AzTrials
AzTrials

VapingNCT06274723

Responses to E-cigarette Message Source and Presentation

A study testing Expert, one-sided, Expert, two-sided and Peer, one-sided in people with Vaping, run by University of Massachusetts, Worcester at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to use crowdsourcing to test the effects of a message source (expert and peer) and message presentation types (one-sided and two-sided) to identify the optimal message type for young adults who vape and do not vape. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 24 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Vaping
What is being tested?
Expert, one-sided, Expert, two-sided and Peer, one-sided
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
848 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
5 Nov 2024to 17 Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 24 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • US residents ages 18-24
  • Fluent in English
  • Reporting either vaping in the past 30 days or not having vaped in the past 30 days but susceptible to vaping

Who cannot join

  • Age less than 18 or above 24
  • Not fluent in English
  • Not a member of partnering crowdsourcing behavioral research platform conducting the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • UMass Chan Medical School

    Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Identifying and Examining the Effects of Source and Presentation on Responses to Electronic Cigarette Public Education Messages in Young Adult Vapers and Non-vapers - Part 1

The goal of this clinical trial is to use crowdsourcing to test the effects of a message source (expert and peer) and message presentation types (one-sided and two-sided) to identify the optimal message type for young adults who vape and do not vape.

Conditions
Vaping
Being tested
Expert, one-sided, Expert, two-sided, Peer, one-sided, Peer, two-sided
Medical subject headings
Vaping

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Expert, one-sidedOther

    Participants will view a brief description of an expert source and see one-sided e-cigarette education messages.

  • Expert, two-sidedOther

    Participants will view a brief description of an expert source and see two-sided e-cigarette education messages.

  • Peer, one-sidedOther

    Participants will view a brief description of a peer source and see one-sided e-cigarette education messages.

  • Peer, two-sidedOther

    Participants will view a brief description of a peer source and see two-sided e-cigarette education messages.

Study groups in NCT06274723
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Expert, one-sidedExperimentalParticipants assigned to the expert, one-sidedness condition will receive one-sided e-cigarette messages from an expert source.
Receives: Other: Expert, one-sided
Expert, two-sidedExperimentalParticipants assigned to the expert, two-sidedness condition will receive two-sided e-cigarette messages from an expert source.
Receives: Other: Expert, two-sided
Peer, one-sidedExperimentalParticipants assigned to the peer, one-sidedness condition will receive one-sided e-cigarette messages from a peer source.
Receives: Other: Peer, one-sided
Peer, two-sidedExperimentalParticipants assigned to the peer, two-sidedness condition will receive two-sided e-cigarette messages from a peer source.
Receives: Other: Peer, two-sided

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Message Acceptance

    Participants' self-reported message acceptance were measured by using a five-point Likert scale using five items assessing whether participants thought the message was worth remembering, grabbed their attention, powerful, convincing, and meaningful on a scale from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree). Items were summed and averaged to create a single composite score, and this was done for each arm for each vaping status. Higher scores indicate more more message acceptance, therefore better outcomes.

    Measured: After exposure to each messages (approximately up to 20 minutes total), measured during a single study visit on Day 1.

  2. Harm Perceptions

    Harm perceptions was measured by a single item e-cigarette harm perceptions question assessing participants' perceived absolute harm of e-cigarette use on a scale from 1 (Not at all harmful) to 10 (Very harmful). Items were summed and averaged to create a single composite score. This was done for each vaping status (current vapers and susceptible non-vapers). Higher scores indicate greater vaping harm perceptions, therefore indicating better outcome.

    Measured: After exposure to each messages (approximately up to 20 minutes total), measured during a single study visit on Day 1.

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Negative Cognition

    Negative cognition was measured by six-item reactance questionnaire, such as perceptions of messages being manipulative, misleading, distorted, overblown, exaggerated, and overstated on a scale from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree). Higher scores indicate greater negative cognition, indicating worse outcome.

    Measured: After exposure to each messages (approximately up to 20 minutes total), measured during a single study visit on Day 1.

  2. Message Anger

    Message anger was measured by four item message anger question assessing the extent to which the messages made participants feel irritated, angry, annoyed, and aggravated on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much). Items were summed and averaged. This was done for each vaping status (current vapers and susceptible non-vapers). Higher scores indicate greater anger toward messages, indicating worse outcomes.

    Measured: After exposure to each messages (approximately up to 20 minutes total), measured during a single study visit on Day 1.

  3. Message Liking

    Message liking will be measured by a single-item liking of the message on scale from 1 (Dislike very much) to 5 (Like very much). Items were summed and averaged to create a single composite score. This was done for each vaping status (current vapers and susceptible non-vapers). Higher scores indicate greater message liking, therefore indicating better outcome.

    Measured: After exposure to each messages (approximately up to 20 minutes total), measured during a single study visit on Day 1.

  4. Source Trust

    Source trust was measured by a single-item trust in health information source questionnaire, such as trust in source about vaping information on a scale from 1(Not at all) to 5 (Very much so). Items were summed and averaged to create a single composite score. This was done for each vaping status (current vapers and susceptible non-vapers). Higher scores indicate greater source trust, therefore indicating better outcome

    Measured: After exposure to each messages (approximately up to 20 minutes total), measured during a single study visit on Day 1.

  5. Attitudes

    Participants' self-reported vaping attitudes were measured by using a five-point bipolar scale using 7 subscale items assessing whether participants thought vaping was enjoyable, healthy, safe, fun, smart, cool, and attractive on a scale from 1 (negative attitudes) to 5 (positive attitudes). Items were summed and averaged to create a single composite score, and this was done for each arm for each vaping status. Higher scores indicate more positive e-cigarette attitudes, therefore worse outcomes.

    Measured: After exposure to all messages (approximately up to 45 minutes), measured during a single study visit on Day 1.

  6. Behavioral Intentions to Vape or Try Vaping

    Participants' vaping or vaping trial intentions were measured by using a 3 subscale items assessing participants' intentions to vape: soon/anytime during the next year/would use offered by one of their best friends, on a scale from 1 (Definitely not) to 5 (Definitely yes). Items were summed and averaged to create a single composite score. This was done for each vaping status (current vapers and susceptible non-vapers). Higher scores indicate greater vaping intentions, therefore indicating worse outcome.

    Measured: After exposure to all messages (approximately up to 45 minutes), measured during a single study visit on Day 1.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Feb 2024
  2. Study start5 Nov 2024
  3. Primary completion5 Dec 2024
  4. Study completion17 Dec 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
848 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06274723
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY00001220
Other IDs
1K99CA281094-01A1
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
17 Jan 2024
Last updated
14 Jan 2026
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Expert, one-sided, Expert, two-sided and Peer, one-sided in people with Vaping, run by University of Massachusetts, Worcester at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Jan 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Message Acceptance (time frame: After exposure to each messages (approximately up to 20 minutes total), measured during a single study visit on Day 1.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jan 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in