Renal ColicNCT06276231
Nebulized Salbutamol in Acute Renal Colic
A study testing Salbutamol, 0.9% Normal Saline and Diclofenac Injection in people with Renal Colic, run by Oman Medical Speciality Board.
Trial summary
A Prospective, double blinded, Randomized efficacy and safety trial of Nebulized Salbutamol in acute renal colic. Research Summary: INTRODUCTION: Pain is a common reason for individuals to seek health care, especially emergency care. Salbutamol has an effect for smooth muscle relaxation of the ureters. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Renal Colic
- What is being tested?
- Salbutamol, 0.9% Normal Saline and Diclofenac Injection
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 214 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2024to 1 May 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient with classical acute renal colic symptoms.
- Age ≥ 18 years and < 60 years
- Hemodynamically stable vital signs.
- Mentally competent patient who can understand and sign the consent form.
Who cannot join
- Patients who are allergic to Salbuamtol.
- Renal disease or transplant.
- Patients with pervious myocardial infarction and PCI.
- Active peptic ulcer disease.
- Liver cirrhosis.
- Couagulopathy.
- History of asthma , urticaria, or other allergic-type reactions after taking NSAIDs.
- Patient with any other contraindications to use of NSAIDs.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
Said Al Mujaini, MD contact
About this study
Official title: Comparative Efficacy of Nebulized Salbutamol in Alleviating Acute Renal Colic Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
A Prospective, double blinded, Randomized efficacy and safety trial of Nebulized Salbutamol in acute renal colic.
Research Summary:
Read more
INTRODUCTION: Pain is a common reason for individuals to seek health care, especially emergency care. Salbutamol has an effect for smooth muscle relaxation of the ureters. The administration of Salbuatmol has been shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of asthma exacerbation, but there have been no studies evaluating the use of neublized salbutamol for the treatment of acute renal colic pain in the emergency department.
METHOD: This is a double blinded randomized clinical controlled trial. Two hundred renal colic patients presenting to the emergency department will be randomized to intervention (10 mg nebulized salbutamol) and (10 ml neublized Normal saline) case groups. Both the groups will get the standard treatment (IM diclofenac 75mg) added to the intervention. Their pain before and after intervention will be measured by Numerical Rating scale (NRS pain score). Patient and attending physician will be blinded throughout the study. The Secondry outcomes are safety, need for rescue medications and time to discharge.
AIM: The aim of this study is to compare analgesic effects of Nebulized Salbutamol versus Placebo in adult patients with renal colic.
PRIMARY OJECTIVES: Analgesic effects of Nebulized Salbutamol on the Numerical Rating scale (NRS).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: Adverse Events, the need of rescue pain medications and time to discharge.
PATEINT POPULATION: Adults (from age 18 to 60 years) who presents to emergency department (ED) at Armed force Hospital with acute flank pain suggestive of renal colic
INTERVENTION: Single dose of Nebulized Salbutamol 10mg.
CLINICAL MEASURMENT: Numerical pain Analog Scale will be assessed at 0,15,30, 45 and 60 minutes after intervention. Number and dosage of rescue medication, any reported events by patient or attending physician will be documented.
OUTCOME: Decrease in pain measures by NRS pain score after Nebulized Salbutamol is given, tolerability and safety evaluation.
Read the detailed description
Renal colic is recognized as one of the most intense types of pain a person can experience. The occurrence of renal stones is widespread, affecting people of all ages, genders, and races, with a lifetime risk of 12%. Men, especially those between 20-49 years, are more commonly affected than women. Recent studies show an increasing number of cases in both developed and developing countries over the past years. In Oman, while renal stones are a common health issue, the exact number of cases is not known due to a lack of data. Regional research indicates a prevalence between 4-20%, with twice as many men affected as women.
The formidable impact of renal colic extends to the realm of emergency medicine, as pain ranks as the paramount driver of emergency department (ED) visits, constituting nearly 45% of all ED admissions, particularly among those grappling with moderate to severe pain. Effective pain management in this context has profound implications, fostering improved patient satisfaction, shorter hospital stays, and reduced mortality rates. Acute renal colic, characterized by its excruciating intensity, is a frequent motive for ED visits across the globe, compelling individuals to seek immediate relief. The pain in renal colic is intricately linked to the stone's location within the urinary system and may manifest concomitantly with hematuria, urinary flow obstruction, infections, or hydronephrosis.
The primary concern for individuals confronted with renal colic is the rapid alleviation of pain. The choice of analgesic hinges on a complex interplay of factors, including availability, safety, efficacy, cost considerations, and the shared preferences of both patients and healthcare providers. Within this spectrum, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) often ascend as the preferred initial choice for pain management, guided by multiple clinical practice guidelines. NSAIDs hold sway over opioids due to their superior pain relief, diminished side effect profile, and reduced demand for adjunctive painkillers.
Salbutamol, a widely employed beta-adrenoreceptor agonist, finds its niche in diverse medical conditions, distinguished by its favorable safety profile. Beta-adrenoreceptor agonists manifest a multifaceted approach to addressing the etiology of renal colic pain, countering factors such as ureteral spasms and inflammation. They exhibit the capacity to induce ureteral relaxation, mitigate muscular contractions, and alleviate renal pressure. Importantly, salbutamol's distinctive pharmacokinetics allow for both systemic and direct urinary system action, as approximately 60% of an intravenously administered dose is excreted unchanged in urine.
While dedicated clinical trials focused on beta agonists for renal colic pain relief are lacking, a substantial body of evidence lends credence to their potential efficacy. This intriguing prospect warrants further exploration through rigorous research endeavors. Given the existing foundation of evidence, a systematic investigation into this treatment paradigm is a logical progression. Many studies have looked at treatments that might expedite stone passage. While this isn't the main focus of this trial, it is one of the secondary goals as previous research suggest salbutamol role in uteral relaxation.
Salbutamol's rapid onset of action, occurring within minutes, renders it an attractive option for addressing the sudden and severe pain characteristic of renal colic in the ED setting. Familiarity among emergency department staff further enhances its appeal, ensuring ease of administration. In this study, we propose a 10 mg nebulized salbutamol dose, an approved dosage that achieves systemic absorption, ensuring a therapeutic effect. Furthermore, this dosage is unlikely to exert undue influence on electrolyte balance and adheres to established guidelines for managing elevated blood potassium levels.
Considering safety, salbutamol's side effect profile, characterized by mild effects such as increased heart rate and shivering, is well-documented and understood, particularly when compared with alternative analgesics. Notably, salbutamol exhibits a relatively modest impact on blood potassium levels (lowering potassium level) compared to other analogous medications. However, studies have revealed that any potential potassium level alterations are primarily observed in individuals who are regular users of salbutamol, with no substantive changes noted in blood potassium levels in research involving salbutamol use, especially at doses ranging from 5mg to 10mg.
The scientific rationale underpinning the consideration of beta-agonists, like salbutamol, for renal colic pain relief rests upon their ability to ameliorate ureteral spasms, a principal contributor to the affliction of pain, subsequently abating the associated agony. Support for this hypothesis stems from an extensive body of evidence encompassing laboratory studies, animal experiments, and human investigations. Studies in human subjects have corroborated the premise that agents inducing ureteral relaxation can mitigate pain and potentially reduce the need for additional analgesic interventions.
In summary, the utilization of salbutamol as a potential therapeutic agent for renal colic pain relief represents an exciting frontier in medical research, offering a multifaceted approach to pain management. Its rapid onset, established safety profile, and plausible mechanistic underpinnings position it as a compelling candidate for further exploration and investigation. By embarking on this research journey, we aim to enhance our understanding of effective renal colic pain relief strategies and, in turn, advance patient care in this challenging clinical context.
- Conditions
- Renal Colic
- Being tested
- Salbutamol, 0.9% Normal Saline, Diclofenac Injection
- Keywords
- Salbutamol
- Medical subject headings
- Renal Colic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SalbutamolDrug
Also called Nebulized Salbutamol
Salbutamol 10mg nebulization over 5 minutes ( flow rate 5-7 liters).
0.9% Normal SalineOther
Also called Nebulized 0.9% Normal Saline
Normal saline nebulization over 5 minutes ( flow rate 5-7 liters).
Diclofenac InjectionDrug
Also called Olfen 75mg IM
75 mg of Diclofenac intramuscular Injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Placebo comparator | Patients in this group will receive the standard treatment (75mg IM Diclofenac ) + nebulized 0.9% normal saline. Receives: Other: 0.9% Normal Saline; Drug: Diclofenac Injection |
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Patients in this group will receive the standard treatment (75mg IM Diclofenac ) + nebulized 10 mg of Nebulized Salbutamol. Receives: Drug: Salbutamol; Drug: Diclofenac Injection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain reduction at 60 minutes
The Analgesic effects of Nebulized Salbutamol on patient with renal colic as measured by Numerical rating scale (NRS).Minimum of Zero and Maximum of Ten in Number scale , in which zero will be least pain expiernced and Ten is the worse pain expiernced by the patient. Increasing Number from (zero to ten) meaning Wrosning of pain.
Measured: 60 minutes
Secondary outcomes (4)
Adverse Event/Side Effects
sides effects will be monitored during the study protocol period like (nausea , vomiting , dizziness )
Measured: 60 mintues
Need of Rescue medications
rate of recuse medications (Opioids )
Measured: 60 mintues
Pain reduction rate.
The rate of pain reduction will be monitored during the 60 minutes at each 15-minute interval.
Measured: 15, 30, 45, 60 mintues
ED revisits
Patient will be followed up after 48 hrs by a follow-up call to document ED revisits.
Measured: 48 hrs
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Feb 2024
- Study start1 Jul 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 May 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Renal ColicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 214 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oman Medical Speciality Board
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Usama Al-Khalasi, Oman Medical Speciality Board
- Investigators
- Mohammed Al Shamsi, MD, Study director, Armed Forces Hospital, Oman
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06276231
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SalbuEase
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 17 Feb 2024
- Last updated
- 19 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Chauhan CK, Joshi MJ, Vaidya AD. Growth inhibition of struvite crystals in the presence of herbal extract Commiphora wightii. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009 Dec;20 Suppl 1:S85-92. doi: 10.1007/s10856-008-3489-z. Epub 2008 Jun 21.
PubMed 18568390Teichman JM. Clinical practice. Acute renal colic from ureteral calculus. N Engl J Med. 2004 Feb 12;350(7):684-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp030813. No abstract available.
PubMed 14960744Holdgate A, Pollock T. Systematic review of the relative efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids in the treatment of acute renal colic. BMJ. 2004 Jun 12;328(7453):1401. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38119.581991.55. Epub 2004 Jun 3.
PubMed 15178585Tabner AJ, Johnson GD, Fakis A, Surtees J, Lennon RI. beta-Adrenoreceptor agonists in the management of pain associated with renal colic: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 20;6(6):e011315. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011315.
PubMed 27324714Pickard R, Starr K, MacLennan G, Lam T, Thomas R, Burr J, McPherson G, McDonald A, Anson K, N'Dow J, Burgess N, Clark T, Kilonzo M, Gillies K, Shearer K, Boachie C, Cameron S, Norrie J, McClinton S. Medical expulsive therapy in adults with ureteric colic: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Jul 25;386(9991):341-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60933-3. Epub 2015 May 18.
PubMed 25998582Wanajo I, Tomiyama Y, Yamazaki Y, Kojima M. Ureteral selectivity of intravenous beta-adrenoceptor agonists in pig model of acute ureteral obstruction: comparison of KUL-7211, a selective beta2/beta3 agonist, with isoproterenol, terbutaline, and CL-316243. Urology. 2011 May;77(5):1266.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.045. Epub 2011 Mar 12.
PubMed 21397304Tomiyama Y, Murakami M, Hayakawa K, Akiyama K, Yamazaki Y, Kojima M, Shibata N, Akahane M. Pharmacological profile of KUL-7211, a selective beta-adrenoceptor agonist, in isolated ureteral smooth muscle. J Pharmacol Sci. 2003 Aug;92(4):411-9. doi: 10.1254/jphs.92.411.
PubMed 12939526
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Efficacy of Nebulized Salbutamol in Alleviating Acute Renal Colic Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06276231
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SalbuEase
- Conditions
- Renal Colic
- Keywords
- Salbutamol
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 214 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Oman Medical Speciality BoardOther government
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A Prospective, double blinded, Randomized efficacy and safety trial of Nebulized Salbutamol in acute renal colic.
Research Summary:
INTRODUCTION: Pain is a common reason for individuals to seek health care, especially emergency care. Salbutamol has an effect for smooth muscle relaxation of the ureters. The administration of Salbuatmol has been shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of asthma exacerbation, but there have been no studies evaluating the use of neublized salbutamol for the treatment of acute renal colic pain in the emergency department.
METHOD: This is a double blinded randomized clinical controlled trial. Two hundred renal colic patients presenting to the emergency department will be randomized to intervention (10 mg nebulized salbutamol) and (10 ml neublized Normal saline) case groups. Both the groups will get the standard treatment (IM diclofenac 75mg) added to the intervention. Their pain before and after intervention will be measured by Numerical Rating scale (NRS pain score). Patient and attending physician will be blinded throughout the study. The Secondry outcomes are safety, need for rescue medications and time to discharge.
AIM: The aim of this study is to compare analgesic effects of Nebulized Salbutamol versus Placebo in adult patients with renal colic.
PRIMARY OJECTIVES: Analgesic effects of Nebulized Salbutamol on the Numerical Rating scale (NRS).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: Adverse Events, the need of rescue pain medications and time to discharge.
PATEINT POPULATION: Adults (from age 18 to 60 years) who presents to emergency department (ED) at Armed force Hospital with acute flank pain suggestive of renal colic
INTERVENTION: Single dose of Nebulized Salbutamol 10mg.
CLINICAL MEASURMENT: Numerical pain Analog Scale will be assessed at 0,15,30, 45 and 60 minutes after intervention. Number and dosage of rescue medication, any reported events by patient or attending physician will be documented.
OUTCOME: Decrease in pain measures by NRS pain score after Nebulized Salbutamol is given, tolerability and safety evaluation.
Detailed description
Renal colic is recognized as one of the most intense types of pain a person can experience. The occurrence of renal stones is widespread, affecting people of all ages, genders, and races, with a lifetime risk of 12%. Men, especially those between 20-49 years, are more commonly affected than women. Recent studies show an increasing number of cases in both developed and developing countries over the past years. In Oman, while renal stones are a common health issue, the exact number of cases is not known due to a lack of data. Regional research indicates a prevalence between 4-20%, with twice as many men affected as women.
The formidable impact of renal colic extends to the realm of emergency medicine, as pain ranks as the paramount driver of emergency department (ED) visits, constituting nearly 45% of all ED admissions, particularly among those grappling with moderate to severe pain. Effective pain management in this context has profound implications, fostering improved patient satisfaction, shorter hospital stays, and reduced mortality rates. Acute renal colic, characterized by its excruciating intensity, is a frequent motive for ED visits across the globe, compelling individuals to seek immediate relief. The pain in renal colic is intricately linked to the stone's location within the urinary system and may manifest concomitantly with hematuria, urinary flow obstruction, infections, or hydronephrosis.
The primary concern for individuals confronted with renal colic is the rapid alleviation of pain. The choice of analgesic hinges on a complex interplay of factors, including availability, safety, efficacy, cost considerations, and the shared preferences of both patients and healthcare providers. Within this spectrum, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) often ascend as the preferred initial choice for pain management, guided by multiple clinical practice guidelines. NSAIDs hold sway over opioids due to their superior pain relief, diminished side effect profile, and reduced demand for adjunctive painkillers.
Salbutamol, a widely employed beta-adrenoreceptor agonist, finds its niche in diverse medical conditions, distinguished by its favorable safety profile. Beta-adrenoreceptor agonists manifest a multifaceted approach to addressing the etiology of renal colic pain, countering factors such as ureteral spasms and inflammation. They exhibit the capacity to induce ureteral relaxation, mitigate muscular contractions, and alleviate renal pressure. Importantly, salbutamol's distinctive pharmacokinetics allow for both systemic and direct urinary system action, as approximately 60% of an intravenously administered dose is excreted unchanged in urine.
While dedicated clinical trials focused on beta agonists for renal colic pain relief are lacking, a substantial body of evidence lends credence to their potential efficacy. This intriguing prospect warrants further exploration through rigorous research endeavors. Given the existing foundation of evidence, a systematic investigation into this treatment paradigm is a logical progression. Many studies have looked at treatments that might expedite stone passage. While this isn't the main focus of this trial, it is one of the secondary goals as previous research suggest salbutamol role in uteral relaxation.
Salbutamol's rapid onset of action, occurring within minutes, renders it an attractive option for addressing the sudden and severe pain characteristic of renal colic in the ED setting. Familiarity among emergency department staff further enhances its appeal, ensuring ease of administration. In this study, we propose a 10 mg nebulized salbutamol dose, an approved dosage that achieves systemic absorption, ensuring a therapeutic effect. Furthermore, this dosage is unlikely to exert undue influence on electrolyte balance and adheres to established guidelines for managing elevated blood potassium levels.
Considering safety, salbutamol's side effect profile, characterized by mild effects such as increased heart rate and shivering, is well-documented and understood, particularly when compared with alternative analgesics. Notably, salbutamol exhibits a relatively modest impact on blood potassium levels (lowering potassium level) compared to other analogous medications. However, studies have revealed that any potential potassium level alterations are primarily observed in individuals who are regular users of salbutamol, with no substantive changes noted in blood potassium levels in research involving salbutamol use, especially at doses ranging from 5mg to 10mg.
The scientific rationale underpinning the consideration of beta-agonists, like salbutamol, for renal colic pain relief rests upon their ability to ameliorate ureteral spasms, a principal contributor to the affliction of pain, subsequently abating the associated agony. Support for this hypothesis stems from an extensive body of evidence encompassing laboratory studies, animal experiments, and human investigations. Studies in human subjects have corroborated the premise that agents inducing ureteral relaxation can mitigate pain and potentially reduce the need for additional analgesic interventions.
In summary, the utilization of salbutamol as a potential therapeutic agent for renal colic pain relief represents an exciting frontier in medical research, offering a multifaceted approach to pain management. Its rapid onset, established safety profile, and plausible mechanistic underpinnings position it as a compelling candidate for further exploration and investigation. By embarking on this research journey, we aim to enhance our understanding of effective renal colic pain relief strategies and, in turn, advance patient care in this challenging clinical context.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Placebo comparator | Other: 0.9% Normal Saline, Drug: Diclofenac InjectionPatients in this group will receive the standard treatment (75mg IM Diclofenac ) + nebulized 0.9% normal saline. |
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Drug: Salbutamol, Drug: Diclofenac InjectionPatients in this group will receive the standard treatment (75mg IM Diclofenac ) + nebulized 10 mg of Nebulized Salbutamol. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patient with classical acute renal colic symptoms.
- Age ≥ 18 years and < 60 years
- Hemodynamically stable vital signs.
- Mentally competent patient who can understand and sign the consent form.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients who are allergic to Salbuamtol.
- Renal disease or transplant.
- Patients with pervious myocardial infarction and PCI.
- Active peptic ulcer disease.
- Liver cirrhosis.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SalbutamolAlso: Nebulized SalbutamolSalbutamol 10mg nebulization over 5 minutes ( flow rate 5-7 liters). | Drug | Intervention Group |
| 0.9% Normal SalineAlso: Nebulized 0.9% Normal SalineNormal saline nebulization over 5 minutes ( flow rate 5-7 liters). | Other | Control Group |
| Diclofenac InjectionAlso: Olfen 75mg IM75 mg of Diclofenac intramuscular Injection | Drug | Control Group, Intervention Group |
Primary outcome
Pain reduction at 60 minutes
Time frame: 60 minutes
The Analgesic effects of Nebulized Salbutamol on patient with renal colic as measured by Numerical rating scale (NRS).Minimum of Zero and Maximum of Ten in Number scale , in which zero will be least pain expiernced and Ten is the worse pain expiernced by the patient. Increasing Number from (zero to ten) meaning Wrosning of pain.
4 secondary outcomes
Adverse Event/Side Effects
Time frame: 60 mintues
Need of Rescue medications
Time frame: 60 mintues
Pain reduction rate.
Time frame: 15, 30, 45, 60 mintues
ED revisits
Time frame: 48 hrs
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Mar 2024.
- Background: PubMed 18568390Chauhan CK, Joshi MJ, Vaidya AD. Growth inhibition of struvite crystals in the presence of herbal extract Commiphora wightii. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009 Dec;20 Suppl 1:S85-92. doi: 10.1007/s10856-008-3489-z. Epub 2008 Jun 21.
- Background: PubMed 14960744Teichman JM. Clinical practice. Acute renal colic from ureteral calculus. N Engl J Med. 2004 Feb 12;350(7):684-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp030813. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 15178585Holdgate A, Pollock T. Systematic review of the relative efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids in the treatment of acute renal colic. BMJ. 2004 Jun 12;328(7453):1401. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38119.581991.55. Epub 2004 Jun 3.
- Background: PubMed 27324714Tabner AJ, Johnson GD, Fakis A, Surtees J, Lennon RI. beta-Adrenoreceptor agonists in the management of pain associated with renal colic: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 20;6(6):e011315. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011315.
- Background: PubMed 25998582Pickard R, Starr K, MacLennan G, Lam T, Thomas R, Burr J, McPherson G, McDonald A, Anson K, N'Dow J, Burgess N, Clark T, Kilonzo M, Gillies K, Shearer K, Boachie C, Cameron S, Norrie J, McClinton S. Medical expulsive therapy in adults with ureteric colic: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Jul 25;386(9991):341-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60933-3. Epub 2015 May 18.
- Background: PubMed 21397304Wanajo I, Tomiyama Y, Yamazaki Y, Kojima M. Ureteral selectivity of intravenous beta-adrenoceptor agonists in pig model of acute ureteral obstruction: comparison of KUL-7211, a selective beta2/beta3 agonist, with isoproterenol, terbutaline, and CL-316243. Urology. 2011 May;77(5):1266.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.045. Epub 2011 Mar 12.
- Background: PubMed 12939526Tomiyama Y, Murakami M, Hayakawa K, Akiyama K, Yamazaki Y, Kojima M, Shibata N, Akahane M. Pharmacological profile of KUL-7211, a selective beta-adrenoceptor agonist, in isolated ureteral smooth muscle. J Pharmacol Sci. 2003 Aug;92(4):411-9. doi: 10.1254/jphs.92.411.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Renal Colic
RecruitingPhase 3
Comparative Efficacy of IV Dexamethasone vs. Nebulized Terbutaline for Renal Colic Pain in the ED
Renal Colic
Not yet recruiting
Relief Efficacy of Lidocaine Versus Morphine for Acute Renal Colic in the Emergency Department
Renal Colic, Kidney Stones, Urolithiasis, Hypocitraturia
Recruiting
Ear Pressure Points Plus Pain Meds for Faster Kidney Stone Pain Relief
Renal Colic, Acupuncture, Ear
Active, not recruiting
Sterile Water Injection vs Morphine for Renal Colic
Renal Colic, Urolithiasis
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Analgesic Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Dexketoprofen in Renal Colic
Renal Colic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Said Al Mujaini, MD contact
Mohammed Al Shamsi, MD study director
Armed Forces Hospital, Oman
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Salbutamol, 0.9% Normal Saline and Diclofenac Injection in people with Renal Colic, run by Oman Medical Speciality Board.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact USAMA ALKHALASI, MD (+96894094001, u.alkhalasi@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain reduction at 60 minutes (time frame: 60 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06276231, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Mar 2024.