Physical ActivityPhase 2NCT06337708
Smart Walk: A Culturally Tailored Smartphone-Delivered Physical Activity Intervention for African American Women
A Phase 2 study testing Smart Walk and Fitbit in people with Physical Activity and Exercise, run by Arizona State University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to test a culturally tailored, smartphone-delivered intervention designed to increase physical activity and reduce risk for heart disease and type 2 diabetes among African American women. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 24 to 65 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Physical Activity, Exercise, Heart Diseases
- What is being tested?
- Smart Walk and Fitbit
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 210 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 8 Apr 2024to 31 Mar 2029
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 24 to 65 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Self-reported African American/Black female
- Aged of 24-65 years
- Insufficiently Active (< 60 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per week as measured by Exercise Vital Sign Questionnaire)
- BMI > 25 kg/m2
- English speaking and reading
- Ownership of a smartphone with the ability to download applications (i.e., apps)
Show all 9Show fewer
- Ownership of a smartphone with the ability to receive text messages
- Willingness to receive a physical activity intervention delivered through their smartphone
- Willingness to include their first name or create an alias to be used on their profile page on the Smart Walk app
Who cannot join
- Plans to relocate out of Phoenix area in next 12 months
- Endorsing an item on the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q), unless a doctor's note for study participation in provided
- Resting systolic blood pressure greater than 180 mmHG and/or a diastolic blood pressure greater than 120 mmHG , as assessed at baseline or at any other study assessment
- Self-reported participation in another diet or weight loss study at screening
- Pregnant or planning to become pregnant in the next 12 months
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Arizona State University
Phoenix, Arizona, 85004
Carina Platte, PhD, (602) 543-2213, carina.platte@asu.edu
Rodney Joseph, PhD
About this study
Official title: Smart Walk: An Efficacy Trial of a Culturally Tailored Smartphone-Delivered Physical Activity Intervention for African American Women
The purpose of this study is to test a culturally tailored, smartphone-delivered intervention designed to increase physical activity and reduce risk for heart disease and type 2 diabetes among African American women.
Read the detailed description
This study addresses major public health concerns among African American women: physical inactivity and cardiometabolic disease risk.
African American women experience a high burden of cardiometabolic diseases, including heart disease, obesity, and type 2 diabetes. Regular aerobic physical activity is an established behavior to prevent and treat these conditions. Yet, the many African American women are insufficiently active, with only 27-40% meeting national aerobic physical activity guidelines.
This study will test the efficacy of Smart Walk, a culturally tailored, theory-based smartphone-delivered intervention designed to increase physical activity and improve cardiometabolic disease risk factors among African American women. In a 12-month trial, participants will be randomly assigned to either the Smart Walk intervention or a Fitbit-only comparison arm for an active 4-month intervention period, followed by an 8-month minimal contact follow-up period.
Specific Aims:
- Test the effects of Smart Walk to increase physical activity and promote adherence to national aerobic physical activity guidelines; compared to Fitbit-only comparison group.
- Test the effects of Smart Walk to improve cardiometabolic risk factors; compared to Fitbit-only comparison group.
- Compare cost and cost effectiveness of the two intervention groups from a societal perspective.
- Examine if protocol adherence predicts outcomes and potential mediation and moderation of intervention effects on physical activity and cardiometabolic outcomes.
- Being tested
- Smart Walk, Fitbit
- Keywords
- mHealth, women's health, health equity, African American women, Black women, exercise, physical activity, heart disease, diabetes
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity, Heart Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Sedentary Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Smart WalkBehavioural
Smart Walk is a culturally tailored, Social Cognitive Theory-based multi-component smartphone delivered physical activity (PA) promotion intervention that delivered through the Smart Walk application, virtual physical activity coaching, and text messages. The Smart Walk smartphone application includes four key features: 1) personal profile pages, 2) culturally relevant multi-media physical activity promotion modules, 3) discussion boards, and 4) physical activity self-monitoring/tracking feature that integrates with Fitbit activity monitors for participants to track their daily, weekly, and monthly activity. Virtual physical activity coaches will actively engage and facilitate group-based dialogue among participants on the app discussion boards and provide individualized, one-on-one PA coaching via telephone or commercially available app-based video teleconferencing software (i.e., FaceTime, Zoom, Google hangouts).
FitbitBehavioural
This intervention group will receive a Fitbit activity monitor and be encouraged to use the commercially available device to increase physical activity.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Smart Walk | Experimental | Participants will receive a culturally tailored smartphone-delivered physical activity intervention. Receives: Behavioral: Smart Walk |
| Fitbit | Active comparator | Participants will receive a Fitbit Inspire 3 activity monitor. Receives: Behavioral: Fitbit |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Participants will wear wrist-worn ActiGraph GT9X Link Activity monitors the activity monitor on their non-dominant wrist during all waking hours for 7 consecutive days to provide an assessment of usual activity
Measured: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in self-reported moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Assessed by the 7-Day Physical Activity Recall
Measured: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Secondary outcomes (19)
Change in cardiorespiratory fitness from baseline to 4- and 12-months
A modified Balke treadmill protocol will be used to estimate maximal aerobic capacity (i.e., VO2 peak).
Measured: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to 4- and 12-months
A measure of aortic stiffness and will be assessed using SphygmoCor XCEL system using validated methodology.
Measured: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in body weight from baseline to 4- and 12-months.
Measured in kilograms using an electronic scale
Measured: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in body mass index from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Calculated using the formula: weight (in kilograms) / height (in meters)squared
Measured: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in waste circumference from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Measured in centimeters
Measured: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in blood pressure (mmHG) from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure will be assessed using electronic sphygmomanometer following 5-min rest
Measured: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Measured in serum using a commercial multiplex immunoassay platform; blood will be drawn after a 10 hour fast.
Measured: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in interleukin 6 (IL-6) from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Measured in serum using a commercial multiplex immunoassay platform; blood will be drawn after a 10 hour fast.
Measured: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in interleukin 10 (IL-10) from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Measured in serum using a commercial multiplex immunoassay platform; blood will be drawn after a 10 hour fast.
Measured: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in interleukin 15 (IL-15) from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Measured in serum using a commercial multiplex immunoassay platform; blood will be drawn after a 10 hour fast.
Measured: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in fasting blood glucose glucose from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Plasma glucose assessed after a 10 hour fasting blood draw. Measured using an automated chemistry analyzer.
Measured: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in serum insulin from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Serum insulin collected after a 10 hour fasting blood draw.
Measured: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in serum lipids (mg/DL) from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL-C, and HDL-C will be assessed
Measured: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in insulin sensitivity (µIU/mL) from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Assessed by calculating homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) scores as: glucose (mg/dl) x insulin (μU/ml)/405.
Measured: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in exercise self-efficacy from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Assessed by the 12-item Exercise Self-Efficacy survey (Sallis et al.1987). The range of possible scores for this measure is 1-5, with higher scores indicating higher levels of physical activity self-efficacy.
Measured: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in self-regulation for physical activity from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Assessed by the 10- item Self-Regulation Scale from the Health Beliefs Survey (Anderson-Bill 2006). This scale assesses the use of behavioral strategies to incorporate physical activity into daily activities (i.e., take stairs instead of elevator, walking instead of driving when running errands). The range of possible scores for this measure is 1-5, with higher scores indicating higher levels of physical activity self-regulation.
Measured: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in social support for physical activity from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Assessed by the Social Support for Exercise survey developed by Sallis et al (1987). This scale assesses social support from family support (10-items, with a possible range of scores from 10-50) and friends (8-items, with a possible score range from from 8-40). Higher scores indicate greater levels of social support.
Measured: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in outcome expectations for physical activity from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Assessed using the 9-item Outcome Expectation Scale for Exercise scale, developed by Resnick (2000). The range of possible scores for this measure is 1-5, with higher scores indicating more positive expectancies associated with physical activity engagement.
Measured: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in behavioral capability for physical activity from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Assessed using a 6-item scale developed by the research team in previous research. The range of possible scores for this measure is 1-6, with higher scores indicating higher levels of behavioral capability of physical activity.
Measured: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Mar 2024
- Study start8 Apr 2024
- Primary completion31 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Mar 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Physical ActivityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Arizona State UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 210 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Arizona State University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06337708
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00017286
- Other IDs
- R01HL168170
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 29 Jan 2024
- Last updated
- 17 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Smart Walk: An Efficacy Trial of a Culturally Tailored Smartphone-Delivered Physical Activity Intervention for African American Women
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06337708
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY00017286
- Keywords
- mHealth, women's health, health equity, African American women, Black women, exercise, physical activity, heart disease
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 210 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Arizona State UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Study start
- 8 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to test a culturally tailored, smartphone-delivered intervention designed to increase physical activity and reduce risk for heart disease and type 2 diabetes among African American women.
Detailed description
This study addresses major public health concerns among African American women: physical inactivity and cardiometabolic disease risk.
African American women experience a high burden of cardiometabolic diseases, including heart disease, obesity, and type 2 diabetes. Regular aerobic physical activity is an established behavior to prevent and treat these conditions. Yet, the many African American women are insufficiently active, with only 27-40% meeting national aerobic physical activity guidelines.
This study will test the efficacy of Smart Walk, a culturally tailored, theory-based smartphone-delivered intervention designed to increase physical activity and improve cardiometabolic disease risk factors among African American women. In a 12-month trial, participants will be randomly assigned to either the Smart Walk intervention or a Fitbit-only comparison arm for an active 4-month intervention period, followed by an 8-month minimal contact follow-up period.
Specific Aims:
- Test the effects of Smart Walk to increase physical activity and promote adherence to national aerobic physical activity guidelines; compared to Fitbit-only comparison group.
- Test the effects of Smart Walk to improve cardiometabolic risk factors; compared to Fitbit-only comparison group.
- Compare cost and cost effectiveness of the two intervention groups from a societal perspective.
- Examine if protocol adherence predicts outcomes and potential mediation and moderation of intervention effects on physical activity and cardiometabolic outcomes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Smart Walk | Experimental | Behavioral: Smart WalkParticipants will receive a culturally tailored smartphone-delivered physical activity intervention. |
| Fitbit | Active comparator | Behavioral: FitbitParticipants will receive a Fitbit Inspire 3 activity monitor. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 24 to 65 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Self-reported African American/Black female
- Aged of 24-65 years
- Insufficiently Active (< 60 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per week as measured by Exercise Vital Sign Questionnaire)
- BMI > 25 kg/m2
- English speaking and reading
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Plans to relocate out of Phoenix area in next 12 months
- Endorsing an item on the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q), unless a doctor's note for study participation in provided
- Resting systolic blood pressure greater than 180 mmHG and/or a diastolic blood pressure greater than 120 mmHG , as assessed at baseline or at any other study assessment
- Self-reported participation in another diet or weight loss study at screening
- Pregnant or planning to become pregnant in the next 12 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Smart WalkSmart Walk is a culturally tailored, Social Cognitive Theory-based multi-component smartphone delivered physical activity (PA) promotion intervention that delivered through the Smart Walk application, virtual physical activity coaching, and text messages. The Smart Walk smartphone application includes four key features: 1) personal profile pages, 2) culturally relevant multi-media physical activity promotion modules, 3) discussion boards, and 4) physical activity self-monitoring/tracking feature that integrates with Fitbit activity monitors for participants to track their daily, weekly, and monthly activity. Virtual physical activity coaches will actively engage and facilitate group-based dialogue among participants on the app discussion boards and provide individualized, one-on-one PA coaching via telephone or commercially available app-based video teleconferencing software (i.e., FaceTime, Zoom, Google hangouts). | Behavioural | Smart Walk |
| FitbitThis intervention group will receive a Fitbit activity monitor and be encouraged to use the commercially available device to increase physical activity. | Behavioural | Fitbit |
Primary outcome
Change in accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Participants will wear wrist-worn ActiGraph GT9X Link Activity monitors the activity monitor on their non-dominant wrist during all waking hours for 7 consecutive days to provide an assessment of usual activity
Change in self-reported moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Assessed by the 7-Day Physical Activity Recall
19 secondary outcomes
Change in cardiorespiratory fitness from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in body weight from baseline to 4- and 12-months.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in body mass index from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in waste circumference from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in blood pressure (mmHG) from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in interleukin 6 (IL-6) from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in interleukin 10 (IL-10) from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in interleukin 15 (IL-15) from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in fasting blood glucose glucose from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in serum insulin from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in serum lipids (mg/DL) from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in insulin sensitivity (µIU/mL) from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in exercise self-efficacy from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in self-regulation for physical activity from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in social support for physical activity from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in outcome expectations for physical activity from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Change in behavioral capability for physical activity from baseline to 4- and 12-months
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jul 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Physical Activity
Recruiting
THE EFFECTS OF GAME-BASED EXERCISE PROGRAMS
Physical Activity, Body Image
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility of a Robot-Guided Active Play Intervention for Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Enrolling by invitation
Online Exercise Program for Transplant Patients: A Pilot Study
Kidney Transplantation, Physical Function
Recruiting
Effect of a Brief Daily Digital Meditation on Well-Being in US Young Adults (BEGIN II)
Mental Health and General Well-being
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Smart Walk and Fitbit in people with Physical Activity and Exercise, run by Arizona State University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Rodney P Joseph, PhD (602-496-0772, rodney.joseph@asu.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity from baseline to 4- and 12-months (time frame: Assessed at baseline, 4-months, 12-months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2026.