AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple SclerosisNCT06327789

Trunk Control and Disability in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis

An observational study of Multiple Sclerosis, run by Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to investigate the relationship between physical disability and trunk control, balance, and pedobarographic parameters in persons with Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) who have a low Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years
Conditions the study is for
Multiple Sclerosis
How many people
23 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
21 Dec 2021to 21 Feb 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Study population: diagnosed with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis by an experienced neurologist

Who may be able to join

  • 18-50 years old,
  • diagnosed with RRMS by an experienced neurologist
  • EDSS score ≤ 3

Who cannot join

  • orthopedic or sensory additional problems in the lower extremity
  • who had an interventional procedure in the last six months, and had an attack in the last three months

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University

    Zonguldak

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Relationship Between Trunk Control and Disability in Persons With Early Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

This study aims to investigate the relationship between physical disability and trunk control, balance, and pedobarographic parameters in persons with Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) who have a low Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score. Twenty-three RRMS patients with an age range of 18-50 years, EDSS score ≤ 3 were included in this study. The patients' level of disability (EDSS), trunk control )Trunk Impairment Scale - TIS), lower extremity functionality (Timed 25-Foot Walk Test - T25FW), upper extremity functionality (Nine Hole Peg Test- 9HPT), balance (Biodex Balance System) and gait (Zebris® FDM 2) were evaluated.

Medical subject headings
Multiple Sclerosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT06327789
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Multiple SclerosisPatients who were 18-50 years old, diagnosed with RRMS by a experienced neurologist, and with an EDSS score ≤ 3 were included in this study. Patients with orthopedic or sensory additional problems in the lower extremity, who had an interventional procedure in the last six months, and had an attack in the last three months were excluded from the study.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)

    EDSS was used to determine the patients' level of disability. EDSS is most commonly used to assess the level of disability in persons with MS. In this scale pyramidal, cerebral, cerebellar, brainstem, visual and sensory subparameters are evaluated it consists of ordinal rating system ranging from 0 (normal neurological status) to 10 (death due to MS) in 0.5 increments interval (when reaching EDSS 1). The lower scale values of the EDSS measure impairments based on the neurological examination, while the upper range of the scale (> EDSS 6) measures handicaps of patients with MS. The determination of EDSS 4 - 6 is heavily dependent on aspects of walking ability

    Measured: up to 8 weeks

  2. Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS)

    This scale used to evaluate the trunk control of the participants, TIS contains static sitting balance, dynamic sitting balance, and coordination. The total score of this scale is from 0 to 23 and a high score indicates better trunk control. The patients were placed in the standard sitting position for the test and the parameters were applied. Standart position is such that the knees are flexed at 90 degrees, without back support, with the hands and forearms on the thighs and the feet in contact with the ground.

    Measured: up to 8 weeks

  3. Biodex Balance System (BBS) (MedicalSystems, Shirley, NY, USA)

    This system is a multiaxial device that objectively measures and records a patient's ability to stabilize the involved joint under dynamic stress. The BBS measures, in degrees, the tilt about each axis during dynamic conditions and calculates a medial-lateral stability index (MLSI), anterior-posterior stability index (APSI), and an overall stability index (OSI). These indexes represent fluctuations around a zero point established before testing when the platform is stable. A high score in the all parameters indicates poor balance. The test was performed in 3 repetitions, each lasting 20 seconds, with a 10-second rest period in between, under different conditions, including eyes open-closed, firm-foam surface, and static-dynamic surface. The average of the three repetitions was calculated automatically by the device

    Measured: up to 8 weeks

  4. Step Length (cm)

    The temporal-spatial characteristics of gait were assessed through the utilization of dynamic pedobarography. Dynamic pedobarographic analysis was performed with the implementation of a pressure platform (Zebris® FDM 2, dimensions 212.2x60.5x2.5 cm, Zebris Medical GmbH, Germany) positioned at the center of an 8-meter walking path. Patients completed the gait cycle three times, once for forward and once for backward gait, while barefoot.

    Measured: up to 8 weeks

  5. Stride Length (cm)

    The temporal-spatial characteristics of gait were assessed through the utilization of dynamic pedobarography. Dynamic pedobarographic analysis was performed with the implementation of a pressure platform (Zebris® FDM 2, dimensions 212.2x60.5x2.5 cm, Zebris Medical GmbH, Germany) positioned at the center of an 8-meter walking path. Patients completed the gait cycle three times, once for forward and once for backward gait, while barefoot.

    Measured: up to 8 weeks

  6. Step Width (cm)

    The temporal-spatial characteristics of gait were assessed through the utilization of dynamic pedobarography. Dynamic pedobarographic analysis was performed with the implementation of a pressure platform (Zebris® FDM 2, dimensions 212.2x60.5x2.5 cm, Zebris Medical GmbH, Germany) positioned at the center of an 8-meter walking path. Patients completed the gait cycle three times, once for forward and once for backward gait, while barefoot.

    Measured: up to 8 weeks

  7. Cadence (steps/min)

    The temporal-spatial characteristics of gait were assessed through the utilization of dynamic pedobarography. Dynamic pedobarographic analysis was performed with the implementation of a pressure platform (Zebris® FDM 2, dimensions 212.2x60.5x2.5 cm, Zebris Medical GmbH, Germany) positioned at the center of an 8-meter walking path. Patients completed the gait cycle three times, once for forward and once for backward gait, while barefoot.

    Measured: up to 8 weeks

  8. Velocity (m/s)

    The temporal-spatial characteristics of gait were assessed through the utilization of dynamic pedobarography. Dynamic pedobarographic analysis was performed with the implementation of a pressure platform (Zebris® FDM 2, dimensions 212.2x60.5x2.5 cm, Zebris Medical GmbH, Germany) positioned at the center of an 8-meter walking path. Patients completed the gait cycle three times, once for forward and once for backward gait, while barefoot.

    Measured: up to 8 weeks

  9. Step time (s)

    The temporal-spatial characteristics of gait were assessed through the utilization of dynamic pedobarography. Dynamic pedobarographic analysis was performed with the implementation of a pressure platform (Zebris® FDM 2, dimensions 212.2x60.5x2.5 cm, Zebris Medical GmbH, Germany) positioned at the center of an 8-meter walking path. Patients completed the gait cycle three times, once for forward and once for backward gait, while barefoot.

    Measured: up to 8 weeks

  10. Stride time (s)

    The temporal-spatial characteristics of gait were assessed through the utilization of dynamic pedobarography. Dynamic pedobarographic analysis was performed with the implementation of a pressure platform (Zebris® FDM 2, dimensions 212.2x60.5x2.5 cm, Zebris Medical GmbH, Germany) positioned at the center of an 8-meter walking path. Patients completed the gait cycle three times, once for forward and once for backward gait, while barefoot.

    Measured: up to 8 weeks

  11. Timed 25-Foot Walk Test (T25FW)

    This test is designed for the evaluation of lower extremity functions.Initiated at the participant's first step, the test concludes upon reaching the finish line. The participants are instructed to walk as expeditiously as feasible within a specified time frame without running. The duration taken to traverse the 25-foot distance, both for the outbound and return segments, is documented, and subsequently, the average of these two durations is calculated.

    Measured: up to 8 weeks

  12. Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT)

    It is a short, standardized, quantitative test used to evaluate upper extremity function. In the test, patients are asked to pick up nine wooden pegs from a platform as quickly as possible and then place them back into the holes.In our study, the test was conducted twice for both the dominant and non-dominant hands, and the average completion time was recorded.

    Measured: up to 8 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Mar 2024
  2. Study start21 Dec 2021
  3. Primary completion25 Dec 2021
  4. Study completion21 Feb 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
23 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06327789
Sponsor's protocol ID
ZBEU-MS
Status last verified
Mar 2024
First submitted
13 Mar 2024
Last updated
25 Mar 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Multiple Sclerosis, run by Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (time frame: up to 8 weeks). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Mar 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in