AzTrials
AzTrials

SurgeryCI-oSurgNCT06320002

Communication Intervention for Fecal Ostomy Surgery

A study testing Communication Intervention for fecal ostomy surgery in people with Surgery and Colostomy Stoma, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this study the investigators will evaluate the acceptability of a communication intervention for fecal ostomy surgery (CI-oSurg) to address the needs of adults who are undergoing fecal ostomy surgery. The investigators will recruit 24 patients and 4 clinicians (surgical nurses, wound ostomy nurses). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Surgery, Colostomy Stoma, Ileostomy - Stoma
What is being tested?
Communication Intervention for fecal ostomy surgery
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
25 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
13 Jun 2024to 1 Nov 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 or older
  • English fluency and literacy
  • Patient planned to undergo elective fecal ostomy surgery

Who cannot join

  • Deemed inappropriate by the surgery team
  • Unable to provide consent due to severe cognitive impairment or physiologic status (septic shock/intubated)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Improving Biopsychosocial Outcomes With a Communication Intervention for Patients Undergoing Fecal Ostomy Surgery

In this study the investigators will evaluate the acceptability of a communication intervention for fecal ostomy surgery (CI-oSurg) to address the needs of adults who are undergoing fecal ostomy surgery. The investigators will recruit 24 patients and 4 clinicians (surgical nurses, wound ostomy nurses). At least half of patients are 65 years or older to understand the unique needs of older adults recovering from fecal ostomy surgery that might impact intervention acceptability. Questionnaires will be administered at two time-points for patient participants: upon study start and 4 weeks after exposure to the intervention.

Read the detailed description

In this study the investigators are trying to understand the feasibility and acceptability of a psychologically informed communication guide for fecal ostomy Surgery with the overall goal of improving biopsychosocial outcomes of patients undergoing fecal ostomy surgery.

An estimated 100,000 people in the US undergo fecal ostomy surgery (colostomy or ileostomy) each year, frequently to address severe symptoms (i.e., obstruction, perforation, and incontinence) due to colorectal cancer, diverticulitis, and pelvic floor dysfunction. Complication rates after fecal ostomy surgery are high (up to 37%) with negative effects on patient and family quality of life. Surgeons do not traditionally identify and address health outcomes patients with serious illness prioritize when making treatment decisions, such as caregiver burden, loss of independence and psychosocial function. Communicating this information is key to address patient anxiety when facing major surgery and ensure caregiver preparedness among patients and families considering fecal ostomy surgery.

Current surgical guidelines support the use of preoperative communication and education interventions to improve psychosocial adjustment after fecal ostomy surgery based on expert opinion. However, little evidence exists evaluating the impact of communication interventions or content needs of patients undergoing fecal ostomy surgery or their family. Despite these guidelines, a recent study notes that inadequate ostomy education remains a frequent concern among patients undergoing fecal ostomy surgery. Furthermore, patients' perception of inadequate education is associated with poor emotional, social, and marital outcomes after surgery. There is a critical need to address this deficit in communication quality between patients undergoing fecal ostomy surgery, their family, and surgical care providers. Our guiding hypothesis is that development of a Communication Intervention for fecal ostomy Surgery (CI-oSurg) is acceptable to patients and clinicians, and will ultimately reduce patient distress and improve quality of life.

Being tested
Communication Intervention for fecal ostomy surgery

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Communication Intervention for fecal ostomy surgeryBehavioural

    This is a educational video-based supportive intervention to address practical skills and adaptation to life with a fecal ostomy

Study groups in NCT06320002
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Fecal ostomy surgery participants receiving the CI-oSurgExperimentalThis arm will include patients who are undergoing or have undergone fecal ostomy surgery and surgical clinicians caring for the patients who will receive the CI-oSurg intervention.
Receives: Behavioral: Communication Intervention for fecal ostomy surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Intervention Acceptability

    The intervention acceptability will be assessed by cognitive interviews with participants

    Measured: 4 weeks after the intervention

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Intervention Usability

    The intervention usability will be assessed by cognitive interviews with participants

    Measured: 4 weeks after intervention use

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Mar 2024
  2. Study start13 Jun 2024
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2025
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
25 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06320002
Sponsor's protocol ID
2023P003564
Acronym
CI-oSurg
Status last verified
Nov 2025
First submitted
6 Mar 2024
Last updated
21 Nov 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Deidentified data of qualitative interviews will be shared with other researchers upon request.

Publications

  • Cauley CE, Rubio A, Brindle M, Cooper Z, Vranceanu AM, Ritchie CS. A Video-Based Communication Intervention for Fecal Ostomy Surgery (CI-oSurg): Protocol for Open Pilot Testing to Improve Intervention Acceptability and Feasibility. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Nov 15;13:e60575. doi: 10.2196/60575.

    PubMed 39546348

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Communication Intervention for fecal ostomy surgery in people with Surgery and Colostomy Stoma, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Intervention Acceptability (time frame: 4 weeks after the intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06320002, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Nov 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in