Catheter-associated Urinary Tract InfectionNCT06295627
The Analysis of Factors Causing Indwelling Urinary Catheter-related Infections in ICU Patients and Their Nursing Strategies
An observational study of Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infection, run by Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
To explore the analysis of factors causing indwelling urinary catheter-related infections in ICU patients and their nursing strategies, and to provide reference for clinical nursing work. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infection
- How many people
- 291 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 30 Jan 2023to 15 Jan 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: 291 patients with indwelling urinary catheters in the second area of ICU of our hospital from January 1, 2023 to September 30, 2023 were selected as research subjects.
Who may be able to join
- Age > 14 years
- Patients with indwelling urinary tube during hospitalization
- Length of stay in ICU > 48h
- Complete hospitalization data
Who cannot join
- Had urinary tract infection before hospitalization
- Indwelling catheter < 72h
- Severe liver and kidney failure and death within 48 hours of admission
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
To explore the analysis of factors causing indwelling urinary catheter-related infections in ICU patients and their nursing strategies, and to provide reference for clinical nursing work. 291 patients with indwelling urinary catheters in the second area of ICU of our hospital from January 1, 2023 to September 30, 2023 were selected as research subjects. They were divided into infection group and non-infection group according to the presence or absence of urinary tract infection. Non-infection group The first group consisted of patients without urinary tract infection (278 cases), and the infection group consisted of patients with urinary tract infection (13 cases). A retrospective analysis method was used to analyze the causes of catheter-related urinary tract infection and the infecting bacteria of the two groups of patients. A single factor analysis was performed on various factors and other related factors, and corresponding nursing strategies were summarized and proposed.
- Being tested
- There were no interventions in retrospective analysis
- Keywords
- ICU, Catheter-associated, Factors, NursingCountermeasures
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
There were no interventions in retrospective analysisOther
A retrospective analysis method was used to analyze the causes of catheter-related urinary tract infection and the infecting bacteria of the two groups of patients. A single factor analysis was performed on various factors and other related factors, and corresponding nursing strategies were summarized and proposed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Infected group | The infection group consisted of patients with urinary tract infection (13 cases) Receives: Other: There were no interventions in retrospective analysis | |
| Non-infected group | Non-infection group The first group consisted of patients without urinary tract infection (278 cases) Receives: Other: There were no interventions in retrospective analysis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
How many patients in the infected group and how many patients in the non-infected group had bladder irrigation
Bladder irrigation is easy to damage the drainage tightness of urinary system and increase the risk of infection. Frequent irrigation is easy to lead to urinary tract infection.SPSS27.0 software was used to analyze and process the bladder irrigation data of the two groups of patients.
Measured: 2023.1.1-2023.9.30
How many patients in the infected group and how many patients in the non-infected group were given enema
Patients with increased frequency of stool after enema, fecal incontinence or diarrhea are at risk of retrograde infection caused by fecal contamination of the urethral opening.SPSS27.0 software was used to analyze and process the enema data of the two groups of patients.
Measured: 2023.1.1-2023.9.30
How many times the indwelling catheter was changed in patients in the infected group and patients in the non-infected group respectively
Indwelling catheter can easily lead to urethral mucosa injury, and the urethral mucosa is damaged repeatedly by repeated intubation, and the normal physiological barrier is damaged and the risk of urinary tract infection is increased.SPSS27.0 software was used to analyze and process the data of the number of indwelling catheters in the two groups
Measured: 2023.1.1-2023.9.30
How many patients in the infected group and the non-infected group had co-diabetes
Urinary tract infection is the most common infection in patients with diabetes, and the high blood sugar state of the body helps bacteria colonize and proliferate.The combined diabetes data of the two groups were analyzed and processed using SPSS27.0 software.
Measured: 2023.1.1-2023.9.30
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Mar 2024
- Study start30 Jan 2023
- Primary completion30 Sep 2023
- Study completion15 Jan 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Catheter-associated Urinary Tract InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 291 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06295627
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SYSKY-2024-115-01
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 5 Feb 2024
- Last updated
- 6 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Analysis of Factors Causing Indwelling Urinary Catheter-related Infections in ICU Patients and Their Nursing Strategies
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06295627
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SYSKY-2024-115-01
- Keywords
- ICU, Catheter-associated, Factors, NursingCountermeasures
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 291 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jan 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To explore the analysis of factors causing indwelling urinary catheter-related infections in ICU patients and their nursing strategies, and to provide reference for clinical nursing work. 291 patients with indwelling urinary catheters in the second area of ICU of our hospital from January 1, 2023 to September 30, 2023 were selected as research subjects. They were divided into infection group and non-infection group according to the presence or absence of urinary tract infection. Non-infection group The first group consisted of patients without urinary tract infection (278 cases), and the infection group consisted of patients with urinary tract infection (13 cases). A retrospective analysis method was used to analyze the causes of catheter-related urinary tract infection and the infecting bacteria of the two groups of patients. A single factor analysis was performed on various factors and other related factors, and corresponding nursing strategies were summarized and proposed.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Infected group | – | Other: There were no interventions in retrospective analysisThe infection group consisted of patients with urinary tract infection (13 cases) |
| Non-infected group | – | Other: There were no interventions in retrospective analysisNon-infection group The first group consisted of patients without urinary tract infection (278 cases) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- 291 patients with indwelling urinary catheters in the second area of ICU of our hospital from January 1, 2023 to September 30, 2023 were selected as research subjects.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age > 14 years
- Patients with indwelling urinary tube during hospitalization
- Length of stay in ICU > 48h
- Complete hospitalization data
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Had urinary tract infection before hospitalization
- Indwelling catheter < 72h
- Severe liver and kidney failure and death within 48 hours of admission
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| There were no interventions in retrospective analysisA retrospective analysis method was used to analyze the causes of catheter-related urinary tract infection and the infecting bacteria of the two groups of patients. A single factor analysis was performed on various factors and other related factors, and corresponding nursing strategies were summarized and proposed. | Other | Infected group, Non-infected group |
Primary outcome
How many patients in the infected group and how many patients in the non-infected group had bladder irrigation
Time frame: 2023.1.1-2023.9.30
Bladder irrigation is easy to damage the drainage tightness of urinary system and increase the risk of infection. Frequent irrigation is easy to lead to urinary tract infection.SPSS27.0 software was used to analyze and process the bladder irrigation data of the two groups of patients.
How many patients in the infected group and how many patients in the non-infected group were given enema
Time frame: 2023.1.1-2023.9.30
Patients with increased frequency of stool after enema, fecal incontinence or diarrhea are at risk of retrograde infection caused by fecal contamination of the urethral opening.SPSS27.0 software was used to analyze and process the enema data of the two groups of patients.
How many times the indwelling catheter was changed in patients in the infected group and patients in the non-infected group respectively
Time frame: 2023.1.1-2023.9.30
Indwelling catheter can easily lead to urethral mucosa injury, and the urethral mucosa is damaged repeatedly by repeated intubation, and the normal physiological barrier is damaged and the risk of urinary tract infection is increased.SPSS27.0 software was used to analyze and process the data of the number of indwelling catheters in the two groups
How many patients in the infected group and the non-infected group had co-diabetes
Time frame: 2023.1.1-2023.9.30
Urinary tract infection is the most common infection in patients with diabetes, and the high blood sugar state of the body helps bacteria colonize and proliferate.The combined diabetes data of the two groups were analyzed and processed using SPSS27.0 software.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Mar 2024.
Related trials for Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infection
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Evaluate of the Use of Uromune as a Potential Non-antibiotic Prophylactic Strategy for Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infection in Patients With Long-term Catheterization.
Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTIs)
Recruiting
Effectiveness of the NowCath Foley in Reducing Catheter-Associated UTIs and Blockages in Long-Term Indwelling Catheter Users (REDUCE)
Urinary Catheters, Urinary Catheterization
Recruiting
Comparative Study Between Foley and T-Control® Catheter in Patients With Long-term Catheterization
Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection, Catheter Related Complication
Active, not recruiting
Early (Postoperative Day 3) Versus Standard (Postoperative Day 6) Urethral Catheter Removal After Living Donor Kidney Transplantation
Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTIs), Kidney Transplantation
Recruiting
Hydrogen Peroxide and Ultraviolet Light for Disinfecting Surfaces in Intensive Care Units
Infection, Hospital, Antimicrobial
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infection, run by Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
How many patients in the infected group and how many patients in the non-infected group had bladder irrigation (time frame: 2023.1.1-2023.9.30). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Mar 2024.