AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device InfectionCIEDOUTNCT06323668

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device RemOval Versus Full CoUrse Medical Treatment

A study testing Cardiac implantable electronic device extraction in people with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The CIEDOUT study is an open label randomized trial in patients with possible cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection. The hypothesis is that CIED removal + guideline antibiotic therapy is better than 6-weeks antibiotic therapy alone in preventing death or relapse of bacteremia in patients with… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
What is being tested?
Cardiac implantable electronic device extraction
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
180 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
17 May 2024to 31 Jan 2038
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Possible CIED infection
  • AND
  • Bacteremia/fungemia with S. aureus detected in ≥1 positive blood culture(s) or CoNS, Cutibacterium spp., Candida spp, Streptococcus spp. (except Streptococcus pneumoniae), and Enterococcus faecalis detected in ≥2 positive blood cultures.
  • OR
  • Left-sided valve infective endocarditis
  • AND
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Possible CIED infection
  • AND
  • Bacteremia/fungemia detected in ≥1 positive blood culture(s) with S. aureus, CoNS, Cutibacterium spp., Candida spp., Streptococcus spp. (except Streptococcus pneumoniae), and Enterococcus faecalis

Who cannot join

  • Unavailable for follow-up (e.g. tourist)
  • Unwilling to sign informed consent
  • Unable to sign informed consent
  • OR
  • At least one of the following criteria
  • Not a candidate by clinician discretion
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Definite CIED infection*
  • Clinical frailty score ≥7
  • EUROSCORE II >33%
  • Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) <1L or <30% of expected
  • By the modified Duke and ESC diagnostic criteria

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Emil L Fosbøl, MD, PhD contact

+4535456340

emil.fosboel@regionh.dk

Amna Alhakak, MD contact

amna.alhakak.01@regionh.dk

Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet

    Copenhagen

    Emil L Fosbøl, +4535456340, emil.fosboel@regionh.dk

    Recruiting

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device RemOval Versus Full CoUrse Medical Treatment - the CIEDOUT Study - a Randomized Clinical Trial

The CIEDOUT study is an open label randomized trial in patients with possible cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection.

The hypothesis is that CIED removal + guideline antibiotic therapy is better than 6-weeks antibiotic therapy alone in preventing death or relapse of bacteremia in patients with bacteremia and possible CIED infection (not definite CIED infection).

The objective of this study is to test whether CIED removal + guideline antibiotic therapy is superior to 6-weeks antibiotic therapy alone in prevention of the composite endpoint of death or relapse bacteremia after 6 months of follow-up in patients with CIED and systemic infection but without definite CIED infection.

Read the detailed description

Complete removal of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is recommended for all patients with confirmed CIED infection under initial empirical antibiotic therapy by guidelines. However, the current 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on treatment of possible CIED infection are mostly based on expert opinions and/or observational studies. No previous randomized clinical trial has been conducted, why the CIEDOUT study is the first randomized clinical trial with high evidence investigating treatment of possible CIED infections. The CIEDOUT study will affect future clinical guidelines and optimize treatment and prognosis for future patients with possible CIED infection.

The hypothesis is that CIED removal + guideline antibiotic therapy is superior to 6-weeks antibiotic therapy alone in preventing death or relapse of bacteremia in patients with bacteremia and possible CIED infection (not definite CIED infection). The investigators want to test whether CIED removal + guideline antibiotic therapy is superior to 6-weeks antibiotic therapy in prevention of the composite endpoint of death or relapse bacteremia after 6 months of follow-up in patients with CIED and systemic infection but without definite CIED infection.

The study is a randomized open label trial. Patients will be allocated by 1:1 randomization to CIED extraction + guideline antibiotic therapy or 6-weeks antibiotic therapy alone. The primary outcome is a composite endpoint of death or relapse bacteremia (same microorganism) within 6 months after randomization. The secondary outcomes are days alive and out-of-hospital to 6 months, death, readmission for any cause, device extraction, relapse of bacteremia (the same microorganism), relapse of bacteremia (all species), and definite CIED infection.

All patients suspected of CIED infection or patients with bacteremia + CIED will be screened for inclusion in the CIEDOUT study according to the ESC modified diagnosis criteria. To enable timely identification of possible candidates, a surveillance system will be set up combining data from The Danish Pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) registry and then real-time bacteremia surveillance data through The Danish nationwide clinical Microbiology Database (MiBa). Hence, whenever a relevant bacteremia is identified, the CIED registry will then by queried for whether that patient also has CIED. Randomization allocation ratio is 1:1 through a computerized application via RedCap. Patients will be entered into the "intention to treat" analysis.

The patients will be randomized to CIED removal and/or medical therapy (at least 10 days iv antibiotic therapy and then per oral treatment to 6 weeks total by POET criteria). The CIED removal will be done as soon as possible within 7 days. The study-outcomes will be assessed at three routine clinical check-ups as part of the standard treatment at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 3 months after randomization. Within 6 months after randomization, patients will be followed for outcomes through medical charts and the national health registries. After that, the patients will be assessed for outcomes on an annual basis by medical chart review and the Danish nationwide registries.

The total trial duration is expected to be 14 years. Inclusion period for the main paper is expected to be 4 years and then follow-up for 3 months for the last included patients. Hereafter, patients will be followed for outcomes annually through medical charts and the national health registries up to 10 years after the last included patient until 2038.

Based on prior studies and especially preliminary data, it is estimated that approximately 29% of patients will experience a primary event by 6 months in the medical treatment group and 12% in the extraction group. In order to have 80% power to detect difference in total primary endpoints between the treatment groups, at least 174 patients will be needed (87 in each study arm) over a median follow-up of 3 years to be able to reject the null hypothesis with a power of 80% and a risk of type I error of 5. Assuming a steady rate of patients with the inclusion criteria, there will be approximately 100 incident cases available for the CIEDOUT study annually in Eastern Denmark based on preliminary data. If 60% of these consent to the study, 60 incident patients per year will be included. By 3 years, 180 incident patients will then be included.

Being tested
Cardiac implantable electronic device extraction
Keywords
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device, CIED, Pacemaker, Implantable cardioverter defibrillator, ICD, Possible CIED infection, Valvular endocarditis, Bacteremia, CIED extraction, Antibiotic therapy
Medical subject headings
Bacteremia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cardiac implantable electronic device extractionProcedure or surgery

    The CIED removal will be done as soon as possible within 7 days.

Study groups in NCT06323668
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cardiac implantable electronic device removal + empirical antibiotic therapyExperimentalCIED removal + guideline antibiotic therapy (at least 10 days iv antibiotic therapy and then per oral treatment to 6 weeks total by POET criteria). The antibiotic therapy is targeted according to microbiological analyses per microorganism. The CIED removal will be done as soon as possible within 7 days.
Receives: Procedure: Cardiac implantable electronic device extraction
Empirical antibiotic therapyNo interventionGuideline antibiotic therapy (at least 10 days iv antibiotic therapy and then per oral treatment to 6 weeks total by POET criteria). The antibiotic therapy is targeted according to microbiological analyses per microorganism.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of death or relapse bacteremia

    Composite endpoint of death or relapse bacteremia (same microorganism)

    Measured: 6 months after randomization

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Days alive and out-of-hospital

    Measured: 6 months after randomization

  2. Rate of death

    Measured: 6 months after randomization

  3. Rate of readmission for any cause

    Measured: 6 months after randomization

  4. Rate of cardiac implantable electronic device extraction

    First CIED extraction for the medical group and second for the extraction group

    Measured: 6 months after randomization

  5. Rate of relapse bacteremia (the same microorganism)

    Measured: 6 months after randomization

  6. Rate of bacteremia (all species)

    Measured: 6 months after randomization

  7. Rate of definite CIED infection

    Measured: 6 months after randomization

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Mar 2024
  2. Study start17 May 2024
  3. Primary completionJun 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2038 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized open label trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
180 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06323668
Sponsor's protocol ID
H-23067693
Acronym
CIEDOUT
Status last verified
Oct 2024
First submitted
7 Mar 2024
Last updated
20 Nov 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cardiac implantable electronic device extraction in people with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Emil L Fosbøl, MD, PhD (+4535456340, emil.fosboel@regionh.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of death or relapse bacteremia (time frame: 6 months after randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in