AzTrials
AzTrials

Infertility, FemaleNCT06332027

Accuracy of Hystro-Salpingo-Foam-Sonography (HYFOSY) as Tubal Patency Test in Comparison to Laparoscopy in Infertile Patients

A study testing Hystro-Salpingo-Foam-Sonography (HYFOSY) in people with Infertility, Female, run by Sohag University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Tubal patency testing is an essential part of female subfertility evaluation . Tubal abnormalities are seen in 30-40% of female subfertility patients . Laparoscopy with chromopertubation is considered to be the gold standard diagnostic procedure . Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Infertility, Female
What is being tested?
Hystro-Salpingo-Foam-Sonography (HYFOSY)
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
How many people
122 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Apr 2024to 1 Apr 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Women aged 18-40
  • Sexually active
  • Infertility or subfertility primary and secondary

Who cannot join

  • Current pregnancy
  • Heavy menstrual bleeding
  • Peivic inflammatory disease
  • Allergy to lidocaine

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Ahmed M Ahmed, Assistant lecturer contact

01092200298

ahmed.hamad@med.sohag.edu.eg

Salah R Ahmed, professor contact

01153008891

Egypt1 site
  • Sohag University Hospital

    Sohag

    Magdy M Amin, Professor

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Tubal patency testing is an essential part of female subfertility evaluation . Tubal abnormalities are seen in 30-40% of female subfertility patients . Laparoscopy with chromopertubation is considered to be the gold standard diagnostic procedure .

Laparoscopy is an invasive test, with a risk of intra-abdominal bleeding, visceral damage, and risks related to general anaesthesia.

Read more

Traditionally, Hysterosalpingography(HSG) is a less invasive less expensive first-step alternative, which has been used for decades with disadvantages such as radiation exposure, discomfort, or even abdominal pain.

Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography (HyCoSy) was introduced as an alternative using either contrast media or saline. The accuracy of HyCoSy is comparable to that of HSG and LSC being reference standards for tubal patency testing.However, hyperechogenic contrast media such as Echovist_ (Schering AG, Berlin) and SonoVue_ (Bracco, Milan)are either no longer available or not licensed for tubal patency testing.

Hysterosalpingo-Foam Sonography (HyFoSy) was developed as an alternative for contrast HyCoSy and was introduced in 2010 as a first-line office tubal patency test.Foam is used in the HyFoSy technique to visualize the fallopian tubes and is created by rigorously mixing 5mlExEm_-gel (containing hydroxyethyl cellulose and glycerol,IQMedical Ventures BV, Rotterdam, TheNetherlands) with 5ml purified ExEm_-water.

The ExEm_-foam is sufficiently fluid to pass the fallopian tubes and in the mean time sufficiently stable to show echogenicity for at least five minutes, which is an advantage over saline. In a review on safety aspects and side effects of ExEm-gel it was considered to be appropriate and safe for tubal patency testing.

In 2017, HyLiFoSy combined with power Doppler (PD)(HyLiFoSy-PD) technique was described as a possibly less painful and easier to detect on ultrasound alternativeto HyFoSy and HyCoSy, which can be used whenever the contrast media used with both are either unavailable or is relatively expensive Ultrasound-based tubal patency tests include hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy), hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy), and hysterosalpingo-lidocaine-foam sonography (HyLiFoSy)and have shown a high detection rate of tubal obstruction and good reproducibility with concordances from 83.8 to 100% with HSG, and from 78.1 to96.91% with lap-and-dye test.

In addition, they allow for a single comprehensive assessment of the uterus and the fallopian tubes and it can be performed by the same specialist who indicates it, in the clinician's own office with it consequently being time efficient. Finally, some studies have shown an increase in the rate of post-procedure gestation.

Being tested
Hystro-Salpingo-Foam-Sonography (HYFOSY)
Medical subject headings
Infertility, Female

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Hystro-Salpingo-Foam-Sonography (HYFOSY)Diagnostic test

    antibiotic prophylaxis oral azithromycin 500 mg per day 3 days the patient lie in dorsal lithotomy cervix visualized by Cusco speculum, cleaned with betadine 7% 6-Fr pediatric Foley's balloon catheter will be introduced into the cervical canal inflated with 2 ml of saline to prevent backflow of contrast through the cervix TV-US probe will be introduced,The foam will be created by mixing 3-4ml of 2% rialocaine gel (lidocaine hydrochloride 2%, Riadh Pharma,Saudi Arabia) with 16-17 ml of saline shaking the mixture between two syringes until a whitish suspension 20ml of lidocaine foam infused into uterine cavity observing the flow in each fallopian tube using greyscale and power Doppler (PD) 2D ultrasound Foam flow over the whole length of the tube fimbrial outflow, or peritoneal spillage of contrast provided evidence of tubal patency Patients observed for15-30 min for any complication or increase in pain Comparison between results and that of laparoscopy in operative list

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. the accuracy of HyFoSy in the assessment of tubal patency

    by comparing it with the reference standard of LDT, using the measures of diagnostic accuracy: sensitivity, specificity,positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ration (LR), negative LR, and overall accuracy.

    Measured: 1yr

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Mar 2024
  2. Study start1 Apr 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Apr 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Apr 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
122 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06332027
Sponsor's protocol ID
Soh-Med-24-03-03MD
Status last verified
Mar 2024
First submitted
19 Mar 2024
Last updated
26 Mar 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Fertility problems: assessment and treatment. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2017 Sep. No abstract available. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554709/

    PubMed 32134604
  • Exalto N, Emanuel MH. Clinical Aspects of HyFoSy as Tubal Patency Test in Subfertility Workup. Biomed Res Int. 2019 Jul 8;2019:4827376. doi: 10.1155/2019/4827376. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 31360713
  • Melcer Y, Zilberman Sharon N, Nimrodi M, Pekar-Zlotin M, Gat I, Maymon R. Hysterosalpingo-Foam Sonography for the Diagnosis of Tubal Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Ultrasound Med. 2021 Oct;40(10):2031-2037. doi: 10.1002/jum.15607. Epub 2020 Dec 28.

    PubMed 33368463
  • Piccioni MG, Riganelli L, Filippi V, Fuggetta E, Colagiovanni V, Imperiale L, Caccetta J, Panici PB, Porpora MG. Sonohysterosalpingography: Comparison of foam and saline solution. J Clin Ultrasound. 2017 Feb;45(2):67-71. doi: 10.1002/jcu.22412. Epub 2016 Oct 18.

    PubMed 27753111

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Hystro-Salpingo-Foam-Sonography (HYFOSY) in people with Infertility, Female, run by Sohag University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ahmed M Ahmed, Assistant lecturer (01092200298, ahmed.hamad@med.sohag.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

the accuracy of HyFoSy in the assessment of tubal patency (time frame: 1yr). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06332027, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in