AzTrials
AzTrials

Shoulder OsteoarthritisNCT06319911

AETOS Shoulder System

An observational study of Shoulder Osteoarthritis and Shoulder Arthritis, run by Smith & Nephew, Inc. at 5 sites in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study is to confirm the safety and performance of the AETOS Shoulder System for USA adoption. This is a prospective, open, adaptive, non-comparative, multi-centre investigation enrolling a maximum of 220 subjects in 2 cohorts (anatomic and reverse) at up to 15 sites. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Shoulder Osteoarthritis, Shoulder Arthritis
What is being tested?
AETOS
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
220 participants
Where
5 sitesUnited States
Study dates
5 Mar 2024to 30 Aug 2030
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Males and females who are at least 18 years of age at the time of consent, are skeletally mature, and are indicated for primary anatomic or primary reverse will be enrolled in the study

Who may be able to join

  • Patients must meet all the following criteria to be included in the study:
  • Patient is at least 18 years of age at the time of consent and skeletally mature.
  • Patient is undergoing a primary elective anatomic or reverse shoulder replacement surgery for one of the following indications:
  • Rheumatoid arthritis, and/or
  • Traumatic arthritis (Post Traumatic arthritis), and/or
  • Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease, and/or
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Correction of functional deformity.
  • Patient is willing and able to accommodate all study-related procedures and visits detailed in the protocol \& cooperate in the standard of care post-operative therapy.
  • Patient is geographically stable and willing to return to the study site for all follow-up visits.
  • Patient has been adequately informed of risks and requirements of the study and is willing and able to provide informed consent for participation.
  • -

Who cannot join

  • Patients who meet any of the following criteria will not qualify for participation in the trial:
  • Patient has a contraindication to AETOS.
  • Patient is undergoing a revision shoulder replacement surgery including total or partial arthroplasty.
  • Patient is indicated for a Hemiarthroplasty.
  • Patient has traumatic injury or a fracture.
  • Patient has uncontrolled diabetes with a hemoglobin A1C of 7.5 or greater.
Show all 25Show fewer
  • Patient has comorbidities/conditions that preclude proper healing/fixation of the implant.
  • Patient has poor quality or insufficient bone stock to support the implant.
  • Patient has poor bone quality where there could be considerable migration of the implant and/or a chance of fracture.
  • Patient has rapid joint destruction, marked bone loss or bone resorption (e.g., severe osteoporosis).
  • Patient has osteomalacia.
  • Patient has muscular, neurologic, or vascular deficiencies that may compromise the outcome of the shoulder replacement surgery.
  • Patient has a known sensitivity, allergic reaction, and/or known allergies to one or more of the implanted materials.
  • Patient has a distant foci of infection which may spread to the implant site, active local or systemic infection, sepsis, or osteomyelitis.
  • Patient has an elevation of sedimentation rate, elevation of WBC count, or marked shift in WBC differential count unexplained by other disease.
  • If reverse shoulder arthroplasty, patient has a non-functional deltoid or external rotator muscles.
  • If reverse shoulder arthroplasty, patient has a significant injury to the upper brachial plexus.
  • If reverse shoulder arthroplasty, patient has paralysis of the axillary nerve.
  • Patient is uncooperative, has a neurologic disorder and is not capable of following directions, or is a vulnerable subject per ISO 14155 (i.e., individuals who are unable to fully understand all aspects of the investigation that are relevant to the decision to participate, or who could be manipulated or unduly influenced as a result of a compromised position, expectation of benefits or fear of retaliatory response).
  • Patient is pregnant or plans to become pregnant during the follow-up period.
  • Patient has a Body Mass Index (BMI) of >35kg/m2 or a BMI that may compromise the outcome of the shoulder replacement surgery.
  • Patient has anticipated activities which would impose high stresses on the implant and its fixation or has a high likelihood of a fall.
  • Patient is a known smoker, vaper, alcohol abuser, or drug abuser within 180 days of consent.
  • Patient has participated previously in this clinical trial and was withdrawn.
  • Patient is participating in another device or drug trial or observational competitive study.

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

5 sites in 1 country

United States5 sites, 5 recruiting
  • Center for Orthopedics and Neurosurgical Care

    Bend, Oregon, 97701

    Cody Manriquez, 541-420-0774, codymanriquez@gmail.com

    Scott Jacobson, MD

    Recruiting
  • Hughston Foundation

    Columbus, Georgia, 31909

    Cholly Minton, 706-494-3330, cminton@hughston.com

    Brent Ponce

    Recruiting
  • Western Orthopaedics

    Denver, Colorado, 80210

    Libby Mauter, 303-321-1333, lmauter@western-ortho.com

    Armand Hatzidakis

    Recruiting
  • Rothman Institute

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107

    Brooke Olin, 267-516-9393

    Matthew Ramsey, MD

    Recruiting
  • California Pacific Orthopedics

    San Francisco, California, 94118

    Katie Sheehi, 415-668-8010, ksheehi@calpacortho.com

    James Kelly, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: AETOS Shoulder System Post Market Clinical Investigation

The goal of this study is to confirm the safety and performance of the AETOS Shoulder System for USA adoption. This is a prospective, open, adaptive, non-comparative, multi-centre investigation enrolling a maximum of 220 subjects in 2 cohorts (anatomic and reverse) at up to 15 sites. No intra-study comparator group will be included, and there will be no randomization

Read the detailed description

This study will confirm the safety and performance of the AETOS Shoulder System in anatomic and reverse TSA. Revisions will not be enrolled into this study.

The AETOS Shoulder System is manufactured by Smith \& Nephew, Inc., 1450 Brooks Road Memphis, Tennessee 38116 USA, and has been 510k Cleared as of 07Jun2023; therefore, it is considered a post-market product and will be procured through normal commercial channels in the USA. The humeral stem is designed to be used for both Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty procedures. The humeral stems are designed with fins and a porous plasma coating to provide fixation within the proximal humeral metaphysis.

Being tested
AETOS
Keywords
Shoulder, arthroplasty

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AETOSDevice

    The AETOS Shoulder System will be implanted into the right or left shoulder in the anatomic or reverse configuration

Study groups in NCT06319911
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Primary AnatomicThose subjects who have the AETOS implanted in the Primary Anatomic configuration
Receives: Device: AETOS
Primary reverseThose subjects who have AETOS implanted in the Reverse configuration
Receives: Device: AETOS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Implant Survivorship

    Implant survivorship at 2 years post operatively defined as absence of device removal or revision of any component

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Implant Survivorship at 6 months, 1 year, 3.5 years and 5 years

    Implant Survivorship at 6 months, 1 year, 3.5 years, and 5 years defined as absence of device removal or revision of any component

    Measured: 6 months, 1 year, 3.5 years, and 5 years

  2. Radiographic Assessment - Glenoid Migration/Subsidence

    Glenoid Component Migration / Subsidence collected post-surgery at day 0, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years will be graded in accordance with the following definitions:

    1. Absent: No evidence of glenoid component displacement ≥ 5 mm relative to the native bone stock.
    2. Present: Presence of glenoid component displacement ≥ 5 mm relative to the native bone stock.

    Measured: Day 0, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years

  3. Radiographic Assessment - Glenoid Radiolucency

    Glenoid Component Radiolucency - antero-posterior (AP) collected post-surgery at day 0, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years will be graded in accordance with the following definitions:

    1. Absent: No evidence of radiolucency > 2 mm in width along the bone-implant / bone-cement interface in any zone.
    2. Present: Presence of radiolucency > 2 mm in width along the bone-implant / bone-cement interface in one or more zones.

    Measured: Day 0, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years

  4. Radiographic Assessment - Humeral Radiolucency

    Humeral Component Radiolucency - AP collected post-surgery at day 0, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years will be graded in accordance with the following definitions:

    1. Absent: No evidence of radiolucency > 2 mm in width along the bone-implant interface in any zone.
    2. Present: Presence of radiolucency > 2 mm in width along the bone-implant interface in one or more zones.

    Measured: Day 0, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years

  5. Radiographic Assessment - Humeral Migration/Subsidence

    Humeral Component Migration / Subsidence collected post-surgery at day 0, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years will be graded in accordance with the following definitions:

    1. Absent: No evidence of a change in position of the humeral component relative to the native bone stock ≥ 5 mm.
    2. Present: Presence of a change in position of the humeral component relative to the native bone stock ≥ 5 mm

    Measured: Day 0, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years

  6. Radiographic Assessment - Humeral Head Centeredness

    Humeral Head Centeredness collected post-surgery at day 0, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years will be calculated using the method described by Iannotti and Norris from the axillary view

    Measured: Day 0, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years

  7. Radiographic Assessment - Bone Remodeling

    Bone Remodeling of the humerus collected post-surgery at day 0, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years will be graded in accordance with the following definitions by Schnetzke et al.:

    1. Absent: No evidence of humerus bone remodeling.
    2. Present: Presence of one or more features of humerus bone remodeling.
    • 1. Condensation Lines: Presence of condensation lines around the tip of the stem.
    • 2. Cortical Thinning: Presence of cortical thinning and osteopenia.
    • 3. Spot Welds: Presence of spot welds.
    • 4. Other: Other feature not listed above.

    Measured: Day 0, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years

  8. Radiographic Assessment - Glenohumeral Subluxation

    Glenohumeral Subluxation collected post-surgery at day 0, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years will be will be derived from the Humeral Head Centeredness assessment using the following definitions, from Iannotti and Norris et al.:

    1. Absent: Humeral Head Centeredness is ≤25%.
    2. Present: Humeral Head Centeredness is >25%.

    Measured: Day 0, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years

  9. Radiographic Assessment - Device Condition: Anatomic

    Device Condition - Anatomic collected post-surgery at day 0, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years will be graded in accordance with the following definitions:

    1. Intact: No evidence of fracture, breakage, loosening, disassembly or migration of any of the components of the anatomic AETOS TSA.
    2. Not Intact: Presence of fracture, breakage, loosening, disassembly or migration of one or more of the components of the anatomic AETOS TSA:
    • 1. Humeral Stem.
    • 2. Humeral Head.
    • 3. Glenoid.
    • 4. Post Extension.

    Measured: Day 0, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years

  10. Radiographic Assessment - Device Condition: Reverse

    Device Condition - Reverse collected post-surgery at day 0, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years will be graded in accordance with the following definitions:

    1. Intact: No evidence of fracture, breakage, loosening, disassembly or migration of any of the components of the reverse AETOS TSA.
    2. Not Intact: Presence of fracture, breakage, loosening, disassembly or migration of one or more of the components of the reverse AETOS TSA:
    • 1. Humeral Stem.
    • 2. Reverse Liner.
    • 3. Glenosphere.
    • 4. Metal Glenoid.
    • 5. Peripheral Screws.
    • 6. Central Screw.
    • 7. Humeral Spacer.
    • 8. Post Extension.

    Measured: Day 0, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years

  11. American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES)

    The ASES instrument is composed of 2 sections containing participant self-reported and clinician assessments. The ASES score is a 0 to 100-point rating with a higher score indicating improvement in pain and function.

    Measured: 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years

  12. Constant Murley Score

    Constant-Murley Shoulder (CMS) scale assesses four aspects related to shoulder pathology; two subjective: pain and activities of daily living (ADL) and two objective: range of motion (ROM) and strength. The subjective components can receive up to 35 points and the objective 65, resulting in a possible maximum total score of 100 points (best function). Pain and ADL are answered by the subject; ROM and strength require a physical evaluation and are answered by the orthopaedic surgeon or the physiotherapist.

    Measured: 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years

  13. Simple Shoulder Test (SST)

    Series of 12 "yes" or "no" questions the patient answers about the function of the involved shoulder. The answer to these questions provides a standardized way of recording the function of a shoulder before and after treatment.

    Measured: 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years

  14. Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)

    The SANE is a simple, single-question, patient-based shoulder function assessment tool: ''How would you rate your shoulder today as a percentage of normal (0% to 100% scale with 100% being normal)?''

    Measured: 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Mar 2024
  2. Study start5 Mar 2024
  3. Primary completion30 Aug 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Aug 2030 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
220 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06319911
Sponsor's protocol ID
AETOS 2022.04
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
28 Feb 2024
Last updated
7 May 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Shoulder Osteoarthritis and Shoulder Arthritis, run by Smith & Nephew, Inc. at 5 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 25 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Tammy Clark, MPH (3512269585, tammy.clark@smith-nephew.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Implant Survivorship (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in