AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical RadiculopathyNCT06309849

Efficacy of Physical Therapy Intervention in Cervical Angina Patients at Jerash University Office Employees, "Randomized Clinical Trail".

A study testing Manual physiotherapy intervention( cervical traction, suboccipital release, muscle energy technique) in people with Cervical Radiculopathy, run by South Valley University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cervicogenic angina (CA) is defined as paroxysmal angina- like pain that originates from the disorders of the cervical spine or other neck structures. Because CA mimics typical cardiac angina, symptoms in the elderly with cervical spondylosis are more frequently misdiagnosed Nakajima H, 2006. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cervical Radiculopathy
What is being tested?
Manual physiotherapy intervention( cervical traction, suboccipital release, muscle energy technique)
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
30 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
20 Apr 2024to 1 Jun 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • cervical spondylosis, cervical disc, cervical instability

Who cannot join

  • Cardiovascular diseases ( ischemic heart disease, heart failure, valvular disease)

About this study

Cervicogenic angina (CA) is defined as paroxysmal angina- like pain that originates from the disorders of the cervical spine or other neck structures. Because CA mimics typical cardiac angina, symptoms in the elderly with cervical spondylosis are more frequently misdiagnosed Nakajima H, 2006. Patients with CA may have suffered symptoms for longer periods of time and seen several clinicians due to conflicting cardiac exams. Clinicians and patients are unaware that CA symptoms are stemming from cervical spine disorders. However, the mechanism of pain occurrence in patients with CA remains unclear.

Read the detailed description

Randomized Control Trail (RCT) will be used in the study. Participants will be divided into two groups (experimental and control groups). Each group will include 30 participants.

The study population will be employees working in JU from different departments.

A total of 60 participants will be included in the study. Their weight ranged from (50 kilograms) to (100 kilograms). And their height ranged from (150 centimeters) to (190 centimeters). And their body mass index ranged from (22.2) to (27.7). This will be divided into 2 groups with 30 participants in each group.

The data collected will focus on measuring the Range of Motion (ROM) of the cervical spine using an Electro-Goniometer, the pain using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the Hart Rate (HR) using an electro cardio Graphic (ECG).

The study setting will be JU, located in Jerash City, Jordan.

Being tested
Manual physiotherapy intervention( cervical traction, suboccipital release, muscle energy technique)
Medical subject headings
Radiculopathy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Manual physiotherapy intervention( cervical traction, suboccipital release, muscle energy technique)Other

    Also called Strengthening exercises for neck muscles, ultrasound with parameters 5 min × 3 times × 4 weeks, 1 MHz, continuous: 1.5 W/cm2; pulsed: 2.5 W/cm2,

    Manual physiotherapy intervention( cervical traction, suboccipital release, muscle energy technique) strengthening exercises for neck muscles, ultrasound with parameters 5 min × 3 times × 4 weeks, 1 MHz, continuous: 1.5 W/cm2; pulsed: 2.5 W/cm2.

Study groups in NCT06309849
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Efficacy of Physical Therapy Intervention in Cervical Angina PatientsExperimentalRandomized Control Trail (RCT) will be used in the study. Participants will be dived into experimental group and control group. Each group will includes 30 participants.The physiotherapy program intervention will includes cervical traction, cervical mobilization, Sub occipital release, Muscle energy technique. and ultra sound with parameters 5 min × 3 times × 4 weeks, 1 MHz, continuous: 1.5 W/cm2; pulsed: 2.5 W/cm2, for study group.
Receives: Other: Manual physiotherapy intervention( cervical traction, suboccipital release, muscle energy technique)
know the effect of Physical Therapy Intervention in Cervical Angina PatientsPlacebo comparator30 participants in control.The physiotherapy program intervention will include ultrasound with parameters 5 min × 3 times × 4 weeks, 1 MHz, continuous: 1.5 W/cm2; pulsed: 2.5 W/cm2
Receives: Other: Manual physiotherapy intervention( cervical traction, suboccipital release, muscle energy technique)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 1-Hart Rate (HR) (bpm) using Electro Cardiac Graphic (ECG). 2- Blood pressure (mm Hg) using Sphygmomanometer.

    1- Hart Rate (HR) (bpm) using Electro Cardiac Graphic (ECG). 2- Blood pressure (mm Hg) using 1-Hart Rate (HR) using Electro Cardiac Graphic (ECG). 2- Blood pressure using Sphygmomanometer.

    Measured: Four weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. 3- Range of Motion (ROM) (in degrees) of the cervical spine using Electro-Goniometer. 4- the pain using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from (0-10)

    3- Range of Motion (ROM) (in degrees) of the cervical spine using Electro-Goniometer. 4- the pain using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from ( 0-10)

    Measured: 4 Weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Mar 2024
  2. Study start20 Apr 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion20 May 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized Control Trail (RCT) will be used in the study. Participants will be dived into experimental group and control group. Each group will includes 30 participants.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06309849
Sponsor's protocol ID
Jerash University
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
10 Feb 2024
Last updated
8 Apr 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: After publication

Publications

  • Chien JT, Hsieh MH, Yang CC, Chen IH, Lee RP. Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Conservative Treatment for Cervical Angina Conservative Treatment. Clin Spine Surg. 2021 Nov 1;34(9):E514-E521. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001178.

    PubMed 33828047

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Manual physiotherapy intervention( cervical traction, suboccipital release, muscle energy technique) in people with Cervical Radiculopathy, run by South Valley University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

1-Hart Rate (HR) (bpm) using Electro Cardiac Graphic (ECG). 2- Blood pressure (mm Hg) using Sphygmomanometer. (time frame: Four weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06309849, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Apr 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in