StrokeNCT06328907
Multifunctional Nutrition Tube on Social Condition and Experience in Cerebralvascular Accident
A study testing comprehensive rehabilitation therapy, Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding and Nasogastric Tube Feeding in people with Stroke, run by Copka Sonpashan.
Trial summary
The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the psychological condition and experience of ischemic stroke patients who receive enteral nutrition support through either Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube or Nasogastric Tube. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- comprehensive rehabilitation therapy, Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding and Nasogastric Tube Feeding
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Mar 2024to Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age>18 years.
- Meeting the diagnostic criteria for ischemic stroke .
- Dysphagia confirmed by video fluoroscopic Swallowing Study.
- Clear consciousness.
- Stable vital signs.
Who cannot join
- Dysphagia that might be caused by other diseases that might cause dysphagia, such as head and neck tumors, traumatic brain injury, etc.
- Complicated with severe liver and kidney failure, tumors, or hematological disorders.
- Simultaneously in need to undergo other therapy that might affect the outcomes of this study.
- Pregnant or nursing females.
About this study
Official title: Multifunctional Nutrition Tube on Social Condition and Experience in Cerebralvascular Accident: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the psychological condition and experience of ischemic stroke patients who receive enteral nutrition support through either Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube or Nasogastric Tube. Patients will be randomly assigned to either an observation group or a control group, with both groups receiving routine rehabilitation treatment. The observation group will receive enteral nutrition support through Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube, while the control group will receive it through Nasogastric Tube. Researchers will then compare the Social Condition and experience of the two groups.
Read the detailed description
The study will last 15 days for each participant. The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the differences on Psychological Condition and Experience in ischemic stroke patients using Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube and Nasogastric Tube. Patients will be randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, all receiving routine rehabilitation treatment. On this basis, the observation group will use Intermittent Oro esophageal Tube for enteral nutrition support, while the control group will use Nasogastric Tube. Researchers will compare Social Condition and Experience of two groups.
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- comprehensive rehabilitation therapy, Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding, Nasogastric Tube Feeding
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
comprehensive rehabilitation therapyBehavioural
Basic treatment, including corresponding control of risk factors and education on healthy lifestyles.
Swallowing training, including lemon ice stimulation, empty swallowing training, and pronunciation training.
Pulmonary function training, including standing training, cough training, and diaphragm muscle training.
Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube FeedingDevice
The observation group was given enteral nutritional support with Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube according to the following procedure: Before each feeding, inside and outside of the tube was cleaned with water. During feeding, the patient should maintain a semi-reclining or sitting position with mouth opened, and the tube was inserted slowly and smoothly into the upper part of the esophagus by medical staffs while the appropriate depth of intubation was checked with the calibration markings on the tube wall. The distance from the incisors to the head part of the tube should be between 22-25 cm. However, the specific depth should be evaluated based on patients' feedback and adjusted accordingly. After insertion, the tail part of the tube should be put into a container full of water and the absence of continuous bubbles indicated a successful intubation. Then, the feeding was to be conducted three times per day with 50 ml per minute and 400-600ml for each feeding.
Nasogastric Tube FeedingDevice
The control group was given enteral nutritional support with Nasogastric Tube Feeding according to the relevant guidelines. Within 4 hours after admission, the placement of the feeding tube was conducted by professional medical staffs and after intubation, the tube was secured to the patient\'s cheek with medical tape. The feeding was conducted once every 3-4 hours, with 200-300ml each time. The total feeding volume was determined based on daily requirements. The feeding content was formulated by the nutritionists based on the patient\'s condition and relevant guidelines to reach the energy demand as 20-25 kcal/kg/day and protein supplementation of 1.2-2.0 g/kg/day for both two groups. For patients with limited tube feeding compliance, we made appropriate adjustments to ensure that they were not at risk of severe malnutrition as much as possible.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| comprehensive rehabilitation therapy+Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding | Experimental | Assigned randomly before the treatment, all patients were provided with comprehensive rehabilitation therapy.
The group is given enteral nutritional support with Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube according to the following procedure. The feeding content was formulated by the nutritionists based on the condition and relevant guidelines to reach the energy demand as 20-25 kcal/kg/day and protein supplementation of 1.2-2.0 g/kg/day for both two groups Receives: Behavioral: comprehensive rehabilitation therapy; Device: Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding |
| comprehensive rehabilitation therapy+Nasogastric Tube Feeding | Active comparator | Assigned randomly before the treatment, all patients were provided with comprehensive rehabilitation therapy.Besides, this group is given enteral nutritional support with Nasogastric Tube according to the relevant guidelines. Within 4 hours after admission, the placement of the feeding tube was conducted by professional medical staffs and after intubation, the tube was secured to the cheek with medical tape. The feeding was conducted once every 3-4 hours, with 200-300ml each time. The total feeding volume was determined based on daily requirements. Receives: Behavioral: comprehensive rehabilitation therapy; Device: Nasogastric Tube Feeding |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Swallowing-Quality of Life questionnaire
The Chinese version of the Swallowing-Quality of Life questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) was used to assess the quality of life of patients.he Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 was utilized for scoring, with a total of 44 items, including difficulties in swallowing, dietary restrictions, oral health, social communication, and others. The total score was converted to a standard percentage scale ranging from 0 to 100, with positively correlated with quality of life.
Measured: day 1 and day 15
Secondary outcomes (3)
The Reintegration to Normal Living Index
The Reintegration to Normal Living Index is a questionnaire used to assess the extent to which individuals have reintegrated into normal life following a stroke. It includes various domains, including social aspects of reintegration. The total score range for the scale is from 0 to 100, and a higher score indicates better reintegration into normal living. Therefore, in the case of the scale, a higher score is considered more favorable as it reflects a greater degree of reintegration into normal life following a stroke.
Measured: day 1 and day 15
Functional Oral Intake Scale
The Functional Oral Intake Scale reflects the patient's oral intake. Studies have shown that this scale can also serve as an independent measure of intake for post-stroke dysphagia patients. The scale is divided into 7 levels, with the level positively correlated with swallowing function. Level 7 indicates normal swallowing function.
Measured: day 1 and day 15
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
The total score of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more severe depression symptoms.
Measured: day 1 and day 15
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Mar 2024
- Study startMar 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completionDec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Copka Sonpashan
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Copka Sonpashan, Chao Phya Abhaibhubejhr Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06328907
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IOE Social Condition
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 10 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 25 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multifunctional Nutrition Tube on Social Condition and Experience in Cerebralvascular Accident: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06328907
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IOE Social Condition
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Copka SonpashanOther government
- Study start
- Mar 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the psychological condition and experience of ischemic stroke patients who receive enteral nutrition support through either Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube or Nasogastric Tube. Patients will be randomly assigned to either an observation group or a control group, with both groups receiving routine rehabilitation treatment. The observation group will receive enteral nutrition support through Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube, while the control group will receive it through Nasogastric Tube. Researchers will then compare the Social Condition and experience of the two groups.
Detailed description
The study will last 15 days for each participant. The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the differences on Psychological Condition and Experience in ischemic stroke patients using Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube and Nasogastric Tube. Patients will be randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, all receiving routine rehabilitation treatment. On this basis, the observation group will use Intermittent Oro esophageal Tube for enteral nutrition support, while the control group will use Nasogastric Tube. Researchers will compare Social Condition and Experience of two groups.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| comprehensive rehabilitation therapy+Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding | Experimental | Behavioral: comprehensive rehabilitation therapy, Device: Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube FeedingAssigned randomly before the treatment, all patients were provided with comprehensive rehabilitation therapy. The group is given enteral nutritional support with Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube according to the following procedure. The feeding content was formulated by the nutritionists based on the condition and relevant guidelines to reach the energy demand as 20-25 kcal/kg/day and protein supplementation of 1.2-2.0 g/kg/day for both two groups |
| comprehensive rehabilitation therapy+Nasogastric Tube Feeding | Active comparator | Behavioral: comprehensive rehabilitation therapy, Device: Nasogastric Tube FeedingAssigned randomly before the treatment, all patients were provided with comprehensive rehabilitation therapy.Besides, this group is given enteral nutritional support with Nasogastric Tube according to the relevant guidelines. Within 4 hours after admission, the placement of the feeding tube was conducted by professional medical staffs and after intubation, the tube was secured to the cheek with medical tape. The feeding was conducted once every 3-4 hours, with 200-300ml each time. The total feeding volume was determined based on daily requirements. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age>18 years.
- Meeting the diagnostic criteria for ischemic stroke .
- Dysphagia confirmed by video fluoroscopic Swallowing Study.
- Clear consciousness.
- Stable vital signs.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Dysphagia that might be caused by other diseases that might cause dysphagia, such as head and neck tumors, traumatic brain injury, etc.
- Complicated with severe liver and kidney failure, tumors, or hematological disorders.
- Simultaneously in need to undergo other therapy that might affect the outcomes of this study.
- Pregnant or nursing females.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| comprehensive rehabilitation therapyBasic treatment, including corresponding control of risk factors and education on healthy lifestyles. Swallowing training, including lemon ice stimulation, empty swallowing training, and pronunciation training. Pulmonary function training, including standing training, cough training, and diaphragm muscle training. | Behavioural | comprehensive rehabilitation therapy+Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding, comprehensive rehabilitation therapy+Nasogastric Tube Feeding |
| Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube FeedingThe observation group was given enteral nutritional support with Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube according to the following procedure: Before each feeding, inside and outside of the tube was cleaned with water. During feeding, the patient should maintain a semi-reclining or sitting position with mouth opened, and the tube was inserted slowly and smoothly into the upper part of the esophagus by medical staffs while the appropriate depth of intubation was checked with the calibration markings on the tube wall. The distance from the incisors to the head part of the tube should be between 22-25 cm. However, the specific depth should be evaluated based on patients' feedback and adjusted accordingly. After insertion, the tail part of the tube should be put into a container full of water and the absence of continuous bubbles indicated a successful intubation. Then, the feeding was to be conducted three times per day with 50 ml per minute and 400-600ml for each feeding. | Device | comprehensive rehabilitation therapy+Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding |
| Nasogastric Tube FeedingThe control group was given enteral nutritional support with Nasogastric Tube Feeding according to the relevant guidelines. Within 4 hours after admission, the placement of the feeding tube was conducted by professional medical staffs and after intubation, the tube was secured to the patient\'s cheek with medical tape. The feeding was conducted once every 3-4 hours, with 200-300ml each time. The total feeding volume was determined based on daily requirements. The feeding content was formulated by the nutritionists based on the patient\'s condition and relevant guidelines to reach the energy demand as 20-25 kcal/kg/day and protein supplementation of 1.2-2.0 g/kg/day for both two groups. For patients with limited tube feeding compliance, we made appropriate adjustments to ensure that they were not at risk of severe malnutrition as much as possible. | Device | comprehensive rehabilitation therapy+Nasogastric Tube Feeding |
Primary outcome
Swallowing-Quality of Life questionnaire
Time frame: day 1 and day 15
The Chinese version of the Swallowing-Quality of Life questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) was used to assess the quality of life of patients.he Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 was utilized for scoring, with a total of 44 items, including difficulties in swallowing, dietary restrictions, oral health, social communication, and others. The total score was converted to a standard percentage scale ranging from 0 to 100, with positively correlated with quality of life.
3 secondary outcomes
The Reintegration to Normal Living Index
Time frame: day 1 and day 15
Functional Oral Intake Scale
Time frame: day 1 and day 15
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Time frame: day 1 and day 15
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Mar 2024.
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing comprehensive rehabilitation therapy, Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding and Nasogastric Tube Feeding in people with Stroke, run by Copka Sonpashan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Swallowing-Quality of Life questionnaire (time frame: day 1 and day 15). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Mar 2024.