AzTrials
AzTrials

Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)NCT06303778

Combining a Smartphone App With Medications to Manage Heavy Drinking

A study testing Stand Down mobile app in people with Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD), run by VA Office of Research and Development at 15 sites in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

One in 10 Veterans have an alcohol use disorder. However, few Veterans receive evidenced-based psychosocial interventions or medications to treat alcohol use disorder. Barriers to receiving these treatments include long wait times, stigma, and long distances from treatment facilities. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)
What is being tested?
Stand Down mobile app
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
330 participants
Where
15 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Nov 2024to 1 Nov 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • To be eligible, Veterans must be:
  • 1) diagnosed with an alcohol use disorder (AUD) and report 4 heavy drinking days (HDD)
  • (defined as 5 standard drinks per day for men and 4 standard drinks per day for women) in prior 30-days
  • 2) enrolled in VA primary care
  • 3) planning to initiate medications for alcohol use disorder (MAUD), as determined by a medication order
  • 4) willing to be randomized
  • 5) Android or iPhone smartphone owners

Who cannot join

  • 1) past 30-day participation in VA or non-VA substance use disorder (SUD) treatment
  • 2) prior episode of medications for alcohol use disorder receipt in the last 30 days (initiation of a new episode of MAUD in the 7 days prior to screening allowed)
  • 3) plans to be or are pregnant
  • 4) severe psychiatric symptoms or psychosocial instability likely to prevent participation in the study protocol, as determined by the referring provider. Veterans aged >80 were excluded because ownership and use of mHealth apps decreases with advancing age. Participants who enter substance use disorder specialty care following randomization will be allowed to continue in the study.

Trial locations and contacts

15 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Eric J Hawkins, PhD contact

(206) 764-2743

eric.hawkins@va.gov

Anissa N Danner, MSW BA contact

(206) 277-4878

anissa.danner@va.gov

15 sites in 1 country

United States15 sites, 15 recruiting
  • Battle Creek VA Medical Center, Battle Creek, MI

    Battle Creek, Michigan, 49037

    Anissa Danner, MSW, Anissa.Danner@va.gov

    Recruiting
  • VA North Texas Health Care System Dallas VA Medical Center, Dallas, TX

    Dallas, Texas, 75216-7167

    Anissa Danner, MSW, Anissa.Danner@va.gov

    Recruiting
  • Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur, GA

    Decatur, Georgia, 30033-4004

    Anissa Danner, MSW, Anissa.Danner@va.gov

    Recruiting
  • Carl Vinson VA Medical Center, Dublin, GA

    Dublin, Georgia, 31021

    Anissa Danner, MSW, Anissa.Danner@va.gov

    Recruiting
  • Veterans Health Care System of the Ozarks, Fayetteville, AR

    Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72703-1944

    Anissa Danner, MSW, Anissa.Danner@va.gov

    Recruiting
  • North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL

    Gainesville, Florida, 32608-1135

    Anissa Danner, MSW, Anissa.Danner@va.gov

    Recruiting
  • Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55417-2309

    Anissa N Danner, MSW BA, (206) 277-4878, anissa.danner@va.gov

    Hildi J. Hagedorn, PhD

    Recruiting
  • Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Nashville Campus, Nashville, TN

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37212-2637

    Anissa Danner, MSW, Anissa.Danner@va.gov

    Recruiting
  • Omaha VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha, NE

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68105-1850

    Anissa Danner, MSW, Anissa.Danner@va.gov

    Recruiting
  • Phoenix VA Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85012

    Anissa Danner, MSW, Anissa.Danner@va.gov

    Recruiting
  • Richmond VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA

    Richmond, Virginia, 23249-0001

    Anissa Danner, MSW, Anissa.Danner@va.gov

    Recruiting
  • VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84148-0001

    Anissa Danner, MSW, Anissa.Danner@va.gov

    Recruiting
  • South Texas Health Care System, San Antonio, TX

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229-4404

    Anissa Danner, MSW, Anissa.Danner@va.gov

    Recruiting
  • VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA

    Seattle, Washington, 98108-1532

    Thomas S Bundt, FACHE, (253) 583-3500, thomas.bundt@va.gov

    Susan Perez, BA, (202) 461-6910, susan.perez@va.gov

    Recruiting
  • Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20422-0001

    Anissa Danner, MSW, Anissa.Danner@va.gov

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

One in 10 Veterans have an alcohol use disorder. However, few Veterans receive evidenced-based psychosocial interventions or medications to treat alcohol use disorder. Barriers to receiving these treatments include long wait times, stigma, and long distances from treatment facilities. Even fewer Veterans receive psychosocial and medication interventions together, despite clinical practice guidelines recommending both and evidence of better outcomes. Expanding access to these treatments in primary care is a VA priority but delivering psychosocial interventions is difficult in this setting, and medication is often the only option. Smartphone apps that deliver alcohol interventions may improve drinking outcomes and ensure Veterans can receive both treatments in primary care. This study will determine whether medications and an app for alcohol use problems offered to Veterans in primary care results in improved drinking outcomes, compared to Veterans receiving medications only. Study data will inform how to spread the app across the VA nationally.

Read the detailed description

Background: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) affects 1 in 10 Veterans and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, few individuals receive evidenced-based psychosocial interventions or medications for AUD (MAUD). Common barriers to treatment include long wait times, stigma, and distance from treatment facilities. Despite clinical guidelines and evidence indicating superior outcomes, even fewer individuals receive MAUD and psychosocial interventions conjointly. The VA prioritizes expanding access to AUD interventions in primary care, but it is difficult to deliver psychosocial interventions in primary care, and care often includes MAUD only. Smartphone mobile applications (apps) that deliver psychosocial interventions concurrent with MAUD may address the gap between recommended and current practices for AUD and appeal to Veterans who prefer to receive their AUD care in primary care. Alcohol intervention apps have been associated with improved drinking-related and mental health outcomes. Self-monitoring of alcohol use, a common feature in apps, may also increase MAUD adherence. Step Away, an app for self-management of alcohol use problems, is designed to guide development and use of personalized strategies to moderate or abstain from drinking. In single-arm cohort studies, the investigators assessed the acceptability and usability of Step Away and Stand Down (SD-App), the Veteran version of the app and focus of this proposal, among Veterans with alcohol use problems. The apps received favorable ratings regarding perceived effectiveness, efficiency, and overall satisfaction, and were associated with reductions in heavy drinking days and drinking-related consequences.

Significance: This study has the potential to substantially improve Veterans' receipt of guideline-concordant AUD care and support national VA initiatives to increase access to AUD care in general healthcare clinics.

Innovation \& Impact: To the investigators' knowledge, no prior study has evaluated the effectiveness of an alcohol-related intervention, delivered by smartphone, with MAUD in primary care. Smartphone apps can be scaled up at relatively low cost, potentially saving lives and improving the quality of care of tens of thousands of Veterans.

Specific Aims: The two aims are to: 1) determine whether MAUD plus SD-App offered to primary care patients diagnosed with AUD, compared to MAUD only, results in (a) greater reductions in heavy drinking days, from baseline to 6-months (primary), (b) greater improvements in alcohol consequences, alcohol use risk levels, and mental health outcomes, from baseline to 6-months (secondary), 2) conduct a process evaluation to identify factors that influence the adoption, implementation, and sustainability of SD-App in combination with MAUD in VA primary care from Veterans', clinical pharmacist specialists' and clinical leaders' perspectives. The investigators will also explore whether MAUD plus SD-App increases MAUD 6-month adherence relative to SD-App alone.

Methodology: Guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework, this Hybrid 1 effectiveness-implementation trial will enroll 330 Veterans across 15 VA sites. Veterans between ages 18-80, meeting AUD criteria, and planning to initiate MAUD will be randomized to MAUD+SD-App or MAUD only. Participants randomized to MAUD+SD-App will receive access to SD-App. MAUD will be prescribed by VA clinical prescribers per standard care. The primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 3-, 6- and 12-months using participant self-report and electronic medical record data. The investigators will complete qualitative interviews to assess Veterans', clinical pharmacists', and clinical leaders' perspectives on barriers and facilitators to adoption, implementation, and sustainability of SD-App in combination with MAUD in primary care.

Next Steps/Implementation: If MAUD+SD-App improves drinking outcomes, the investigators will work closely with the operations partners to review study findings and to develop a tailored implementation strategy to support widespread implementation across VA primary care.

Being tested
Stand Down mobile app, Standard Care
Keywords
alcohol use disorder, substance use disorder, medications for AUD, smartphone app, primary care, mobile health
Medical subject headings
Alcoholism, Substance-Related Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Stand Down mobile appOther

    The Stand Down mobile app is a smartphone-based stand-alone intervention designed to help persons manage drinking and alcohol-related problems on their own. The app is based on principles of motivational enhancement and cognitive-behavioral therapies and comprises 7 modules organized around 4 goals: (i) Enhance awareness of drinking patterns (assessment and personalized feedback), (ii) Establish and monitor progress towards drinking goal - i.e., moderation or abstinence, (iii) Manage cravings and other problems using in-the-moment tools, and (iv) Connect users with other types of support.

  • Standard CareOther

    Participants assigned to the standard care condition will receive standard MAUD care delivered by their CPSs and will not receive access to SD-App. Three medications, naltrexone, disulfiram, and acamprosate, have been approved by the Federal Drug Administration and topiramate has been recommended by the VA/DoD clinical practice guidelines for SUD. MAUD includes these four medications. All medication decisions will be between the CPS and the Veteran and not influenced by study participation.

Study groups in NCT06303778
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard CareActive comparatorParticipants assigned to the standard care condition will receive standard MAUD care delivered by their CPSs and will not receive access to SD-App. Three medications, naltrexone, disulfiram, and acamprosate, have been approved by the Federal Drug Administration and topiramate has been recommended by the VA/DoD clinical practice guidelines for SUD. MAUD includes these four medications. All medication decisions will be between the CPS and the Veteran and not influenced by study participation.
Receives: Other: Standard Care
Combined MAUD+SD-AppExperimentalIn addition to standard MAUD care, participants assigned to the MAUD+SD-App condition will receive access to the Stand Down app at randomization.
Receives: Other: Stand Down mobile app

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Percent Heavy Drinking Days (HDD)

    Change from baseline to 6-month follow-up in percent heavy drinking days (HDD), defined as >4 drinks per day for women and >5 drinks per day for men, was selected as the primary outcome as it combines both frequency and intensity of drinking and is a clinically meaningful measure of change. HDD will be generated from the Timeline Follow Back (TLFB), a retrospective, calendar-based measure that provides information on quantity/frequency of alcohol use in the past 30 days. Percent HDD will be calculated by dividing the number of HDD during a one-month period by 30 days.

    Measured: 6 months post-baseline

  2. Semi-structured qualitative interview data from patients, providers, clinical leaders

    [Qualitative] Patient, provider, and clinical leader perspectives regarding barriers and facilitators to adoption, implementation, and sustainability of the Stand Down mobile application in combination with medications for AUD in primary care.

    Measured: 3 months post-baseline

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Change in Short Inventory of Problems - Revised version (SIP-R)

    Change from baseline to 6-month follow-up in the Short Inventory of Problems - Revised version (SIP-R), a 17-item questionnaire used to assess negative consequences from drinking. Items are rated on a 4-pt scale (0=Never, 1= Once or a Few Times, 2 = Once or Twice a Week, 3 = Daily or Almost Daily), which yields a total score. Higher scores reflect greater severity of alcohol-related problems.

    Measured: 6 months post-baseline

  2. Change in World Health Organization (WHO) Risk Levels

    Change from baseline to 6-month follow-up in WHO risk levels, which are defined by average grams of alcohol consumed per day as calculated for each participant from the Timeline Follow Back (TLFB), a retrospective, calendar-based measure that provides information on quantity/frequency of alcohol use in the past 30 days. Participants are categorized into five levels: abstinent (0 g of alcohol/day), low risk (1-40 g/1-20 g of alcohol/day), medium risk (41-60 g/21-40 g of alcohol/day), high risk (61-100 g/41-60 g of alcohol/day), and very high risk (>101 g/>61 g of alcohol/day), with 14g of alcohol being equivalent to 1 standard drink. Reductions in WHO risk levels have been associated with significant improvements in liver function, AUD severity, and functioning among persons with AUD. WHO risk levels are reported as the percentage of participants in each study group representing each risk level.

    Measured: 6 months post-baseline

  3. Change in Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) Scores

    Change from baseline to 6-month follow-up in the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ), an 8-item questionnaire used to assess patient satisfaction with substance use treatment. Total scores range from 8 to 32, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

    Measured: 6 months post-baseline

  4. Change in Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Screen (PHQ-9) Scores

    Change from baseline to 6-month follow-up in the PHQ-9, a 9-item instrument used to screen, diagnose, and monitor the severity of depression. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale (0=Not at all; 1=Several days; 2=More than half the days; and 3=Nearly every day). The total score can range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depression.

    Measured: 6 months post-baseline

  5. Change in PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) Scores

    Change from baseline to 6-month follow-up in the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), a 20-item instrument used to measure presence and severity of PTSD symptoms. Items on the PCL-5 correspond with DSM-5 criteria for PTSD. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale (0= Not at all; 1= A little bit; 2= Moderately; 3= Quite a bit; and 4= Extremely). The total score can range from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater severity of PTSD.

    Measured: 6 months post-baseline

  6. Change in Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey Scores

    Change from baseline to 6-month follow-up in the Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey, a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of twelve questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning.

    Measured: 6 months post-baseline

  7. Change in Percent Heavy Drinking Days (HDD)

    Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up in in percent HDD, defined as >4 drinks per day for women and >5 drinks per day for men, was selected as the primary outcome as it combines both frequency and intensity of drinking and is a clinically meaningful measure of change. HDD will be generated from the Timeline Follow Back (TLFB), a retrospective, calendar-based measure that provides information on quantity/frequency of alcohol use in the past 30 days. Percent HDD will be calculated by dividing the number of HDD during a one-month period by 30 days.

    Measured: 12-months post-baseline

  8. Change in Short Inventory of Problems - Revised version (SIP-R)

    Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up in the Short Inventory of Problems - Revised version (SIP-R), a 17-item questionnaire used to assess negative consequences from drinking. Items are rated on a 4-pt scale (0=Never, 1= Once or a Few Times, 2 = Once or Twice a Week, 3 = Daily or Almost Daily), which yields a total score. Higher scores reflect greater severity of alcohol-related problems.

    Measured: 12-months post-baseline

  9. Change in World Health Organization (WHO) Risk Levels

    Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up in WHO risk levels, which are defined by average grams of alcohol consumed per day as calculated for each participant from the Timeline Follow Back (TLFB), a retrospective, calendar-based measure that provides information on quantity/frequency of alcohol use in the past 30 days. Participants are categorized into five levels: abstinent (0 g of alcohol/day), low risk (1-40 g/1-20 g of alcohol/day), medium risk (41-60 g/21-40 g of alcohol/day), high risk (61-100 g/41-60 g of alcohol/day), and very high risk (>101 g/>61 g of alcohol/day), with 14g of alcohol being equivalent to 1 standard drink. Reductions in WHO risk levels have been associated with significant improvements in liver function, AUD severity, and functioning among persons with AUD. WHO risk levels are reported as the percentage of participants in each study group representing each risk level.

    Measured: 12-months post-baseline

  10. Change in Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Screen (PHQ-9) Scores

    Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up in the PHQ-9, a 9-item instrument used to screen, diagnose, and monitor the severity of depression. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale (0=Not at all; 1=Several days; 2=More than half the days; and 3=Nearly every day). The total score can range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depression.

    Measured: 12-months post-baseline

  11. Number of Participants Receiving VA Outpatient Substance Use Disorder Treatment

    The total number of participants who received VA outpatient substance use disorder treatment as assessed from visits documented in the VA electronic health record data.

    Measured: 12-months post-baseline

  12. Number of Participants Receiving VA Emergency Department Services

    The total number of participants who received VA emergency department services as assessed from visits documented in the VA electronic health record data.

    Measured: 12-months post-baseline

  13. Change in PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) Scores

    Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up in the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), a 20-item instrument used to measure presence and severity of PTSD symptoms. Items on the PCL-5 correspond with DSM-5 criteria for PTSD. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale (0= Not at all; 1= A little bit; 2= Moderately; 3= Quite a bit; and 4= Extremely). The total score can range from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater severity of PTSD.

    Measured: 12-months post-baseline

  14. Change in Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey Scores

    Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up in the Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey, a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of twelve questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning.

    Measured: 12-months post-baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Mar 2024
  2. Study start1 Nov 2024
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Following completion of informed consent and baseline assessments, participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to MAUD+SD-App or MAUD only conditions.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
330 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06303778
Sponsor's protocol ID
IIR 22-141
Other IDs
1I01HX003742-01A1, HX003742-01A1
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
9 Feb 2024
Last updated
7 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Stand Down mobile app in people with Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD), run by VA Office of Research and Development at 15 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 15 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Eric J Hawkins, PhD ((206) 764-2743, eric.hawkins@va.gov), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Percent Heavy Drinking Days (HDD) (time frame: 6 months post-baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in