Regional AnesthesiaNOL and LRANCT06300606
Nociception Index Level (NOL) Perioperative Monitoring During Regional Anesthesia
An observational study of Regional Anesthesia and Pain, run by American Hospital of Paris at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
This prospective observational study was conducted to assess pain using NOL index under locoregional anesthesia for orthopedic surgery of the upper limb. We included 50 consecutive adult patients scheduled for orthopedic surgery of the upper limb under locoregional anesthesia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Regional Anesthesia, Pain, Intraoperative Monitoring
- What is being tested?
- NOL monitoring
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 5 Mar 2024to 15 Apr 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: all the patients scheduled to undergo an upper limb orthopedic surgery under regional anesthesia
Who may be able to join
- scheduled upper limb orthopedic surgery under regional anesthesia
Who cannot join
- Patient less than 18 years old emergency surgery patient refusal of regional anesthesia chronic neurocognitive disease
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
France1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Gilles BOCCARA
Neuilly-sur-Seine, 92200
Gilles BOCCARA, +33662382833, gilles.boccara@ahparis.org
thierry GUENOUN, +33146412691, thierry.guenoun@ahparis.org
About this study
Official title: Is the Regional Anesthesia Technique Painful? an Evaluation Using the Nociception Index Level (NOL), a New Pain Monitoring, and Algiscore, a Multidimensional Pain Score
This prospective observational study was conducted to assess pain using NOL index under locoregional anesthesia for orthopedic surgery of the upper limb. We included 50 consecutive adult patients scheduled for orthopedic surgery of the upper limb under locoregional anesthesia. The locoregional anesthesia was performed under ultrasound, with or without neurostimulation. Intraoperative pain is assessed using NOL index monitoring, ALGISCORE and Numerical Scale, and second point study is the midazolam and propofol requirement.
Read the detailed description
Introduction: Intraoperative pain assessment is difficult and based on indirect parameters of sympathetic-parasympathetic system stimulation. Recently, the Nociception Level index (NOL™) providing a value from combination of multiple physiological parameters to measure pain has been developed to enable intraoperative pain monitoring during general anesthesia. While this monitoring has also been used postoperatively in awake patients, data are scarce to assess pain under locoregional anesthesia. This study was conducted to assess pain using NOL index under locoregional anesthesia for orthopedic surgery of the upper limb.
Method: 50 consecutive patients scheduled for orthopedic surgery of the upper limb under locoregional anesthesia were included. Exclusion criteria were emergencies, request for general anesthesia, and patients under 18 years of age. All patients were informed and consented to the technique of locoregional anesthesia and pain monitoring without change of practice. After premedication with oral hydroxyzine, locoregional anesthesia was performed under ultrasound, with or without neurostimulation. Monitoring began as soon as the venous infusion was started, and parameters were recorded at the time of locoregional anesthesia, tourniquet inflation, surgical incision, skin closure and dressing.
Pain is also assessed using the ALGISCORE by the nurse and the numerical scale (0 to 5) and satisfaction score at the end of the procedure. The need to administer midazolam or propofol at the anesthetist's discretion is noted, as is the effectiveness of locoregional anesthesia (conversion to general anesthesia). Data were analyzed using Friedman and Mann-Whitney tests.
- Conditions
- Regional Anesthesia, Pain, Intraoperative Monitoring
- Being tested
- NOL monitoring
- Keywords
- nociception, regional anesthesia, intraoperative monitoring, NOL monitor
- Medical subject headings
- Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NOL monitoringDevice
Also called regional anesthesia
Prospective observational study to assess pain during regional anesthesia for upper limb orthopedic surgery using NOL monitoring and the Algoplus pain scale
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
pain score
Nociception index level monitoring NOL
Measured: intraoperative
pain score
ALGOPLUS pain scale
Measured: intraoperative
Secondary outcomes (3)
sedative requirement
propofol
Measured: intraoperative
anxiolytic requirement
midazolam
Measured: intraoperative
failure of regional anesthesia
general conversion or sufentanil requirement
Measured: intraoperative
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Mar 2024
- Study start5 Mar 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion15 Apr 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Apr 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Regional AnesthesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- American Hospital of Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Nataliya KARASHCHUK, Briana LUI, Thierry GUENOUN, Stephane ROMANO
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gilles BOCCARA, American Hospital of Paris
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06300606
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NOL1 and RA
- Acronym
- NOL and LRA
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 3 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 8 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Meijer FS, Niesters M, van Velzen M, Martini CH, Olofsen E, Edry R, Sessler DI, van Dorp ELA, Dahan A, Boon M. Does nociception monitor-guided anesthesia affect opioid consumption? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Aug;34(4):629-641. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00362-4. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
PubMed 31327102Morisson L, Nadeau-Vallee M, Espitalier F, Laferriere-Langlois P, Idrissi M, Lahrichi N, Gelinas C, Verdonck O, Richebe P. Prediction of acute postoperative pain based on intraoperative nociception level (NOL) index values: the impact of machine learning-based analysis. J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Feb;37(1):337-344. doi: 10.1007/s10877-022-00897-z. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
PubMed 35925430Neumann C, Gehlen L, Weinhold L, Strassberger-Nerschbach N, Soehle M, Kornilov E, Thudium M. Influence of Intraoperative Nociception during Hip or Knee Arthroplasty with Supplementary Regional Anaesthesia on Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jun 17;59(6):1166. doi: 10.3390/medicina59061166.
PubMed 37374370Gelinas C, Shahiri T S, Richard-Lalonde M, Laporta D, Morin JF, Boitor M, Ferland CE, Bourgault P, Richebe P. Exploration of a Multi-Parameter Technology for Pain Assessment in Postoperative Patients After Cardiac Surgery in the Intensive Care Unit: The Nociception Level Index (NOL)TM. J Pain Res. 2021 Dec 7;14:3723-3731. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S332845. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34908872Shahiri TS, Richebe P, Richard-Lalonde M, Gelinas C. Description of the validity of the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) and Nociception Level Index (NOL) for nociception assessment in anesthetized patients undergoing surgery: a systematized review. J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Jun;36(3):623-635. doi: 10.1007/s10877-021-00772-3. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
PubMed 34783941Ghiyasinasab M, Morisson L, Laferriere-Langlois P, Geraldo-Demers MA, Gelinas C, Nadeau-Vallee M, Verdonck O, Lahrichi N, Richebe P. Identification of the intraoperative antinociceptive effect of intravenous fentanyl using the Nociception Level (NOL) index versus clinical parameters in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery: A secondary analysis of the NOLGYN study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2022 Aug;41(4):101102. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101102. Epub 2022 May 25.
PubMed 35643392Edry R, Recea V, Dikust Y, Sessler DI. Preliminary Intraoperative Validation of the Nociception Level Index: A Noninvasive Nociception Monitor. Anesthesiology. 2016 Jul;125(1):193-203. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001130.
PubMed 27171828Renaud-Roy E, Stockle PA, Maximos S, Brulotte V, Sideris L, Dube P, Drolet P, Tanoubi I, Issa R, Verdonck O, Fortier LP, Richebe P. Correlation between incremental remifentanil doses and the Nociception Level (NOL) index response after intraoperative noxious stimuli. Can J Anaesth. 2019 Sep;66(9):1049-1061. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01372-1. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
PubMed 30997633Martini CH, Boon M, Broens SJ, Hekkelman EF, Oudhoff LA, Buddeke AW, Dahan A. Ability of the nociception level, a multiparameter composite of autonomic signals, to detect noxious stimuli during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2015 Sep;123(3):524-34. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000757.
PubMed 26154185
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Is the Regional Anesthesia Technique Painful? an Evaluation Using the Nociception Index Level (NOL), a New Pain Monitoring, and Algiscore, a Multidimensional Pain Score
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06300606
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NOL and LRA / NOL1 and RA
- Conditions
- Regional Anesthesia, Pain, Intraoperative Monitoring
- Keywords
- nociception, regional anesthesia, intraoperative monitoring, NOL monitor
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- American Hospital of ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Nataliya KARASHCHUK, Briana LUI, Thierry GUENOUN, Stephane ROMANO
- Study start
- 5 Mar 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 15 Apr 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Apr 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This prospective observational study was conducted to assess pain using NOL index under locoregional anesthesia for orthopedic surgery of the upper limb. We included 50 consecutive adult patients scheduled for orthopedic surgery of the upper limb under locoregional anesthesia. The locoregional anesthesia was performed under ultrasound, with or without neurostimulation. Intraoperative pain is assessed using NOL index monitoring, ALGISCORE and Numerical Scale, and second point study is the midazolam and propofol requirement.
Detailed description
Introduction: Intraoperative pain assessment is difficult and based on indirect parameters of sympathetic-parasympathetic system stimulation. Recently, the Nociception Level index (NOL™) providing a value from combination of multiple physiological parameters to measure pain has been developed to enable intraoperative pain monitoring during general anesthesia. While this monitoring has also been used postoperatively in awake patients, data are scarce to assess pain under locoregional anesthesia. This study was conducted to assess pain using NOL index under locoregional anesthesia for orthopedic surgery of the upper limb.
Method: 50 consecutive patients scheduled for orthopedic surgery of the upper limb under locoregional anesthesia were included. Exclusion criteria were emergencies, request for general anesthesia, and patients under 18 years of age. All patients were informed and consented to the technique of locoregional anesthesia and pain monitoring without change of practice. After premedication with oral hydroxyzine, locoregional anesthesia was performed under ultrasound, with or without neurostimulation. Monitoring began as soon as the venous infusion was started, and parameters were recorded at the time of locoregional anesthesia, tourniquet inflation, surgical incision, skin closure and dressing.
Pain is also assessed using the ALGISCORE by the nurse and the numerical scale (0 to 5) and satisfaction score at the end of the procedure. The need to administer midazolam or propofol at the anesthetist's discretion is noted, as is the effectiveness of locoregional anesthesia (conversion to general anesthesia). Data were analyzed using Friedman and Mann-Whitney tests.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- all the patients scheduled to undergo an upper limb orthopedic surgery under regional anesthesia
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- scheduled upper limb orthopedic surgery under regional anesthesia
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patient less than 18 years old emergency surgery patient refusal of regional anesthesia chronic neurocognitive disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NOL monitoringAlso: regional anesthesiaProspective observational study to assess pain during regional anesthesia for upper limb orthopedic surgery using NOL monitoring and the Algoplus pain scale | Device | – |
Primary outcome
pain score
Time frame: intraoperative
Nociception index level monitoring NOL
pain score
Time frame: intraoperative
ALGOPLUS pain scale
3 secondary outcomes
sedative requirement
Time frame: intraoperative
anxiolytic requirement
Time frame: intraoperative
failure of regional anesthesia
Time frame: intraoperative
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Mar 2024.
- Background: PubMed 31327102Meijer FS, Niesters M, van Velzen M, Martini CH, Olofsen E, Edry R, Sessler DI, van Dorp ELA, Dahan A, Boon M. Does nociception monitor-guided anesthesia affect opioid consumption? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Aug;34(4):629-641. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00362-4. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
- Background: PubMed 35925430Morisson L, Nadeau-Vallee M, Espitalier F, Laferriere-Langlois P, Idrissi M, Lahrichi N, Gelinas C, Verdonck O, Richebe P. Prediction of acute postoperative pain based on intraoperative nociception level (NOL) index values: the impact of machine learning-based analysis. J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Feb;37(1):337-344. doi: 10.1007/s10877-022-00897-z. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
- Background: PubMed 37374370Neumann C, Gehlen L, Weinhold L, Strassberger-Nerschbach N, Soehle M, Kornilov E, Thudium M. Influence of Intraoperative Nociception during Hip or Knee Arthroplasty with Supplementary Regional Anaesthesia on Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jun 17;59(6):1166. doi: 10.3390/medicina59061166.
- Results publication: PubMed 34908872Gelinas C, Shahiri T S, Richard-Lalonde M, Laporta D, Morin JF, Boitor M, Ferland CE, Bourgault P, Richebe P. Exploration of a Multi-Parameter Technology for Pain Assessment in Postoperative Patients After Cardiac Surgery in the Intensive Care Unit: The Nociception Level Index (NOL)TM. J Pain Res. 2021 Dec 7;14:3723-3731. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S332845. eCollection 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 34783941Shahiri TS, Richebe P, Richard-Lalonde M, Gelinas C. Description of the validity of the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) and Nociception Level Index (NOL) for nociception assessment in anesthetized patients undergoing surgery: a systematized review. J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Jun;36(3):623-635. doi: 10.1007/s10877-021-00772-3. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 35643392Ghiyasinasab M, Morisson L, Laferriere-Langlois P, Geraldo-Demers MA, Gelinas C, Nadeau-Vallee M, Verdonck O, Lahrichi N, Richebe P. Identification of the intraoperative antinociceptive effect of intravenous fentanyl using the Nociception Level (NOL) index versus clinical parameters in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery: A secondary analysis of the NOLGYN study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2022 Aug;41(4):101102. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101102. Epub 2022 May 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 27171828Edry R, Recea V, Dikust Y, Sessler DI. Preliminary Intraoperative Validation of the Nociception Level Index: A Noninvasive Nociception Monitor. Anesthesiology. 2016 Jul;125(1):193-203. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001130.
- Results publication: PubMed 30997633Renaud-Roy E, Stockle PA, Maximos S, Brulotte V, Sideris L, Dube P, Drolet P, Tanoubi I, Issa R, Verdonck O, Fortier LP, Richebe P. Correlation between incremental remifentanil doses and the Nociception Level (NOL) index response after intraoperative noxious stimuli. Can J Anaesth. 2019 Sep;66(9):1049-1061. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01372-1. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
- Results publication: PubMed 26154185Martini CH, Boon M, Broens SJ, Hekkelman EF, Oudhoff LA, Buddeke AW, Dahan A. Ability of the nociception level, a multiparameter composite of autonomic signals, to detect noxious stimuli during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2015 Sep;123(3):524-34. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000757.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Regional Anesthesia
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Changes to Prostate Procedures
Prostate Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Magnesium Sulphate as an Adjuvant in Combined Costoclavicular Block and Suprascapular Block Versus Interscalene Block for Ambulatory Shoulder Arthroscopy
Postoperative Pain, Shoulder Arthroscopy
Recruiting
Comparison of Spinal Anesthesia With Intrathecal Morphine Versus PENG Block With or Without Dexamethasone in Hip Arthroplasty
Arthropathy of Hip, Hip Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruiting
Use of a Virtual Reality Headset During Prostate Biopsy Under Local Anesthesia to Improve the Patient's Experience
Prostate Biopsy
Not yet recruiting
Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus PENG Block for Hip Fracture Surgery
Femur Neck Fracture, Hip Fractures
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Regional Anesthesia and Pain, run by American Hospital of Paris at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Gilles BOCCARA, MD, PhD (+33 6 62 38 28 33, gilles.boccara@ahparis.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
pain score (time frame: intraoperative). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06300606, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Mar 2024.