Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device InfectionCIEDOUTNCT06323668
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device RemOval Versus Full CoUrse Medical Treatment
A study testing Cardiac implantable electronic device extraction in people with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
The CIEDOUT study is an open label randomized trial in patients with possible cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection. The hypothesis is that CIED removal + guideline antibiotic therapy is better than 6-weeks antibiotic therapy alone in preventing death or relapse of bacteremia in patients with… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection
- What is being tested?
- Cardiac implantable electronic device extraction
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 180 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 17 May 2024to 31 Jan 2038
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Possible CIED infection
- AND
- Bacteremia/fungemia with S. aureus detected in ≥1 positive blood culture(s) or CoNS, Cutibacterium spp., Candida spp, Streptococcus spp. (except Streptococcus pneumoniae), and Enterococcus faecalis detected in ≥2 positive blood cultures.
- OR
- Left-sided valve infective endocarditis
- AND
Show all 9Show fewer
- Possible CIED infection
- AND
- Bacteremia/fungemia detected in ≥1 positive blood culture(s) with S. aureus, CoNS, Cutibacterium spp., Candida spp., Streptococcus spp. (except Streptococcus pneumoniae), and Enterococcus faecalis
Who cannot join
- Unavailable for follow-up (e.g. tourist)
- Unwilling to sign informed consent
- Unable to sign informed consent
- OR
- At least one of the following criteria
- Not a candidate by clinician discretion
Show all 11Show fewer
- Definite CIED infection*
- Clinical frailty score ≥7
- EUROSCORE II >33%
- Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) <1L or <30% of expected
- By the modified Duke and ESC diagnostic criteria
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Amna Alhakak, MD contact
Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen
Emil L Fosbøl, +4535456340, emil.fosboel@regionh.dk
About this study
Official title: Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device RemOval Versus Full CoUrse Medical Treatment - the CIEDOUT Study - a Randomized Clinical Trial
The CIEDOUT study is an open label randomized trial in patients with possible cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection.
The hypothesis is that CIED removal + guideline antibiotic therapy is better than 6-weeks antibiotic therapy alone in preventing death or relapse of bacteremia in patients with bacteremia and possible CIED infection (not definite CIED infection).
The objective of this study is to test whether CIED removal + guideline antibiotic therapy is superior to 6-weeks antibiotic therapy alone in prevention of the composite endpoint of death or relapse bacteremia after 6 months of follow-up in patients with CIED and systemic infection but without definite CIED infection.
Read the detailed description
Complete removal of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is recommended for all patients with confirmed CIED infection under initial empirical antibiotic therapy by guidelines. However, the current 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on treatment of possible CIED infection are mostly based on expert opinions and/or observational studies. No previous randomized clinical trial has been conducted, why the CIEDOUT study is the first randomized clinical trial with high evidence investigating treatment of possible CIED infections. The CIEDOUT study will affect future clinical guidelines and optimize treatment and prognosis for future patients with possible CIED infection.
The hypothesis is that CIED removal + guideline antibiotic therapy is superior to 6-weeks antibiotic therapy alone in preventing death or relapse of bacteremia in patients with bacteremia and possible CIED infection (not definite CIED infection). The investigators want to test whether CIED removal + guideline antibiotic therapy is superior to 6-weeks antibiotic therapy in prevention of the composite endpoint of death or relapse bacteremia after 6 months of follow-up in patients with CIED and systemic infection but without definite CIED infection.
The study is a randomized open label trial. Patients will be allocated by 1:1 randomization to CIED extraction + guideline antibiotic therapy or 6-weeks antibiotic therapy alone. The primary outcome is a composite endpoint of death or relapse bacteremia (same microorganism) within 6 months after randomization. The secondary outcomes are days alive and out-of-hospital to 6 months, death, readmission for any cause, device extraction, relapse of bacteremia (the same microorganism), relapse of bacteremia (all species), and definite CIED infection.
All patients suspected of CIED infection or patients with bacteremia + CIED will be screened for inclusion in the CIEDOUT study according to the ESC modified diagnosis criteria. To enable timely identification of possible candidates, a surveillance system will be set up combining data from The Danish Pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) registry and then real-time bacteremia surveillance data through The Danish nationwide clinical Microbiology Database (MiBa). Hence, whenever a relevant bacteremia is identified, the CIED registry will then by queried for whether that patient also has CIED. Randomization allocation ratio is 1:1 through a computerized application via RedCap. Patients will be entered into the "intention to treat" analysis.
The patients will be randomized to CIED removal and/or medical therapy (at least 10 days iv antibiotic therapy and then per oral treatment to 6 weeks total by POET criteria). The CIED removal will be done as soon as possible within 7 days. The study-outcomes will be assessed at three routine clinical check-ups as part of the standard treatment at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 3 months after randomization. Within 6 months after randomization, patients will be followed for outcomes through medical charts and the national health registries. After that, the patients will be assessed for outcomes on an annual basis by medical chart review and the Danish nationwide registries.
The total trial duration is expected to be 14 years. Inclusion period for the main paper is expected to be 4 years and then follow-up for 3 months for the last included patients. Hereafter, patients will be followed for outcomes annually through medical charts and the national health registries up to 10 years after the last included patient until 2038.
Based on prior studies and especially preliminary data, it is estimated that approximately 29% of patients will experience a primary event by 6 months in the medical treatment group and 12% in the extraction group. In order to have 80% power to detect difference in total primary endpoints between the treatment groups, at least 174 patients will be needed (87 in each study arm) over a median follow-up of 3 years to be able to reject the null hypothesis with a power of 80% and a risk of type I error of 5. Assuming a steady rate of patients with the inclusion criteria, there will be approximately 100 incident cases available for the CIEDOUT study annually in Eastern Denmark based on preliminary data. If 60% of these consent to the study, 60 incident patients per year will be included. By 3 years, 180 incident patients will then be included.
- Being tested
- Cardiac implantable electronic device extraction
- Keywords
- Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device, CIED, Pacemaker, Implantable cardioverter defibrillator, ICD, Possible CIED infection, Valvular endocarditis, Bacteremia, CIED extraction, Antibiotic therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Bacteremia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cardiac implantable electronic device extractionProcedure or surgery
The CIED removal will be done as soon as possible within 7 days.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiac implantable electronic device removal + empirical antibiotic therapy | Experimental | CIED removal + guideline antibiotic therapy (at least 10 days iv antibiotic therapy and then per oral treatment to 6 weeks total by POET criteria).
The antibiotic therapy is targeted according to microbiological analyses per microorganism.
The CIED removal will be done as soon as possible within 7 days. Receives: Procedure: Cardiac implantable electronic device extraction |
| Empirical antibiotic therapy | No intervention | Guideline antibiotic therapy (at least 10 days iv antibiotic therapy and then per oral treatment to 6 weeks total by POET criteria). The antibiotic therapy is targeted according to microbiological analyses per microorganism. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of death or relapse bacteremia
Composite endpoint of death or relapse bacteremia (same microorganism)
Measured: 6 months after randomization
Secondary outcomes (7)
Days alive and out-of-hospital
Measured: 6 months after randomization
Rate of death
Measured: 6 months after randomization
Rate of readmission for any cause
Measured: 6 months after randomization
Rate of cardiac implantable electronic device extraction
First CIED extraction for the medical group and second for the extraction group
Measured: 6 months after randomization
Rate of relapse bacteremia (the same microorganism)
Measured: 6 months after randomization
Rate of bacteremia (all species)
Measured: 6 months after randomization
Rate of definite CIED infection
Measured: 6 months after randomization
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Mar 2024
- Study start17 May 2024
- Primary completionJun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jan 2038 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Copenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized open label trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Emil Loldrup Fosbol, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Investigators
- Emil L Fosbøl, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06323668
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H-23067693
- Acronym
- CIEDOUT
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 7 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 20 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device RemOval Versus Full CoUrse Medical Treatment - the CIEDOUT Study - a Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06323668
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CIEDOUT / H-23067693
- Keywords
- Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device, CIED, Pacemaker, Implantable cardioverter defibrillator, ICD, Possible CIED infection, Valvular endocarditis, Bacteremia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 17 May 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2038 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The CIEDOUT study is an open label randomized trial in patients with possible cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection.
The hypothesis is that CIED removal + guideline antibiotic therapy is better than 6-weeks antibiotic therapy alone in preventing death or relapse of bacteremia in patients with bacteremia and possible CIED infection (not definite CIED infection).
The objective of this study is to test whether CIED removal + guideline antibiotic therapy is superior to 6-weeks antibiotic therapy alone in prevention of the composite endpoint of death or relapse bacteremia after 6 months of follow-up in patients with CIED and systemic infection but without definite CIED infection.
Detailed description
Complete removal of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is recommended for all patients with confirmed CIED infection under initial empirical antibiotic therapy by guidelines. However, the current 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on treatment of possible CIED infection are mostly based on expert opinions and/or observational studies. No previous randomized clinical trial has been conducted, why the CIEDOUT study is the first randomized clinical trial with high evidence investigating treatment of possible CIED infections. The CIEDOUT study will affect future clinical guidelines and optimize treatment and prognosis for future patients with possible CIED infection.
The hypothesis is that CIED removal + guideline antibiotic therapy is superior to 6-weeks antibiotic therapy alone in preventing death or relapse of bacteremia in patients with bacteremia and possible CIED infection (not definite CIED infection). The investigators want to test whether CIED removal + guideline antibiotic therapy is superior to 6-weeks antibiotic therapy in prevention of the composite endpoint of death or relapse bacteremia after 6 months of follow-up in patients with CIED and systemic infection but without definite CIED infection.
The study is a randomized open label trial. Patients will be allocated by 1:1 randomization to CIED extraction + guideline antibiotic therapy or 6-weeks antibiotic therapy alone. The primary outcome is a composite endpoint of death or relapse bacteremia (same microorganism) within 6 months after randomization. The secondary outcomes are days alive and out-of-hospital to 6 months, death, readmission for any cause, device extraction, relapse of bacteremia (the same microorganism), relapse of bacteremia (all species), and definite CIED infection.
All patients suspected of CIED infection or patients with bacteremia + CIED will be screened for inclusion in the CIEDOUT study according to the ESC modified diagnosis criteria. To enable timely identification of possible candidates, a surveillance system will be set up combining data from The Danish Pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) registry and then real-time bacteremia surveillance data through The Danish nationwide clinical Microbiology Database (MiBa). Hence, whenever a relevant bacteremia is identified, the CIED registry will then by queried for whether that patient also has CIED. Randomization allocation ratio is 1:1 through a computerized application via RedCap. Patients will be entered into the "intention to treat" analysis.
The patients will be randomized to CIED removal and/or medical therapy (at least 10 days iv antibiotic therapy and then per oral treatment to 6 weeks total by POET criteria). The CIED removal will be done as soon as possible within 7 days. The study-outcomes will be assessed at three routine clinical check-ups as part of the standard treatment at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 3 months after randomization. Within 6 months after randomization, patients will be followed for outcomes through medical charts and the national health registries. After that, the patients will be assessed for outcomes on an annual basis by medical chart review and the Danish nationwide registries.
The total trial duration is expected to be 14 years. Inclusion period for the main paper is expected to be 4 years and then follow-up for 3 months for the last included patients. Hereafter, patients will be followed for outcomes annually through medical charts and the national health registries up to 10 years after the last included patient until 2038.
Based on prior studies and especially preliminary data, it is estimated that approximately 29% of patients will experience a primary event by 6 months in the medical treatment group and 12% in the extraction group. In order to have 80% power to detect difference in total primary endpoints between the treatment groups, at least 174 patients will be needed (87 in each study arm) over a median follow-up of 3 years to be able to reject the null hypothesis with a power of 80% and a risk of type I error of 5. Assuming a steady rate of patients with the inclusion criteria, there will be approximately 100 incident cases available for the CIEDOUT study annually in Eastern Denmark based on preliminary data. If 60% of these consent to the study, 60 incident patients per year will be included. By 3 years, 180 incident patients will then be included.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized open label trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiac implantable electronic device removal + empirical antibiotic therapy | Experimental | Procedure: Cardiac implantable electronic device extractionCIED removal + guideline antibiotic therapy (at least 10 days iv antibiotic therapy and then per oral treatment to 6 weeks total by POET criteria). The antibiotic therapy is targeted according to microbiological analyses per microorganism. The CIED removal will be done as soon as possible within 7 days. |
| Empirical antibiotic therapy | No intervention | –Guideline antibiotic therapy (at least 10 days iv antibiotic therapy and then per oral treatment to 6 weeks total by POET criteria). The antibiotic therapy is targeted according to microbiological analyses per microorganism. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Possible CIED infection
- AND
- Bacteremia/fungemia with S. aureus detected in ≥1 positive blood culture(s) or CoNS, Cutibacterium spp., Candida spp, Streptococcus spp. (except Streptococcus pneumoniae), and Enterococcus faecalis detected in ≥2 positive blood cultures.
- OR
- Left-sided valve infective endocarditis
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Unavailable for follow-up (e.g. tourist)
- Unwilling to sign informed consent
- Unable to sign informed consent
- OR
- At least one of the following criteria
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiac implantable electronic device extractionThe CIED removal will be done as soon as possible within 7 days. | Procedure or surgery | Cardiac implantable electronic device removal + empirical antibiotic therapy |
Primary outcome
Rate of death or relapse bacteremia
Time frame: 6 months after randomization
Composite endpoint of death or relapse bacteremia (same microorganism)
7 secondary outcomes
Days alive and out-of-hospital
Time frame: 6 months after randomization
Rate of death
Time frame: 6 months after randomization
Rate of readmission for any cause
Time frame: 6 months after randomization
Rate of cardiac implantable electronic device extraction
Time frame: 6 months after randomization
Rate of relapse bacteremia (the same microorganism)
Time frame: 6 months after randomization
Rate of bacteremia (all species)
Time frame: 6 months after randomization
Rate of definite CIED infection
Time frame: 6 months after randomization
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Nov 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection
RecruitingPhase 3
New Treatment of Cardiac Device Infections; Immediate Reimplantation After Removal of Infected System
Endocarditis, Bacterial
RecruitingPhase 4
A Randomized Trial of Lenient Versus Strict Arm Instruction Post Cardiac Device Surgery
Post-Op Complication
Recruiting
CIED Infection Quality Initiative Demonstration Project
Infections
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Observational, Retrospective, Single-center Study Aimed at Evaluating Long-term Outcomes Following Transvenous Lead Extraction of Infected Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
CIED Implantation Technique at Assiut University Heart Hospital in Relation to ESC Guidelines
CIED-related Infections, CIED Implantation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Amna Alhakak, MD contact
Emil L Fosbøl, MD, PhD principal investigator
Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cardiac implantable electronic device extraction in people with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Emil L Fosbøl, MD, PhD (+4535456340, emil.fosboel@regionh.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of death or relapse bacteremia (time frame: 6 months after randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2024.