AzTrials
AzTrials

AnesthesiaNCT06297720

Early Oral Hydration After Thoracoscopic Surgery

A study testing Oral hydration in people with Anesthesia and Intubation Complication, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the safety and feasibility of early oral hydration in patients receiving video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery after general anesthesia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Anesthesia, Intubation Complication
What is being tested?
Oral hydration
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
1 Mar 2024to 30 Jun 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Males and females aged 18 to 70.
  • Anesthesia physical status classification III or below
  • Body Mass Index 30 or below
  • Elective video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Who cannot join

  • Pre-operative throat pain
  • Impaired mental status
  • Tendency to choke (inc. dysphagia, stroke hx.)
  • Nil Per Os (NPO) less than 8 hours
  • Pregnancy
  • Nausea and vomiting in Operating room or Post-anesthesia care unit

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Ting Ting Wang, Master contact

+886978316935

ttwang94anes@gmail.com

Taiwan1 site
  • ChangGung MH

    Taoyuan, 33380

    JUN-YU CHEN

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: Safety and Feasibility of Early Oral Hydration After Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, and Controlled Study

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the safety and feasibility of early oral hydration in patients receiving video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery after general anesthesia. The main questions aims to answer:

  • the safety and feasibility of oral hydration supplementation in the recovery room following general anesthesia.
  • the degree of improvement in sore throat and dry mouth after oral hydration.
  • the side effects and risks of oral hydration supplementation, such as the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
  • the impact of oral hydration supplementation in the recovery room following general anesthesia on hemodynamics.
  • patient satisfaction with oral hydration supplementation in the recovery room following general anesthesia.

Participants will receive a series of oral hydration from swab moistening, and ice cube hydration to water hydration in the recovery room. Researchers will compare with the standard, no-hydration group to see if it is safe and feasible to hydrate patients in the recovery room.

Read the detailed description

Anesthesiologists assess the removal of the endotracheal tube post-surgery and the patient is then transferred to the recovery room for rest. The principal investigator will evaluate the consciousness status and risk of nausea and vomiting to confirm eligibility for the trial. Subsequently, the following grouping will be conducted:

  1. Experimental group
  • First, moisten the patient's throat with a cotton swab dipped in water. If no nausea or vomiting occurs after five minutes, proceed to the next stage.
  • Provide an ice cube for the patient to hold in their mouth. If no nausea or vomiting occurs after ten minutes, proceed to the next stage.
  • Offer 10-20ml water for the patient to drink under medical supervision. If no nausea or vomiting occurs and the patient requests more water, administer 10-20ml of water every ten minutes, assessing for any adverse effects each time. The total water intake should not exceed 500ml.
  1. Comparison group - standard care without any intervention

Evaluate the level of throat pain using VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) score, the incidence, timing, frequency of post-operative nausea and vomiting, the level of mouth dryness, the satisfaction of patients in recovery room, and the vital signs.

Being tested
Oral hydration
Keywords
Early oral hydration, Sore throat
Medical subject headings
Pharyngitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Oral hydrationBehavioural

    • Researchers moisten the patient's throat with a wet cotton swab. If no nausea or vomiting occurs after five minutes, proceed to the next stage.
    • Provide an ice cube of potable water for the patient to hold in their mouth. If no nausea or vomiting occurs after ten minutes, proceed to the next stage.
    • Offer 10-20ml of potable water for the patient to drink under medical supervision. If no nausea or vomiting occurs and the patient requests more water, administer 10-20ml every ten minutes, assessing for any adverse effects each time. The total water intake should not exceed 500ml.
Study groups in NCT06297720
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Oral hydrationExperimentalwet swab-ice cube-small amount of water
Receives: Behavioral: Oral hydration
No hydrationNo interventionAccording to routine care, no oral fluid supplementation is provided.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. sore throat level by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)

    sore throat level by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) measured by 0-10 point-scale

    Measured: From patient arrived at the PACU (Postanesthesia Care Unit) to patient being discharged, about 1-3 hours

  2. Mouth dryness

    Modified Schirmer tear strip test

    Measured: From patient arrived at the PACU (Postanesthesia Care Unit) to patient being discharged, about 1-3 hours

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV)

    PONV exist or not

    Measured: From patient been sent to PACU (Postanesthesia Care Unit) until discharge, about 1-3 hours

  2. timing of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV)

    PONV or not, if yes, record timing

    Measured: From patient been sent to PACU (Postanesthesia Care Unit) until discharge, about 1-3 hours

  3. duration of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV)

    PONV or not, if yes, record duration

    Measured: From patient been sent to PACU (Postanesthesia Care Unit) until discharge, about 1-3 hours

  4. management of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV)

    PONV or not, if yes, record management

    Measured: From patient been sent to PACU (Postanesthesia Care Unit) until discharge, about 1-3 hours

  5. Heart Rate in PACU (Postanesthesia Care Unit)

    Heart Rate (/min) in PACU (Postanesthesia Care Unit)

    Measured: From patient been sent to PACU (Postanesthesia Care Unit) until discharge in every 5 minutes, about 1-3 hours

  6. Blood pressure in PACU (Postanesthesia Care Unit)

    Blood pressure (mmHg) in PACU (Postanesthesia Care Unit)

    Measured: From patient been sent to PACU (Postanesthesia Care Unit) until discharge in every 5 minutes, about 1-3 hours

  7. Patient's satisfaction

    Patient's satisfaction measured by Likert scale (1-5)

    Measured: Through study completion, before patients leaving PACU (Postanesthesia Care Unit)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Mar 2024
  2. Study start1 Mar 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion28 Feb 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06297720
Sponsor's protocol ID
2401110013
Status last verified
Jan 2024
First submitted
5 Feb 2024
Last updated
7 Mar 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Oral hydration in people with Anesthesia and Intubation Complication, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ting Ting Wang, Master (+886978316935, ttwang94anes@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

sore throat level by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) (time frame: From patient arrived at the PACU (Postanesthesia Care Unit) to patient being discharged, about 1-3 hours). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Mar 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in