NSCLCDECIDENCT06329648
Distributed Learning of Edic and CardIac Dose Effects in Lung Cancer
An observational study of NSCLC, run by The Netherlands Cancer Institute.
Trial summary
Cardiac dose was not a major concern in lung radiotherapy patients until the results of the RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) 0617 trial, which showed an association between cardiac dose and survival. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- NSCLC
- How many people
- 20,000 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2024to 1 Jun 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: This study has been designed as a retrospective, non-experimental, non-control, multiplecentre cohort investigation.
Who may be able to join
- Pathologically confirmed primary diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stage I - III
- Subjects must have been treated by primary radiotherapy - e.g. 3D-conformal, intensity modulated, arc therapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy - and either with or without chemotherapy.
- Mandatory data elements (see below) are available
Who cannot join
- Subjects under 18 years of age.
- Vulnerable groups or individuals (as per WMA Helsinki Declaration) that have not given consent to be treated with radiotherapy by a qualified physician at the participating centre.
- Primary cancer was not NSCLC or SCLC.
- Surgical resection of lung (wedge, lobectomy, etc.) prior to radiotherapy.
- CT studies and corresponding GTV delineations were previously made publicly available via open access data repositories.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Cardiac dose was not a major concern in lung radiotherapy patients until the results of the RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) 0617 trial, which showed an association between cardiac dose and survival. Since then, many papers have studied the association between cardiac (substructure) dose and either survival or cardiac toxicity. Ideally, cardiac toxicity would be separated from survival. However, scoring cardiac toxicity prospectively was not standard practice, and retrospective scoring is challenging because of the overlap of cardiac toxicity symptoms and lung cancer (treatment) symptoms. Therefore in real world cohorts, cardiac toxicity is usually not scored properly and most larger studies pragmatically consider overall survival as primary endpoint, and the relation between cardiac dose and cardiac toxicity is not well established for lung cancer patients.
Cardiac toxicity might not be the only factor in decreased survival; toxicity of the immune system might be a competing risk or a major contributing factor, where dose to the heart is a surrogate for dose to blood. Dose to the immune system is defined as EDIC (Effective Dose to circulating Immune Cells), comprising heart dose, lung dose and body dose combined. As EDIC dose and cardiac dose partly overlap, a large cohort with substantial variation will be required to disentangle the two effects. Such vast amounts of routine care data are immediately available in many radiotherapy centers all over the world. The problem we face is not the lack of routine care data, but making such data available for analysis. DECIDE adopts a federated learning approach, which implies that data does not have to be centralized within a single institution to be fit for use. We aim to include an unprecedentedly large-scale cohort of 20,000 patients.
In this proposal, we need to add on scientific and technological innovations that exploit the existing federated learning framework to scale up to supporting >25 simultaneously connected partners. We will be training (generalized) linear epidemiological models as well as new computer vision-based models for outcome predictions. As cause-specific survival (cardiac toxicity or immune toxicity) is unavailable or unreliable in major studies, we will use the more pragmatic endpoint of survival. By elucidating the clinical contributions of whole heart dose, cardiac substructure dose and EDIC dose in combination with known clinical risk factors, the desired impact is to change clinical practice for lung cancer radiotherapy and improve survival.
- Conditions
- NSCLC
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Optimize EDIC dose
- Optimize the relative contribution of the different components of the EDIC dose, with overall survival as endpoint.
Measured: 4 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
cardiac toxicity
- Depending on the optional data available we will explicitly model cardiac toxicity and hematological toxicity
Measured: 4 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Mar 2024
- Study start1 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jun 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for NSCLCStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Netherlands Cancer InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 20,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Barbara Stam, PhD, Principal investigator, The Netherlands Cancer Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06329648
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DECIDE
- Acronym
- DECIDE
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 19 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 26 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Distributed Learning of Edic and CardIac Dose Effects in Lung Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06329648
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DECIDE / DECIDE
- Conditions
- NSCLC
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 20,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- The Netherlands Cancer InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cardiac dose was not a major concern in lung radiotherapy patients until the results of the RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) 0617 trial, which showed an association between cardiac dose and survival. Since then, many papers have studied the association between cardiac (substructure) dose and either survival or cardiac toxicity. Ideally, cardiac toxicity would be separated from survival. However, scoring cardiac toxicity prospectively was not standard practice, and retrospective scoring is challenging because of the overlap of cardiac toxicity symptoms and lung cancer (treatment) symptoms. Therefore in real world cohorts, cardiac toxicity is usually not scored properly and most larger studies pragmatically consider overall survival as primary endpoint, and the relation between cardiac dose and cardiac toxicity is not well established for lung cancer patients.
Cardiac toxicity might not be the only factor in decreased survival; toxicity of the immune system might be a competing risk or a major contributing factor, where dose to the heart is a surrogate for dose to blood. Dose to the immune system is defined as EDIC (Effective Dose to circulating Immune Cells), comprising heart dose, lung dose and body dose combined. As EDIC dose and cardiac dose partly overlap, a large cohort with substantial variation will be required to disentangle the two effects. Such vast amounts of routine care data are immediately available in many radiotherapy centers all over the world. The problem we face is not the lack of routine care data, but making such data available for analysis. DECIDE adopts a federated learning approach, which implies that data does not have to be centralized within a single institution to be fit for use. We aim to include an unprecedentedly large-scale cohort of 20,000 patients.
In this proposal, we need to add on scientific and technological innovations that exploit the existing federated learning framework to scale up to supporting >25 simultaneously connected partners. We will be training (generalized) linear epidemiological models as well as new computer vision-based models for outcome predictions. As cause-specific survival (cardiac toxicity or immune toxicity) is unavailable or unreliable in major studies, we will use the more pragmatic endpoint of survival. By elucidating the clinical contributions of whole heart dose, cardiac substructure dose and EDIC dose in combination with known clinical risk factors, the desired impact is to change clinical practice for lung cancer radiotherapy and improve survival.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- This study has been designed as a retrospective, non-experimental, non-control, multiplecentre cohort investigation.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Pathologically confirmed primary diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stage I - III
- Subjects must have been treated by primary radiotherapy - e.g. 3D-conformal, intensity modulated, arc therapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy - and either with or without chemotherapy.
- Mandatory data elements (see below) are available
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Subjects under 18 years of age.
- Vulnerable groups or individuals (as per WMA Helsinki Declaration) that have not given consent to be treated with radiotherapy by a qualified physician at the participating centre.
- Primary cancer was not NSCLC or SCLC.
- Surgical resection of lung (wedge, lobectomy, etc.) prior to radiotherapy.
- CT studies and corresponding GTV delineations were previously made publicly available via open access data repositories.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Optimize EDIC dose
Time frame: 4 years
- Optimize the relative contribution of the different components of the EDIC dose, with overall survival as endpoint.
1 secondary outcome
cardiac toxicity
Time frame: 4 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Mar 2024.
Related trials for NSCLC
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Barbara Stam, PhD principal investigator
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of NSCLC, run by The Netherlands Cancer Institute.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Tomas Janssen, PhD (+31205122164, t.janssen@nki.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Optimize EDIC dose (time frame: 4 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2024.