Acute Myeloid LeukemiaNCT06301425
MRD Response-adapted Allo-HSCT for Adverse-risk AML
A study testing Intervention group in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, run by Peking University People's Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This TROPHY-AML01 regimen aims to identify the effectiveness and safety of MRD response-adapted allo-HSCT for adverse-risk acute myeloid leukemia in an open-label, randomized, controlled trial. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- Intervention group
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 178 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 24 May 2024to 1 May 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Newly diagnosed AML;
- Categorized into adverse-risk group according to ELN 2022 criteria;
- 16-65 years of age at the time of diagnosis;
- achieving CR after 1 or 2 courses of induction chemotherapies;
- 4) ECOG PS score of 0 to 1 5) It needs consent from the patients or/and legal guardian, and signature on the Informed Consent.
Who cannot join
- Newly diagnosed AML, but categorized into favorite- or intermediate-risk group according to ELN 2022 criteria;
- < 16 years, or older than 65 years at the time of diagnosis;
- Achieving CR after 3 or more courses of induction chemotherapies, or could not achieve CR after induction chemotherapies;
- ECOG PS score of 2 or more;
- Patients with other comorbidities or mental diseases that influence the life safety and compliance of patients as well as affect informed consent, enrollment in the research, follow-up visit or result interpretation.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Xiaoxia Hu contact
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Peking University People's Hospital
Beijing
Xiaodong Mo, mxd453@163.com
About this study
Official title: Measurable Residual Disease Response-adapted Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Adverse-risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia: an Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Trial(TROPHY-AML01)
This TROPHY-AML01 regimen aims to identify the effectiveness and safety of MRD response-adapted allo-HSCT for adverse-risk acute myeloid leukemia in an open-label, randomized, controlled trial.
Read the detailed description
1.1 Relapse is the most important cause of transplant failure Acute myeloid leukemia is one the most important hematologic malignancies for adults. According to the criteria of European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022, approximately 40%-50% of AML patients were categorized into adverse-risk group. The clinical outcomes of these patients receiving chemotherapy alone is poor and the 4-year probability of leukemia-free survival (LFS) after therapy is nearly 10%. Thus, allogeneic hematologic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is considered as the critical consolidation in adverse-risk AML patients, and many AML patients could achieve long-term LFS after allo-HSCT. However, nearly one third of the adverse-risk AML patients would experience relapse after allo-HSCT, and the outcomes of patients with post-transplant are very poor and relapse is also the most important cause of mortality after allo-HSCT. Thus, how to prevent post-transplant relapse is important to further improve the survival of patients with adverse-risk AML.
1.2 Measurable residual disease (MRD) can predict the relapse of AML after treatment.
The detection of MRD is one of the most important methods for defining the depth of remission. Using current sensitive techniques, the presence of 1 residual leukemia cell in 10 000-1 000 000 cells can be detected in patients with morphological complete remission (CR). The most commonly used method for MRD assessment involves (1) the determination of leukemia-associated immunophenotypic patterns (LAIPs) using multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and (2) the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based evaluation of expression levels of leukemia-related genes, such as recurrent genetic abnormalities and other mutation types.
1.3 Pre-transplant MRD can predict the relapse of AML after allo-HSCT. MFC is one of the most common methods for MRD monitoring and is the most important method for MRD monitoring for those without leukemia-specific molecular markers. In the systemic review of Buckley et al., pre-transplant MRD was associated with worse LFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.76 [1.90-4.00]), overall survival (OS, HR = 2.36 [1.73-3.22]), and cumulative incidence of relapse (HR = 3.65 [2.53-5.27]).
1.4 The prognostic value of pre-transplant MRD positivity is controversial in adverse-risk AML.
Pre-transplant MRD positivity could predict relapse after allo-HSCT, however, its prognostic value may be more significantly in patients with favorite- and intermediate-risk group. Some authors suggested that pre-transplant MFC MRD was less important in predicting relapse than variables reflecting the biology of the disease (e.g., cytogenetics, molecular marker, or chemotherapy refractory). Receiving repeated consolidation to achieve pre-transplant MRD negativity may not decrease the risk of relapse and improve survival, and patients may experience relapse during consolidation chemotherapy and may suffer additional therapeutic toxicities which may increase the risk of non-relapse mortality after allo-HSCT.
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- Being tested
- Intervention group, Control group
- Keywords
- Acute myeloid leukemia, Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, Measurable residual disease, Adverse risk
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Neoplasm, Residual
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intervention groupOther
Patients in interventional group could choose one of the following treatment protocols and then receive allo-HSCT if they were CR after the second consolidation:
- . Venetoclax plus azacitidine: azacitidine 75mg/m2/d d1-7; venetoclax 400mg/d, d1-21;
- . Venetoclax plus CAG: venetoclax 400mg qd d1-14; aclacinomycin 20mg qd d1-4; cytarabine 10mg/m2 q12h subcutaneous injection d1-14; G-CSF 300μg qd d1-14;
- . Venetoclax plus IA: venetoclax 400mg qd d1-4; idarubicin 10mg qd d1-4; cytarabine 500mg qd d1-4;
- . Venetoclax plus AA: venetoclax 400mg qd d1-7; aclacinomycin 20mg qd d1-7; cytarabine 100mg/m2 qd d1-7.
Control groupOther
Receive allo-HSCT directly without the second consolidation chemotherapy.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | According to the MFC MRD status after the first consolidation (MRDcon1), the MRDcon1 positive patients were categorized into high-risk group (i.e., risk stratification). All the patients in high-risk group who fulfilled all inclusion/exclusion criteria were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a second consolidation therapy (intervention group) or receive allo-HSCT directly (control group). Receives: Other: Intervention group |
| Control group | Active comparator | According to the MFC MRD status after the first consolidation (MRDcon1), the MRDcon1 positive patients were categorized into high-risk group (i.e., risk stratification). All the patients in high-risk group who fulfilled all inclusion/exclusion criteria were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a second consolidation therapy (intervention group) or receive allo-HSCT directly (control group). Receives: Other: Control group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Event-free survival (EFS)
EFS, defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of MRD positivity, relapse, or death due to any cause.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (6)
Relapse
Relapse, defined as the time from date of randomization to date of leukemia relapse.
Measured: 1 year
Leukemia-free survival (LFS)
LFS, defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of relapse or death due to any cause.
Measured: 1 year
Non-relapse mortality (NRM)
NRM, defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death not preceded by leukemia relapse.
Measured: 1 year
Overall survival (OS)
OS, defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause.
Measured: 1 year
Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD)
aGvHD, defined as the diagnosis of any aGvHD including grade I to IV.
Measured: 1 year
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD)
cGvHD, defined as the diagnosis of any cGvHD including mild, moderate, severe.
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Mar 2024
- Study start24 May 2024
- Primary completion1 May 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 May 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Myeloid LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 178 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University People's Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ruijin Hospital, Wuhan TongJi Hospital, Anhui Provincial Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Xiao-Jun Huang, Peking University People's Hospital
- Investigators
- Xiaodong Mo, Principal investigator, Peking University People's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06301425
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TROPHY-AML01
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 2 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 10 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Measurable Residual Disease Response-adapted Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Adverse-risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia: an Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Trial(TROPHY-AML01)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06301425
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TROPHY-AML01
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- Keywords
- Acute myeloid leukemia, Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, Measurable residual disease, Adverse risk
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 178 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University People's HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ruijin Hospital, Wuhan TongJi Hospital, Anhui Provincial Hospital
- Study start
- 24 May 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 May 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This TROPHY-AML01 regimen aims to identify the effectiveness and safety of MRD response-adapted allo-HSCT for adverse-risk acute myeloid leukemia in an open-label, randomized, controlled trial.
Detailed description
1.1 Relapse is the most important cause of transplant failure Acute myeloid leukemia is one the most important hematologic malignancies for adults. According to the criteria of European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022, approximately 40%-50% of AML patients were categorized into adverse-risk group. The clinical outcomes of these patients receiving chemotherapy alone is poor and the 4-year probability of leukemia-free survival (LFS) after therapy is nearly 10%. Thus, allogeneic hematologic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is considered as the critical consolidation in adverse-risk AML patients, and many AML patients could achieve long-term LFS after allo-HSCT. However, nearly one third of the adverse-risk AML patients would experience relapse after allo-HSCT, and the outcomes of patients with post-transplant are very poor and relapse is also the most important cause of mortality after allo-HSCT. Thus, how to prevent post-transplant relapse is important to further improve the survival of patients with adverse-risk AML.
1.2 Measurable residual disease (MRD) can predict the relapse of AML after treatment.
The detection of MRD is one of the most important methods for defining the depth of remission. Using current sensitive techniques, the presence of 1 residual leukemia cell in 10 000-1 000 000 cells can be detected in patients with morphological complete remission (CR). The most commonly used method for MRD assessment involves (1) the determination of leukemia-associated immunophenotypic patterns (LAIPs) using multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and (2) the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based evaluation of expression levels of leukemia-related genes, such as recurrent genetic abnormalities and other mutation types.
1.3 Pre-transplant MRD can predict the relapse of AML after allo-HSCT. MFC is one of the most common methods for MRD monitoring and is the most important method for MRD monitoring for those without leukemia-specific molecular markers. In the systemic review of Buckley et al., pre-transplant MRD was associated with worse LFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.76 [1.90-4.00]), overall survival (OS, HR = 2.36 [1.73-3.22]), and cumulative incidence of relapse (HR = 3.65 [2.53-5.27]).
1.4 The prognostic value of pre-transplant MRD positivity is controversial in adverse-risk AML.
Pre-transplant MRD positivity could predict relapse after allo-HSCT, however, its prognostic value may be more significantly in patients with favorite- and intermediate-risk group. Some authors suggested that pre-transplant MFC MRD was less important in predicting relapse than variables reflecting the biology of the disease (e.g., cytogenetics, molecular marker, or chemotherapy refractory). Receiving repeated consolidation to achieve pre-transplant MRD negativity may not decrease the risk of relapse and improve survival, and patients may experience relapse during consolidation chemotherapy and may suffer additional therapeutic toxicities which may increase the risk of non-relapse mortality after allo-HSCT.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Other: Intervention groupAccording to the MFC MRD status after the first consolidation (MRDcon1), the MRDcon1 positive patients were categorized into high-risk group (i.e., risk stratification). All the patients in high-risk group who fulfilled all inclusion/exclusion criteria were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a second consolidation therapy (intervention group) or receive allo-HSCT directly (control group). |
| Control group | Active comparator | Other: Control groupAccording to the MFC MRD status after the first consolidation (MRDcon1), the MRDcon1 positive patients were categorized into high-risk group (i.e., risk stratification). All the patients in high-risk group who fulfilled all inclusion/exclusion criteria were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a second consolidation therapy (intervention group) or receive allo-HSCT directly (control group). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Newly diagnosed AML;
- Categorized into adverse-risk group according to ELN 2022 criteria;
- 16-65 years of age at the time of diagnosis;
- achieving CR after 1 or 2 courses of induction chemotherapies;
- 4) ECOG PS score of 0 to 1 5) It needs consent from the patients or/and legal guardian, and signature on the Informed Consent.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Newly diagnosed AML, but categorized into favorite- or intermediate-risk group according to ELN 2022 criteria;
- < 16 years, or older than 65 years at the time of diagnosis;
- Achieving CR after 3 or more courses of induction chemotherapies, or could not achieve CR after induction chemotherapies;
- ECOG PS score of 2 or more;
- Patients with other comorbidities or mental diseases that influence the life safety and compliance of patients as well as affect informed consent, enrollment in the research, follow-up visit or result interpretation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention groupPatients in interventional group could choose one of the following treatment protocols and then receive allo-HSCT if they were CR after the second consolidation: 1. . Venetoclax plus azacitidine: azacitidine 75mg/m2/d d1-7; venetoclax 400mg/d, d1-21; 2. . Venetoclax plus CAG: venetoclax 400mg qd d1-14; aclacinomycin 20mg qd d1-4; cytarabine 10mg/m2 q12h subcutaneous injection d1-14; G-CSF 300μg qd d1-14; 3. . Venetoclax plus IA: venetoclax 400mg qd d1-4; idarubicin 10mg qd d1-4; cytarabine 500mg qd d1-4; 4. . Venetoclax plus AA: venetoclax 400mg qd d1-7; aclacinomycin 20mg qd d1-7; cytarabine 100mg/m2 qd d1-7. | Other | Intervention group |
| Control groupReceive allo-HSCT directly without the second consolidation chemotherapy. | Other | Control group |
Primary outcome
Event-free survival (EFS)
Time frame: 1 year
EFS, defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of MRD positivity, relapse, or death due to any cause.
6 secondary outcomes
Relapse
Time frame: 1 year
Leukemia-free survival (LFS)
Time frame: 1 year
Non-relapse mortality (NRM)
Time frame: 1 year
Overall survival (OS)
Time frame: 1 year
Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD)
Time frame: 1 year
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD)
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jul 2024.
Related trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 3
Pivotal Open-label Phase 3 Clinical Study of QTX-2101 in Adult Patients With Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia
Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL), Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia
Active, not recruiting
High-Intensity Parent Intervention Program in Improving Learning and School Functioning in Latino Children With Acute Leukemia or Lymphoblastic Lymphoma
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
RecruitingPhase 1
Study of REM-422 in Patients With AML or Higher Risk MDS
Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Not yet recruiting
my.naviGATE: A Guide to After-Treatment Effects for Adolescents and Young Adults
Sarcoma, Osteosarcoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Xiaoxia Hu contact
Xiaodong Mo principal investigator
Peking University People's Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intervention group in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, run by Peking University People's Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Xiaodong Mo (86-10-88326001, moxiaodong@pkuph.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Event-free survival (EFS) (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jul 2024.