Prostate CancerIP9-ATLASNCT06280781
Imperial Prostate 9 - ATLAS (Approaches To Long-Term Active Surveillance)
A study testing MRI Scans in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Imperial College London at 12 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The goal of this intervention study is for patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer, to demonstrate that use of regular MRI scans is better able to detect cancer progression over 5 years compared to the current NICE defined strategy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- MRI Scans
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,263 participants
- Where
- 12 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 24 May 2024to Jun 2032
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 years or above (no upper limit)
- Patients with a prostate (either cis-male gender or trans-female gender with no prior androgen deprivation hormone use at all).
- Diagnostic bi-parametric or multiparametric MRI
- Diagnostic systematic biopsy +/- targeted biopsy
- A histological diagnosis of localised prostate cancer
- Patient chosen active surveillance
Who cannot join
- On active surveillance for greater than 9 months prior to screening date.
- Contraindication to MRI or gadolinium contrast
- Previous hip replacement to both hips
- Contraindication to performing a biopsy guided by a transrectal ultrasound probe
Trial locations and contacts
12 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
12 sites in 1 country
United Kingdom12 sites, 12 recruiting
- Recruiting
Heatherwood Hospital
Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7GB
Lauren Barnett, lauren.barnett6@nhs.net
Nishant Bedi
- Recruiting
Bradford Royal Infirmary
Bradford
Imran Hamid, 07778 954483, imran.hamid@bthft.nhs.uk
Rohit Chahal
- Recruiting
St Peter's Hospital
Chertsey
Keshnie Govender, 01932726851, keshnie.govender@nhs.net
Nimalan Arumainayagam
- Recruiting
Darent Valley Hospital
Dartford, Kent, DA2 8DA
Charlotte Kamundi, charlotte.kamundi1@nhs.net
Sanjeev Madaan
- Recruiting
Charing Cross Hospital
London, W6 8RF
Archana Gopalakrishnan, archana.gopalakrishnan@imperial.ac.uk
Hashim Ahmed
- Recruiting
Kings College London
London
Sahin Emer, 0 203 299 6860, sahin.emer@nhs.net
Nicholas Raison
- Recruiting
West Middlesex Hospital
London
Metod Oblak, 07766064813, metod.oblak@nhs.net
Mathias Winkler
- Recruiting
Freeman Hospital
Newcastle upon Tyne
Jade Whitehead, 0191 2137322, jade.whitehead2@nhs.net
Rajan Veeratterapillay
- Recruiting
Glan Clywd Hospital
Rhyl
Sharon Harland, +44 3000 844543, Sharon.Harland@wales.nhs.uk
Kingsley Ekwueme
- Recruiting
Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust
Scunthorpe
Dorota Potoczna, 03033 305867, dorota.potoczna@nhs.net
Mark Rogers
- Recruiting
Southampton University Hospital
Southampton
Nikki Carney, Nikki.Carney@uhs.nhs.uk
Aneta Zahorska, Aneta.Zahorska@uhs.nhs.uk
- Recruiting
North Cumbria
Whitehaven
Rachel Mutch, 07811714656, Rachel.mutch@ncic.nhs.uk
Yannick Yangue
About this study
Official title: A Randomised Controlled Trial of Regular MRI Scans Compared to Standard Care in Patients With Prostate Cancer Managed Using Active Surveillance
The goal of this intervention study is for patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer, to demonstrate that use of regular MRI scans is better able to detect cancer progression over 5 years compared to the current NICE defined strategy.
Research Question P - In patients who are on active surveillance for low to medium risk prostate cancer, I - is the use of regular MRI scans C - compared to current NICE defined standard of care, O - better at detecting cancer progression with less cost to the NHS (fewer PSA tests, biopsies and clinic visits)?
Patients will be allocated in a 1.1 ratio to either MRI scans or the current NICE defined standard. Randomisation will be blocked (random block size) and stratified by MRI visibility of lesions (3 categories [ no visible lesion, diffuse changes, discrete visible lesion]), cancer Grade Group (GG1, GG2) and time since diagnosis. This study will not be blinded to patients or physicians.
Read the detailed description
What is the problem being addressed?
Of 50,000 newly diagnosed patients with prostate cancer every year, about 7,600 choose active surveillance rather than immediate surgery or radiotherapy. Most have low risk whilst 20-30% have medium risk prostate cancer. This is because low and medium risk prostate cancers grow slowly. As a result, immediate treatment does not improve cancer-specific survival over 10 years but can cause high rates of urinary, sexual and bowel side-effects.
Although these cancers are slow growing, 25-34% will progress to higher risk over 5 years and need treatment later. Whilst there is no evidence that delayed detection of progression has an impact on survival, a recent systematic review has shown detrimental effects on other aspects of cancer control. For instance, in the largest RCT comparing active surveillance to immediate surgery or radiotherapy, 2-3 times as many patients had disease progression and cancer spread to other parts of the body in the active surveillance arm. So, active surveillance needs to be improved. NICE currently advise that active surveillance should involve 3-6 monthly prostate specific antigen (PSA) blood tests and rectal examinations. They advise an MRI and biopsy at 12 months. After one year, 3-6 monthly PSA and rectal examinations are recommended and further biopsy if the PSA starts to rise or if the rectal exam detects a prostate nodule.
This is problematic for 3 reasons:
First, PSA and rectal examination changes are inaccurate in detecting progression. As a result, some centres do regular biopsies every 1-2 years; this is borne out by a 48 physician survey (Jan 2022). However, biopsies alone are also inaccurate as they are ultrasound-guided; the operator can see the prostate but not areas suspicious for cancer progression.
Second, biopsies have side-effects such as infection, bleeding and pain; when these occur, patients are less likely to agree to further biopsies. Biopsies cost £488 and lead to significant NHS resource use. Regular and repeat biopsies can also cause prostate scarring making surgery more difficult if it is needed later.
Third, 10-43% of patients often decide to have treatment even if the cancer has not progressed. This is because of anxiety about living with cancer, or because of the biopsy and burden of tests. Some studies have shown other psychological impacts such as sub-clinical depression, illness uncertainty and hopelessness.
The Investigators propose using regular MRI scans in active surveillance to detect progression. The team led the pivotal UK studies which changed recommendations for MRI in diagnosing prostate cancer. Subsequently, The Investigators and others have shown that regular prostate MRI scans with targeted biopsies to areas of suspicion are accurate in ruling-out and detecting progression. To change NHS practice, an RCT is needed to compare regular MRI scans to current NICE defined standard of care in patients who choose active surveillance following an MRI-directed biopsy at time of diagnosis.
The studies proposal was positively reviewed by the NCRI Prostate Proposal Guidance panel (7/2/2022).
Why is this research important?
- The regular use of MRI in active surveillance will lead to greater confidence in active surveillance for patients with low and medium risk prostate cancer. This is because such a strategy is likely to detect cancer progression earlier with fewer invasive biopsies. In previous studies, 1 of 672 patients chose treatment during surveillance due to anxiety.
- An additional ~2000 patients with medium risk cancer could be managed with active surveillance in future.
- Fewer NHS resources for clinic follow-ups, PSA tests and biopsies.
Of 5 research priorities that NICE have identified for prostate cancer, two relate to improving active surveillance. Similarly, the James Lind Alliance has 3 research priorities to improve active surveillance.
Research Question P - In patients who are on active surveillance for low to medium risk prostate cancer, I - is the use of regular MRI scans C - compared to current NICE defined standard of care, O - better at detecting cancer progression with less cost to the NHS (fewer PSA tests, biopsies and clinic visits)?
- Aims and Objectives
Primary Objective
In patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer, to demonstrate that use of regular MRI scans is better able to detect cancer progression over 5 years compared to the current NICE defined strategy.
Difference between current and planned care pathways
Current (NICE defined active surveillance):
PSA 3 monthly in year 1 and then 6 monthly with rectal exam annually. MRI will be carried out at 12 months (if not had one at diagnosis). A biopsy will be required if indicated due to changes in rectal exam or PSA.
Planned (Regular MRI based active surveillance):
Patients with a visible lesion or medium risk cancer will have PSA 6 monthly and MRI annually. All other patients will undergo PSA 6 monthly and MRI in years 1, 3 and 5. In all patients, a targeted biopsy will be carried out if the MRI PRECISE score is >/=4.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- MRI Scans
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MRI ScansDiagnostic test
The regular use of MRI in active surveillance will lead to greater confidence in active surveillance for patients with low and medium risk prostate cancer. This is because such a strategy is likely to detect cancer progression earlier with fewer invasive biopsies. Those patients randomised to the intervention arm will have additional MRI scans. These will be non-contrast so there is no risk from having repeated 1-2 yearly injections of gadolinium contrast. Patients with contraindications to MRI will not be taking part in the study so will not be exposed to an unnecessary MRI.
Patients with a visible lesion or medium risk cancer will have PSA 6 monthly and MRI annually. All other patients will undergo PSA 6 monthly and MRI in years 1, 3 and 5. In all patients, a targeted biopsy will be carried out if the MRI PRECISE score is >/=4.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard care (Control) Arm | No intervention | PSA 3 monthly in year 1 and then 6 monthly with rectal exam annually if clinically indicated. MRI will be carried out at 12 months (if not had one at diagnosis). If a diagnostic MRI was carried out, a 12 month MRI scan will not be required. A biopsy will be required if indicated due to changes in rectal exam or PSA. Follow-up for 5 years. |
| Intervention Arm | Experimental | Patients with a visible lesion or medium risk cancer will have PSA 6 monthly and MRI scans annually. As per international PIRADS committee guidance the surveillance MRIs will be biparametric MRI scans which last approximately 15 minutes and exclude gadolinium contrast injection. All other patients will undergo PSA 6 monthly and MRI in years 1, 3 and 5. In all patients, a targeted biopsy will be carried out if the MRI PRECISE score is >/=4. Receives: Diagnostic Test: MRI Scans |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Biopsy
Progression in each group defined as higher risk cancer on biopsy (Grade Group >/=3)
Prostate cancer progression rates and time to progression in each randomised arm defined on,
- biopsy: grade progression to Grade Group 3 or greater or detection on biopsy of intraductal cancer or lymphovascular invasion. Many of our clinicians would include patients on active surveillance with cribriform pattern on Grade Group so this is not a factor for progression.
Measured: 5 Years
Staging
Progression in each group defined as higher risk cancer on higher stage (>/=T3 or >/=N or >/=M1) over 5 years.
Prostate cancer progression rates and time to progression in each randomised arm defined on,
- staging: cancer has spread to surrounding tissues (extracapsular), lymph node involvement or distant body parts as demonstrated on cross-sectional imaging including MRI, CT, bone-scan or PET scans as deemed appropriate by the local multidisciplinary cancer team.
Measured: 5 Years
Secondary outcomes (8)
Cost-effectiveness
Cost-effectiveness of revising the prostate cancer active surveillance protocol to incorporate regular surveillance MRI within the NHS (QALYs questionnaire).
Measured: 5 Years
Biopsy Measurement
Biopsy would be recommended when there is a change on the MRI or if there is a consistent rise in PSA over 3 readings that is concerning for progression even if the MRI shows no change and other factors such as infection or prostatitis have been ruled out.
Measured: 5 years
MRI & biopsy-related adverse events
Patients will be asked to self-report pain and discomfort (referred to as pain hereafter) immediately after and seven days after biopsy on a 4-point Likert-type scale as none, mild, moderate, or severe. Specific related complications such as fever, flu-like shivers, pain, haematuria, haematochezia, and haemoejaculate will be self-reported at 35 to 90 days after prostate biopsy as absent or present following biopsy on a purpose designed questionnaire. For each symptom, patients will be asked to score the degree of "problem" as none, minor, moderate, or major. This will be used to derive a binary outcome for each symptom (present/moderate/severe problem vs. absent /minor problem).
Measured: 5 Years
Treatment
Patients treatment options for progressive disease will be collected through multidisciplinary team (MDT) outcomes in the clinical records and clinic letters or entries by clinicians in the health records. Such options depending on cancer risk include; active surveillance, focal therapy, radical surgery or radiotherapy (with some men started on androgen deprivation therapy).
Measured: 5 Years
Compliance
Compliance measured as proportion having each test (PSA, rectal exam, MRI) at each allocated timepoint and proportion agreeing to a biopsy when clinically recommended
Measured: 5 Years
EPIC Questionnaires
Annual changes in patient reported outcome measure (PROMS) using validated questionnaires, compared to baseline, to measure impact on urinary, erectile and bowel function (EPIC).
Measured: 5 years
HADS Questionnaires
Annual changes in patient reported outcome measure (PROMS) using validated questionnaires, compared to baseline, to measure impact on cancer-related anxiety (HADS)
Measured: 5 Years
EQ-5D-5L Questionnaires
Annual changes in patient reported outcome measure (PROMS) using validated questionnaires, compared to baseline, to measure impact on overall health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Feb 2024
- Study start24 May 2024
- Primary completionJun 2029 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2032 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Imperial College LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Model description
- Current (NICE defined active surveillance): PSA 3 monthly in year 1 and then 6 monthly with rectal exam annually. MRI will be carried out at 12 months (if not had one at diagnosis). A biopsy will be required if indicated due to changes in rectal exam or PSA. Planned (Regular MRI based active surveillance): Patients with a visible lesion or medium risk cancer will have PSA 6 monthly and MRI annually. All other patients will undergo PSA 6 monthly and MRI in years 1, 3 and 5. In all patients, a targeted biopsy will be carried out if the MRI PRECISE score is \>/=4.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,263 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Imperial College London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Queen Mary University of London, University of Leeds, University College, London, University of York, University College London Hospitals
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06280781
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 22CX7971
- Other IDs
- NIHR152027
- Acronym
- IP9-ATLAS
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 25 Jan 2024
- Last updated
- 30 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Gopalakrishnan A, Light A, Mayor N, Cullen E, Rawlins F, Dalton R, Tanaka MB, Connor MJ, De Dios CC, Fiorentino F, Ali A, Akinyemi I, Klimowska-Nassar N, Sasikaran T, Monk R, Baker G, Andrews M, Sculpher M, Rothery C, Barrett T, Mangar S, Freeman A, Winkler M, Heer R, Shah TT, Sokhi HK, Giganti F, Punwani S, Emberton M, Ahmed HU. The Imperial Prostate 9 - Approaches To Long-term Active Surveillance: Regular MRI scans versus standard of care (IP9-ATLAS) randomised controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2026 Jun;165:108308. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108308. Epub 2026 Apr 15.
PubMed 41990428
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised Controlled Trial of Regular MRI Scans Compared to Standard Care in Patients With Prostate Cancer Managed Using Active Surveillance
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06280781
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IP9-ATLAS / 22CX7971
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,263 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Imperial College LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Queen Mary University of London, University of Leeds, University College, London, University of York, University College London Hospitals
- Study start
- 24 May 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2032 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this intervention study is for patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer, to demonstrate that use of regular MRI scans is better able to detect cancer progression over 5 years compared to the current NICE defined strategy.
Research Question P - In patients who are on active surveillance for low to medium risk prostate cancer, I - is the use of regular MRI scans C - compared to current NICE defined standard of care, O - better at detecting cancer progression with less cost to the NHS (fewer PSA tests, biopsies and clinic visits)?
Patients will be allocated in a 1.1 ratio to either MRI scans or the current NICE defined standard. Randomisation will be blocked (random block size) and stratified by MRI visibility of lesions (3 categories [ no visible lesion, diffuse changes, discrete visible lesion]), cancer Grade Group (GG1, GG2) and time since diagnosis. This study will not be blinded to patients or physicians.
Detailed description
What is the problem being addressed?
Of 50,000 newly diagnosed patients with prostate cancer every year, about 7,600 choose active surveillance rather than immediate surgery or radiotherapy. Most have low risk whilst 20-30% have medium risk prostate cancer. This is because low and medium risk prostate cancers grow slowly. As a result, immediate treatment does not improve cancer-specific survival over 10 years but can cause high rates of urinary, sexual and bowel side-effects.
Although these cancers are slow growing, 25-34% will progress to higher risk over 5 years and need treatment later. Whilst there is no evidence that delayed detection of progression has an impact on survival, a recent systematic review has shown detrimental effects on other aspects of cancer control. For instance, in the largest RCT comparing active surveillance to immediate surgery or radiotherapy, 2-3 times as many patients had disease progression and cancer spread to other parts of the body in the active surveillance arm. So, active surveillance needs to be improved. NICE currently advise that active surveillance should involve 3-6 monthly prostate specific antigen (PSA) blood tests and rectal examinations. They advise an MRI and biopsy at 12 months. After one year, 3-6 monthly PSA and rectal examinations are recommended and further biopsy if the PSA starts to rise or if the rectal exam detects a prostate nodule.
This is problematic for 3 reasons:
First, PSA and rectal examination changes are inaccurate in detecting progression. As a result, some centres do regular biopsies every 1-2 years; this is borne out by a 48 physician survey (Jan 2022). However, biopsies alone are also inaccurate as they are ultrasound-guided; the operator can see the prostate but not areas suspicious for cancer progression.
Second, biopsies have side-effects such as infection, bleeding and pain; when these occur, patients are less likely to agree to further biopsies. Biopsies cost £488 and lead to significant NHS resource use. Regular and repeat biopsies can also cause prostate scarring making surgery more difficult if it is needed later.
Third, 10-43% of patients often decide to have treatment even if the cancer has not progressed. This is because of anxiety about living with cancer, or because of the biopsy and burden of tests. Some studies have shown other psychological impacts such as sub-clinical depression, illness uncertainty and hopelessness.
The Investigators propose using regular MRI scans in active surveillance to detect progression. The team led the pivotal UK studies which changed recommendations for MRI in diagnosing prostate cancer. Subsequently, The Investigators and others have shown that regular prostate MRI scans with targeted biopsies to areas of suspicion are accurate in ruling-out and detecting progression. To change NHS practice, an RCT is needed to compare regular MRI scans to current NICE defined standard of care in patients who choose active surveillance following an MRI-directed biopsy at time of diagnosis.
The studies proposal was positively reviewed by the NCRI Prostate Proposal Guidance panel (7/2/2022).
Why is this research important?
- The regular use of MRI in active surveillance will lead to greater confidence in active surveillance for patients with low and medium risk prostate cancer. This is because such a strategy is likely to detect cancer progression earlier with fewer invasive biopsies. In previous studies, 1 of 672 patients chose treatment during surveillance due to anxiety.
- An additional ~2000 patients with medium risk cancer could be managed with active surveillance in future.
- Fewer NHS resources for clinic follow-ups, PSA tests and biopsies.
Of 5 research priorities that NICE have identified for prostate cancer, two relate to improving active surveillance. Similarly, the James Lind Alliance has 3 research priorities to improve active surveillance.
Research Question P - In patients who are on active surveillance for low to medium risk prostate cancer, I - is the use of regular MRI scans C - compared to current NICE defined standard of care, O - better at detecting cancer progression with less cost to the NHS (fewer PSA tests, biopsies and clinic visits)?
- Aims and Objectives
Primary Objective
In patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer, to demonstrate that use of regular MRI scans is better able to detect cancer progression over 5 years compared to the current NICE defined strategy.
Difference between current and planned care pathways
Current (NICE defined active surveillance):
PSA 3 monthly in year 1 and then 6 monthly with rectal exam annually. MRI will be carried out at 12 months (if not had one at diagnosis). A biopsy will be required if indicated due to changes in rectal exam or PSA.
Planned (Regular MRI based active surveillance):
Patients with a visible lesion or medium risk cancer will have PSA 6 monthly and MRI annually. All other patients will undergo PSA 6 monthly and MRI in years 1, 3 and 5. In all patients, a targeted biopsy will be carried out if the MRI PRECISE score is >/=4.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Current (NICE defined active surveillance): PSA 3 monthly in year 1 and then 6 monthly with rectal exam annually. MRI will be carried out at 12 months (if not had one at diagnosis). A biopsy will be required if indicated due to changes in rectal exam or PSA. Planned (Regular MRI based active surveillance): Patients with a visible lesion or medium risk cancer will have PSA 6 monthly and MRI annually. All other patients will undergo PSA 6 monthly and MRI in years 1, 3 and 5. In all patients, a targeted biopsy will be carried out if the MRI PRECISE score is >/=4.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard care (Control) Arm | No intervention | –PSA 3 monthly in year 1 and then 6 monthly with rectal exam annually if clinically indicated. MRI will be carried out at 12 months (if not had one at diagnosis). If a diagnostic MRI was carried out, a 12 month MRI scan will not be required. A biopsy will be required if indicated due to changes in rectal exam or PSA. Follow-up for 5 years. |
| Intervention Arm | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: MRI ScansPatients with a visible lesion or medium risk cancer will have PSA 6 monthly and MRI scans annually. As per international PIRADS committee guidance the surveillance MRIs will be biparametric MRI scans which last approximately 15 minutes and exclude gadolinium contrast injection. All other patients will undergo PSA 6 monthly and MRI in years 1, 3 and 5. In all patients, a targeted biopsy will be carried out if the MRI PRECISE score is >/=4. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age 18 years or above (no upper limit)
- Patients with a prostate (either cis-male gender or trans-female gender with no prior androgen deprivation hormone use at all).
- Diagnostic bi-parametric or multiparametric MRI
- Diagnostic systematic biopsy +/- targeted biopsy
- A histological diagnosis of localised prostate cancer
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- On active surveillance for greater than 9 months prior to screening date.
- Contraindication to MRI or gadolinium contrast
- Previous hip replacement to both hips
- Contraindication to performing a biopsy guided by a transrectal ultrasound probe
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MRI ScansThe regular use of MRI in active surveillance will lead to greater confidence in active surveillance for patients with low and medium risk prostate cancer. This is because such a strategy is likely to detect cancer progression earlier with fewer invasive biopsies. Those patients randomised to the intervention arm will have additional MRI scans. These will be non-contrast so there is no risk from having repeated 1-2 yearly injections of gadolinium contrast. Patients with contraindications to MRI will not be taking part in the study so will not be exposed to an unnecessary MRI. Patients with a visible lesion or medium risk cancer will have PSA 6 monthly and MRI annually. All other patients will undergo PSA 6 monthly and MRI in years 1, 3 and 5. In all patients, a targeted biopsy will be carried out if the MRI PRECISE score is >/=4. | Diagnostic test | Intervention Arm |
Primary outcome
Biopsy
Time frame: 5 Years
Progression in each group defined as higher risk cancer on biopsy (Grade Group >/=3) Prostate cancer progression rates and time to progression in each randomised arm defined on, • biopsy: grade progression to Grade Group 3 or greater or detection on biopsy of intraductal cancer or lymphovascular invasion. Many of our clinicians would include patients on active surveillance with cribriform pattern on Grade Group so this is not a factor for progression.
Staging
Time frame: 5 Years
Progression in each group defined as higher risk cancer on higher stage (>/=T3 or >/=N or >/=M1) over 5 years. Prostate cancer progression rates and time to progression in each randomised arm defined on, • staging: cancer has spread to surrounding tissues (extracapsular), lymph node involvement or distant body parts as demonstrated on cross-sectional imaging including MRI, CT, bone-scan or PET scans as deemed appropriate by the local multidisciplinary cancer team.
8 secondary outcomes
Cost-effectiveness
Time frame: 5 Years
Biopsy Measurement
Time frame: 5 years
MRI & biopsy-related adverse events
Time frame: 5 Years
Treatment
Time frame: 5 Years
Compliance
Time frame: 5 Years
EPIC Questionnaires
Time frame: 5 years
HADS Questionnaires
Time frame: 5 Years
EQ-5D-5L Questionnaires
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Mar 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41990428Gopalakrishnan A, Light A, Mayor N, Cullen E, Rawlins F, Dalton R, Tanaka MB, Connor MJ, De Dios CC, Fiorentino F, Ali A, Akinyemi I, Klimowska-Nassar N, Sasikaran T, Monk R, Baker G, Andrews M, Sculpher M, Rothery C, Barrett T, Mangar S, Freeman A, Winkler M, Heer R, Shah TT, Sokhi HK, Giganti F, Punwani S, Emberton M, Ahmed HU. The Imperial Prostate 9 - Approaches To Long-term Active Surveillance: Regular MRI scans versus standard of care (IP9-ATLAS) randomised controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2026 Jun;165:108308. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108308. Epub 2026 Apr 15.
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
12 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing MRI Scans in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Imperial College London at 12 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 12 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Hashim Ahmed (+44 (0)20 7594 1660, hashim.ahmed@imperial.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Biopsy (time frame: 5 Years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06280781, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2026.