Diffuse Low Grade B-Cell LymphomaCART-SIENCT06339255
Italian Observational Study on CAR-T Therapy for Lymphoma
An observational study of Diffuse Low Grade B-Cell Lymphoma and Primary Mediastinal Large B-cell Lymphoma (PMBCL), run by Paolo Corradini at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The goal of this observational study on chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is to monitor the feasibility, efficacy, toxicity and biomarkers in a real life setting. Partecipants will be asked to agree to their clinical data collection and to partecipate to the optional biological study that aims to evaluate… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diffuse Low Grade B-Cell Lymphoma, Primary Mediastinal Large B-cell Lymphoma (PMBCL), Mantle Cell Lymphoma
- How many people
- 5,300 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 30 Oct 2019to 31 Dec 2029
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with diagnosis of DLCBL, PMBCL, MCL and FL eligible for CAR-T treatment with commercialy available products in Italy.
Who may be able to join
- Patients with diagnosis of DLCBL, PMBCL, MCL and FL eligible for CAR-T treatment with commercialy available products in Italy.
Who cannot join
- Not applicable
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori
Milan, 20133
Paolo Corradini, Professor, +39 02 2390 2950, paolo.corradini@istitutotumori.mi.it
Anisa Bermema, PhD, +39 02 2390 3145, anisa.bermema@istitutotumori.mi.it
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study on Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell Therapy for Lymphoma: Monitoring Feasibility, Efficacy, Toxicity and Biomarkers in a Real Life Setting
The goal of this observational study on chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is to monitor the feasibility, efficacy, toxicity and biomarkers in a real life setting.
Partecipants will be asked to agree to their clinical data collection and to partecipate to the optional biological study that aims to evaluate biomarkers of toxicity and response (clinical characteristics, cytokine profile, cellcomposition and type of the CAR-T cell product, lymphoma genomics). The study will evaluate even the disease response according to lugano criteria by PET and CT in routine clinical activity.
Read the detailed description
This observational prosopective multicenter study aims to:
- evaluate the feasibility of CAR T-cell treatment in the real-life setting, with particular regard to eligible patients versus those subjected to leukapheresis versus those finally treated.
- evaluate the survival outcome of PMBCL, DLBCL, MCL and FL patients treated with CAR T-cells versus those potentially eligible, but excluded from cellular therapy for other causes (either related to the patient or to the manufacturing);
- monitor the incidence of early and late AEs up to three year after CAR-T;
- evaluate disease response and immune recovery biomarkers at different time-points up after CAR-T (when clinically indicated or using blood sampling leftover);
- evaluate biomarkers of toxicity and response (clinical characteristics, cytokine profile, cell composition and type of the CAR T-cell product, lymphoma genomics).
- evaluate disease response according to Lugano criteria by PET and CT in routine clinical activity.
Primary Objective:
- Feasibility and efficacy of the treatment in the real life practice
Secondary Objectives:
- Evaluation of Outcome [Response rate (ORR), Overall survival (OS), Progression free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR) non-relapse mortality (NRM)] according to Lugano criteria.
- Evaluation of safety (CRS, neurotoxicity, infections, cytopenias, B cell aplasia, second malignancies) with particular attention to the safety in the new indications
- Evaluation of bridging therapy (outcome and safety)
- Evaluation of salvage therapy after CAR-T failure (outcome and safety)
- Comparison of the different CAR T-cell products (time from patient screening to infusion, disease response and safety)
- Comparison of the different histotypes (PMBCL, DLBCL, MCL FL) according to CAR-T cell products
Biological Studies
- Characterization of biomarkers of early response (circulating tumor cell free DNA versus PET and CT scans)
- Characterization of toxicity biomarkers
- Analysis of the immune reconstitution and CAR-T expression Radiomics Evaluation
- Influence of PET quantitative parameters (tMTV, Distance max, Distance max bulky, metabolic changes between baseline and +30 and +90 after CAR T-cell infusion (ΔSUV max) on outcome
- Influence of PET quantitative parameters (tMTV, Distance max, Distance max bulky, metabolic changes between baseline and +30 and +90 after CAR T-cell infusion (ΔSUV max) on outcome.
Primary endpoint:
to evaluate the percentage of patients infused versus those eligible and leukoapheresed to evaluate the overall response and survival at one year of the patients treated with CAR T cells.
Secondary endpoints:
Overall response rate (ORR) at 3-6-12-18 months Overall survival (OS) for all patients included in the study OS, Progression free survival (PFS), Event free survival (EFS), and duration of response (DoR), non-relapse mortality (NRM) after CAR T-cell therapy at one,two years and 5 years Incidence and grading of CRS and neurotoxicity Number of patients receiving a bridging therapy before lymphodepletion Intensive Care Unit admission rate for all treated patients Lymphoma genomics and circulating cell free DNA as early response biomarker Characterization of toxicity biomarkers Analysis of immune reconstitution and CAR-T expression Early Adverse event (grading/onset/severity/treatment) Long term Safety (AE grading/onset/severity/treatment) Incidence of second malignancies Evaluation of quantitative parameters of PET by central review, when applicable in selected sites This is an observational multicenter prospective study enrolling all consecutive patients referred to the Italian hematologic centers already qualified for CAR T-cell treatment with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, PMBCL, MCL and FL. The screening will be done according to the axi-cel, tisagen-cel, brexucabtagene autoleucel and lisocabtagene maraleucel label criteria, the eligibility of a given patient to CAR-T will be definedaccording to AIFA criteria.
All patients eligible to CAR-T will be consecutively enrolled Biological samples will be stored at each institution or centralized at the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano. Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) will be in charge of the GCP management of the study. Web-based CRF are prepared by FIL.
- Conditions
- Diffuse Low Grade B-Cell Lymphoma, Primary Mediastinal Large B-cell Lymphoma (PMBCL), Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Follicular Lymphoma
- Keywords
- CAR-T, Lymphoma
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell, Lymphoma, Follicular, Lymphoma
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility of the CAR-T cells treatment in lymphomas in the italian real life practice
Evaluate the feasibility of CAR T-cell treatment in the real-life setting, with particular regard to eligible patients versus those subjected to leukapheresis versus those finally treated. The percentage of patients infused will be estimated as the number of patients infused divided by the total number of those declared eligible; the corresponding exact confidence intervals at 95% will also be estimated.
Measured: 10 years enrollment, minimum 1 year follow-up
Efficacy of the CAR-T cells treatment in lymphomas in the italian real life practice
Evaluate the survival outcome of PMBCL, DLBCL, MCL and FL patients treated with CAR T-cells versus those potentially eligible, but excluded from cellular therapy for other causes (either related to the patient or to the manufacturing)
Measured: 10 years enrollment, minimum 1 year follow-up
Secondary outcomes (14)
Evaluation of Outcome: Overall Response rate (ORR), according to Lugano criteria.
Overall response rate (ORR): the percentage of responding patients will be estimated as the number of patients with complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) divided by the total number of patients assessable at each specific timepoint (3-6-12-18 months). Patients not assessable for response for any reason will be considered as non-responding in the calculation of the response rate. The exact 95% confidence intervals of the response percentage will also be estimated.
Measured: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Evaluation of Outcome: Overall survival (OS), according to Lugano criteria.
Overall survival (OS): time will be measured as the interval between the date of CAR-T infusion and the date of death for all causes, with censoring at the date of the latest follow-up in alive patients. OS curves will be estimated with the Kaplan Meier method.
Measured: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Evaluation of Outcome: Progression free survival (PFS)
Progression-free survival (PFS): time will be measured as the interval between the CAR-T infusion and the date of progression disease (PD), or death, whichever occurs first.
Measured: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Evaluation of Outcome: duration of response (DoR)
Duration of Response (DoR): for patients who will respond to treatment, the duration of response will be measured as the interval between the response achievement and the date of progression or death, whichever occurs first, with censoring at the date of the latest follow-up in alive patients without progression. DoR curves will be estimated with the Kaplan Meier method.
Measured: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Evaluation of Outcome: Overall Response rate (ORR)
Overall response rate (ORR): the percentage of responding patients will be estimated as the number of patients with complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) divided by the total number of patients assessable at each specific timepoint (3-6-12-18 months). Patients not assessable for response for any reason will be considered as non-responding in the calculation of the response rate. The exact 95% confidence intervals of the response percentage will also be estimated.
Measured: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Evaluation of Outcome: Overall survival (OS)
Overall survival (OS): time will be measured as the interval between the date of CAR-T infusion and the date of death for all causes, with censoring at the date of the latest follow-up in alive patients. OS curves will be estimated with the Kaplan Meier method.
Measured: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Evaluation of Outcome: non-relapse mortality (NRM)
Non-relapse mortality (NRM) after CAR-T cell therapy: time will be measured as the interval between the date of treatment start and the date of non-relapse death, with censoring at the date of the latest follow-up in alive patients without relapse. NRM cumulative incidence curves will be estimated regarding disease recurrence as competing event, and between groups comparisons will be performed using the Gray test.
Measured: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Evaluation of safety (CRS, neurotoxicity, infections, cytopenias, B cell aplasia, second malignancies) with particular attention to the safety in the new indications
CRS and ICANS will be measured according to ASCTC. Other toxicities will be measured according to CTCAE.
Measured: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Evaluation of bridging therapy: safety
Bridging therapy will be analysed in terms of safety as per adverse event occurrence (according to CTCAE).
Measured: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Evaluation of bridging therapy: efficay
Bridging therapy will be analysed in terms of efficacy in terms of response achievement compared to response assessment prior to bridging therapy.
Measured: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Evaluation of salvage therapy after CAR-T failure
In case of relapse after CAR-T, data regarding salvage therapy will be collected in terms of reponse (PFS)
Measured: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Evaluation of salvage therapy after CAR-T failure
In case of relapse after CAR-T, data regarding salvage therapy will be collected in terms of survival (OS).
Measured: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Comparison of the different CAR T-cell products (time from patient screening to infusion, disease response and safety)
Time form screening to infusion will be compared between CAR-T products, disease response will be evaluated in terms of CR, PR and SD.
Measured: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Comparison of the different histotypes (PMBCL, DLBCL, MCL FL) according to CAR-T cell products
Study popoulation will be analysed in terms of reponse and type CAR-T product.
Measured: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Apr 2024
- Study start30 Oct 2019
- Primary completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (28)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diffuse Low Grade B-Cell LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 5,300 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Paolo Corradini
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Annalisa Chiappella, Cristiana Carniti, Anna Dodero
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Paolo Corradini, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06339255
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- INT 180/19
- Acronym
- CART-SIE
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 4 Jan 2024
- Last updated
- 1 Apr 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Crump M, Neelapu SS, Farooq U, Van Den Neste E, Kuruvilla J, Westin J, Link BK, Hay A, Cerhan JR, Zhu L, Boussetta S, Feng L, Maurer MJ, Navale L, Wiezorek J, Go WY, Gisselbrecht C. Outcomes in refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results from the international SCHOLAR-1 study. Blood. 2017 Oct 19;130(16):1800-1808. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-03-769620. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
PubMed 28774879Neelapu SS, Locke FL, Bartlett NL, Lekakis LJ, Miklos DB, Jacobson CA, Braunschweig I, Oluwole OO, Siddiqi T, Lin Y, Timmerman JM, Stiff PJ, Friedberg JW, Flinn IW, Goy A, Hill BT, Smith MR, Deol A, Farooq U, McSweeney P, Munoz J, Avivi I, Castro JE, Westin JR, Chavez JC, Ghobadi A, Komanduri KV, Levy R, Jacobsen ED, Witzig TE, Reagan P, Bot A, Rossi J, Navale L, Jiang Y, Aycock J, Elias M, Chang D, Wiezorek J, Go WY. Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CAR T-Cell Therapy in Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 28;377(26):2531-2544. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707447. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
PubMed 29226797Locke FL, Ghobadi A, Jacobson CA, Miklos DB, Lekakis LJ, Oluwole OO, Lin Y, Braunschweig I, Hill BT, Timmerman JM, Deol A, Reagan PM, Stiff P, Flinn IW, Farooq U, Goy A, McSweeney PA, Munoz J, Siddiqi T, Chavez JC, Herrera AF, Bartlett NL, Wiezorek JS, Navale L, Xue A, Jiang Y, Bot A, Rossi JM, Kim JJ, Go WY, Neelapu SS. Long-term safety and activity of axicabtagene ciloleucel in refractory large B-cell lymphoma (ZUMA-1): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 1-2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):31-42. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30864-7. Epub 2018 Dec 2.
PubMed 30518502Neelapu SS, Jacobson CA, Ghobadi A, Miklos DB, Lekakis LJ, Oluwole OO, Lin Y, Braunschweig I, Hill BT, Timmerman JM, Deol A, Reagan PM, Stiff P, Flinn IW, Farooq U, Goy AH, McSweeney PA, Munoz J, Siddiqi T, Chavez JC, Herrera AF, Bartlett NL, Bot AA, Shen RR, Dong J, Singh K, Miao H, Kim JJ, Zheng Y, Locke FL. Five-year follow-up of ZUMA-1 supports the curative potential of axicabtagene ciloleucel in refractory large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2023 May 11;141(19):2307-2315. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022018893.
PubMed 36821768Schuster SJ, Tam CS, Borchmann P, Worel N, McGuirk JP, Holte H, Waller EK, Jaglowski S, Bishop MR, Damon LE, Foley SR, Westin JR, Fleury I, Ho PJ, Mielke S, Teshima T, Janakiram M, Hsu JM, Izutsu K, Kersten MJ, Ghosh M, Wagner-Johnston N, Kato K, Corradini P, Martinez-Prieto M, Han X, Tiwari R, Salles G, Maziarz RT. Long-term clinical outcomes of tisagenlecleucel in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas (JULIET): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Oct;22(10):1403-1415. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00375-2. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
PubMed 34516954Abramson JS, Palomba ML, Gordon LI, Lunning MA, Wang M, Arnason J, Mehta A, Purev E, Maloney DG, Andreadis C, Sehgal A, Solomon SR, Ghosh N, Albertson TM, Garcia J, Kostic A, Mallaney M, Ogasawara K, Newhall K, Kim Y, Li D, Siddiqi T. Lisocabtagene maraleucel for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas (TRANSCEND NHL 001): a multicentre seamless design study. Lancet. 2020 Sep 19;396(10254):839-852. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31366-0. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
PubMed 32888407Locke FL, Miklos DB, Jacobson CA, Perales MA, Kersten MJ, Oluwole OO, Ghobadi A, Rapoport AP, McGuirk J, Pagel JM, Munoz J, Farooq U, van Meerten T, Reagan PM, Sureda A, Flinn IW, Vandenberghe P, Song KW, Dickinson M, Minnema MC, Riedell PA, Leslie LA, Chaganti S, Yang Y, Filosto S, Shah J, Schupp M, To C, Cheng P, Gordon LI, Westin JR; All ZUMA-7 Investigators and Contributing Kite Members. Axicabtagene Ciloleucel as Second-Line Therapy for Large B-Cell Lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 17;386(7):640-654. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2116133. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
PubMed 34891224Abramson JS, Solomon SR, Arnason J, Johnston PB, Glass B, Bachanova V, Ibrahimi S, Mielke S, Mutsaers P, Hernandez-Ilizaliturri F, Izutsu K, Morschhauser F, Lunning M, Crotta A, Montheard S, Previtali A, Ogasawara K, Kamdar M. Lisocabtagene maraleucel as second-line therapy for large B-cell lymphoma: primary analysis of the phase 3 TRANSFORM study. Blood. 2023 Apr 6;141(14):1675-1684. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022018730.
PubMed 36542826Wang M, Munoz J, Goy A, Locke FL, Jacobson CA, Hill BT, Timmerman JM, Holmes H, Jaglowski S, Flinn IW, McSweeney PA, Miklos DB, Pagel JM, Kersten MJ, Milpied N, Fung H, Topp MS, Houot R, Beitinjaneh A, Peng W, Zheng L, Rossi JM, Jain RK, Rao AV, Reagan PM. KTE-X19 CAR T-Cell Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Mantle-Cell Lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 2;382(14):1331-1342. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1914347.
PubMed 32242358Monfrini C, Stella F, Aragona V, Magni M, Ljevar S, Vella C, Fardella E, Chiappella A, Nanetti F, Pennisi M, Dodero A, Guidetti A, Corradini P, Carniti C. Phenotypic Composition of Commercial Anti-CD19 CAR T Cells Affects In Vivo Expansion and Disease Response in Patients with Large B-cell Lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Aug 2;28(15):3378-3386. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-0164.
PubMed 35583610Lee DW, Santomasso BD, Locke FL, Ghobadi A, Turtle CJ, Brudno JN, Maus MV, Park JH, Mead E, Pavletic S, Go WY, Eldjerou L, Gardner RA, Frey N, Curran KJ, Peggs K, Pasquini M, DiPersio JF, van den Brink MRM, Komanduri KV, Grupp SA, Neelapu SS. ASTCT Consensus Grading for Cytokine Release Syndrome and Neurologic Toxicity Associated with Immune Effector Cells. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Apr;25(4):625-638. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.12.758. Epub 2018 Dec 25.
PubMed 30592986Biancon G, Gimondi S, Vendramin A, Carniti C, Corradini P. Noninvasive Molecular Monitoring in Multiple Myeloma Patients Using Cell-Free Tumor DNA: A Pilot Study. J Mol Diagn. 2018 Nov;20(6):859-870. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
PubMed 30165206Chapuy B, Stewart C, Dunford AJ, Kim J, Kamburov A, Redd RA, Lawrence MS, Roemer MGM, Li AJ, Ziepert M, Staiger AM, Wala JA, Ducar MD, Leshchiner I, Rheinbay E, Taylor-Weiner A, Coughlin CA, Hess JM, Pedamallu CS, Livitz D, Rosebrock D, Rosenberg M, Tracy AA, Horn H, van Hummelen P, Feldman AL, Link BK, Novak AJ, Cerhan JR, Habermann TM, Siebert R, Rosenwald A, Thorner AR, Meyerson ML, Golub TR, Beroukhim R, Wulf GG, Ott G, Rodig SJ, Monti S, Neuberg DS, Loeffler M, Pfreundschuh M, Trumper L, Getz G, Shipp MA. Molecular subtypes of diffuse large B cell lymphoma are associated with distinct pathogenic mechanisms and outcomes. Nat Med. 2018 May;24(5):679-690. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0016-8. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
PubMed 29713087Orlando EJ, Han X, Tribouley C, Wood PA, Leary RJ, Riester M, Levine JE, Qayed M, Grupp SA, Boyer M, De Moerloose B, Nemecek ER, Bittencourt H, Hiramatsu H, Buechner J, Davies SM, Verneris MR, Nguyen K, Brogdon JL, Bitter H, Morrissey M, Pierog P, Pantano S, Engelman JA, Winckler W. Genetic mechanisms of target antigen loss in CAR19 therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Med. 2018 Oct;24(10):1504-1506. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0146-z. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
PubMed 30275569Singh N, Perazzelli J, Grupp SA, Barrett DM. Early memory phenotypes drive T cell proliferation in patients with pediatric malignancies. Sci Transl Med. 2016 Jan 6;8(320):320ra3. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad5222.
PubMed 26738796
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Apr 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study on Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell Therapy for Lymphoma: Monitoring Feasibility, Efficacy, Toxicity and Biomarkers in a Real Life Setting
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06339255
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CART-SIE / INT 180/19
- Conditions
- Diffuse Low Grade B-Cell Lymphoma, Primary Mediastinal Large B-cell Lymphoma (PMBCL), Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Follicular Lymphoma
- Keywords
- CAR-T, Lymphoma
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 5,300 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Paolo CorradiniUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Annalisa Chiappella, Cristiana Carniti, Anna Dodero
- Study start
- 30 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this observational study on chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is to monitor the feasibility, efficacy, toxicity and biomarkers in a real life setting.
Partecipants will be asked to agree to their clinical data collection and to partecipate to the optional biological study that aims to evaluate biomarkers of toxicity and response (clinical characteristics, cytokine profile, cellcomposition and type of the CAR-T cell product, lymphoma genomics). The study will evaluate even the disease response according to lugano criteria by PET and CT in routine clinical activity.
Detailed description
This observational prosopective multicenter study aims to:
- evaluate the feasibility of CAR T-cell treatment in the real-life setting, with particular regard to eligible patients versus those subjected to leukapheresis versus those finally treated.
- evaluate the survival outcome of PMBCL, DLBCL, MCL and FL patients treated with CAR T-cells versus those potentially eligible, but excluded from cellular therapy for other causes (either related to the patient or to the manufacturing);
- monitor the incidence of early and late AEs up to three year after CAR-T;
- evaluate disease response and immune recovery biomarkers at different time-points up after CAR-T (when clinically indicated or using blood sampling leftover);
- evaluate biomarkers of toxicity and response (clinical characteristics, cytokine profile, cell composition and type of the CAR T-cell product, lymphoma genomics).
- evaluate disease response according to Lugano criteria by PET and CT in routine clinical activity.
Primary Objective:
- Feasibility and efficacy of the treatment in the real life practice
Secondary Objectives:
- Evaluation of Outcome [Response rate (ORR), Overall survival (OS), Progression free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR) non-relapse mortality (NRM)] according to Lugano criteria.
- Evaluation of safety (CRS, neurotoxicity, infections, cytopenias, B cell aplasia, second malignancies) with particular attention to the safety in the new indications
- Evaluation of bridging therapy (outcome and safety)
- Evaluation of salvage therapy after CAR-T failure (outcome and safety)
- Comparison of the different CAR T-cell products (time from patient screening to infusion, disease response and safety)
- Comparison of the different histotypes (PMBCL, DLBCL, MCL FL) according to CAR-T cell products
Biological Studies
- Characterization of biomarkers of early response (circulating tumor cell free DNA versus PET and CT scans)
- Characterization of toxicity biomarkers
- Analysis of the immune reconstitution and CAR-T expression Radiomics Evaluation
- Influence of PET quantitative parameters (tMTV, Distance max, Distance max bulky, metabolic changes between baseline and +30 and +90 after CAR T-cell infusion (ΔSUV max) on outcome
- Influence of PET quantitative parameters (tMTV, Distance max, Distance max bulky, metabolic changes between baseline and +30 and +90 after CAR T-cell infusion (ΔSUV max) on outcome.
Primary endpoint:
to evaluate the percentage of patients infused versus those eligible and leukoapheresed to evaluate the overall response and survival at one year of the patients treated with CAR T cells.
Secondary endpoints:
Overall response rate (ORR) at 3-6-12-18 months Overall survival (OS) for all patients included in the study OS, Progression free survival (PFS), Event free survival (EFS), and duration of response (DoR), non-relapse mortality (NRM) after CAR T-cell therapy at one,two years and 5 years Incidence and grading of CRS and neurotoxicity Number of patients receiving a bridging therapy before lymphodepletion Intensive Care Unit admission rate for all treated patients Lymphoma genomics and circulating cell free DNA as early response biomarker Characterization of toxicity biomarkers Analysis of immune reconstitution and CAR-T expression Early Adverse event (grading/onset/severity/treatment) Long term Safety (AE grading/onset/severity/treatment) Incidence of second malignancies Evaluation of quantitative parameters of PET by central review, when applicable in selected sites This is an observational multicenter prospective study enrolling all consecutive patients referred to the Italian hematologic centers already qualified for CAR T-cell treatment with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, PMBCL, MCL and FL. The screening will be done according to the axi-cel, tisagen-cel, brexucabtagene autoleucel and lisocabtagene maraleucel label criteria, the eligibility of a given patient to CAR-T will be definedaccording to AIFA criteria.
All patients eligible to CAR-T will be consecutively enrolled Biological samples will be stored at each institution or centralized at the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano. Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) will be in charge of the GCP management of the study. Web-based CRF are prepared by FIL.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with diagnosis of DLCBL, PMBCL, MCL and FL eligible for CAR-T treatment with commercialy available products in Italy.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with diagnosis of DLCBL, PMBCL, MCL and FL eligible for CAR-T treatment with commercialy available products in Italy.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Not applicable
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Feasibility of the CAR-T cells treatment in lymphomas in the italian real life practice
Time frame: 10 years enrollment, minimum 1 year follow-up
Evaluate the feasibility of CAR T-cell treatment in the real-life setting, with particular regard to eligible patients versus those subjected to leukapheresis versus those finally treated. The percentage of patients infused will be estimated as the number of patients infused divided by the total number of those declared eligible; the corresponding exact confidence intervals at 95% will also be estimated.
Efficacy of the CAR-T cells treatment in lymphomas in the italian real life practice
Time frame: 10 years enrollment, minimum 1 year follow-up
Evaluate the survival outcome of PMBCL, DLBCL, MCL and FL patients treated with CAR T-cells versus those potentially eligible, but excluded from cellular therapy for other causes (either related to the patient or to the manufacturing)
14 secondary outcomes
Evaluation of Outcome: Overall Response rate (ORR), according to Lugano criteria.
Time frame: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Evaluation of Outcome: Overall survival (OS), according to Lugano criteria.
Time frame: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Evaluation of Outcome: Progression free survival (PFS)
Time frame: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Evaluation of Outcome: duration of response (DoR)
Time frame: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Evaluation of Outcome: Overall Response rate (ORR)
Time frame: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Evaluation of Outcome: Overall survival (OS)
Time frame: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Evaluation of Outcome: non-relapse mortality (NRM)
Time frame: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Evaluation of safety (CRS, neurotoxicity, infections, cytopenias, B cell aplasia, second malignancies) with particular attention to the safety in the new indications
Time frame: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Evaluation of bridging therapy: safety
Time frame: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Evaluation of bridging therapy: efficay
Time frame: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Evaluation of salvage therapy after CAR-T failure
Time frame: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Evaluation of salvage therapy after CAR-T failure
Time frame: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Comparison of the different CAR T-cell products (time from patient screening to infusion, disease response and safety)
Time frame: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Comparison of the different histotypes (PMBCL, DLBCL, MCL FL) according to CAR-T cell products
Time frame: 10 years, minimum f-up 1 year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Apr 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 28774879Crump M, Neelapu SS, Farooq U, Van Den Neste E, Kuruvilla J, Westin J, Link BK, Hay A, Cerhan JR, Zhu L, Boussetta S, Feng L, Maurer MJ, Navale L, Wiezorek J, Go WY, Gisselbrecht C. Outcomes in refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results from the international SCHOLAR-1 study. Blood. 2017 Oct 19;130(16):1800-1808. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-03-769620. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 29226797Neelapu SS, Locke FL, Bartlett NL, Lekakis LJ, Miklos DB, Jacobson CA, Braunschweig I, Oluwole OO, Siddiqi T, Lin Y, Timmerman JM, Stiff PJ, Friedberg JW, Flinn IW, Goy A, Hill BT, Smith MR, Deol A, Farooq U, McSweeney P, Munoz J, Avivi I, Castro JE, Westin JR, Chavez JC, Ghobadi A, Komanduri KV, Levy R, Jacobsen ED, Witzig TE, Reagan P, Bot A, Rossi J, Navale L, Jiang Y, Aycock J, Elias M, Chang D, Wiezorek J, Go WY. Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CAR T-Cell Therapy in Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 28;377(26):2531-2544. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707447. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 30518502Locke FL, Ghobadi A, Jacobson CA, Miklos DB, Lekakis LJ, Oluwole OO, Lin Y, Braunschweig I, Hill BT, Timmerman JM, Deol A, Reagan PM, Stiff P, Flinn IW, Farooq U, Goy A, McSweeney PA, Munoz J, Siddiqi T, Chavez JC, Herrera AF, Bartlett NL, Wiezorek JS, Navale L, Xue A, Jiang Y, Bot A, Rossi JM, Kim JJ, Go WY, Neelapu SS. Long-term safety and activity of axicabtagene ciloleucel in refractory large B-cell lymphoma (ZUMA-1): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 1-2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):31-42. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30864-7. Epub 2018 Dec 2.
- Results publication: PubMed 36821768Neelapu SS, Jacobson CA, Ghobadi A, Miklos DB, Lekakis LJ, Oluwole OO, Lin Y, Braunschweig I, Hill BT, Timmerman JM, Deol A, Reagan PM, Stiff P, Flinn IW, Farooq U, Goy AH, McSweeney PA, Munoz J, Siddiqi T, Chavez JC, Herrera AF, Bartlett NL, Bot AA, Shen RR, Dong J, Singh K, Miao H, Kim JJ, Zheng Y, Locke FL. Five-year follow-up of ZUMA-1 supports the curative potential of axicabtagene ciloleucel in refractory large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2023 May 11;141(19):2307-2315. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022018893.
- Results publication: PubMed 34516954Schuster SJ, Tam CS, Borchmann P, Worel N, McGuirk JP, Holte H, Waller EK, Jaglowski S, Bishop MR, Damon LE, Foley SR, Westin JR, Fleury I, Ho PJ, Mielke S, Teshima T, Janakiram M, Hsu JM, Izutsu K, Kersten MJ, Ghosh M, Wagner-Johnston N, Kato K, Corradini P, Martinez-Prieto M, Han X, Tiwari R, Salles G, Maziarz RT. Long-term clinical outcomes of tisagenlecleucel in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas (JULIET): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Oct;22(10):1403-1415. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00375-2. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 32888407Abramson JS, Palomba ML, Gordon LI, Lunning MA, Wang M, Arnason J, Mehta A, Purev E, Maloney DG, Andreadis C, Sehgal A, Solomon SR, Ghosh N, Albertson TM, Garcia J, Kostic A, Mallaney M, Ogasawara K, Newhall K, Kim Y, Li D, Siddiqi T. Lisocabtagene maraleucel for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas (TRANSCEND NHL 001): a multicentre seamless design study. Lancet. 2020 Sep 19;396(10254):839-852. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31366-0. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 34891224Locke FL, Miklos DB, Jacobson CA, Perales MA, Kersten MJ, Oluwole OO, Ghobadi A, Rapoport AP, McGuirk J, Pagel JM, Munoz J, Farooq U, van Meerten T, Reagan PM, Sureda A, Flinn IW, Vandenberghe P, Song KW, Dickinson M, Minnema MC, Riedell PA, Leslie LA, Chaganti S, Yang Y, Filosto S, Shah J, Schupp M, To C, Cheng P, Gordon LI, Westin JR; All ZUMA-7 Investigators and Contributing Kite Members. Axicabtagene Ciloleucel as Second-Line Therapy for Large B-Cell Lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 17;386(7):640-654. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2116133. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 36542826Abramson JS, Solomon SR, Arnason J, Johnston PB, Glass B, Bachanova V, Ibrahimi S, Mielke S, Mutsaers P, Hernandez-Ilizaliturri F, Izutsu K, Morschhauser F, Lunning M, Crotta A, Montheard S, Previtali A, Ogasawara K, Kamdar M. Lisocabtagene maraleucel as second-line therapy for large B-cell lymphoma: primary analysis of the phase 3 TRANSFORM study. Blood. 2023 Apr 6;141(14):1675-1684. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022018730.
- Results publication: PubMed 32242358Wang M, Munoz J, Goy A, Locke FL, Jacobson CA, Hill BT, Timmerman JM, Holmes H, Jaglowski S, Flinn IW, McSweeney PA, Miklos DB, Pagel JM, Kersten MJ, Milpied N, Fung H, Topp MS, Houot R, Beitinjaneh A, Peng W, Zheng L, Rossi JM, Jain RK, Rao AV, Reagan PM. KTE-X19 CAR T-Cell Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Mantle-Cell Lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 2;382(14):1331-1342. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1914347.
- Results publication: PubMed 35583610Monfrini C, Stella F, Aragona V, Magni M, Ljevar S, Vella C, Fardella E, Chiappella A, Nanetti F, Pennisi M, Dodero A, Guidetti A, Corradini P, Carniti C. Phenotypic Composition of Commercial Anti-CD19 CAR T Cells Affects In Vivo Expansion and Disease Response in Patients with Large B-cell Lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Aug 2;28(15):3378-3386. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-0164.
- Results publication: PubMed 30592986Lee DW, Santomasso BD, Locke FL, Ghobadi A, Turtle CJ, Brudno JN, Maus MV, Park JH, Mead E, Pavletic S, Go WY, Eldjerou L, Gardner RA, Frey N, Curran KJ, Peggs K, Pasquini M, DiPersio JF, van den Brink MRM, Komanduri KV, Grupp SA, Neelapu SS. ASTCT Consensus Grading for Cytokine Release Syndrome and Neurologic Toxicity Associated with Immune Effector Cells. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Apr;25(4):625-638. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.12.758. Epub 2018 Dec 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 30165206Biancon G, Gimondi S, Vendramin A, Carniti C, Corradini P. Noninvasive Molecular Monitoring in Multiple Myeloma Patients Using Cell-Free Tumor DNA: A Pilot Study. J Mol Diagn. 2018 Nov;20(6):859-870. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diffuse Low Grade B-Cell Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Glofitamab as a Bridge to and/or Consolidation Post Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Patients With Relapsed B Cell Lymphomas
Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Refractory
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Low Dose Radiation as Bridging Therapy in Relapsed B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
DLBCL - Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma, High-grade B-cell Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2/3
NexCAR19 (Talikabtagene Autoleucel) in Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Malignancies (NexCAR19)
Relapsed/Refractory B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL), Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Study of Oral MRT-2359 in Selected Cancer Patients
NSCLC, SCLC
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Diffuse Low Grade B-Cell Lymphoma and Primary Mediastinal Large B-cell Lymphoma (PMBCL), run by Paolo Corradini at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Paolo Corradini, Professor (+39 02 2390 2950, paolo.corradini@istitutotumori.mi.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility of the CAR-T cells treatment in lymphomas in the italian real life practice (time frame: 10 years enrollment, minimum 1 year follow-up). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06339255, which also lists 28 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2024.