Depression, UnipolarLIVES-GPNCT06286345
Lifestyle InterVEntion Study in General Practice: LIVES - GP
A study testing GLI-LEEF in people with Depression, Unipolar and Cardiovascular Diseases, run by University Medical Center Groningen at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Patients with depression are at a substantially increased risk of chronic physical disease including cardiovascular disease. This may be attributed primarily to an unhealthy lifestyle related to their disorder. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Depression, Unipolar, Cardiovascular Diseases
- What is being tested?
- GLI-LEEF
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2023to 1 Jul 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of depressive symptoms or depressive disorder in the past year as registered in the general practice electronic health record and coded according to the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) as P03 and P76, respectively, or currently treated for depressive symptoms or depressive disorder in general practice.
- At least mild depressive symptom level according to the Quick Inventory Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR) (score ≥6)
- Body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2 or increased waist circumference (>88 cm (women) of >102 cm (men)).
Who cannot join
- Current treatment in mental health care (GGZ in Dutch)
- Severe somatic / neurological disease at the discretion of the GP
- Currently participating in another lifestyle intervention
- Insufficient proficiency in Dutch
- Inability to read and write
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Netherlands1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, 9700 AD
Huibert Burger, MD PhD, +31(0)50 361 6722 ext. 6722, h.burger@umcg.nl
Patrick Brink, +31(0)50 361 6724 ext. 6724, p.brink@umcg.nl
About this study
Patients with depression are at a substantially increased risk of chronic physical disease including cardiovascular disease. This may be attributed primarily to an unhealthy lifestyle related to their disorder. Interestingly, the unhealthy lifestyle feeds back to decreased quality of life and increased depressive symptoms, thus creating a hazardous vicious circle. Consequently, there is a great potential for 'Lifestyle Medicine' for depression. Yet, it is known that patients with depression often have motivational and self-management problems. Therefore an 18 session multimodal lifestyle intervention (MLI) specifically tailored to the needs of depressed patients was developed and piloted in mental health care, with promising results. This research aims to investigate using a process evaluation the feasibility of this MLI in general practice because this is the setting where the majority of patients with depression are treated and results from mental health care are unlikely to apply.
Read the detailed description
Rationale: Patients with depression are at a substantially increased risk of chronic physical disease including cardiovascular disease. This may be attributed primarily to an unhealthy lifestyle related to their disorder. Interestingly, the unhealthy lifestyle feeds back to decreased quality of life and increased depressive symptoms, thus creating a hazardous vicious circle. Consequently, there is a great potential for 'Lifestyle Medicine' for depression. Yet, it is known that patients with depression often have motivational and self-management problems. Therefore a multimodal lifestyle intervention (MLI) specifically tailored to the needs of depressed patients was developed and piloted in mental health care, with promising results. This research aims to investigate this MLI in general practice because this is the setting where the majority of patients with depression are treated and results from mental health care are unlikely to apply.
Objective: to estimate in general practice the feasibility of conducting a large-scale study on the effectiveness of a MLI for depression, and identify key factors that can influence its successful conduct. In addition, this study aims to obtain an estimate of the variance of outcome measures (mental health, lifestyle factors, functioning, recovery, wellbeing, sleeping quality, self-esteem, quality of life, health care costs, anthropometry and blood pressure).
Study design: An observational single-group prospective cohort study (n = 50) using mixed methods with baseline measurement and two follow-up measurements: after the intervention at 18 weeks and after a follow-up at 42 weeks.
Study population: Patients (18 years or over) with depression and overweight who are being treated in general practice.
Intervention (if applicable): A MLI named (in Dutch) "Gecombineerde Leefstijl Interventie Leef" (GLI-LEEF), developed for patients with depression consisting of several modules (e.g. on physical activity, healthy diet) comprising both individual and group sessions.
Main study parameters/endpoints: implementation feasibility using three of the elements of the 'Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance' (RE-AIM) framework for process evaluation (i.e. Reach, Adoption and Implementation)
- Conditions
- Depression, Unipolar, Cardiovascular Diseases
- Being tested
- GLI-LEEF
- Keywords
- depression, lifestyle, general practice
- Medical subject headings
- Depressive Disorder, Cardiovascular Diseases, Depression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GLI-LEEFBehavioural
GLI-LEEF is an 18-week program, during which various lifestyle topics are discussed, such as nutrition, exercise, sleep, relationships and intimacy, and specific education about depression and its influence on lifestyle. GLI-LEEF is aimed at improving the activity level, quality of life and (cardiovascular) health of patients and thus increasing the general functioning and well-being of patients and at the same time reducing psychological complaints.
GLI-LEEF consists of 14 group meetings and 4 individual meetings, the group meetings last 90 minutes, the individual meetings 30 minutes. Patients are asked to wear a FitBit and to complete short homework assignments. Each group contains 8-10 patients. Patients are asked to find a buddy who can support them during the program.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Reach of GLI-LEEF
Reach of GLI-LEEF as defined as the number of individuals who are willing to participate in this study
Measured: 12 months
General practice adoption of GLI-LEEF
General practice adoption of GLI-LEEF as defined by the number of general practices that are willing to implement GLI-LEEF in this study
Measured: 12 months
General practitioner adoption of GLI-LEEF
General practice adoption of GLI-LEEF as defined by the number of general practitioners that are willing to implement GLI-LEEF in this study
Measured: 12 months
Lifestyle coach adoption of GLI-LEEF
Lifestyle coach adoption of GLI-LEEF as defined by the number of lifestyle coaches that are willing to implement GLI-LEEF in this study
Measured: 12 months
Adherence to GLI-LEEF
First aspect of implementation is adherence to GLI-LEEF which is defined by the number of sessions attended by the participant out of the total of 18 sessions
Measured: 18 weeks
Drop-out from GLI-LEEF
Second aspect of implementation is drop-out from GLI-LEEF which is defined by the proportion of participants who decide to prematurely stop taking part in the intervention
Measured: 18 weeks
Barriers and facilitators of the GLI-LEEF implementation
Potential barriers and facilitators of the GLI-LEEF implementation will be identified using a qualitative approach by interviewing approximately 10 participants who dropped out and 10 who completed GLI-LEEF, if opportune
Measured: 18 weeks
Secondary outcomes (11)
Body weight of the participant as assessed by a medical weight scale
Body weight in kilograms
Measured: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Body height of the participant as assessed by a stadiometer
Body height in meters
Measured: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Waist circumference of the participant as assessed using a tape meter line
Waist circumference in centimeters
Measured: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Diastolic and systolic blood pressure as assessed using a sphygmomanometer
Diastolic and systolic blood pressure in millimeters mercury
Measured: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Treatment success on several domains by according to the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ-=45)
The OQ-45 runs from 0 to 180. The lower the score, the more successful treatment
Measured: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Recovery of the participant according to the Individual Recovery Outcomes - Counter (I.ROC)
The I.ROC is an instrument to quantitatively measure recovery. The total score runs from 12 to 72. Higher scores indicate better outcomes.
Measured: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Wellbeing as assessed by the Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF)
The MHC-SF measures emotional, social and psychological wellbeing. Its total score runs from 0 to 20. Higher score means better outcome.
Measured: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Self esteem according to the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES)
The RSES is a widely used self-report instrument for evaluating individual self-esteem. The total score runs from 0 to 30. Higher score means worse outcome, i.e. less self-esteem.
Measured: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Insomnia according to the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
The ISI assesses insomnia. The total score runs from 0 to 28. Higher score means worse outcome.
Measured: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Quality of life according to the Recovering Quality of Life (ReQol)
This is a Patient Reported Outcome Measure assesses the quality of life for people with different mental health conditions. Its score runs from 0 to 80. Higher score means better outcome.
Measured: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Health care consumption and productivity loss according to the Treatment Inventory of Costs in Patients with psychiatric disorders (TIC-P)
The TiC - P assesses health care consumption and productivity loss in patients with mental illness
Measured: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Feb 2024
- Study start1 Aug 2023
- Primary completion1 Mar 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jul 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Depression, UnipolarStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Uncontrolled cohort study
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Medical Center Groningen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- GGZ Drenthe Mental Health Institution
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06286345
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 17644
- Acronym
- LIVES-GP
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 5 Feb 2024
- Last updated
- 4 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Lifestyle InterVEntion Study in General Practice: LIVES - GP
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06286345
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LIVES-GP / 17644
- Conditions
- Depression, Unipolar, Cardiovascular Diseases
- Keywords
- depression, lifestyle, general practice
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Medical Center GroningenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- GGZ Drenthe Mental Health Institution
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients with depression are at a substantially increased risk of chronic physical disease including cardiovascular disease. This may be attributed primarily to an unhealthy lifestyle related to their disorder. Interestingly, the unhealthy lifestyle feeds back to decreased quality of life and increased depressive symptoms, thus creating a hazardous vicious circle. Consequently, there is a great potential for 'Lifestyle Medicine' for depression. Yet, it is known that patients with depression often have motivational and self-management problems. Therefore an 18 session multimodal lifestyle intervention (MLI) specifically tailored to the needs of depressed patients was developed and piloted in mental health care, with promising results. This research aims to investigate using a process evaluation the feasibility of this MLI in general practice because this is the setting where the majority of patients with depression are treated and results from mental health care are unlikely to apply.
Detailed description
Rationale: Patients with depression are at a substantially increased risk of chronic physical disease including cardiovascular disease. This may be attributed primarily to an unhealthy lifestyle related to their disorder. Interestingly, the unhealthy lifestyle feeds back to decreased quality of life and increased depressive symptoms, thus creating a hazardous vicious circle. Consequently, there is a great potential for 'Lifestyle Medicine' for depression. Yet, it is known that patients with depression often have motivational and self-management problems. Therefore a multimodal lifestyle intervention (MLI) specifically tailored to the needs of depressed patients was developed and piloted in mental health care, with promising results. This research aims to investigate this MLI in general practice because this is the setting where the majority of patients with depression are treated and results from mental health care are unlikely to apply.
Objective: to estimate in general practice the feasibility of conducting a large-scale study on the effectiveness of a MLI for depression, and identify key factors that can influence its successful conduct. In addition, this study aims to obtain an estimate of the variance of outcome measures (mental health, lifestyle factors, functioning, recovery, wellbeing, sleeping quality, self-esteem, quality of life, health care costs, anthropometry and blood pressure).
Study design: An observational single-group prospective cohort study (n = 50) using mixed methods with baseline measurement and two follow-up measurements: after the intervention at 18 weeks and after a follow-up at 42 weeks.
Study population: Patients (18 years or over) with depression and overweight who are being treated in general practice.
Intervention (if applicable): A MLI named (in Dutch) "Gecombineerde Leefstijl Interventie Leef" (GLI-LEEF), developed for patients with depression consisting of several modules (e.g. on physical activity, healthy diet) comprising both individual and group sessions.
Main study parameters/endpoints: implementation feasibility using three of the elements of the 'Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance' (RE-AIM) framework for process evaluation (i.e. Reach, Adoption and Implementation)
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Model description
- Uncontrolled cohort study
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Diagnosis of depressive symptoms or depressive disorder in the past year as registered in the general practice electronic health record and coded according to the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) as P03 and P76, respectively, or currently treated for depressive symptoms or depressive disorder in general practice.
- At least mild depressive symptom level according to the Quick Inventory Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR) (score ≥6)
- Body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2 or increased waist circumference (>88 cm (women) of >102 cm (men)).
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Current treatment in mental health care (GGZ in Dutch)
- Severe somatic / neurological disease at the discretion of the GP
- Currently participating in another lifestyle intervention
- Insufficient proficiency in Dutch
- Inability to read and write
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| GLI-LEEFGLI-LEEF is an 18-week program, during which various lifestyle topics are discussed, such as nutrition, exercise, sleep, relationships and intimacy, and specific education about depression and its influence on lifestyle. GLI-LEEF is aimed at improving the activity level, quality of life and (cardiovascular) health of patients and thus increasing the general functioning and well-being of patients and at the same time reducing psychological complaints. GLI-LEEF consists of 14 group meetings and 4 individual meetings, the group meetings last 90 minutes, the individual meetings 30 minutes. Patients are asked to wear a FitBit and to complete short homework assignments. Each group contains 8-10 patients. Patients are asked to find a buddy who can support them during the program. | Behavioural | – |
Primary outcome
Reach of GLI-LEEF
Time frame: 12 months
Reach of GLI-LEEF as defined as the number of individuals who are willing to participate in this study
General practice adoption of GLI-LEEF
Time frame: 12 months
General practice adoption of GLI-LEEF as defined by the number of general practices that are willing to implement GLI-LEEF in this study
General practitioner adoption of GLI-LEEF
Time frame: 12 months
General practice adoption of GLI-LEEF as defined by the number of general practitioners that are willing to implement GLI-LEEF in this study
Lifestyle coach adoption of GLI-LEEF
Time frame: 12 months
Lifestyle coach adoption of GLI-LEEF as defined by the number of lifestyle coaches that are willing to implement GLI-LEEF in this study
Adherence to GLI-LEEF
Time frame: 18 weeks
First aspect of implementation is adherence to GLI-LEEF which is defined by the number of sessions attended by the participant out of the total of 18 sessions
Drop-out from GLI-LEEF
Time frame: 18 weeks
Second aspect of implementation is drop-out from GLI-LEEF which is defined by the proportion of participants who decide to prematurely stop taking part in the intervention
Barriers and facilitators of the GLI-LEEF implementation
Time frame: 18 weeks
Potential barriers and facilitators of the GLI-LEEF implementation will be identified using a qualitative approach by interviewing approximately 10 participants who dropped out and 10 who completed GLI-LEEF, if opportune
11 secondary outcomes
Body weight of the participant as assessed by a medical weight scale
Time frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Body height of the participant as assessed by a stadiometer
Time frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Waist circumference of the participant as assessed using a tape meter line
Time frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Diastolic and systolic blood pressure as assessed using a sphygmomanometer
Time frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Treatment success on several domains by according to the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ-=45)
Time frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Recovery of the participant according to the Individual Recovery Outcomes - Counter (I.ROC)
Time frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Wellbeing as assessed by the Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF)
Time frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Self esteem according to the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES)
Time frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Insomnia according to the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Time frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Quality of life according to the Recovering Quality of Life (ReQol)
Time frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Health care consumption and productivity loss according to the Treatment Inventory of Costs in Patients with psychiatric disorders (TIC-P)
Time frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Mar 2024.
Related trials for Depression, Unipolar
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Validation of Wearable Core Body Temperature-Based Circadian Rhythm Digital Biomarkers
Mood Disorders, Major Depressive Diorder
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Vortioxetine in Japanese Pediatric Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
Major Depressive Disorder
RecruitingPhase 1
Neuropharmacologic Imaging and Biomarker Assessments of Response to Acute and Repeated-Dosed Ketamine Infusions in Major Depressive Disorder
Healthy Volunteer, Major Depressive Disorder
Recruiting
rTMS to Target Neural Connectivity and Rumination in Treatment-Resistant Depression
Depression, Treatment Resistant
Recruiting
Ketogenic Diet and Neuromodulation in Treatment Resistant Depression
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing GLI-LEEF in people with Depression, Unipolar and Cardiovascular Diseases, run by University Medical Center Groningen at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Huibert Burger, MD PhD (+31(0)50 361 6722 ext. 6722, h.burger@umcg.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Reach of GLI-LEEF (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2024.