HypertensionC-RISIMANCT06302127
County Medical Community-based, Cardiovascular Risk Stratified Integrated Care Model: a Pragmatic Cluster Randomised Control Trial
A study testing Team-based care, Risk-stratified care pathway and Strengthened health education in people with Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, run by Peking University at 3 sites in China.
Trial summary
The goal of this cluster randomized trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the RISIMA model based on an integrated county healthcare consortium implemented by multi-level family health teams (FHTs)on patients with diabetes and/or hypertension, including CVD risk assessment, treatment, and management. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, Cardiovascular Diseases
- What is being tested?
- Team-based care, Risk-stratified care pathway and Strengthened health education
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,560 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 20 May 2024to 20 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged between 40 and 70 years old;
- Patients with hypertension or diabetes;
- Permanent residents of the county where the research is conducted;
- Already signed up with the family doctor team in the township where the research is located.
Who cannot join
- Unable to independently carry out the interventions required for the study;
- Residing far from the village or township health center where the research is located, making it difficult to cooperate with visits;
- Patients who refuse to participate;
- Patients with comorbidities such as cancer that may interfere with the study visits or intervention effects;
- Pregnant or lactating women
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
Luzhai County People's hospital
Liuzhou, Guangxi
Pengfei Liu, +86 18177251898, lzxygb@126.com
- Recruiting
Luzhai County Traditional Medicine hospital
Liuzhou
Pengfei Liu, +86 18177251898, lzxygb@126.com
- Recruiting
Shaxian County General Hospital
Sanming, Fujian
Xiaohong Xie, +86 13860506137, lilylwj@live.com
About this study
The goal of this cluster randomized trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the RISIMA model based on an integrated county healthcare consortium implemented by multi-level family health teams (FHTs)on patients with diabetes and/or hypertension, including CVD risk assessment, treatment, and management.
- Being tested
- Team-based care, Risk-stratified care pathway, Strengthened health education, Financial incentives for integration of care, Supporting health information system
- Medical subject headings
- Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Cardiovascular Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Team-based careOther
The RISIMA model is provided by a family healthcare team composed of one village doctor, one general physician at township health centers and one specialist including cardiologists, neurologists or endocrinologists from county hospital. For villages without village doctor, public health professionals from township health centers would join the service team as the supplement. Within the team, three team members carry the different function. Village doctor is responsible for regular home visits, CVD risk measurement and organizing health education course. GP as the core service provider in the team is responsible for CVD risk monitoring, providing health education course for middle-high risk participants, and generating integrated care plans for each participant. Specialist is responsible for providing guidance particularly for high-risk population management to township and village doctors within the team.
Risk-stratified care pathwayProcedure or surgery
Based on WHO/ISH score, baseline population will be divided into three groups-low risk (10-year CVD risk: \<10%), middle risk (10-year CVD risk: 10%~20%) and high risk (10-year risk: \>20%). With the support from experts and health care professionals, study had developed a risk-stratified care pathway on the basis of clinical guidance. According to the pathway, participants at different risk tertile are provided with differentiated management plan especially in terms of health education, follow-up frequency and treatment plan.
Strengthened health educationBehavioural
The education comprised 8 monthly sessions developed by GP and village doctors. At the 4th month, individual health counseling by village doctors will be done to encourage the imitation and maintenance of self-management behaviors, and to identify any potential problems in the program. It took half an hour per each participant. At the 8th month, self-management evaluation will be done to assess personal self-management ability. High risk participants are required to take the education course, and middle risk participants are only encouraging to take. All participants would receive the education messages twice a month, which introduce tips about the management of hypertension, diabetes and CVD risk factors.
Financial incentives for integration of careOther
Specialists receive reimbursement for case discussion and high risk population management; GP receive reimbursement for providing education program and risk monitoring; Village doctor receive reimbursement for assisting education program, risk measurement and home visits. And overall services quality will be measured, and taken into account for annual performance evaluation.
Supporting health information systemOther
A dynamic patient risk monitoring information system is established for simplifying the risk data collection and entry for village doctors, meanwhile, GP and specialist can receive the updates of risk scores simultaneously. Apart from the function of risk monitoring, this system also incorporates the e-records of home visits, health education attendance as well as medical records including outpatient visits and hospitalizations. The upgraded information systems not only can support the healthcare professionals with comprehensive and real-time data, but also provide the performance evaluation data for policymakers.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | During the study, control participant will be provided with existing essential public health service including quarterly follow-ups and annual physical examination, and be advised to see their usual provider for care, as appropriate. |
| Intervention | Experimental | Intervention group will receive the risk-stratified integrated CVD management (RISIMA) model consisting of 5 core elements provided as a package: (1) Team-based care; (2) Risk-stratified care pathway; (3) Strengthened health education; (4) Financial incentives for integration of care; (5) Supporting health information system. Receives: Other: Team-based care; Procedure: Risk-stratified care pathway; Behavioral: Strengthened health education; Other: Financial incentives for integration of care; Other: Supporting health information system |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
10-year CVD risk score
This study intervention is designed to address CVD risk by introducing an integrated care package. Therefore, a validated risk score is required to properly evaluate the effect of interventions. The WHO/ISH score is a tool to estimate the risk of CVD development based on age, sex, BP, total cholesterol, smoking and diabetes. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether or not the intervention can substantially lower the risk at 1 year. The primary outcome is the mean difference in WHO/ISH risk score change from baseline to 12 months between the intervention and control townships. The WHO/ISH risk score will be calculated using the lab-based measurements, but if there are missing, a nonlaboratory measurements will be used.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (8)
10-year CVD risk score changes
change in 10-year CVD risk score changes between the intervention and control FDTs at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
blood pressure control rate
change in blood pressure control rate between the intervention and control FDTs at 12 months
Measured: 12 months
systolic blood pressure
change in SBP between the intervention and control FHTs at 12 months
Measured: 12 months
systolic blood pressure
change in SBP between the intervention and control FHTs at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
total cholesterol
change in total cholesterol between the intervention and control FHTs at 12 months.
Measured: 12 months
fasting blood glucose
change in fasting blood glucose between the intervention and control FDTs at 12 months
Measured: 12 months
CVD incidence rate
difference of incidence rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (including acute myocardial infarction, stroke, angina, and sudden cardiac death) between the intervention and control FDTs at 12 months
Measured: 12 months
cost-effectiveness outcome
a health economic evaluation to assess the cost-effectiveness of the intervention compared with usual care at 12 months
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Mar 2024
- Study start20 May 2024
- Primary completion20 Oct 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion20 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HypertensionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Peking UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 2,560 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06302127
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CCHDS
- Acronym
- C-RISIMA
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 4 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 16 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lu W, Xia X, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Lin Y, Xie W, Xu J. Effectiveness of a Primary-Care-Centered Integrated Care Intervention for Stratified Cardiovascular Risk Control in China: Study Protocol for a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Health Care Sci. 2026 Sep 27:10.1002/hcs2.70105. doi: 10.1002/hcs2.70105. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42807163
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- County Medical Community-based, Cardiovascular Risk Stratified Integrated Care Model: a Pragmatic Cluster Randomised Control Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06302127
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C-RISIMA / CCHDS
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 2,560 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Peking UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 May 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Oct 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 20 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this cluster randomized trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the RISIMA model based on an integrated county healthcare consortium implemented by multi-level family health teams (FHTs)on patients with diabetes and/or hypertension, including CVD risk assessment, treatment, and management.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | –During the study, control participant will be provided with existing essential public health service including quarterly follow-ups and annual physical examination, and be advised to see their usual provider for care, as appropriate. |
| Intervention | Experimental | Other: Team-based care, Procedure: Risk-stratified care pathway, Behavioral: Strengthened health education, Other: Financial incentives for integration of care, Other: Supporting health information systemIntervention group will receive the risk-stratified integrated CVD management (RISIMA) model consisting of 5 core elements provided as a package: (1) Team-based care; (2) Risk-stratified care pathway; (3) Strengthened health education; (4) Financial incentives for integration of care; (5) Supporting health information system. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Aged between 40 and 70 years old;
- Patients with hypertension or diabetes;
- Permanent residents of the county where the research is conducted;
- Already signed up with the family doctor team in the township where the research is located.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Unable to independently carry out the interventions required for the study;
- Residing far from the village or township health center where the research is located, making it difficult to cooperate with visits;
- Patients who refuse to participate;
- Patients with comorbidities such as cancer that may interfere with the study visits or intervention effects;
- Pregnant or lactating women
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Team-based careThe RISIMA model is provided by a family healthcare team composed of one village doctor, one general physician at township health centers and one specialist including cardiologists, neurologists or endocrinologists from county hospital. For villages without village doctor, public health professionals from township health centers would join the service team as the supplement. Within the team, three team members carry the different function. Village doctor is responsible for regular home visits, CVD risk measurement and organizing health education course. GP as the core service provider in the team is responsible for CVD risk monitoring, providing health education course for middle-high risk participants, and generating integrated care plans for each participant. Specialist is responsible for providing guidance particularly for high-risk population management to township and village doctors within the team. | Other | Intervention |
| Risk-stratified care pathwayBased on WHO/ISH score, baseline population will be divided into three groups-low risk (10-year CVD risk: \<10%), middle risk (10-year CVD risk: 10%~20%) and high risk (10-year risk: \>20%). With the support from experts and health care professionals, study had developed a risk-stratified care pathway on the basis of clinical guidance. According to the pathway, participants at different risk tertile are provided with differentiated management plan especially in terms of health education, follow-up frequency and treatment plan. | Procedure or surgery | Intervention |
| Strengthened health educationThe education comprised 8 monthly sessions developed by GP and village doctors. At the 4th month, individual health counseling by village doctors will be done to encourage the imitation and maintenance of self-management behaviors, and to identify any potential problems in the program. It took half an hour per each participant. At the 8th month, self-management evaluation will be done to assess personal self-management ability. High risk participants are required to take the education course, and middle risk participants are only encouraging to take. All participants would receive the education messages twice a month, which introduce tips about the management of hypertension, diabetes and CVD risk factors. | Behavioural | Intervention |
| Financial incentives for integration of careSpecialists receive reimbursement for case discussion and high risk population management; GP receive reimbursement for providing education program and risk monitoring; Village doctor receive reimbursement for assisting education program, risk measurement and home visits. And overall services quality will be measured, and taken into account for annual performance evaluation. | Other | Intervention |
| Supporting health information systemA dynamic patient risk monitoring information system is established for simplifying the risk data collection and entry for village doctors, meanwhile, GP and specialist can receive the updates of risk scores simultaneously. Apart from the function of risk monitoring, this system also incorporates the e-records of home visits, health education attendance as well as medical records including outpatient visits and hospitalizations. The upgraded information systems not only can support the healthcare professionals with comprehensive and real-time data, but also provide the performance evaluation data for policymakers. | Other | Intervention |
Primary outcome
10-year CVD risk score
Time frame: 12 months
This study intervention is designed to address CVD risk by introducing an integrated care package. Therefore, a validated risk score is required to properly evaluate the effect of interventions. The WHO/ISH score is a tool to estimate the risk of CVD development based on age, sex, BP, total cholesterol, smoking and diabetes. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether or not the intervention can substantially lower the risk at 1 year. The primary outcome is the mean difference in WHO/ISH risk score change from baseline to 12 months between the intervention and control townships. The WHO/ISH risk score will be calculated using the lab-based measurements, but if there are missing, a nonlaboratory measurements will be used.
8 secondary outcomes
10-year CVD risk score changes
Time frame: 6 months
blood pressure control rate
Time frame: 12 months
systolic blood pressure
Time frame: 12 months
systolic blood pressure
Time frame: 6 months
total cholesterol
Time frame: 12 months
fasting blood glucose
Time frame: 12 months
CVD incidence rate
Time frame: 12 months
cost-effectiveness outcome
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jul 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42807163Lu W, Xia X, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Lin Y, Xie W, Xu J. Effectiveness of a Primary-Care-Centered Integrated Care Intervention for Stratified Cardiovascular Risk Control in China: Study Protocol for a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Health Care Sci. 2026 Sep 27:10.1002/hcs2.70105. doi: 10.1002/hcs2.70105. Online ahead of print.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hypertension
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Enrolling by invitation
Testing Implementation Strategies to Support Clinic Fidelity to an Outpatient Hypertension Bundle
Pregnancy Related, Hypertension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Team-based care, Risk-stratified care pathway and Strengthened health education in people with Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, run by Peking University at 3 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jin Prof. Xu, PhD (0086-82805701, xujin@hsc.pku.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
10-year CVD risk score (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06302127, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.