Heart Failure NYHA Class IIIPhase 1ESHF-WHRTNCT06299176
Whole Heart Radiotherapy for End-stage Heart Failure
A Phase 1 study testing Whole Heart Radiation Therapy in people with Heart Failure NYHA Class III and Heart Failure NYHA Class IV, run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
End-stage heart failure (ESHF) causes recurrent hospitalizations, cardiac arrhythmias, and intolerance to standard HF therapies are common as the disease progresses. Management focuses on controlling symptoms, correcting precipitants, avoiding triggers, and improving quality-of-life. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure NYHA Class III, Heart Failure NYHA Class IV, End-stage Heart Failure
- What is being tested?
- Whole Heart Radiation Therapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 6 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 30 Apr 2025to 31 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age ≥ 18
- End-stage heart failure with NYHA class 3 or 4,
- LVEF ≤ 30%
- NT-Pro-BNP ≥ 1500 pg/mL
- on maximum medical therapy with progressive symptoms/disease as defined by their primary cardiologist and ineligible for advanced therapies including left ventricular assist devices and heart transplant
Who cannot join
- previous RT in the treatment field that precludes further RT
- active connective tissue disease
- interstitial pulmonary fibrosis
- Participants who are unable to be positioned in a manner where treatment can be safely delivered
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Phase 1 Feasibility and Safety of Whole Heart Radiotherapy for End-stage Heart Failure: First In-human Treatments
End-stage heart failure (ESHF) causes recurrent hospitalizations, cardiac arrhythmias, and intolerance to standard HF therapies are common as the disease progresses. Management focuses on controlling symptoms, correcting precipitants, avoiding triggers, and improving quality-of-life. The combination of recent preclinical and clinical data suggests that localized cardiac RT is relatively safe and has positive conductive and anti-proliferative effects in the "sick" heart. In this Phase 1 study, the investigators aim to assess the feasibility and safety of 5 Gy whole heart radiotherapy in six (6) ESHF participants with limited options for further medical therapy to control their disease. The investigators hypothesize that 5 Gy whole heart radiotherapy can improve LVEF and decrease blood markers of heart failure and inflammation including B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), C-reactive protein (CRP), and troponins, while also having a very tolerable side effect profile.
Read the detailed description
HEART FAILURE Heart Failure (HF) is a heterogeneous syndrome manifested by vascular congestion and/or peripheral hypoperfusion in the setting of structural and/or functional cardiac abnormalities. Congestion commonly presents with dyspnea, reduced exercise tolerance, and edema while hypoperfusion results in end-organ dysfunction. HF is a major public health problem and because of its age-dependent increase in incidence and prevalence, it's one of the leading causes of death and hospitalization among the elderly. As a consequence of the worldwide increase in life expectancy, and due to improvements in the treatment of HF in recent years, the proportion of participants that reach an advanced phase of the disease, so-called ESHF, is steadily growing.
HF is characterized by impairment in cardiac structure and function which, in its advanced phases, results in decreased cardiac output (hypoperfusion) and/or fluid buildup (congestion). Initially cardiac output (CO) is maintained through the Frank-Starling mechanism with LV dilation and wall thickening. Eventually myocardial contractility declines and stroke volume (SV) decreases . A compensatory increase in heart rate (HR) may initially help maintain cardiac output, but this too will ultimately fail to preserve output. Currently, patients with HF are most often categorized as having heart failure with reduced (HFrEF; LVEF <40%), mid-range (HFmrEF; LVEF 40-49%) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; LVEF ≥50%). The four classical hemodynamic profiles of heart failure can be categorized in a two-by-two matrix based on filling pressures (presence or absence of congestion) and perfusion status (adequate/inadequate). Furthermore, patients are classified by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) based on the presence or absence of symptoms during rest and physical activity (Figure 2). Patients with ESHF typically live in the NYHA Class III-IV and in a fine balance between the "wet and warm" (i.e. relatively preserved perfusion but congested) and "wet and cold" (i.e. low perfusion and congested) categories.
The two principal pathways mediating the pathophysiology of heart failure are the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). These systems are innately related, having the ability to further activate each other and ultimately resulting in a chronic state of increased effective circulating volume. Over time, myocardial alterations result in reduced responsiveness to these adaptive mechanisms, and thus a drop in cardiac output ensues. Not surprisingly the principal HF therapies target these pathways. The primary therapies have been comprised of the triad of ACE inhibitors (or angiotensin receptor blockers [ARB] if intolerant), beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists (beta-blockers), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) titrated to target doses. Unfortunately, in ESHF, medical optimization is often not tolerated because of worsening hypotension, hyperkalemia, and renal dysfunction. There is often a need to reduce the dose or eliminate these therapies which is a well-established marker of poor prognosis. Once diagnosed with ESHF focus turns towards defining the optimal therapeutic approach with options including orthotopic heart transplant (OHT), left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and/or palliation. Ultimately, a combination of these three strategies is often required.
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is generally viewed as a clinically useful phenotypic marker indicative of underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and sensitivity to therapy.
End-stage heart failure (ESHF) manifests as severe and often relentless symptoms of dyspnea, fatigue, abdominal discomfort and ultimately cardiac cachexia with renal and hepatic dysfunction frequently further complicating the process. Recurrent hospitalizations, cardiac arrhythmias, and intolerance to standard HF therapies are common as the disease progresses. Management focuses on controlling symptoms, correcting precipitants, avoiding triggers, and improving quality-of-life (QOL).
RADIATION THERAPY Radiation therapy involves delivering high energy x-rays precisely to a target with minimal dose to the surrounding clinical tissues. Accuracy in radiation therapy requires effective patient immobilization, precise target localization, and highly conformed dosimetry and isotropic dose fall-off. Dose calculations involve algorithms that account for effects of tissue heterogeneities, and the linear accelerators that deliver the treatment are also equipped with multileaf collimators and have the ability of using multiple non-overlapping beams of radiation as well as intensity modulated radiation therapy to maximize accuracy of target dose deposition while minimizing surrounding organ dose.
Radiation therapy is used in many malignant and benign conditions with a variety of dose and fractionation schemes. For malignant diseases in the palliative setting, radiation therapy is delivered to painful or progressive sites of disease in a highly focused manner with significant benefit on controlling pain, local progression, and quality of life. Typical doses for these types of treatment vary and can be limited to 8 Gy in a single fraction. These treatments are tolerated extremely well by almost all patients with almost no side effects.
Radiation therapy (RT) is utilized half of all patients with a cancer diagnosis. RT is effective in reducing populations of highly proliferative cells, a common feature of malignant disease. RT is also used successfully to treat many non-malignant disorders, including hyperproliferative and inflammatory conditions. The RT doses required for these non-malignant disorders are often much smaller and carry a lighter burden of adverse effects. Recently, a number of human and murine studies indicate that in heart failure (HF), proliferating macrophages and fibroblasts are major mediators of collateral tissue injury and progressive disease. Strategies that ablate these highly proliferative precursors in preclinical models attenuate features of heart failure progression.
The use of high-dose stereotactic radiation therapy in patients with cardiac arrhythmias, specifically ventricular tachycardia (VT), has been shown to reduce arrhythmia burden in several human clinical trials and case series. In these studies, a single dose (25 Gy) of non-invasive electrophysiologically guided localized RT was safe, substantially reduced VT, improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and improved quality of life (QOL) in 50-70% of patients with no other options for therapy. The initial hypothesis for this effect was that RT would create a scar, similar to how invasive catheter therapies are utilized to ablate arrhythmias. However, subsequent mechanistic studies suggest that rather than simply scarring the targeted tissue, RT stimulates physiologic changes including increased sodium channel (NaV1.5) and connexin-43 (Cx-43) expression, increasing conduction velocity within the heart. These physiologic changes were also seen outside of the 25Gy target areas, suggesting that smaller doses of radiation is sufficient to stimulate these effects. Retrospective analysis of the RT dosimetry from patients treated for VT demonstrated that 5 Gy was reflective of the approximate whole heart dose received outside of the targeted scar in these patients. A recent hypothesis postulated that 5 Gy may be sufficient to upregulate pro-conductive proteins and signaling pathways while attenuating cardiac remodeling via decreasing levels of macrophages and fibroblasts; the primary proliferative precursors to adverse cardiac remodeling in many models of cardiac injury. This was investigated in murine heart failure models, which demonstrated that 5 Gy of cardiac radiation delivered after injury attenuated adverse cardiac remodeling, improved LVEF, reduced fibrosis, and decreased proliferation of macrophages and fibroblasts.
HYPOTHESIS The combination of recent preclinical and clinical data suggests that localized cardiac RT is relatively safe and has positive conductive and anti-proliferative effects in the "sick" heart. In this Phase 1 study, the investigators aim to assess the feasibility and safety of 5 Gy whole heart radiotherapy in six (6) ESHF participants with limited options for further medical therapy to control their disease in a 3+3 study design. The investigators hypothesize that 5 Gy whole heart radiotherapy is a safe therapy with a limited side effect profile that may improve LVEF and decrease blood markers of heart failure and inflammation including B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), C-reactive protein (CRP), troponins, lactate, and neturophil to lymphocyte ratio.
INTERIM REVIEW OF DATA, ESCALATION, AND DE-ESCALATION CRITERIA A data safety and monitoring board (DSMB) composed of two radiation oncologists and one cardiologists outside of the study team will review the data 30 days after the first 3 participants are treated. They will have the authority to stop the study based on the following dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rule: all 3 patients with grade 3+ toxicity, or any grade 4+ toxicity classified as probably, or definitely related to the study intervention. Toxicities are based on CTCAE v5.0 definitions. Following this review, for the purpose of escalation and de-escalation, escalation-limiting toxicity (ELT) will be defined as any grade 3+ toxicity considered possibly, probably, or definitely related to the treatment intervention.
The following de-escalation, and escalation rules will be applied. There will be, at most, 4 dose levels. Escalation and de-escalation rules follow.
- Dose 1 (5 Gy) - starting dose based on rationale described in protocol
- Dose 0 (3 Gy) - de-escalation dose following 2 ELTs
- Dose 2 (7 Gy) - escalation dose 1 following no ELTs at Dose 1
- Dose 3 (9 Gy) - escalation dose 2 if no ELTs encountered at Dose 2
Following the treatment of 3 patients at dose level 1 (5 Gy), If one patient experiences a ELT, then 3 additional patients are enrolled at dose level 1 (5 Gy), for a maximum of 6 patients. If none of these patients experience a ELT then 3 patients would be enrolled at dose level 2 (7 Gy). If only one of those 6 patients experience a ELT, then the next 3 patients will be enrolled at dose level 2 (7 Gy).
The study continues in this fashion until no more than 1 of 6 patients treated at the highest dose level experience a ELT. At any dose level, if 2 patients experience a ELT, then dose de-escalation is to occur, with 6 total patients enrolled at that dose level.
PARTICIPANT TREATMENT SIMULATION Prior to radiation treatment planning, participants will be immobilized and a free-breathing CT simulation with 3 mm slice thickness will be performed. Respiratory correlated four-dimensional tomographic (4D-CT) images will be acquired to assess the extent of cardiac and respiratory motion. The average CT derived from 4D-CT images will be used for target and organ at risk (OAR) delineation as well as radiotherapy treatment planning.
RADIATION THERAPY TARGET VOLUMES The treatment target will be delineated using conventional radiotherapy definitions. The clinical target volume (CTV) will be defined on the simulation CT as the entire contour of the muscular heart excluding the pericardium. An ITV will be generated based on the motion seen on the 4D-CT, to encompass the combined respiratory and cardiac motion during free-breathing. A planning target volume (PTV) of up to 5 mm will be generated as a volumetric expansion from the ITV to account for uncertainties in planning and treatment delivery. Prior to creating a radiation treatment plan, organs-at-risk (OARs) including the spinal cord, stomach, liver, spleen, trachea, bronchi, lungs, and esophagus will be delineated.
TREATMENT PLAN, EVALUATION, AND QUALITY ASSURANCE Participants will be prescribed between 3Gy and 9 Gy in 1 fraction depending on which stage of escalation/de-escalation the trial is at. The plan will be normalized aiming for 95% coverage of the PTV volume by the 100% isodose. RT will be delivered with a 6 MV energy beam, using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) through partial arcs. Beam geometry will be optimized to avoid any defibrillator or pacemaker in place. Quality assurance (QA) for each treatment plan includes a group review of contours and plan by the radiation oncology, cardiology and medical physics study team members, as well as the standard departmental two-step plan verification prior to treatment and presentation at departmental QA rounds.
- Conditions
- Heart Failure NYHA Class III, Heart Failure NYHA Class IV, End-stage Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
- Being tested
- Whole Heart Radiation Therapy
- Keywords
- radiation therapy, radiotherapy, radiation, heart failure, cardiac radioablation, left ventricle ejection fraction
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Whole Heart Radiation TherapyOther
Radiation to the whole heart in one treatment with a prescribed dose of 5 Gy.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Whole Heart Radiation Therapy | Experimental | Whole heart radiotherapy, 5 Gy in 1 fraction Receives: Other: Whole Heart Radiation Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Acute adverse events definitely or probably related to radiation therapy at 30 days as per CTCAE v 5.0
Safety Endpoint
Measured: 30 days
Secondary outcomes (14)
Overall survival
Death from any cause after treatment
Measured: 6 months
Hospital stays
length of hospitalization after treatment due to heart failure exacerbation
Measured: 6 months
Subacute adverse events
Adverse events definitely or probably related to radiation therapy
Measured: 30-90 days after treatment
Late adverse events
Adverse events definitely or probably related to radiation therapy
Measured: 90 days to 6 months after treatment
Medication Changes - dose
changes in dose of medications following radiotherapy
Measured: 6 months
Medication Changes - number
changes innumber of medications following radiotherapy
Measured: 6 months
Quality of life KCCQ
quality of life based on questionnaire results following treatment
Measured: day 0, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Quality of life - SF-36
quality of life based on questionnaire results following treatment
Measured: day 0, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Troponin changes
Changes in value of blood marker.
Measured: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 1 year
Lactate changes
Changes in value of blood marker.
Measured: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 1 year
Renal Function
Changes in value of blood marker.
Measured: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 1 year
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio
Changes in value of blood marker.
Measured: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 1 year
b-natrurietic peptide
Changes in value of blood marker.
Measured: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 1 year
Change in mean left ventricle ejection fraction
Change in Left ventricle ejaction fraction as measured by transthoracic echocardiogram
Measured: 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Mar 2024
- Study start30 Apr 2025
- Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (29)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heart Failure NYHA Class IIIStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health CentreThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- 6 participants with end-stage heart failure (NYHA 3 or 4, LVEF \< 30%) with no other standard of care therapy options to receive whole heart radiation therapy.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Tarek Hijal, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
- Investigators
- Ian J Gerard, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health CentreTarek Hijal, MD, Principal investigator, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health CentreMartin L Bernier, MD, Principal investigator, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06299176
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ESHF-WHRT (2024-10362)
- Acronym
- ESHF-WHRT
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 21 Dec 2023
- Last updated
- 14 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: no public sharing, will share anonymized data if necessary for other collaborative projects in future following REB review
Publications
Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, Falk V, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Harjola VP, Jankowska EA, Jessup M, Linde C, Nihoyannopoulos P, Parissis JT, Pieske B, Riley JP, Rosano GMC, Ruilope LM, Ruschitzka F, Rutten FH, van der Meer P. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2016 Dec;69(12):1167. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2016.11.005. No abstract available. English, Spanish.
PubMed 27894487Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr, Drazner MH, Fonarow GC, Geraci SA, Horwich T, Januzzi JL, Johnson MR, Kasper EK, Levy WC, Masoudi FA, McBride PE, McMurray JJ, Mitchell JE, Peterson PN, Riegel B, Sam F, Stevenson LW, Tang WH, Tsai EJ, Wilkoff BL; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;62(16):e147-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.019. Epub 2013 Jun 5. No abstract available.
PubMed 23747642Kemp CD, Conte JV. The pathophysiology of heart failure. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2012 Sep-Oct;21(5):365-71. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2011.11.007. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
PubMed 22227365Nohria A, Tsang SW, Fang JC, Lewis EF, Jarcho JA, Mudge GH, Stevenson LW. Clinical assessment identifies hemodynamic profiles that predict outcomes in patients admitted with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 May 21;41(10):1797-804. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00309-7.
PubMed 12767667Srinivasan, S. and R. Kundu, Fluid Management in Cardiogenic Shock, in Rational Use of Intravenous Fluids in Critically Ill Patients, M.L.N.G. Malbrain, et al., Editors. 2024, Springer International Publishing: Cham. p. 315-328.
Borlaug BA, Redfield MM. Diastolic and systolic heart failure are distinct phenotypes within the heart failure spectrum. Circulation. 2011 May 10;123(18):2006-13; discussion 2014. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.954388. No abstract available.
PubMed 21555723Paulus WJ, Tschope C. A novel paradigm for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: comorbidities drive myocardial dysfunction and remodeling through coronary microvascular endothelial inflammation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jul 23;62(4):263-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.092. Epub 2013 May 15.
PubMed 23684677McMurray JJ. Clinical practice. Systolic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 21;362(3):228-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp0909392. No abstract available.
PubMed 20089973Triposkiadis F, Butler J, Abboud FM, Armstrong PW, Adamopoulos S, Atherton JJ, Backs J, Bauersachs J, Burkhoff D, Bonow RO, Chopra VK, de Boer RA, de Windt L, Hamdani N, Hasenfuss G, Heymans S, Hulot JS, Konstam M, Lee RT, Linke WA, Lunde IG, Lyon AR, Maack C, Mann DL, Mebazaa A, Mentz RJ, Nihoyannopoulos P, Papp Z, Parissis J, Pedrazzini T, Rosano G, Rouleau J, Seferovic PM, Shah AM, Starling RC, Tocchetti CG, Trochu JN, Thum T, Zannad F, Brutsaert DL, Segers VF, De Keulenaer GW. The continuous heart failure spectrum: moving beyond an ejection fraction classification. Eur Heart J. 2019 Jul 1;40(26):2155-2163. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz158.
PubMed 30957868Spencer K, Parrish R, Barton R, Henry A. Palliative radiotherapy. BMJ. 2018 Mar 23;360:k821. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k821. No abstract available.
PubMed 29572337Schaue D, McBride WH. Opportunities and challenges of radiotherapy for treating cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep;12(9):527-40. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.120. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
PubMed 26122185Micke O, Seegenschmiedt MH; German Working Group on Radiotherapy in Germany. Consensus guidelines for radiation therapy of benign diseases: a multicenter approach in Germany. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Feb 1;52(2):496-513. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01814-4.
PubMed 11872298Rodel F, Fournier C, Wiedemann J, Merz F, Gaipl US, Frey B, Keilholz L, Seegenschmiedt MH, Rodel C, Hehlgans S. Basics of Radiation Biology When Treating Hyperproliferative Benign Diseases. Front Immunol. 2017 May 3;8:519. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00519. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 28515727Dick SA, Epelman S. Chronic Heart Failure and Inflammation: What Do We Really Know? Circ Res. 2016 Jun 24;119(1):159-76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308030.
PubMed 27340274Lafuse WP, Wozniak DJ, Rajaram MVS. Role of Cardiac Macrophages on Cardiac Inflammation, Fibrosis and Tissue Repair. Cells. 2020 Dec 31;10(1):51. doi: 10.3390/cells10010051.
PubMed 33396359
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase 1 Feasibility and Safety of Whole Heart Radiotherapy for End-stage Heart Failure: First In-human Treatments
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06299176
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ESHF-WHRT / ESHF-WHRT (2024-10362)
- Conditions
- Heart Failure NYHA Class III, Heart Failure NYHA Class IV, End-stage Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
- Keywords
- radiation therapy, radiotherapy, radiation, heart failure, cardiac radioablation, left ventricle ejection fraction
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health CentreUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
End-stage heart failure (ESHF) causes recurrent hospitalizations, cardiac arrhythmias, and intolerance to standard HF therapies are common as the disease progresses. Management focuses on controlling symptoms, correcting precipitants, avoiding triggers, and improving quality-of-life. The combination of recent preclinical and clinical data suggests that localized cardiac RT is relatively safe and has positive conductive and anti-proliferative effects in the "sick" heart. In this Phase 1 study, the investigators aim to assess the feasibility and safety of 5 Gy whole heart radiotherapy in six (6) ESHF participants with limited options for further medical therapy to control their disease. The investigators hypothesize that 5 Gy whole heart radiotherapy can improve LVEF and decrease blood markers of heart failure and inflammation including B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), C-reactive protein (CRP), and troponins, while also having a very tolerable side effect profile.
Detailed description
HEART FAILURE Heart Failure (HF) is a heterogeneous syndrome manifested by vascular congestion and/or peripheral hypoperfusion in the setting of structural and/or functional cardiac abnormalities. Congestion commonly presents with dyspnea, reduced exercise tolerance, and edema while hypoperfusion results in end-organ dysfunction. HF is a major public health problem and because of its age-dependent increase in incidence and prevalence, it's one of the leading causes of death and hospitalization among the elderly. As a consequence of the worldwide increase in life expectancy, and due to improvements in the treatment of HF in recent years, the proportion of participants that reach an advanced phase of the disease, so-called ESHF, is steadily growing.
HF is characterized by impairment in cardiac structure and function which, in its advanced phases, results in decreased cardiac output (hypoperfusion) and/or fluid buildup (congestion). Initially cardiac output (CO) is maintained through the Frank-Starling mechanism with LV dilation and wall thickening. Eventually myocardial contractility declines and stroke volume (SV) decreases . A compensatory increase in heart rate (HR) may initially help maintain cardiac output, but this too will ultimately fail to preserve output. Currently, patients with HF are most often categorized as having heart failure with reduced (HFrEF; LVEF <40%), mid-range (HFmrEF; LVEF 40-49%) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; LVEF ≥50%). The four classical hemodynamic profiles of heart failure can be categorized in a two-by-two matrix based on filling pressures (presence or absence of congestion) and perfusion status (adequate/inadequate). Furthermore, patients are classified by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) based on the presence or absence of symptoms during rest and physical activity (Figure 2). Patients with ESHF typically live in the NYHA Class III-IV and in a fine balance between the "wet and warm" (i.e. relatively preserved perfusion but congested) and "wet and cold" (i.e. low perfusion and congested) categories.
The two principal pathways mediating the pathophysiology of heart failure are the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). These systems are innately related, having the ability to further activate each other and ultimately resulting in a chronic state of increased effective circulating volume. Over time, myocardial alterations result in reduced responsiveness to these adaptive mechanisms, and thus a drop in cardiac output ensues. Not surprisingly the principal HF therapies target these pathways. The primary therapies have been comprised of the triad of ACE inhibitors (or angiotensin receptor blockers [ARB] if intolerant), beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists (beta-blockers), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) titrated to target doses. Unfortunately, in ESHF, medical optimization is often not tolerated because of worsening hypotension, hyperkalemia, and renal dysfunction. There is often a need to reduce the dose or eliminate these therapies which is a well-established marker of poor prognosis. Once diagnosed with ESHF focus turns towards defining the optimal therapeutic approach with options including orthotopic heart transplant (OHT), left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and/or palliation. Ultimately, a combination of these three strategies is often required.
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is generally viewed as a clinically useful phenotypic marker indicative of underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and sensitivity to therapy.
End-stage heart failure (ESHF) manifests as severe and often relentless symptoms of dyspnea, fatigue, abdominal discomfort and ultimately cardiac cachexia with renal and hepatic dysfunction frequently further complicating the process. Recurrent hospitalizations, cardiac arrhythmias, and intolerance to standard HF therapies are common as the disease progresses. Management focuses on controlling symptoms, correcting precipitants, avoiding triggers, and improving quality-of-life (QOL).
RADIATION THERAPY Radiation therapy involves delivering high energy x-rays precisely to a target with minimal dose to the surrounding clinical tissues. Accuracy in radiation therapy requires effective patient immobilization, precise target localization, and highly conformed dosimetry and isotropic dose fall-off. Dose calculations involve algorithms that account for effects of tissue heterogeneities, and the linear accelerators that deliver the treatment are also equipped with multileaf collimators and have the ability of using multiple non-overlapping beams of radiation as well as intensity modulated radiation therapy to maximize accuracy of target dose deposition while minimizing surrounding organ dose.
Radiation therapy is used in many malignant and benign conditions with a variety of dose and fractionation schemes. For malignant diseases in the palliative setting, radiation therapy is delivered to painful or progressive sites of disease in a highly focused manner with significant benefit on controlling pain, local progression, and quality of life. Typical doses for these types of treatment vary and can be limited to 8 Gy in a single fraction. These treatments are tolerated extremely well by almost all patients with almost no side effects.
Radiation therapy (RT) is utilized half of all patients with a cancer diagnosis. RT is effective in reducing populations of highly proliferative cells, a common feature of malignant disease. RT is also used successfully to treat many non-malignant disorders, including hyperproliferative and inflammatory conditions. The RT doses required for these non-malignant disorders are often much smaller and carry a lighter burden of adverse effects. Recently, a number of human and murine studies indicate that in heart failure (HF), proliferating macrophages and fibroblasts are major mediators of collateral tissue injury and progressive disease. Strategies that ablate these highly proliferative precursors in preclinical models attenuate features of heart failure progression.
The use of high-dose stereotactic radiation therapy in patients with cardiac arrhythmias, specifically ventricular tachycardia (VT), has been shown to reduce arrhythmia burden in several human clinical trials and case series. In these studies, a single dose (25 Gy) of non-invasive electrophysiologically guided localized RT was safe, substantially reduced VT, improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and improved quality of life (QOL) in 50-70% of patients with no other options for therapy. The initial hypothesis for this effect was that RT would create a scar, similar to how invasive catheter therapies are utilized to ablate arrhythmias. However, subsequent mechanistic studies suggest that rather than simply scarring the targeted tissue, RT stimulates physiologic changes including increased sodium channel (NaV1.5) and connexin-43 (Cx-43) expression, increasing conduction velocity within the heart. These physiologic changes were also seen outside of the 25Gy target areas, suggesting that smaller doses of radiation is sufficient to stimulate these effects. Retrospective analysis of the RT dosimetry from patients treated for VT demonstrated that 5 Gy was reflective of the approximate whole heart dose received outside of the targeted scar in these patients. A recent hypothesis postulated that 5 Gy may be sufficient to upregulate pro-conductive proteins and signaling pathways while attenuating cardiac remodeling via decreasing levels of macrophages and fibroblasts; the primary proliferative precursors to adverse cardiac remodeling in many models of cardiac injury. This was investigated in murine heart failure models, which demonstrated that 5 Gy of cardiac radiation delivered after injury attenuated adverse cardiac remodeling, improved LVEF, reduced fibrosis, and decreased proliferation of macrophages and fibroblasts.
HYPOTHESIS The combination of recent preclinical and clinical data suggests that localized cardiac RT is relatively safe and has positive conductive and anti-proliferative effects in the "sick" heart. In this Phase 1 study, the investigators aim to assess the feasibility and safety of 5 Gy whole heart radiotherapy in six (6) ESHF participants with limited options for further medical therapy to control their disease in a 3+3 study design. The investigators hypothesize that 5 Gy whole heart radiotherapy is a safe therapy with a limited side effect profile that may improve LVEF and decrease blood markers of heart failure and inflammation including B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), C-reactive protein (CRP), troponins, lactate, and neturophil to lymphocyte ratio.
INTERIM REVIEW OF DATA, ESCALATION, AND DE-ESCALATION CRITERIA A data safety and monitoring board (DSMB) composed of two radiation oncologists and one cardiologists outside of the study team will review the data 30 days after the first 3 participants are treated. They will have the authority to stop the study based on the following dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rule: all 3 patients with grade 3+ toxicity, or any grade 4+ toxicity classified as probably, or definitely related to the study intervention. Toxicities are based on CTCAE v5.0 definitions. Following this review, for the purpose of escalation and de-escalation, escalation-limiting toxicity (ELT) will be defined as any grade 3+ toxicity considered possibly, probably, or definitely related to the treatment intervention.
The following de-escalation, and escalation rules will be applied. There will be, at most, 4 dose levels. Escalation and de-escalation rules follow.
- Dose 1 (5 Gy) - starting dose based on rationale described in protocol
- Dose 0 (3 Gy) - de-escalation dose following 2 ELTs
- Dose 2 (7 Gy) - escalation dose 1 following no ELTs at Dose 1
- Dose 3 (9 Gy) - escalation dose 2 if no ELTs encountered at Dose 2
Following the treatment of 3 patients at dose level 1 (5 Gy), If one patient experiences a ELT, then 3 additional patients are enrolled at dose level 1 (5 Gy), for a maximum of 6 patients. If none of these patients experience a ELT then 3 patients would be enrolled at dose level 2 (7 Gy). If only one of those 6 patients experience a ELT, then the next 3 patients will be enrolled at dose level 2 (7 Gy).
The study continues in this fashion until no more than 1 of 6 patients treated at the highest dose level experience a ELT. At any dose level, if 2 patients experience a ELT, then dose de-escalation is to occur, with 6 total patients enrolled at that dose level.
PARTICIPANT TREATMENT SIMULATION Prior to radiation treatment planning, participants will be immobilized and a free-breathing CT simulation with 3 mm slice thickness will be performed. Respiratory correlated four-dimensional tomographic (4D-CT) images will be acquired to assess the extent of cardiac and respiratory motion. The average CT derived from 4D-CT images will be used for target and organ at risk (OAR) delineation as well as radiotherapy treatment planning.
RADIATION THERAPY TARGET VOLUMES The treatment target will be delineated using conventional radiotherapy definitions. The clinical target volume (CTV) will be defined on the simulation CT as the entire contour of the muscular heart excluding the pericardium. An ITV will be generated based on the motion seen on the 4D-CT, to encompass the combined respiratory and cardiac motion during free-breathing. A planning target volume (PTV) of up to 5 mm will be generated as a volumetric expansion from the ITV to account for uncertainties in planning and treatment delivery. Prior to creating a radiation treatment plan, organs-at-risk (OARs) including the spinal cord, stomach, liver, spleen, trachea, bronchi, lungs, and esophagus will be delineated.
TREATMENT PLAN, EVALUATION, AND QUALITY ASSURANCE Participants will be prescribed between 3Gy and 9 Gy in 1 fraction depending on which stage of escalation/de-escalation the trial is at. The plan will be normalized aiming for 95% coverage of the PTV volume by the 100% isodose. RT will be delivered with a 6 MV energy beam, using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) through partial arcs. Beam geometry will be optimized to avoid any defibrillator or pacemaker in place. Quality assurance (QA) for each treatment plan includes a group review of contours and plan by the radiation oncology, cardiology and medical physics study team members, as well as the standard departmental two-step plan verification prior to treatment and presentation at departmental QA rounds.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- 6 participants with end-stage heart failure (NYHA 3 or 4, LVEF < 30%) with no other standard of care therapy options to receive whole heart radiation therapy.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Whole Heart Radiation Therapy | Experimental | Other: Whole Heart Radiation TherapyWhole heart radiotherapy, 5 Gy in 1 fraction |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- age ≥ 18
- End-stage heart failure with NYHA class 3 or 4,
- LVEF ≤ 30%
- NT-Pro-BNP ≥ 1500 pg/mL
- on maximum medical therapy with progressive symptoms/disease as defined by their primary cardiologist and ineligible for advanced therapies including left ventricular assist devices and heart transplant
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- previous RT in the treatment field that precludes further RT
- active connective tissue disease
- interstitial pulmonary fibrosis
- Participants who are unable to be positioned in a manner where treatment can be safely delivered
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Whole Heart Radiation TherapyRadiation to the whole heart in one treatment with a prescribed dose of 5 Gy. | Other | Whole Heart Radiation Therapy |
Primary outcome
Acute adverse events definitely or probably related to radiation therapy at 30 days as per CTCAE v 5.0
Time frame: 30 days
Safety Endpoint
14 secondary outcomes
Overall survival
Time frame: 6 months
Hospital stays
Time frame: 6 months
Subacute adverse events
Time frame: 30-90 days after treatment
Late adverse events
Time frame: 90 days to 6 months after treatment
Medication Changes - dose
Time frame: 6 months
Medication Changes - number
Time frame: 6 months
Quality of life KCCQ
Time frame: day 0, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Quality of life - SF-36
Time frame: day 0, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Troponin changes
Time frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 1 year
Lactate changes
Time frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 1 year
Renal Function
Time frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 1 year
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio
Time frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 1 year
b-natrurietic peptide
Time frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 1 year
Change in mean left ventricle ejection fraction
Time frame: 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 1 year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 May 2025.
- Background: PubMed 27894487Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, Falk V, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Harjola VP, Jankowska EA, Jessup M, Linde C, Nihoyannopoulos P, Parissis JT, Pieske B, Riley JP, Rosano GMC, Ruilope LM, Ruschitzka F, Rutten FH, van der Meer P. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2016 Dec;69(12):1167. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2016.11.005. No abstract available. English, Spanish.
- Background: PubMed 23747642Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr, Drazner MH, Fonarow GC, Geraci SA, Horwich T, Januzzi JL, Johnson MR, Kasper EK, Levy WC, Masoudi FA, McBride PE, McMurray JJ, Mitchell JE, Peterson PN, Riegel B, Sam F, Stevenson LW, Tang WH, Tsai EJ, Wilkoff BL; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;62(16):e147-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.019. Epub 2013 Jun 5. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 22227365Kemp CD, Conte JV. The pathophysiology of heart failure. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2012 Sep-Oct;21(5):365-71. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2011.11.007. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
- Background: PubMed 12767667Nohria A, Tsang SW, Fang JC, Lewis EF, Jarcho JA, Mudge GH, Stevenson LW. Clinical assessment identifies hemodynamic profiles that predict outcomes in patients admitted with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 May 21;41(10):1797-804. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00309-7.
- BackgroundSrinivasan, S. and R. Kundu, Fluid Management in Cardiogenic Shock, in Rational Use of Intravenous Fluids in Critically Ill Patients, M.L.N.G. Malbrain, et al., Editors. 2024, Springer International Publishing: Cham. p. 315-328.
- Background: PubMed 21555723Borlaug BA, Redfield MM. Diastolic and systolic heart failure are distinct phenotypes within the heart failure spectrum. Circulation. 2011 May 10;123(18):2006-13; discussion 2014. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.954388. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 23684677Paulus WJ, Tschope C. A novel paradigm for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: comorbidities drive myocardial dysfunction and remodeling through coronary microvascular endothelial inflammation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jul 23;62(4):263-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.092. Epub 2013 May 15.
- Background: PubMed 20089973McMurray JJ. Clinical practice. Systolic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 21;362(3):228-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp0909392. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 30957868Triposkiadis F, Butler J, Abboud FM, Armstrong PW, Adamopoulos S, Atherton JJ, Backs J, Bauersachs J, Burkhoff D, Bonow RO, Chopra VK, de Boer RA, de Windt L, Hamdani N, Hasenfuss G, Heymans S, Hulot JS, Konstam M, Lee RT, Linke WA, Lunde IG, Lyon AR, Maack C, Mann DL, Mebazaa A, Mentz RJ, Nihoyannopoulos P, Papp Z, Parissis J, Pedrazzini T, Rosano G, Rouleau J, Seferovic PM, Shah AM, Starling RC, Tocchetti CG, Trochu JN, Thum T, Zannad F, Brutsaert DL, Segers VF, De Keulenaer GW. The continuous heart failure spectrum: moving beyond an ejection fraction classification. Eur Heart J. 2019 Jul 1;40(26):2155-2163. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz158.
- Background: PubMed 29572337Spencer K, Parrish R, Barton R, Henry A. Palliative radiotherapy. BMJ. 2018 Mar 23;360:k821. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k821. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 26122185Schaue D, McBride WH. Opportunities and challenges of radiotherapy for treating cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep;12(9):527-40. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.120. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
- Background: PubMed 11872298Micke O, Seegenschmiedt MH; German Working Group on Radiotherapy in Germany. Consensus guidelines for radiation therapy of benign diseases: a multicenter approach in Germany. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Feb 1;52(2):496-513. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01814-4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. no public sharing, will share anonymized data if necessary for other collaborative projects in future following REB review
Related trials for Heart Failure NYHA Class III
Not yet recruiting
RELIEVE-HFrEF TRIAL: REducing Lung congestIon Symptoms Using the v-wavE Shunt in adVancEd Heart Failure With Reduced EF
Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure Chronic
Recruiting
Barostim-Enabled NEurohormonal Intervention For Improving Treatment of Heart Failure
Heart Failure, Heart Failure NYHA Class II
Recruiting
PrEcision Pacing in HFpEF: the PEP-HFpEF Trial
Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure New York Heart Association Class III
Active, not recruiting
Neural Cardiac Therapy for Heart Failure Study (NECTAR-HF)
Heart Failure, Congestive Heart Failure
Not yet recruiting
Inspiratory Muscle Training in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure Awaiting Advanced Therapies
Heart Failure, Heart Failure New York Heart Association Class III
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Ian J Gerard, MD, PhD principal investigator
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
Tarek Hijal, MD principal investigator
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
Martin L Bernier, MD principal investigator
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Whole Heart Radiation Therapy in people with Heart Failure NYHA Class III and Heart Failure NYHA Class IV, run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Acute adverse events definitely or probably related to radiation therapy at 30 days as per CTCAE v 5.0 (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06299176, which also lists 29 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 May 2025.