Surgical Site InfectionJumpStartNCT06312267
Reducing Wound Infections Using Bioelectric Wound Dressings
A study testing Bioelectric dressing in people with Surgical Site Infection, run by AdventHealth at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of using Bioelectric wound dressing on the pre-operative wound site and post operatively and compared it outcomes to the standard of care chlorhexidine skin preparation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Surgical Site Infection
- What is being tested?
- Bioelectric dressing
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 4 Mar 2024to 1 May 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Elective diverticular, benign polyp, or colon cancer resection
- Age 18-90 years old
- All patients must receive some kind of bowel prep (SU- prep, pills, Go-Lytely, milk of magnesia, etc.…)
- Must be off antibiotics for more than 2 weeks before surgery
- Surgery must be laparoscopic, hand assisted or Robotic
- Skin will be closed in layers and subcuticular interrupted fashion
Show all 10Show fewer
- Just one dose of preoperative antibiotics (Invanz or equivalent if patient is allergic)
- Patients will have a primary anastomosis, no colostomy.
- Patient must be compliant with dressing care
- Ability to provide informed consent
Who cannot join
- Active infections before surgery -example: Intra-abdominal abscess not drained or actively on antibiotics on the day of surgery, skin infections
- Inability to take intestinal bowel preparation
- HgbA1c >8
- BMI >40
- Immunosuppression
- Need of steroid stress dose pre-op
Show all 15Show fewer
- Patient receiving active chemotherapy
- Need of stoma (end ostomies after resection protective stoma included)
- Need of blood transfusion during surgery
- Use of irrigation with antibiotics or IRRISEPTR during surgery
- Any standard contraindication to anesthesia and/or surgery
- Pregnancy or lactating women
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Inability to follow instructions for dressing care
- Sensitivity or allergy to silver or zinc
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of using Bioelectric wound dressing on the pre-operative wound site and post operatively and compared it outcomes to the standard of care chlorhexidine skin preparation.
Read the detailed description
The standard of care for enhance recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol uses chlorhexidine alcohol base prep as the way to clean the skin preoperatively to decrease bacterial flora before sterile prep at the OR.
Under ERAS protocol there is no recommendations on any post-operative dressing. Biolelectric wound dressing has been introduced, used and proof to decrease wound infection in orthopedic extremity clean surgery for years.
The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of using Bioelectric wound dressing on the pre-operative wound site and post operatively and compared it outcomes to the standard of care chlorhexidine skin preparation.
- Conditions
- Surgical Site Infection
- Being tested
- Bioelectric dressing
- Keywords
- Surgery outcomes, Bioelectric dressing,
- Medical subject headings
- Surgical Wound Infection
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bioelectric dressingDevice
Participants randomized into the experimental arm will have a bioelectric dressing applied 3 days before surgery, and 3 days post-surgery.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Arm | No intervention | Study participants will undergo surgery using current ERAS protocol standard of care skin cleaning preparation. |
| Experimental Arm | Experimental | Study participants will use Bioelectrical dressing preoperatively and post-operative. Receives: Device: Bioelectric dressing |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quantitative bacterial count
Skin biopsies will be collected and analyzed for bacterial counts
Measured: 4 total biopsies will be collected. (3 days before surgery, surgery day pre incision, immediately post-surgery and 3 days post-surgery)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Mar 2024
- Study start4 Mar 2024
- Primary completion1 May 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 May 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Surgical Site InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Total of 20 patients will be identified and divided in two groups (control and experimental group). 10 of the patients undergo surgery using current ERAS protocol standard of care skin cleaning preparation. The other 10 patients skin prep will be substituted with the Bioelectrical dressing preoperatively and post-operative.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AdventHealth
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jay Redan, MD, Principal investigator, AdventHealth
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06312267
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1840655
- Acronym
- JumpStart
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 7 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 27 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, Nygren J, Demartines N, Francis N, Rockall TA, Young-Fadok TM, Hill AG, Soop M, de Boer HD, Urman RD, Chang GJ, Fichera A, Kessler H, Grass F, Whang EE, Fawcett WJ, Carli F, Lobo DN, Rollins KE, Balfour A, Baldini G, Riedel B, Ljungqvist O. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society Recommendations: 2018. World J Surg. 2019 Mar;43(3):659-695. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y.
PubMed 30426190Cooke CL, Greene RS, van Eck CF, Uquilas C, Limpisvasti O. Bioelectric Silver-Zinc Dressing Equally Effective to Chlorhexidine in Reducing Skin Bacterial Load in Healthy Volunteers. Arthroscopy. 2018 Oct;34(10):2886-2891. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.05.046. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
PubMed 30195951Kim H, Park S, Housler G, Marcel V, Cross S, Izadjoo M. An Overview of the Efficacy of a Next Generation Electroceutical Wound Care Device. Mil Med. 2016 May;181(5 Suppl):184-90. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00157.
PubMed 27168571Banerjee J, Das Ghatak P, Roy S, Khanna S, Hemann C, Deng B, Das A, Zweier JL, Wozniak D, Sen CK. Silver-zinc redox-coupled electroceutical wound dressing disrupts bacterial biofilm. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 24;10(3):e0119531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119531. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 25803639Banerjee J, Das Ghatak P, Roy S, Khanna S, Sequin EK, Bellman K, Dickinson BC, Suri P, Subramaniam VV, Chang CJ, Sen CK. Improvement of human keratinocyte migration by a redox active bioelectric dressing. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 3;9(3):e89239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089239. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 24595050Barki KG, Das A, Dixith S, Ghatak PD, Mathew-Steiner S, Schwab E, Khanna S, Wozniak DJ, Roy S, Sen CK. Electric Field Based Dressing Disrupts Mixed-Species Bacterial Biofilm Infection and Restores Functional Wound Healing. Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):756-766. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002504.
PubMed 29099398Kim H, Makin I, Skiba J, Ho A, Housler G, Stojadinovic A, Izadjoo M. Antibacterial efficacy testing of a bioelectric wound dressing against clinical wound pathogens. Open Microbiol J. 2014 Feb 21;8:15-21. doi: 10.2174/1874285801408010015. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 24627730Kim H, Izadjoo MJ. Antibiofilm efficacy evaluation of a bioelectric dressing in mono- and multi-species biofilms. J Wound Care. 2015 Feb;24 Suppl 2:S10-4. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.Sup2.S10.
PubMed 25647504Kulkarni N, Arulampalam T. Laparoscopic surgery reduces the incidence of surgical site infections compared to the open approach for colorectal procedures: a meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Oct;24(10):1017-1024. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02293-8. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
PubMed 32648141Hubner M, Diana M, Zanetti G, Eisenring MC, Demartines N, Troillet N. Surgical site infections in colon surgery: the patient, the procedure, the hospital, and the surgeon. Arch Surg. 2011 Nov;146(11):1240-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.176. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
PubMed 21768407
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Reducing Wound Infections Using Bioelectric Wound Dressings
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06312267
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- JumpStart / 1840655
- Conditions
- Surgical Site Infection
- Keywords
- Surgery outcomes, Bioelectric dressing,
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- AdventHealthUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 May 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of using Bioelectric wound dressing on the pre-operative wound site and post operatively and compared it outcomes to the standard of care chlorhexidine skin preparation.
Detailed description
The standard of care for enhance recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol uses chlorhexidine alcohol base prep as the way to clean the skin preoperatively to decrease bacterial flora before sterile prep at the OR.
Under ERAS protocol there is no recommendations on any post-operative dressing. Biolelectric wound dressing has been introduced, used and proof to decrease wound infection in orthopedic extremity clean surgery for years.
The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of using Bioelectric wound dressing on the pre-operative wound site and post operatively and compared it outcomes to the standard of care chlorhexidine skin preparation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Total of 20 patients will be identified and divided in two groups (control and experimental group). 10 of the patients undergo surgery using current ERAS protocol standard of care skin cleaning preparation. The other 10 patients skin prep will be substituted with the Bioelectrical dressing preoperatively and post-operative.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Arm | No intervention | –Study participants will undergo surgery using current ERAS protocol standard of care skin cleaning preparation. |
| Experimental Arm | Experimental | Device: Bioelectric dressingStudy participants will use Bioelectrical dressing preoperatively and post-operative. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Elective diverticular, benign polyp, or colon cancer resection
- Age 18-90 years old
- All patients must receive some kind of bowel prep (SU- prep, pills, Go-Lytely, milk of magnesia, etc.…)
- Must be off antibiotics for more than 2 weeks before surgery
- Surgery must be laparoscopic, hand assisted or Robotic
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Active infections before surgery -example: Intra-abdominal abscess not drained or actively on antibiotics on the day of surgery, skin infections
- Inability to take intestinal bowel preparation
- HgbA1c >8
- BMI >40
- Immunosuppression
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bioelectric dressingParticipants randomized into the experimental arm will have a bioelectric dressing applied 3 days before surgery, and 3 days post-surgery. | Device | Experimental Arm |
Primary outcome
Quantitative bacterial count
Time frame: 4 total biopsies will be collected. (3 days before surgery, surgery day pre incision, immediately post-surgery and 3 days post-surgery)
Skin biopsies will be collected and analyzed for bacterial counts
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Apr 2026.
- Background: PubMed 30426190Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, Nygren J, Demartines N, Francis N, Rockall TA, Young-Fadok TM, Hill AG, Soop M, de Boer HD, Urman RD, Chang GJ, Fichera A, Kessler H, Grass F, Whang EE, Fawcett WJ, Carli F, Lobo DN, Rollins KE, Balfour A, Baldini G, Riedel B, Ljungqvist O. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society Recommendations: 2018. World J Surg. 2019 Mar;43(3):659-695. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y.
- Background: PubMed 30195951Cooke CL, Greene RS, van Eck CF, Uquilas C, Limpisvasti O. Bioelectric Silver-Zinc Dressing Equally Effective to Chlorhexidine in Reducing Skin Bacterial Load in Healthy Volunteers. Arthroscopy. 2018 Oct;34(10):2886-2891. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.05.046. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
- Background: PubMed 27168571Kim H, Park S, Housler G, Marcel V, Cross S, Izadjoo M. An Overview of the Efficacy of a Next Generation Electroceutical Wound Care Device. Mil Med. 2016 May;181(5 Suppl):184-90. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00157.
- Background: PubMed 25803639Banerjee J, Das Ghatak P, Roy S, Khanna S, Hemann C, Deng B, Das A, Zweier JL, Wozniak D, Sen CK. Silver-zinc redox-coupled electroceutical wound dressing disrupts bacterial biofilm. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 24;10(3):e0119531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119531. eCollection 2015.
- Background: PubMed 24595050Banerjee J, Das Ghatak P, Roy S, Khanna S, Sequin EK, Bellman K, Dickinson BC, Suri P, Subramaniam VV, Chang CJ, Sen CK. Improvement of human keratinocyte migration by a redox active bioelectric dressing. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 3;9(3):e89239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089239. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 29099398Barki KG, Das A, Dixith S, Ghatak PD, Mathew-Steiner S, Schwab E, Khanna S, Wozniak DJ, Roy S, Sen CK. Electric Field Based Dressing Disrupts Mixed-Species Bacterial Biofilm Infection and Restores Functional Wound Healing. Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):756-766. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002504.
- Background: PubMed 24627730Kim H, Makin I, Skiba J, Ho A, Housler G, Stojadinovic A, Izadjoo M. Antibacterial efficacy testing of a bioelectric wound dressing against clinical wound pathogens. Open Microbiol J. 2014 Feb 21;8:15-21. doi: 10.2174/1874285801408010015. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 25647504Kim H, Izadjoo MJ. Antibiofilm efficacy evaluation of a bioelectric dressing in mono- and multi-species biofilms. J Wound Care. 2015 Feb;24 Suppl 2:S10-4. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.Sup2.S10.
- Background: PubMed 32648141Kulkarni N, Arulampalam T. Laparoscopic surgery reduces the incidence of surgical site infections compared to the open approach for colorectal procedures: a meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Oct;24(10):1017-1024. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02293-8. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
- Results publication: PubMed 21768407Hubner M, Diana M, Zanetti G, Eisenring MC, Demartines N, Troillet N. Surgical site infections in colon surgery: the patient, the procedure, the hospital, and the surgeon. Arch Surg. 2011 Nov;146(11):1240-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.176. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Surgical Site Infection
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pilot Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of OPTILENE® SILVER MESH ELASTIC in Prevention of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) and Incisional Hernia (IH)
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Morbid Obesity
RecruitingPhase 2
A Single Arm Phase II Trial in p16-positive Oropharynx Cancer of Selective Dose De-escalation of nodAl VolumEs at Minimal Risk and Primary Site Disease (SAVED)
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer
Recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of NTP in Thyroid Surgery: Pilot Study on Morbidity Prevention and Adjuvant Oncological Control
Thyroid Diseases, Wound Healing
RecruitingObservational study
Novosyn® CHD vs Polyglactin 910 Suture to Close Wounds After Emergency or Elective Laparotomy or Laparoscopic Surgery
Surgical Site Infection
Not yet recruiting
Safety Assessment of Placing a Single Dental Implant Without Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Simple Cases: A Pilot Study
Tooth Loss and Rehabillitation, Dental Implant Failure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Jay Redan, MD principal investigator
AdventHealth
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Bioelectric dressing in people with Surgical Site Infection, run by AdventHealth at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quantitative bacterial count (time frame: 4 total biopsies will be collected. (3 days before surgery, surgery day pre incision, immediately post-surgery and 3 days post-surgery)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06312267, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2026.