FeasibilityTARANGPilotNCT06320964
The TARANG Intervention
A study testing TARANG in people with Feasibility and Acceptability, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in India.
Trial summary
The mixed methods pilot study aims to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and implementation challenges of the TARANG intervention in villages in rural/tribal Rajasthan to inform the study design and operational details for a larger cluster-randomized controlled trial. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Feasibility, Acceptability, Family Planning
- What is being tested?
- TARANG
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 42 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndia
- Study dates
- 14 Jul 2023to 21 Jan 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Newly married women:
- Age 18-25 years at the time of wedding
- Does not plan to move out of the area for the period of the intervention
- Mother-in-law has agreed to support daughter-in-law's participation in the study
- Mother-in-law and husband are eligible for the study participation
- Husbands:
Show all 15Show fewer
- 18 years or more at the time of the wedding
- Does not plan to move out of the village during period of the intervention
- Mother and wife are eligible for study participation
- Mothers-in-law:
- Has a daughter-in-law who is eligible and willing to participate in the study
- Provides individual consent to participate in the study
- Assents for daughter-in-law to participate in the study
- Does not plan to move out of the village during period of the intervention
- The son and the daughter-in-law are eligible for study participation
Who cannot join
- Newly married women:
- Wanting to have a child in the next 12 months at the time of baseline
- Cognitive ability to participate in surveys
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Feasibility and Acceptability of a Group-based Life Skills-integrated Reproductive Health Empowerment Intervention for Newly Married Women, Husbands, and Mothers-in-law
The mixed methods pilot study aims to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and implementation challenges of the TARANG intervention in villages in rural/tribal Rajasthan to inform the study design and operational details for a larger cluster-randomized controlled trial.
Read the detailed description
Participants will participate in the single group in the TARANG intervention arm and receive the sessions that will enable them to navigate newly formed relationships (e.g. spousal communication, healthy relationships with in-laws, establishing peer network, and negotiation skills), improve participants awareness of sexual reproductive health, enable participants to challenge inequitable gender norms to reduce unintended pregnancies.
Newly married women (daughters-in-law) received 17 sessions; husbands received 4 sessions and mothers-in-law received 4 sessions. The sessions are implemented by NGO partner, Vikalp Sansthan via trained facilitators/moderators who are supervised by NGO staff.
In this mixed methods pilot study, we aimed to qualitatively understand the participants' acceptability, feasibility of the TARANG intervention delivery, content, modules, etc. We also aimed to capture the qualitative impact of the TARANG intervention and pilot activities in communities/villages as well as to understand the operational challenges of delivery from participants and NGO moderators (key informants) delivering the intervention. Quantitative pre- and post-surveys were conducted to understand implementation outcomes such as feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction, among other outcomes.
- Conditions
- Feasibility, Acceptability, Family Planning, Unintended Pregnancy
- Being tested
- TARANG
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TARANGBehavioural
For newly married women, the intervention had one introductory rapport-building session, followed by 16 group sessions facilitated by trained female moderators over 5 months. The intervention aimed to empower participants by enhancing their understanding of fundamental topics such as menstruation, conception, and contraception, choice of a method among others. Sessions also covered topics to strengthen participants' sense of agency and their ability to make informed decisions regarding family planning and the timing of their first childbirth. Similarly, for husbands, a male moderator delivered sessions on four topics: Love, Relationships and Expectations; Conception and Health; Contraception Methods, and how to choose family planning methods. For MILs, a female moderator covered four sessions: Nutrition flag, Conception and Health, communication between family members, and the final session on relationships with daughter-in-law.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TARANG arm | Experimental | The newly married women received 16 weekly group sessions and one rapport-building session, while the husbands and mothers-in-law received four group sessions each over four months. The TARANG intervention was delivered via gender-matched moderators from Vikalp Sansthan and uses three overarching themes: sexual and reproductive health, gender norms, and empowerment. Receives: Behavioral: TARANG |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility of the Intervention
Proportion of participants who complete 50% of the intervention sessions
Measured: Post-intervention at 5 month endline survey
Acceptability
Proportion of participants who were completely or somewhat satisfied with the intervention
Measured: Post-intervention at 5 month endline survey
Usefulness
Proportion of participants who found the TARANG intervention sessions very useful or somewhat useful
Measured: Post-intervention at 5 month endline survey
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Mar 2024
- Study start14 Jul 2023
- Primary completion21 Jan 2024
- Study completion21 Jan 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for FeasibilityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, San FranciscoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Network for Engineering and Economics Research and Management, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), Vikalp Sansthan
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Nadia Diamond-Smith, PhD, MS, Principal investigator, University of California, San Francisco
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06320964
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R01HD108252_1
- Other IDs
- R01HD108252
- Acronym
- TARANGPilot
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 13 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 6 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Gopalakrishnan L, Patil S, Das D, Paul A, Sharma P, Kachhwaha A, Choudhary U, Diamond-Smith N. Feasibility and acceptability of a life skills and reproductive health empowerment intervention for young newly married women in Rajasthan, India: a pre-post convergent mixed methods pilot study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Nov 15;11(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01720-7.
PubMed 41241746Gopalakrishnan L, Choudhary U, Vallin J, Das D, Sharma P, Kachhwaha A, Panjalingam T, Ruwala R, Diamond-Smith N. Implementation and evaluation of a family planning intervention engaging mothers-in-law of young women in India: a mixed methods pilot study. Glob Health Action. 2025 Dec;18(1):2554435. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2025.2554435. Epub 2025 Sep 8.
PubMed 40916629Gopalakrishnan L, Patil S, Das D, Paul A, Sharma P, Kachhwaha A, Choudhary U, Diamond-Smith N. Feasibility and acceptability of a life skills and reproductive health empowerment interventionfor young newly married women in Rajasthan, India: A pre-post convergent mixed methods pilot study. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2024 Oct 16:rs.3.rs-4255712. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4255712/v1.
PubMed 39483877Diamond-Smith N, Vaishnav Y, Choudhary U, Sharma P, Kachhwaha A, Panjalingam T, Vallin J, Das D, Gopalakrishnan L. Individual empowerment and community norm effects of engaging young husbands in reproductive health in rural India: findings from a pilot study. Reprod Health. 2024 Oct 17;21(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01878-y.
PubMed 39420379Diamond-Smith N, Vaishnav Y, Choudhary U, Sharma P, Kachhwaha A, Panjalingam T, Vallin J, Das D, Gopalakrishnan L. Individual empowerment and community norm effects of engaging young husbands in reproductive health in rural India: findings from a pilot study. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2024 May 15:rs.3.rs-4376443. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4376443/v1.
PubMed 38798481
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Feasibility and Acceptability of a Group-based Life Skills-integrated Reproductive Health Empowerment Intervention for Newly Married Women, Husbands, and Mothers-in-law
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06320964
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TARANGPilot / R01HD108252_1
- Conditions
- Feasibility, Acceptability, Family Planning, Unintended Pregnancy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San FranciscoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Network for Engineering and Economics Research and Management, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), Vikalp Sansthan
- Study start
- 14 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Jan 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 6 Feb 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The mixed methods pilot study aims to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and implementation challenges of the TARANG intervention in villages in rural/tribal Rajasthan to inform the study design and operational details for a larger cluster-randomized controlled trial.
Detailed description
Participants will participate in the single group in the TARANG intervention arm and receive the sessions that will enable them to navigate newly formed relationships (e.g. spousal communication, healthy relationships with in-laws, establishing peer network, and negotiation skills), improve participants awareness of sexual reproductive health, enable participants to challenge inequitable gender norms to reduce unintended pregnancies.
Newly married women (daughters-in-law) received 17 sessions; husbands received 4 sessions and mothers-in-law received 4 sessions. The sessions are implemented by NGO partner, Vikalp Sansthan via trained facilitators/moderators who are supervised by NGO staff.
In this mixed methods pilot study, we aimed to qualitatively understand the participants' acceptability, feasibility of the TARANG intervention delivery, content, modules, etc. We also aimed to capture the qualitative impact of the TARANG intervention and pilot activities in communities/villages as well as to understand the operational challenges of delivery from participants and NGO moderators (key informants) delivering the intervention. Quantitative pre- and post-surveys were conducted to understand implementation outcomes such as feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction, among other outcomes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TARANG arm | Experimental | Behavioral: TARANGThe newly married women received 16 weekly group sessions and one rapport-building session, while the husbands and mothers-in-law received four group sessions each over four months. The TARANG intervention was delivered via gender-matched moderators from Vikalp Sansthan and uses three overarching themes: sexual and reproductive health, gender norms, and empowerment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Age 18-25 years at the time of wedding
- Does not plan to move out of the area for the period of the intervention
- Mother-in-law has agreed to support daughter-in-law's participation in the study
- Mother-in-law and husband are eligible for the study participation
- 18 years or more at the time of the wedding
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Wanting to have a child in the next 12 months at the time of baseline
- Cognitive ability to participate in surveys
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TARANGFor newly married women, the intervention had one introductory rapport-building session, followed by 16 group sessions facilitated by trained female moderators over 5 months. The intervention aimed to empower participants by enhancing their understanding of fundamental topics such as menstruation, conception, and contraception, choice of a method among others. Sessions also covered topics to strengthen participants' sense of agency and their ability to make informed decisions regarding family planning and the timing of their first childbirth. Similarly, for husbands, a male moderator delivered sessions on four topics: Love, Relationships and Expectations; Conception and Health; Contraception Methods, and how to choose family planning methods. For MILs, a female moderator covered four sessions: Nutrition flag, Conception and Health, communication between family members, and the final session on relationships with daughter-in-law. | Behavioural | TARANG arm |
Primary outcome
Feasibility of the Intervention
Time frame: Post-intervention at 5 month endline survey
Proportion of participants who complete 50% of the intervention sessions
Acceptability
Time frame: Post-intervention at 5 month endline survey
Proportion of participants who were completely or somewhat satisfied with the intervention
Usefulness
Time frame: Post-intervention at 5 month endline survey
Proportion of participants who found the TARANG intervention sessions very useful or somewhat useful
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Feb 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41241746Gopalakrishnan L, Patil S, Das D, Paul A, Sharma P, Kachhwaha A, Choudhary U, Diamond-Smith N. Feasibility and acceptability of a life skills and reproductive health empowerment intervention for young newly married women in Rajasthan, India: a pre-post convergent mixed methods pilot study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Nov 15;11(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01720-7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40916629Gopalakrishnan L, Choudhary U, Vallin J, Das D, Sharma P, Kachhwaha A, Panjalingam T, Ruwala R, Diamond-Smith N. Implementation and evaluation of a family planning intervention engaging mothers-in-law of young women in India: a mixed methods pilot study. Glob Health Action. 2025 Dec;18(1):2554435. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2025.2554435. Epub 2025 Sep 8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39483877Gopalakrishnan L, Patil S, Das D, Paul A, Sharma P, Kachhwaha A, Choudhary U, Diamond-Smith N. Feasibility and acceptability of a life skills and reproductive health empowerment interventionfor young newly married women in Rajasthan, India: A pre-post convergent mixed methods pilot study. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2024 Oct 16:rs.3.rs-4255712. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4255712/v1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39420379Diamond-Smith N, Vaishnav Y, Choudhary U, Sharma P, Kachhwaha A, Panjalingam T, Vallin J, Das D, Gopalakrishnan L. Individual empowerment and community norm effects of engaging young husbands in reproductive health in rural India: findings from a pilot study. Reprod Health. 2024 Oct 17;21(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01878-y.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38798481Diamond-Smith N, Vaishnav Y, Choudhary U, Sharma P, Kachhwaha A, Panjalingam T, Vallin J, Das D, Gopalakrishnan L. Individual empowerment and community norm effects of engaging young husbands in reproductive health in rural India: findings from a pilot study. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2024 May 15:rs.3.rs-4376443. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4376443/v1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Feasibility
Active, not recruiting
A Mobile App to Improve 24-Hour Movement Guideline Adherence in Preschoolers
Healthy, 24-Hour Movement Guidelines
Not yet recruiting
Testing the Timing and Application of Virtual Reality Distraction During Knee Injections in a VA Pain Clinic
Pain Management, Injection Pain Prevention
Recruiting
PROtective Ventilation With FLOW-Controlled Ventilation
Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (PPCs), Feasibility Studies
Recruiting
Pilot Study of a Behavioral Program for Resident Depression in Skilled Nursing Facilities
Nursing Home Resident, Skilled Nursing Facility
Not yet recruiting
The ACT-PrEP Study
HIV, PrEP
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nadia Diamond-Smith, PhD, MS principal investigator
University of California, San Francisco
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing TARANG in people with Feasibility and Acceptability, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in India.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Feb 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility of the Intervention (time frame: Post-intervention at 5 month endline survey). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06320964, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Feb 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 28 Oct 2026.