AzTrials
AzTrials

Behavior and Behavior MechanismsNCT06322966

Learning and Living With Wildfire Smoke

A study testing Air Action Curriculum in people with Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms and Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, run by University of Washington at 1 site in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The proposed intervention in this Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR) proposal will improve knowledge and awareness of the health impacts of air pollution exposure, will elevate the youth voice, improve youth self-efficacy and lead to behavior changes that would reduce exposure to air pollution in a high school… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 14 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Air Action Curriculum
How many people
85 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
4 Sep 2023to 26 May 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 14 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Freshman and Sophomore students at Montrose High School in Montrose, Colorado, Grand Junction High School in Grand Junction, Colorado and the STEAD School in Commerce City, Colorado with the ability to participate for more than two years.
  • Teachers, Administrators and Staff at aforementioned high schools willing to participate for more than two years.

Who cannot join

  • Junior and Senior Students at the aforementioned schools (unable to participate for more than two years)
  • Teachers, Administrators and Staff at aforementioned high schools unwilling or unable to participate for more than two years.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Washington

    Seattle, Washington, 98195

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Learning and Living With Wildfire Smoke: Creating Air Clean Environments in Schools Through Youth Participatory Action Research

The proposed intervention in this Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR) proposal will improve knowledge and awareness of the health impacts of air pollution exposure, will elevate the youth voice, improve youth self-efficacy and lead to behavior changes that would reduce exposure to air pollution in a high school setting. These outcomes will be accomplished through the introduction of a new air quality curriculum into science classes, and the establishment of an after-school air quality monitoring program.

All students enrolled in Food Science (Montrose High School), Intro to Agriculture (The STEAD School) and Environmental Science Academy (Grand Junction High School) will participate in the new air quality curriculum, as it will be built into the existing lesson plans. For the after-school monitoring program, the PI and participating teachers (Letters A and B) will recruit 10 to 15 students at each school to be involved in the Student Research Cohort (SRC). Information on this program and how to apply will be shared with students through their health and science classes, included in the school newsletter, and posted on billboards around the school. Students will be identified within the following inclusion criteria: 1) freshman or sophomores in high school and 2) participation in the air quality curriculum. New students will be recruited each year to keep a consistent group as students leave and/or graduate. New students will be brought up to speed by carry-over students, and each new year will represent a separate SRC dedicated to a specific goal.

Read the detailed description

Air Quality Curriculum: The goal of integrating a new curriculum into classrooms is to improve student knowledge on the health effects of air pollution, specifically of wildfire smoke. The curriculum was jointly designed by the PI and colleagues at CO Dept of Public Health and Environment to teach at the intersection of air pollution, citizen science and civic action and to create critical thinkers who understand they can impact air quality in their community. Students will learn research and air quality 101 (with time devoted specifically to wildfire smoke), learn to measure both their personal exposure to air pollutants and acute health outcomes of exposure, and will be taught the basics of sensors and of air quality monitoring networks. The PI will be available to assist in teaching any lessons as necessary.

YPAR Air Quality Monitoring Project: The goal of the SRC is to implement a student-designed and student-driven air quality monitoring study. Based on the knowledge they gained from the curriculum, and given access to outdoor, indoor, and personal monitoring devices, the SRC will pose research questions, design a study to answer these questions, and collect and analyze data to share with their school community.

Students will begin this portion of the project by developing research questions that will address air quality issues in each school community. The PI will support students in developing questions that would fill research gaps about: a) wildfire smoke versus other pollutant sources; b) indoor-outdoor infiltration; and c) exposure differences throughout the school building and or throughout a student's day. Once 3-5 questions have been developed, students will be given a list of materials (three-five indoor stationary monitors, one-two outdoor stationary monitor and five handheld mobile monitors), information about any constraints (Wi-Fi availability; facilities restrictions) and a manual for monitor setup. The manual will support students in placing monitors, teach them how to calibrate and maintain monitors, how to process data for QA-QC, and how to analyze monitor data. The SRC will then develop a research plan and place monitors in locations that will allow them to answer their research questions. Once the plan is solidified and approved by the PI, students will present their plan to school administrators and facilities staff to ensure feasibility of monitor placement. To encourage self-efficacy and engagement with the systems of power in their school community, the meeting to present their plan will be arranged by the students themselves. In this meeting, students will present the questions they wish to answer, their plan to do so, and ask for any assistance they may need from facilities (power sources) or IT (Wi-Fi access) in order to begin data collection.

Impact of student participation: The impact on students of the curriculum and involvement in the SRC will be separately evaluated to measure both student's content knowledge, self-efficacy and behavior through both qualitative and quantitative data collection.

To measure the impact of the curriculum quantitatively, a Likert-style survey will assess 1) content knowledge based on completion of the curriculum learning objectives, and 2) student self-efficacy using the Sociopolitical Control Scale (SPCS) for Youth. Content knowledge questions will ask students to rank the extent of understanding for each learning objective and the self-efficacy questions will use the established SPCS for youth to measure students' self-perceptions in two domains: 1) capacity to organize a group of people to achieve certain goals; and 2) ability to influence decisions in their community. Both the content knowledge and self-efficacy portions of the Likert-style survey will be given to all students participating in the curriculum before and after the curriculum lessons (beginning and end of semester). Qualitative data will also be collected via a reflective memo on student interactions and learning written at the end of every curriculum lesson by teachers. The PI will create a template for reflective memos to lessen the burden on teachers, and to ensure the memo is specific to both the learning objectives and the SPCS for youth.

A similar approach will be used to measure the impact of participation in the SRC. As all of the students participating in the SRC will have participated in the air quality curriculum, the quantitative assessment for this group will focus solely on self-efficacy and behavior change. The self-efficacy portions of the quantitative, Likert-style survey will be given to all SRC students at the beginning and end of each school year. Additionally, SRC-generated artifacts (notes and journals) will be collected continuously throughout the year for qualitative analysis.

An additional Likert-style survey will be given to all students (SRC and curriculum only students) in the final year of the grant to assess the impact of the curriculum and monitoring program on air-quality related behavior changes overall. The purpose of these surveys will be to evaluate content knowledge on the health effects of smoke exposure, as well as changes in individual and school-wide behaviors post-implementation of the intervention plan. This survey will be Likert-style and a combination of 1) a series of questions developed to assess comprehension of new knowledge specific to the intervention; and 2) validated questions from the 2007-2011 NHANES survey to evaluate behavior change specific to air quality. Questions include the following themes: mask use; time outdoors versus indoors; exercise schedule; transportation and air filtration.

Being tested
Air Action Curriculum
Medical subject headings
Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Air Action CurriculumOther

    Also called YPAR monitoring project

    The goal of integrating a new curriculum into classrooms is to improve student knowledge on the health effects of air pollution, specifically of wildfire smoke.

    The goal is to implement a student-designed and student-driven air quality study in each school that will lead to improved air quality and health impacts in schools, promote health equity, and train young people to be more informed about their health and proactive citizens in their school community and beyond.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of students, staff, teacher and administrators with higher scores on a Likert-style questionnaire for content knowledge learning objectives.

    Improved Health Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice related to the health impacts of local air pollution across students, staff, teachers and administrators are measured pre and post involvement in an air quality curriculum intervention via a likert scale survey to measure predetermined learning objectives.

    Measured: Year 1 and 2

  2. Scores on Likert-style questionnaire to evaluate behavior change around air quality.

    A Likert-style survey will be given to all students to assess the impact of the curriculum and monitoring program on air-quality related behavior changes post-intervention. (The air quality intervention is to be designed by students as part of the project but could include interventions such as changes to filtration systems, an anti-idling or educational campaign.) The Likert-style survey will be validated questions from the 2007-2011 NHANES survey to evaluate behavior change specific to air quality. Questions include the following themes: mask use; time outdoors versus indoors; exercise schedule; transportation and air filtration.

    Measured: Year 3 and 4

  3. Change in student exposure to air pollution calculated through measurements of indoor particulate matter and indoor carbon dioxide.

    Indoor air quality levels (particulate matter and carbon dioxide) will be measured with indoor air quality sensors before and after each air quality intervention plan (such as changes to filtration systems, an anti-idling or educational campaign) has been implemented. Overall student exposure is calculated with approximate respiratory rates and time spent in each indoor location.

    Measured: Year 4 and 5

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Mar 2024
  2. Study start4 Sep 2023
  3. Primary completion28 May 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion26 May 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
85 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06322966
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY00017745
Other IDs
K99ES034442
Status last verified
Apr 2025
First submitted
14 Feb 2024
Last updated
15 Apr 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Air Action Curriculum in people with Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms and Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, run by University of Washington at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of students, staff, teacher and administrators with higher scores on a Likert-style questionnaire for content knowledge learning objectives. (time frame: Year 1 and 2). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Apr 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in