AzTrials
AzTrials

Choledocholithiasis With Acute CholangitisNCT06327126

Efficacy and Safety of Single-session Endoscopic Stone Extraction

An observational study of Choledocholithiasis With Acute Cholangitis, run by Beijing Friendship Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a retrospective study, including approximately 600 patients with acute cholangitis accompanied with choledocholithiasis, who treated with single-session or two-session endoscopic stone extraction at Beijing friendship hospital. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
two-session ERCP and single-session ERCP
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
563 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jan 2024to 1 Jul 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients who diagnosed with acute cholangitis associated with choledocholithiasis underwent single-session stone extraction or two-session treatment involving stone removal after drainage at Beijing Friendship Hospital.

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥18 years old
  • Patients met the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) diagnosis of acute cholangitis
  • Imaging examination confirmed the presence of choledocholithiasis
  • Patients received endoscopic single-session stone extraction or two-session treatment involving stone removal after drainage

Who cannot join

  • Common bile duct with benign or malignant stenosis
  • Changes in the anatomical structure of the stomach or duodenum
  • Patients complicated with severe acute pancreatitis
  • Patients who underwent endoscopic intervention before admission
  • Patients received percutaneous transhepatic cholangio drainage (PTCD) or other invasive interventions besides endoscopic treatment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Beijing Friendship Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100050

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Efficacy and Safety of Single-session Endoscopic Stone Extraction for Treating Acute Cholangitis Accompanied With Choledocholithiasis

This is a retrospective study, including approximately 600 patients with acute cholangitis accompanied with choledocholithiasis, who treated with single-session or two-session endoscopic stone extraction at Beijing friendship hospital. The investigators assessed the outcomes of single-stage and two-stage endoscopic stone extraction.

Read the detailed description

Acute cholangitis is an acute inflammation caused by obstruction of the bile duct, of which choledocholithiasis is the most common cause. Without timely removal of the obstruction or control of the infection, cholangitis can get worse and even become life-threatening. Therefore, timely and effective treatment is essential for patients with acute cholangitis combined with choledocholithiasis. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) is used as the first-line treatment for choledocholithiasis-associated acute cholangitis. Previous guidelines recommended two-session endoscopic therapy. Endoscopic biliary drainage as the initial treatment, followed by endoscopic stone extraction after cholangitis improved. In recent years, studies have found that single-session endoscopic stone extraction is safe and effective for patients without serious organ function impairment. Meanwhile, single-session endoscopic lithotomy can avoid the second ERCP intervention, which can relieve the pain of patients, reduce medical costs and shorten the length of hospital stay. However, there is still insufficient evidence on the effectiveness and safety of early single-session ERCP lithotomy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-session endoscopic stone extraction for acute cholangitis associated with choledocholithiasis, so as to provide reference of clinical treatment.

In a retrospective analysis, approximately 600 patients with acute cholangitis accompanied with choledocholithiasis, who treated with single-session or two-session endoscopic stone extraction at Beijing friendship hospital were studied. The investigators assessed the outcomes of single-stage and two-stage endoscopic stone extraction.

Being tested
two-session ERCP, single-session ERCP
Keywords
Choledocholithiasis, Acute Cholangitis, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Medical subject headings
Choledocholithiasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • two-session ERCPProcedure or surgery

    early endoscopic drainage followed by endoscopic stone extraction

  • single-session ERCPProcedure or surgery

    directly endoscopic stone extraction

Study groups in NCT06327126
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
two-session treatment grouptwo-session ERCP
Receives: Procedure: two-session ERCP
single-session treatment groupsingle-session ERCP
Receives: Procedure: single-session ERCP

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Success rate of complete stone removal

    Segmental angiography was performed by balloon closure to determine the presence or absence of negative stone shadow

    Measured: during the operation

  2. ERCP-related complication rate

    The complications include pancreatitis, hemorrhage, perforation, pneumonia, etc. The results of intraoperative endoscopic observation, postoperative symptoms and signs, blood routine examination, amylase, lipase, and imaging and endoscopic examination were measured.

    Measured: from the operation to 1 month after the operation

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Length of stay

    Total time from admission to discharge.

    Measured: perioperatively

  2. Hospital expenses

    Total expenses from admission to discharge.

    Measured: perioperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Mar 2024
  2. Study start1 Jan 2024
  3. Primary completion1 May 2024
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
563 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06327126
Sponsor's protocol ID
BFHHZS20240001
Status last verified
Mar 2024
First submitted
11 Mar 2024
Last updated
17 Jul 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Choledocholithiasis With Acute Cholangitis, run by Beijing Friendship Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Success rate of complete stone removal (time frame: during the operation). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in