Alcohol DrinkingNCT06309134
The Healthy Families Bright Futures Program
A study testing Healthy Families Bright Futures Program in people with Alcohol Drinking and Violence in Adolescence, run by University of Colorado, Colorado Springs at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about an online group program (Healthy Families Bright Futures program) for LGBTQ+ teens and their caregivers. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: • is this program acceptable, appropriate, and feasible for LGBTQ+ youth and their caregivers • does the program affect… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 to 18 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Alcohol Drinking, Violence in Adolescence
- What is being tested?
- Healthy Families Bright Futures Program
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 122 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 7 Jan 2025to 4 Mar 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 to 18 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age between 15 and 18 years
- Self-identify as a sexual and/or gender minority or questioning identity
- In dating/sexual/hook up relationship in past three months
- Ability to read, write, and speak English
- Current residence in United States
- Regular Internet access
- Ability to complete program and assessments
- Has caregiver willing to complete program who is eligible to participate (18 +, sees teen at least once per week, can read/write/speak English, residence in US, Internet access, no current suicidality, psychotic symptoms, or symptoms of serious mental illness)
Who cannot join
- Current enrollment as a college student
- Current suicidality
- Current psychotic symptoms
- Current symptoms of serious mental illness
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Colorado Colorado Springs
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80918-3733
About this study
Official title: An Online Family-based Program to Prevent Alcohol Use and Dating and Sexual Violence Among Sexual and Gender Minority Youth
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about an online group program (Healthy Families Bright Futures program) for LGBTQ+ teens and their caregivers. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: • is this program acceptable, appropriate, and feasible for LGBTQ+ youth and their caregivers • does the program affect teen (alcohol use, dating violence, alcohol use refusal self-efficacy, healthy communication self-efficacy) and caregiver (accepting behaviors, parenting self-efficacy, parenting behaviors) outcomes associated with risk for dating violence and alcohol use among LGBTQ+ teens. Participants will participate in a one-hour weekly online group for seven weeks with separate groups for teens and caregivers.
Read the detailed description
Research documents concerning rates of alcohol use (AU) and dating violence (DV) among sexual and gender minority youth (SGMY), likely related to a combination of population-specific risk factors (e.g., caregiver rejection, internalized homo/bi/transphobia), universal risk factors (e.g., deficits in social emotional skills and alcohol refusal skills, inaccurate perceptions of alcohol norms) and lack of protective factors (e.g., parenting and family relational skills). To date, however, little is known about how to concurrently prevent AU and DV among SGMY. This study will develop and evaluate an online family-based program (Healthy Families Bright Future program [HFBFP]) to prevent AU and DV among SGMY ages 15 to 18. The HFBFP is a group-based intervention that includes seven weekly separate caregiver and youth sessions. Programming for caregivers focuses on fostering acceptance and support for SGMY and enhancing relevant caregiving/positive parenting skills. Programming for SGMY focuses on reducing internalized homo/bi/transphobia and enhancing social-emotional skills, increasing accurate perceptions of alcohol and dating violence norms, increasing alcohol refusal skills, and improving conflict resolution strategies/improving assertive communication. SGMY and caregiver programming is designed to be complementary in content to enhance the potency of programming components, and program skills will be practiced as a family between sessions. The program is co-facilitated by an SGM young adult and SGMY caregiver. During the Pilot Evaluation Phase, the investigators will via a randomized controlled trial of caregiver-SGMY dyads (40 dyads assigned to the HFBFP and 40 dyads to a waitlist), assess the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the HFBFP via program observations, post-session surveys (n = 80), and exit interviews (n = 28) with participants. The study will test the HFBFP's efficacy in improving relevant family/caregiver outcomes (e.g., family communication skills, parenting self-efficacy, affirming behaviors) as well as relevant SGMY outcomes (e.g., alcohol use intentions, alcohol use, dating violence victimization and perpetration, minority stress, perceived DV/alcohol use norms, communication self-efficacy) via surveys completed at baseline, immediate post-test, and 3-month follow-up. Participants will be recruited from across the U.S. via social media and from LGBTQ+ organizations.
- Conditions
- Alcohol Drinking, Violence in Adolescence
- Being tested
- Healthy Families Bright Futures Program
- Keywords
- dating violence, teen drinking, alcohol use, minority stress, parenting behaviors
- Medical subject headings
- Alcohol Drinking, Underage Drinking
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Healthy Families Bright Futures ProgramBehavioural
Seven weekly online group sessions with separate sessions for teens and caregivers. Sessions focus on increasing knowledge and acceptance of LGBTQ+ identities, alcohol use and dating violence social norms correction, bystander intervention, assertive communication skills, social emotional skills, family problem solving, and parenting behaviors.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy Families Bright Futures Program | Experimental | This arm will complete the intervention. Assessments will occur at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and three month follow up. Receives: Behavioral: Healthy Families Bright Futures Program |
| Waitlist | No intervention | Waitlist control. This arm will complete assessments on the same schedule as the experimental condition. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Measure of Adolescent Relationships and Harassment and Abuse - Victimization
Teens only- both dichotomous scores and mean scores calculated for each subscale administered (privacy control, social control, intimidation). Items refer to frequency of past month victimization (0 times [0], 1-3 times [1], 4-10 times [2], more than 10 times [3]). Higher scores reflect greater victimization.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Measure of Adolescent Relationships and Harassment and Abuse - Perpetration
Teens only- both dichotomous scores and mean scores calculated for each subscale administered (cyber control, social control, intimidation). Items refer to frequency of past month perpetration (0 times [0], 1-3 times [1], 4-10 times [2], more than 10 times [3]). Higher scores reflect greater perpetration.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Monitoring the future alcohol use intentions
Teens only, two items that query about intentions to drink alcohol in the next 3 months and the next 30 days. Rating scale responses ranging from 1- Definitely will and 5- Definitely won't. Mean score of both items are calculated. Possible range 1 to 5, higher scores reflect lower intentions to use alcohol.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Monitoring the future alcohol use items
Teens only- Items assesses frequency of alcohol use and frequency of getting drunk in past 30 days. Response options are: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6-9, 10-19, 20-39, 40+. Mean scores across both items are calculated. Higher scores reflect more frequent alcohol use.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Drinking Refusal Self-Efficacy Questionnaire- Shortened adolescent version
Teens only- both total and subscale (opportunistic, social pressure, emotional relief) scores are calculated. Items are summed. Higher scores reflect greater alcohol refusal self-efficacy. Possible total range 9- 54.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Conflict Tactics Scale- 2 (SGM Specific IPV Perpetration)
Teens only- both a dichotomous and mean score calculated. For each item, teens indicate how often in the past month they engaged in the SGM specific dating violence behavior with options of 0 times (0), 1-3 times (1), 4-10 times (2), more than 10 times (3). Higher scores reflect greater engagement in SGM specific IPV.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Conflict Tactics Scale- 2 (SGM Specific IPV Victimization)
Teens only- both a dichotomous and mean score calculated. For each item, teens indicate how often in the past month they experience the SGM specific dating violence behavior with options of 0 times (0), 1-3 times (1), 4-10 times (2), more than 10 times (3). Higher scores reflect greater SGM specific IPV victimization.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Program acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility ratings (drawn from Weiner)
Teens and caregivers- subscales consist of 6 items each with one assessing appropriateness (e.g., the program was a good match to my needs), one assessing acceptability (e.g., I liked the program), and one assessing feasibility (e.g., The skills I learned in the program are easy to use). Mean scores are calculated for each subscale. For each item, participants rate their agreement with the statement on a 5 point scale ranging from 1 strongly disagree to 5 strongly agree. Mean subscale scores are compared to scale midpoint (3). Scores significantly above the midpoint are evidence of intervention acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility.
Measured: 8 weeks
Secondary outcomes (12)
PHQ-8 (modified for adolescents)
Teens only-Total scores are calculated. Higher scores reflect greater depression symptoms. Possible range 0-24.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
LGBTQ+ teen perceived drinking norms
Teens only- two items assessing perceptions of on how many occasions participants believed LGBTQ+ teens on average drank and got drunk in the past 30 days. Response options are: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6-9, 10-19, 20-39, 40+ Mean scores are calculated across both items. Higher scores represent greater perceived drinking norms.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
LGBTQ+ teen perceived dating violence norms
Teens only- 18 items assessing participants' perceptions of the percentage of LGBTQ+ teens who engaged in a variety of dating violence perpetration behaviors. For each item, participants estimate percentage of teens who engaged in each behavior in the past month, ranging from 0 to 100%. Mean scores are calculated for each subscale: social control, physical abuse, sexual abuse, isolation, cyber control, intimidation. Higher scores reflect greater perceived dating violence norms.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Sexual communication self-efficacy scale
Teens only- mean scores are calculated for both subscales: positive sexual messages, negative sexual messages. Higher scores reflect greater sexual communication self-efficacy. Subscale scores can range from 1 to 4.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Communication skills test (modified to assess self-efficacy)
Teens only- 9 items that assess participants' self-efficacy to engage in healthy communication strategies with their dating partners. Mean scores across all items are calculated. Higher scores reflect greater healthy communication self-efficacy. Scores can range from 1 to 4.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Short Internalized Homonegativity Scale.
Teens only- 11 items assess internalized homonegativity. One item that assesses comfort in LGBTQ+ bars was omitted. Items were modified to refer to LGBTQ+ identities. Total scores are calculated. Higher scores reflect greater internalized homonegativity. Scores can range from 11 to 55.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Self-Efficacy for Parenting Adolescents Scale
Caregivers only- three subscales administered: physical and sexual development, emotional responsivity and communication, and discipline and behavior management. Mean scores are calculated for each subscale. Higher scores reflect greater self-efficacy. Scores for each subscale can range from 1 to 4.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Parental Monitoring Short Scale
Teens and caregivers- mean scores are calculated for caregivers and teens for each subscale: parental knowledge, parental control, comunication. Higher scores on each subscale reflect greater use of each parental monitoring strategy. Scores on each subscale can range from 1 to 5.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Parent Adolescent Communication Scale
Teens and caregivers- total scores for each subscale are calculated separately for teens and caregivers: open communication and problem free communication. Higher scores reflect less perceived communication problems. Scores can range from 10 to 100 for each subscale.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Alabama Parenting Questionnaire- Short form
Caregivers only- Total score are calculated for each subscale (positive parenting, inconsistent discipline, poor supervision). Higher subscale scores reflect greater engagement in that parenting behavior. Scores on each subscale can range from 5 to 15.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Social and Emotional Competencies Questionnaire
Teens only- Total scores are calculated for each subscale (self-awareness, self-management and motivation, social awareness and prosocial behavior, decision making). Higher scores reflect greater perceived competence. Scores for self awareness subscale range from 4 to 20, scores for the self-management and decision making subscales range from 3 to 15, scores for the social awareness subscale range from 6 to 30.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
LGBTQ+ Microaggressions and Microaffirmations in Families
Teens and caregivers- mean scores are calculated for each subscale separately for teens and caregivers (interpersonal positive, interpersonal negative). For each subscale, higher scores reflect greater engagement in that behavior by the caregiver. Scores on each subscale can range from 0 to 4.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Mar 2024
- Study start7 Jan 2025
- Primary completion4 Mar 2026
- Study completion4 Mar 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Alcohol DrinkingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants will be randomly assigned by algorithm to either complete the program or to waitlist. Allocation to conditions will be 50/50. Randomization will occur at the dyad level.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 122 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Colorado, Colorado Springs
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Nebraska Lincoln
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Heather Littleton, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs
- Investigators
- Heather Littleton, PhD, Principal investigator, UCCS
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06309134
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R34AA030662
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 23 Feb 2024
- Last updated
- 1 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: IPD will be deposited into NIMH Data Archive. Participants will be identified by pseudoGUIDS
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Online Family-based Program to Prevent Alcohol Use and Dating and Sexual Violence Among Sexual and Gender Minority Youth
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06309134
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- R34AA030662
- Conditions
- Alcohol Drinking, Violence in Adolescence
- Keywords
- dating violence, teen drinking, alcohol use, minority stress, parenting behaviors
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 122 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Colorado, Colorado SpringsUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Nebraska Lincoln
- Study start
- 7 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 4 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Mar 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about an online group program (Healthy Families Bright Futures program) for LGBTQ+ teens and their caregivers. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: • is this program acceptable, appropriate, and feasible for LGBTQ+ youth and their caregivers • does the program affect teen (alcohol use, dating violence, alcohol use refusal self-efficacy, healthy communication self-efficacy) and caregiver (accepting behaviors, parenting self-efficacy, parenting behaviors) outcomes associated with risk for dating violence and alcohol use among LGBTQ+ teens. Participants will participate in a one-hour weekly online group for seven weeks with separate groups for teens and caregivers.
Detailed description
Research documents concerning rates of alcohol use (AU) and dating violence (DV) among sexual and gender minority youth (SGMY), likely related to a combination of population-specific risk factors (e.g., caregiver rejection, internalized homo/bi/transphobia), universal risk factors (e.g., deficits in social emotional skills and alcohol refusal skills, inaccurate perceptions of alcohol norms) and lack of protective factors (e.g., parenting and family relational skills). To date, however, little is known about how to concurrently prevent AU and DV among SGMY. This study will develop and evaluate an online family-based program (Healthy Families Bright Future program [HFBFP]) to prevent AU and DV among SGMY ages 15 to 18. The HFBFP is a group-based intervention that includes seven weekly separate caregiver and youth sessions. Programming for caregivers focuses on fostering acceptance and support for SGMY and enhancing relevant caregiving/positive parenting skills. Programming for SGMY focuses on reducing internalized homo/bi/transphobia and enhancing social-emotional skills, increasing accurate perceptions of alcohol and dating violence norms, increasing alcohol refusal skills, and improving conflict resolution strategies/improving assertive communication. SGMY and caregiver programming is designed to be complementary in content to enhance the potency of programming components, and program skills will be practiced as a family between sessions. The program is co-facilitated by an SGM young adult and SGMY caregiver. During the Pilot Evaluation Phase, the investigators will via a randomized controlled trial of caregiver-SGMY dyads (40 dyads assigned to the HFBFP and 40 dyads to a waitlist), assess the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the HFBFP via program observations, post-session surveys (n = 80), and exit interviews (n = 28) with participants. The study will test the HFBFP's efficacy in improving relevant family/caregiver outcomes (e.g., family communication skills, parenting self-efficacy, affirming behaviors) as well as relevant SGMY outcomes (e.g., alcohol use intentions, alcohol use, dating violence victimization and perpetration, minority stress, perceived DV/alcohol use norms, communication self-efficacy) via surveys completed at baseline, immediate post-test, and 3-month follow-up. Participants will be recruited from across the U.S. via social media and from LGBTQ+ organizations.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants will be randomly assigned by algorithm to either complete the program or to waitlist. Allocation to conditions will be 50/50. Randomization will occur at the dyad level.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy Families Bright Futures Program | Experimental | Behavioral: Healthy Families Bright Futures ProgramThis arm will complete the intervention. Assessments will occur at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and three month follow up. |
| Waitlist | No intervention | –Waitlist control. This arm will complete assessments on the same schedule as the experimental condition. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age between 15 and 18 years
- Self-identify as a sexual and/or gender minority or questioning identity
- In dating/sexual/hook up relationship in past three months
- Ability to read, write, and speak English
- Current residence in United States
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Current enrollment as a college student
- Current suicidality
- Current psychotic symptoms
- Current symptoms of serious mental illness
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy Families Bright Futures ProgramSeven weekly online group sessions with separate sessions for teens and caregivers. Sessions focus on increasing knowledge and acceptance of LGBTQ+ identities, alcohol use and dating violence social norms correction, bystander intervention, assertive communication skills, social emotional skills, family problem solving, and parenting behaviors. | Behavioural | Healthy Families Bright Futures Program |
Primary outcome
Measure of Adolescent Relationships and Harassment and Abuse - Victimization
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Teens only- both dichotomous scores and mean scores calculated for each subscale administered (privacy control, social control, intimidation). Items refer to frequency of past month victimization (0 times [0], 1-3 times [1], 4-10 times [2], more than 10 times [3]). Higher scores reflect greater victimization.
Measure of Adolescent Relationships and Harassment and Abuse - Perpetration
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Teens only- both dichotomous scores and mean scores calculated for each subscale administered (cyber control, social control, intimidation). Items refer to frequency of past month perpetration (0 times [0], 1-3 times [1], 4-10 times [2], more than 10 times [3]). Higher scores reflect greater perpetration.
Monitoring the future alcohol use intentions
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Teens only, two items that query about intentions to drink alcohol in the next 3 months and the next 30 days. Rating scale responses ranging from 1- Definitely will and 5- Definitely won't. Mean score of both items are calculated. Possible range 1 to 5, higher scores reflect lower intentions to use alcohol.
Monitoring the future alcohol use items
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Teens only- Items assesses frequency of alcohol use and frequency of getting drunk in past 30 days. Response options are: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6-9, 10-19, 20-39, 40+. Mean scores across both items are calculated. Higher scores reflect more frequent alcohol use.
Drinking Refusal Self-Efficacy Questionnaire- Shortened adolescent version
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Teens only- both total and subscale (opportunistic, social pressure, emotional relief) scores are calculated. Items are summed. Higher scores reflect greater alcohol refusal self-efficacy. Possible total range 9- 54.
Conflict Tactics Scale- 2 (SGM Specific IPV Perpetration)
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Teens only- both a dichotomous and mean score calculated. For each item, teens indicate how often in the past month they engaged in the SGM specific dating violence behavior with options of 0 times (0), 1-3 times (1), 4-10 times (2), more than 10 times (3). Higher scores reflect greater engagement in SGM specific IPV.
Conflict Tactics Scale- 2 (SGM Specific IPV Victimization)
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Teens only- both a dichotomous and mean score calculated. For each item, teens indicate how often in the past month they experience the SGM specific dating violence behavior with options of 0 times (0), 1-3 times (1), 4-10 times (2), more than 10 times (3). Higher scores reflect greater SGM specific IPV victimization.
Program acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility ratings (drawn from Weiner)
Time frame: 8 weeks
Teens and caregivers- subscales consist of 6 items each with one assessing appropriateness (e.g., the program was a good match to my needs), one assessing acceptability (e.g., I liked the program), and one assessing feasibility (e.g., The skills I learned in the program are easy to use). Mean scores are calculated for each subscale. For each item, participants rate their agreement with the statement on a 5 point scale ranging from 1 strongly disagree to 5 strongly agree. Mean subscale scores are compared to scale midpoint (3). Scores significantly above the midpoint are evidence of intervention acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility.
12 secondary outcomes
PHQ-8 (modified for adolescents)
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
LGBTQ+ teen perceived drinking norms
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
LGBTQ+ teen perceived dating violence norms
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Sexual communication self-efficacy scale
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Communication skills test (modified to assess self-efficacy)
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Short Internalized Homonegativity Scale.
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Self-Efficacy for Parenting Adolescents Scale
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Parental Monitoring Short Scale
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Parent Adolescent Communication Scale
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Alabama Parenting Questionnaire- Short form
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Social and Emotional Competencies Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
LGBTQ+ Microaggressions and Microaffirmations in Families
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. IPD will be deposited into NIMH Data Archive. Participants will be identified by pseudoGUIDS
Related trials for Alcohol Drinking
Recruiting
Coordinated Care for Alcohol Problems
Alcohol Use Disorder
RecruitingPhase 1
Environment and Alcohol: A Pilot Study
Alcohol Use Disorder
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Cannabidiol as an Adjunct Treatment for Alcohol Withdrawal and Craving
Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD), Withdrawal From Addictive Substance; Detoxification
Not yet recruiting
HC-HMP: Healthy Choices Implementation Trial
Alcohol Drinking, HIV Infections
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Addictions Neuroclinical Assessment (ANA)
Normal Physiology, Alcohol Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Heather Littleton, PhD principal investigator
UCCS
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Healthy Families Bright Futures Program in people with Alcohol Drinking and Violence in Adolescence, run by University of Colorado, Colorado Springs at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Measure of Adolescent Relationships and Harassment and Abuse - Victimization (time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 3 months). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Sep 2026.