lee C, McCall M, Paulson L, Tentori F. Patient Perspectives on the Choice of Dialysis Modality: Results From the Empowering Patients on Choices for Renal Replacement Therapy (EPOCH-RRT) Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Dec;68(6):901-910. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
PubMed 27337991Akbari A, Clase CM, Acott P, Battistella M, Bello A, Feltmate P, Grill A, Karsanji M, Komenda P, Madore F, Manns BJ, Mahdavi S, Mustafa RA, Smyth A, Welcher ES. Canadian Society of Nephrology commentary on the KDIGO clinical practice guideline for CKD evaluation and management. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Feb;65(2):177-205. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.10.013. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
PubMed 25511161Smart NA, Dieberg G, Ladhani M, Titus T. Early referral to specialist nephrology services for preventing the progression to end-stage kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 18;(6):CD007333. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007333.pub2.
PubMed 24938824He T, Liu X, Li Y, Wu Q, Liu M, Yuan H. Remote home management for chronic kidney disease: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2017 Jan;23(1):3-13. doi: 10.1177/1357633X15626855. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
PubMed 27269795
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Open Access Digital CommunitY Promoting Self-Care, Peer Support, and HEalth LitEracy (ODYSSEE) for Kidney Health (KH) Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06274710
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ODYSSEE-KH / 23-5554
- Conditions
- Chronic Kidney Diseases
- Keywords
- Cognitive behavioural therapy, Motivational interviewing, eHealth, Self-care behaviours, Clinical Trial, Health-related quality of life, Digital health, Digital counselling
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 344 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Health Network, TorontoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Scarborough General Hospital, The Ottawa Hospital
- Study start
- 13 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 Apr 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 13 Apr 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
INTRODUCTION
Severe CKD is defined as a risk of greater than 10% for progressing to RRT [home hemodialysis (HHD), home peritoneal dialysis (HPD), and transplantation] within 2 years. There is a need to improve access to CKD self-care counselling and RRT education for patients with severe CKD. Trials of CKD self-care education have achieved therapeutic benefits with moderate to high patient-provider contact. There is high potential for a trial of digital counselling for CKD self-care and RRT education to enhance patient health and quality of life.
HYPOTHESES
The primary hypothesis is that ODYSSEE-KH versus usual care (UC) will significantly increase the incidence of home RRT, measured by a composite index of HHD, HPD, and preemptive kidney transplant at trial completion (median = 19 months; range: 12 to 27 months).
The secondary hypothesis is that ODYSSEE-KH for CKD self-care and RRT education improves Home RRT, RRT preparation, annual hospitalization rate, engagement with CKD self-care resources at months 6 and 12 and trial completion and scores on outcome measures.
RECRUITMENT
Patients diagnosed with CKD who are 18 years of age or older were recruited from University Health Network (UHN), Sunnybrook Hospital, Scarborough Health Network, and The Ottawa Hospital.
DESIGN
ODYSSEE-KH is a double-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial that has assessments at baseline, months 6 and 12, and trial completion (median = 19 months; range: 12 to 27 months). This is a single-blind design with research personnel masked.
ODYSSEE-KH combines automated digital counselling of CKD self-care with renal replacement therapy (RRT) education. UC enhances the standard of usual care by providing patients with conventional digital CKD education. Over 27 months, patients will be emailed on a weekly basis with a digital link to log on to their respective program using a password-protected, personal account.
ANALYSIS
Separate GLMs will evaluate if Digital Counselling versus UC is independently associated with outcomes at months 6 and 12 and trial completion (median = 19; range: 12 to 27 months). Dependent variables include the KDQOL-SF, SF-36, EUROIA, PHQ-9, GAD-7, MIDLS, ESSI, PWB, BMPN, AI, as well as a modified SEMCD-6. Multivariable models will adjust for baseline assessments of each outcome and potential baseline covariates (noted above). In all GLMs, significant interactions will be followed by subgroup analyses with Bonferroni post hoc tests.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND
In Canada, severe CKD prevalence is 14.9 per 1000 persons. The mortality risk is greatest for pre-dialysis patients with stage 4 or 5 CKD (182 deaths per 1000). The annual cost of medical services for Canadians with CKD is $32 billion, with an annual cost per patient of $20 124 and $23 303 at stages 4 and 5, respectively. Persons with stage 4 or 5 CKD also report a lower quality of life and experience the greatest decrement in quality-adjusted life years projected over time.
Kidney transplantation is recognized as the gold standard for RRT due to its benefit for improving clinical outcomes and quality of life. However, the median wait time in Canada for kidney transplantation is 4 years. Approximately 80% of patients with severe CKD are suitable to receive dialysis. Most CKD patients (76%) receive in-center hemodialysis (ICHD), while only 17% receive home hemodialysis (HHD) and 2.5% receive home peritoneal dialysis (HPD). When considering the systemic and patient burden of CKD, it is important to note that ICHD does not offer added survival benefits, and patients who receive home dialysis report greater quality of life. There is also a lower cost for providing HHD and HPD versus ICHD.
Task force statements and reviews advocate for informed patient choice about HHD and HPD, and patients who receive RRT education are more likely to select home dialysis. However, 38% of CKD patients on dialysis report that they were not informed or involved in the decision to select their dialysis modality, and 64% report that education on managing CKD was inadequate or not provided. During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, in-hospital dialysis was associated with a 3- to 4-fold increased risk of virus infection and a high mortality rate of 21-34%, which further supports HHD and HPD.
Task force committees concede that patients with severe CKD require specialized nephrology services that include (i) education to promote informed decision-making about RRT and (ii) counselling to improve quality of life and CKD self-care (i.e., attending medical appointments and adhering to medications, dialysis, fluid and dietary guidelines, monitoring symptoms, engaging in an active lifestyle, and refraining from smoking). A Cochrane review of 40 longitudinal cohort studies (pooled N = 63 887) reported that early access to specialized services predicted shorter hospitalization for initial admission [-9.1 days; 95% confidence interval (CI): -11 to -7], and reduced mortality at 12 months (RR =0.65; 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.69) and 5 years (RR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.60 to 0.71). Corroborating findings from a meta-analysis (pooled N = 648) and a recent randomized trial (N = 130) show that CKD self-care education with telehealth services is associated with reduced hospital admissions and emergency department visits. A further meta-analysis (pooled N = 1647) reported improved quality of life with CKD self-care education or counselling. It is, therefore, vital to commence a CKD self-care and RRT initiative that is evidence-based, scalable, and patient-centred.
RATIONALE
Trials of CKD self-care education have achieved therapeutic benefits with moderate to high patient-provider contact. Direct contact time with individual patients has been estimated in a systematic review of behavioural counselling to range up to 6 hours, which limits the scalability of conventional programs. Moreover, current CKD patient education programs are infrequent and not standardized. CKD patients have reported in several studies that they are not adequately informed or involved in decision-making about their care. In addition, patient barriers that influence informed decision-making about home-based RRT are not adequately addressed. Importantly, patients with severe CKD express marked interest in counselling that extends beyond information about procedures or medical outcomes. Patient interests include ways to improve quality of life and psychosocial well-being, control of care, safety, ability to maintain daily activities, and communication with health care providers. There is high potential for a trial of digital counselling for CKD self-care and RRT education to enhance patient health and quality of life. The risk for mortality decreases in a stepwise manner with incremental adherence to self-care[PR1] . A digital strategy is feasible to promote CKD self-care since 90% of Canadians report internet access, which includes 81 to 93% of persons in the 2 lowest income quartiles, 87% of individuals aged 50 to 64 years, and 66% of those equal to or greater than 65 years.
HYPOTHESES
The primary hypothesis is that ODYSSEE-KH versus UC will significantly increase the incidence of home RRT, measured by a composite index27 of HHD, HPD, and preemptive kidney transplant at trial completion (median = 19 months; range: 12 to 27 months).
The secondary hypothesis is that ODYSSEE-KH versus UC will significantly improve the following:
- Home RRT (composite index of HHD, HPD, and preemptive kidney transplant at trial completion)27
- RRT preparation [incidence of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft (AVG), or PD catheter] at trial completion (median = 19 months; range: 12 to 27 months)
- Annual hospitalization rate, calculated as a rate per patient per year, at trial completion (median = 19 months; range: 12 to 27 months)
- Engagement with CKD self-care resources at months 6 and 12 and trial completion (median = 19 months; range: 12 to 27 months), defined by the sum of logon minutes, the sum of logons, and the number of logon days prior to a lapse of equal to or greater than 2 months (taken from CHF-CePPORT49-52 and the former pilot study).
- The following patient-reported outcome measures of HRQL at baseline, months 6 and 12, and trial completion (median = 19 months; range: 12 to 27 months):
- HRQL (KDQOL-SF and SF-36)
- Engagement in activities for living well (EUROIA)
- Depression (PHQ-9)
- Anxiety (GAD-7)
- Mattering in life domains (MIDLS)
- Social support (ESSI)
- Psychological well-being (PWB)
- Psychological needs (BMPN)
- Extrinsic and intrinsic aspirations (AI)
- Self-efficacy in managing a chronic disease (SEMCD-6)
POTENTIAL RISKS
There is a potential risk that patients in the intervention arm will feel uncomfortable while using ODYSSEE-KH because they are not familiar with the software. Participants may also feel uncomfortable answering certain questions posed in the questionnaire packages, such as those pertaining to mental health, social support, loneliness, and disease burden.
SAFETY PARAMETERS
This is a non-invasive, digital (behavioural) counselling trial. It is complementary in nature and patients will be aware that they can withdraw at any time based on the informed consent procedure. Therefore, there are no significant safety issues associated with this trial.
Personal accounts on the ODYSSEE program will be password-protected. The website itself is hosted on the secure UHN server.
Some of the items presented in the self-report measures of HRQL pertain to mental, physical, social, and occupational functioning. If participants have any concerns about answering one or more questions posed in the questionnaire package, they may contact our office by email or telephone so that their concerns may be addressed. A refusal to respond to any questionnaire item will be accommodated for.
STATISTICAL PLAN
A time-to-event analysis at trial completion (median = 19; range: 12 to 27 months) will be performed using a multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards (PH) model. It will evaluate if Digital Counselling versus UC significantly improves the likelihood for home-based RRT, based on a composite endpoint of first of HPD, HHD, or preemptive kidney transplant. Potential confounders (e.g., age, gender) will be selected using forward (p < 0.05) and backward (p < 0.10) stepwise selection.
A multivariable Cox PH model will assess if Digital Counselling versus UC significantly improves the likelihood for the composite endpoint of incidence of AVF, or AVG, or PD catheter at trial completion (median = 19; range: 12 to 27 months).
At trial completion (median = 19; range: 12 to 27 months), log-linear Poisson models will be conducted for hospitalization rate, per patient, per year. A multivariable Cox PH model will then evaluate if Digital Counselling versus UC significantly increases time to hospitalization.
Separate Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) will evaluate if Digital Counselling versus UC evokes greater CKD self-care program adherence at months 6 and 12- and trial completion (median = 19; range: 12 to 27 months). The dependent variable will be the sum of logon time and the predictors will include age, gender, and trial arm (Digital Counselling or UC), as well as potential baseline confounders (noted above). The GLM for the endpoints will be repeated using the sum of logons as the dependent variable. Finally, for these endpoints, a multivariable Poisson model will evaluate whether Digital Counselling versus UC is associated with greater duration of engagement (defined as the sum of logons, sum of logon hours, and number of logon days prior to a logon lapse of equal to or greater than 1 month), adjusting for sex, age, and potential confounding variables (noted above).
Separate GLMs will evaluate if Digital Counselling versus UC is independently associated with outcomes at months 6 and 12 and trial completion (median = 19; range: 12 to 27 months). Dependent variables include the KDQOL-SF, AI, EUROIA, ESSI, PHQ-9, GAD-7, BMPN, PWB, MIDLS and SF-36, as well as a modified SEMCD-6. Multivariable models will adjust for baseline assessments of each outcome and potential baseline covariates (noted above). In all GLMs, significant interactions will be followed by subgroup analyses with Bonferroni post-hoc tests.
After testing interactions between Digital Counselling versus UC and gender in the primary and secondary outcome analyses, separate exploratory analyses will be performed for gender categories sufficiently represented in the sample. Separate competing risk models will be employed to evaluate time to each of the following outcomes: HPD, HHD, and preemptive kidney transplant.
DEVIATIONS FROM STATISTICAL PLAN
A need to deviate from the original statistical plan is not anticipated because exploratory analyses are included. Nevertheless, the Statistical Analyses and Methodology Committee will be consulted regularly throughout the trial.
SAMPLE SIZE
The sample estimate for the ODYSSEE-KH trial, with monitoring over 19 months, is only 64 patients, type 1 error = 5% and power = 80%.The CKD pilot study achieved moderate program adherence, similar to the CHF-CEPPORT trial whereby the median proportion of sessions access was 61%. The sample estimate to detect this effect with a double-group design, type 1 error of 5%, and power of 80% is N = 114. In sum, the conservative sample estimate used for our primary outcome will ensure appropriate statistical power to evaluate our secondary outcomes of hospitalization and usability. The final sample estimate is N = 344, with a type 1 error of 5% and a power of 80%.
COMPLIANCE
Participation will be supported by senior clinical staff members to ensure that trial activities are presented as complementary to a patient's healthcare. The research team will promote adherence to online assessments via REDCap® with email, telephone, and in-person reminders.
WITHDRAWAL
This trial does not include invasive procedures or changes to medications that could trigger a significant clinical event. Therefore, the need to actively withdraw subjects from this complementary, behavioural (digital) counselling program is not anticipated.
CRITERIA FOR TRIAL TERMINATION
The ODYSSEE-KH trial would have been terminated prematurely in the event of a recurrent adverse event that was related to our trial procedures or content.
QUALITY CONTROL AND ASSURANCE
Daily management and monitoring of recruitment and assessment activities will be completed by the research coordinator.
Responsibility for quality control will remain with the full team. The multidisciplinary research team holds senior administrative, clinical, and research appointments at participating institutions
CONSENT
Initial contact with the patient will be made only by members of the circle of care, who will not attempt to obtain informed consent from the patients. Clinical staff in participating outpatient nephrology clinics will identify patients who meet trial criteria and will obtain verbal consent to be approached by the research team. Informed consent will be obtained either in person or virtually. Regardless of the method, A follow-up email will be sent to the participant by the research team containing the participant's onboarding information (i.e., hyperlink to ODYSSEE platform, username, and temporary password), as well instructions and tutorial videos on how to access the ODYSSEE platform.
In-person, a trained research team member will approach the potential participant during their clinic appointment and will provide them with a hard copy of the Informed Consent Form. The trained research team member will discuss the content of the Informed Consent Form with the patient and will address any questions and/or concerns relating to the trial that the patient may have. Patients will be informed that their participation is voluntary and that it will have no bearing on their healthcare. Moreover, this message is clearly conveyed in the Informed Consent Form. The trained research team member will provide the patient with as much time as they require to make an informed decision about participating in the trial.If the patient decides to consent to participate in the trial, informed consent will be obtained in person via double signatures on hard copies. One copy will be kept on file by the research team and the other copy will be retained by the participant.
Virtually, a trained research team member will contact the patient by telephone to confirm their interest in the trial. The trained research team member will email the patient a hyperlink to the Informed Consent Form, housed on the UHN REDCap server ®. The patient will be asked to refrain from signing the Informed Consent Form until they have had an opportunity to discuss the trial, as well as any questions and/or concerns they may have, with the research team. The trained research team member will discuss the content of the Informed Consent Form with the patient over the telephone and will address any questions and/or concerns relating to the trial that the patient may have. Patients will be informed that their participation is voluntary and that it will have no bearing on their healthcare. Moreover, this message is clearly conveyed in the Informed Consent Form. The trained research team member will provide the patient with as much time as they require to make an informed decision about participating in the trial. If the patient decides to consent to participate in the trial, informed consent will be obtained virtually via electronic signatures on PDF copies. A copy will be kept on file by the research team and the other copy will be sent to the participant by email.
DATA STORAGE
All data will be stored on secure servers within the UHN digital environment, ensuring that security measures are well-developed to protect the data from external intrusion. Data will be stored for 10 years as per UHN Research procedure.
The digital forms and materials will be retained on the secure UHN server for at least 10 years from the completion of the trial.
Data will be available from the corresponding author pending approval of research ethics boards of participating institutions and on a reasonable request received from qualified researchers trained in human subject confidentiality protocols.
PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY
Subjects are issued a tracking number when data involving identifying information is transmitted for analysis. Subject anonymity and confidentiality have been preserved. Only aggregate data will be published.
All research personnel have signed an employee confidentiality agreement ensuring that confidential information is not disclosed to any other person or entity. All source documents containing personal identifiers are stored in filing cabinets under lock and key. The database is stored electronically on the firewall-protected server, making it inaccessible externally. Access to the room containing the research file server is restricted to designated persons who are employed by the Behavioural Cardiology Research Unit at the UHN.
Discussion of the trial with persons outside the research team will never reveal the personal identifiers of participants. All-access to data is denied to persons outside the research team. Data transmission occurs via encrypted storage material over the Internet.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ODYSSEE-KH | Experimental | Behavioral: ODYSSEE-KHParticipants in the intervention arm of the trial will have full access to digital counselling materials for CKD self-care and RRT education. Program engagement is dynamic with videos, digital handouts, animated charts, infographics, interactive digital trackers, and self-assessment forms. Patients will receive weekly email links to digital sessions (Supplements 1 and 2). Initial sessions will build motivation for therapeutic change. Subsequent sessions follow CBT guidelines. Finally, a monthly video posted on ODYSSEE will address common challenges and patient comments or queries. |
| Usual care (UC) | No intervention | –UC is the standard of usual care which provides patients with conventional digital CKD education |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- CKD patients who are at least 18 years old, that have a greater than a 10% risk of requiring dialysis within 2 years, using the 4-variable 2-year Kidney Failure Risk Equation,1,2 and are registered in a nephrology clinic (including an in-center dialysis clinic) at a participating hospital
- Confirmation from a referring nephrologist that the CKD has been stable for at least 1 month at the time of enrollment
- Oral and written comprehension of English or French
- Informed written consent
- At least a basic level of self-reported computer literacy
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Previous kidney transplant or waitlisted for organ transplant at the time of enrollment
- Severe co-morbidities that prohibit full participation (e.g., dementia, clinically severe depression)
- Diagnosis of a medical condition for which the life expectancy is less than 2 years.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ODYSSEE-KHAutomated digital counselling program | Behavioural | ODYSSEE-KH |
Primary outcome
Incidence of home RRT
Time frame: Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
The primary objective is to determine whether an automated digital counselling program for CKD self-care and RRT education improves RRT or preemptive renal transplant over a median of 19 months. As in our previous research,45-47 assessment of RRT includes documentation of incident home dialysis (HPD or HHD) or preemptive kidney transplant (before dialysis) in a composite index, using data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI).48
18 secondary outcomes
Improvement of Home RRT
Time frame: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Improvement of RRT preparation with planned dialysis access
Time frame: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Incidence of annual hospitalization rate
Time frame: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Engagement with RRT education and CKD self-care counselling resources
Time frame: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported engagement in activities for living well
Time frame: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported assessment for health-related quality of life due to kidney disease
Time frame: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported assessment of people's aspirations and goals
Time frame: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported measure of overall health (e.g. pain, mental health, physical, role and social functioning)
Time frame: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported depression
Time frame: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported perceived social support
Time frame: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported psychological wellbeing
Time frame: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported anxiety
Time frame: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported feeling of value to self and others
Time frame: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported measure of psychological wellbeing and happiness
Time frame: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported measure of overall life experience
Time frame: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported measure of well-being
Time frame: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported readiness for change (motivation)
Time frame: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Self-reported confidence in doing life activities
Time frame: Month 6, month 12, Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Dec 2024.
- Background: PubMed 21482743Tangri N, Stevens LA, Griffith J, Tighiouart H, Djurdjev O, Naimark D, Levin A, Levey AS. A predictive model for progression of chronic kidney disease to kidney failure. JAMA. 2011 Apr 20;305(15):1553-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.451. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
- Background: PubMed 26757465Tangri N, Grams ME, Levey AS, Coresh J, Appel LJ, Astor BC, Chodick G, Collins AJ, Djurdjev O, Elley CR, Evans M, Garg AX, Hallan SI, Inker LA, Ito S, Jee SH, Kovesdy CP, Kronenberg F, Heerspink HJ, Marks A, Nadkarni GN, Navaneethan SD, Nelson RG, Titze S, Sarnak MJ, Stengel B, Woodward M, Iseki K; CKD Prognosis Consortium. Multinational Assessment of Accuracy of Equations for Predicting Risk of Kidney Failure: A Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016 Jan 12;315(2):164-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.18202.
- Background: PubMed 30993231Bello AK, Ronksley PE, Tangri N, Kurzawa J, Osman MA, Singer A, Grill A, Nitsch D, Queenan JA, Wick J, Lindeman C, Soos B, Tuot DS, Shojai S, Brimble S, Mangin D, Drummond N. Prevalence and Demographics of CKD in Canadian Primary Care Practices: A Cross-sectional Study. Kidney Int Rep. 2019 Jan 21;4(4):561-570. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2019.01.005. eCollection 2019 Apr.
- Background: PubMed 31057803Manns B, Hemmelgarn B, Tonelli M, Au F, So H, Weaver R, Quinn AE, Klarenbach S; for Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease. The Cost of Care for People With Chronic Kidney Disease. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2019 Apr 4;6:2054358119835521. doi: 10.1177/2054358119835521. eCollection 2019.
- Background: PubMed 24647050Inker LA, Astor BC, Fox CH, Isakova T, Lash JP, Peralta CA, Kurella Tamura M, Feldman HI. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 May;63(5):713-35. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.01.416. Epub 2014 Mar 16.
- Background: PubMed 16316356Gorodetskaya I, Zenios S, McCulloch CE, Bostrom A, Hsu CY, Bindman AB, Go AS, Chertow GM. Health-related quality of life and estimates of utility in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2005 Dec;68(6):2801-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00752.x.
- Background: PubMed 20333902Landreneau K, Lee K, Landreneau MD. Quality of life in patients undergoing hemodialysis and renal transplantation--a meta-analytic review. Nephrol Nurs J. 2010 Jan-Feb;37(1):37-44.
- Background: PubMed 31321065Vinson AJ, Perl J, Tennankore KK. Survival Comparisons of Home Dialysis Versus In-Center Hemodialysis: A Narrative Review. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2019 Jul 13;6:2054358119861941. doi: 10.1177/2054358119861941. eCollection 2019.
- Background: PubMed 30621634Eneanya ND, Maddux DW, Reviriego-Mendoza MM, Larkin JW, Usvyat LA, van der Sande FM, Kooman JP, Maddux FW. Longitudinal patterns of health-related quality of life and dialysis modality: a national cohort study. BMC Nephrol. 2019 Jan 8;20(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-1198-5.
- Background: PubMed 24231665Klarenbach S, Tonelli M, Pauly R, Walsh M, Culleton B, So H, Hemmelgarn B, Manns B. Economic evaluation of frequent home nocturnal hemodialysis based on a randomized controlled trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Mar;25(3):587-94. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013040360. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
- Background: PubMed 30545707Chan CT, Wallace E, Golper TA, Rosner MH, Seshasai RK, Glickman JD, Schreiber M, Gee P, Rocco MV. Exploring Barriers and Potential Solutions in Home Dialysis: An NKF-KDOQI Conference Outcomes Report. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Mar;73(3):363-371. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.09.015. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
- Background: PubMed 27337991Dahlerus C, Quinn M, Messersmith E, Lachance L, Subramanian L, Perry E, Cole J, Zhao J, Lee C, McCall M, Paulson L, Tentori F. Patient Perspectives on the Choice of Dialysis Modality: Results From the Empowering Patients on Choices for Renal Replacement Therapy (EPOCH-RRT) Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Dec;68(6):901-910. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Kidney Diseases
RecruitingPhase 2
Neurovascular Regulation During Exercise in Humans With Chronic Kidney Disease: Sympatholysis in CKD
Chronic Kidney Disease
Not yet recruiting
Combined Versus Multicomponent Training in People With Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 3a and 3b
Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3A, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3B
Recruiting
Dry Weight Reduction Intervention Via Extra Ultrafiltration
Fluid Accumulation, Blood Pressure Management
Not yet recruiting
Cycling During Dialysis: A Feasibility and Safety Study
Hemodialysis, Kidney Disease, End-Stage
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
A Study of Dapagliflozin in Chinese Adult Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Robert Nolan, PhD principal investigator
University Health Network, Toronto
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ODYSSEE-KH in people with Chronic Kidney Diseases, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Robert Nolan, PhD ((416) 340-4800 ext. 6400, rob.nolan@uhn.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of home RRT (time frame: Trial completion (median = 19 months, range = 12-27 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06274710, which also lists 75 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Dec 2024.