AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokeNCT06299904

Effect of Modified Air-pulse Stimulation on Tracheotomised Patients With Dysphagia After Stroke

A study testing Modified Air-pulse Stimulation and Conventional air-pulse stimulation in people with Stroke, run by The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate the efficacy of flexible endoscopy-mediated modified air-pulse stimulation in restoring of swallowing function in this group of patients.Forty-two subacute stroke patients with tracheotomy and dysphagia need to be recruited and divided into a control group of 21 cases and a trial group of 21 cases. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Stroke
What is being tested?
Modified Air-pulse Stimulation and Conventional air-pulse stimulation
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
42 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Dec 2023to 1 Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients who met the diagnostic criteria for stroke formulated in the 4th National Academic Conference on Cerebrovascular disease;
  • patients with relatively stable vital signs, with a NIHSS score of 21 points;
  • patients with tracheotomy accompanied by dysphagia;
  • no previous history of dysphagia;
  • age ≥ 30 years and ≤80 years;
  • informed consent signed by the patient and his family.

Who cannot join

  • patients with medullary haemorrhage/infarction;
  • patients that experienced cerebral hernia and recurrent stroke;
  • patients with unstable arrhythmia, fever, infection, severe restlessness and inability to cooperate with treatment;
  • patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux, bilateral paralysis of the vocal cord, laryngopharyngeal stenosis/haemorrhage/tumour;
  • patients in which there was an inability to accurately locate epiglottis and arytenoid cartilage due to throat disease;
  • patients with a history of epilepsy or risk of seizures.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University

    Dalian, Liaoning, 116024

    wuyao Pan, postgraduate, +86-18186766836, 331189506@qq.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

To evaluate the efficacy of flexible endoscopy-mediated modified air-pulse stimulation in restoring of swallowing function in this group of patients.Forty-two subacute stroke patients with tracheotomy and dysphagia need to be recruited and divided into a control group of 21 cases and a trial group of 21 cases. On the basis of receiving personalized swallowing rehabilitation training, the control group received traditional air-pulse stimulation therapy, while the trial group received modified air-pulse stimulation therapy mediated by flexible endoscopy. Murray secretion scale (MSS), penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) and spontaneous swallowing frequency were used to assess dysphagia. Moreover, clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) was used for evaluating the degree of pneumonia, hemoglobin(Hb) and serum prealbumin (PAB) were used to assess the nutritional status of patients.

Conditions
Stroke
Being tested
Modified Air-pulse Stimulation, Conventional air-pulse stimulation
Medical subject headings
Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Modified Air-pulse StimulationBehavioural

    Connected the oxygen humidification bottle to a fibreoptic endoscope, then inserted the terminal into the nasal cavity and the pulse sensation stimulation generated by oxygen was transmitted through the internal port of the fibreoptic endoscope to the anterior wall of the pyriform recess or to the folds of the arytenoepiglottis. (5 min once a day for 2 weeks)

  • Conventional air-pulse stimulationBehavioural

    The terminal airway of the air pulse was placed in the oral cavity, specifically in the patient's palatoglossal arch, pharyngeal posterior wall, tongue base, and other areas. The airbag was quickly squeezed to generate airflow and stimulate the mucosa.(5 min once a day for 2 weeks)

Study groups in NCT06299904
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
control groupSham comparatorBased on receiving personalized swallowing rehabilitation training, the control group received traditional air-pulse stimulation therapy.
Receives: Behavioral: Conventional air-pulse stimulation
trial groupExperimentalThe trial group received modified air-pulse stimulation therapy mediated by flexible endoscopy.
Receives: Behavioral: Modified Air-pulse Stimulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. the score of Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing (FEES)

    Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing

    Measured: 2 weeks

  2. the score of Murray's secretion scale (MSS)

    MSS

    Measured: 2 weeks

  3. the score of penetration-aspiration scale (PAS)

    PAS

    Measured: 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. the score of Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS)

    CPIS

    Measured: 2 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Mar 2024
  2. Study start1 Dec 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
42 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06299904
Sponsor's protocol ID
stroke
Status last verified
Mar 2024
First submitted
1 Mar 2024
Last updated
8 Mar 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Modified Air-pulse Stimulation and Conventional air-pulse stimulation in people with Stroke, run by The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

the score of Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing (FEES) (time frame: 2 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Mar 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in