AzTrials
AzTrials

Gastroesophageal RefluxNCT06339801

Role of Mucosal Impedance Measurement for the Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

An observational study of Gastroesophageal Reflux, run by Hospital de Clinicas José de San Martín at 1 site in Argentina.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Existing current tests for diagnosing GERD are suboptimal because they lack adequate sensitivity or specificity. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is highly specific for diagnosing GERD, particularly when erosive esophagitis is present (Los Angeles Classification B, C, or D). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Gastroesophageal Reflux
What is being tested?
MiVu
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteArgentina
Study dates
12 Dec 2024to 1 Aug 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients \>18 years presenting symptoms of GERD that have not adequately responded to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treatment after 8 weeks and have undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) without erosive esophagitis. Patients with a broad spectrum of severity, assessed through the GERDq score, will be included

Who may be able to join

  • Patients \>18 years presenting symptoms of GERD that have not adequately responded to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treatment after 8 weeks and have undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) without erosive esophagitis.
  • Patients with a broad spectrum of severity, assessed through the GERDq score, will be included

Who cannot join

  • ● Pregnancy or lactation
  • Esophageal disorders (esophageal motor disorders, eosinophilic esophagitis, neoplastic diseases)
  • Uncontrolled systemic diseases (diabetes mellitus, hypo- or hyperthyroidism, cancer, etc.)
  • Lack of informed consent
  • Severe psychiatric disorders

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

MARIA M PISKORZ, MD contact

5491133192885

neurogastrohc@gmail.com

JORGE A OLMOS, MD contact

5491154128577

jorge.a.olmos@gmail.com

Argentina1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Hospital de Clinicas

    Buenos Aires, 1119

    MARIA M PISKORZ, MD, 541159508794, neurogastrohc@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Argentina

About this study

Existing current tests for diagnosing GERD are suboptimal because they lack adequate sensitivity or specificity. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is highly specific for diagnosing GERD, particularly when erosive esophagitis is present (Los Angeles Classification B, C, or D). Nevertheless, its sensitivity is limited, as this scenario is only present in 30% of cases. Most patients will exhibit normal endoscopic findings, indicating Non-Erosive Reflux Disease (NERD). The 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring (MII) is currently considered the gold standard. However, its main limitation is that it can only measure reflux activity over a 24-hour period, in addition to the discomfort caused by the catheter. 6-8 It is noteworthy that 50% of patients with NERD will have pathological reflux, and the other 50% will have a sensory disorder. The importance of making an accurate diagnosis lies in the treatment, which varies in each case.11 Recently, a minimally invasive device was developed and validated in the USA to assess changes in esophageal mucosal impedance. This serves as a tool for evaluating tissue changes associated with chronic reflux. However, this device has recently undergone improvements. This new technology has not been tested yet for GERD diagnosis. The primary benefit would be the ability to diagnose GERD in symptomatic patients with NERD during the initial endoscopy conducted under sedation.

Objectives

Read more

The Main objectives of this study are to:

  1. Evaluate the diagnostic performance of mucosal impedance measurement.
  2. Investigate the mucosal impedance pattern in patients with and without GERD.

Secondary objectives:

  1. Evaluate the correlation between the global mucosal impedance measurement vs the first 3cm measurement
  2. Evaluate the best probability score to distinguish between GERD and non-GERD Design Prospective, cross-sectional, and analytical study Study Design and Procedures The study will be conducted in the Gastroenterology Department of the Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martin, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Following a 4-week screening period during which a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) washout will be performed, and baseline measurements will be taken, all patients will undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with mucosal impedance measurement and 24-hour impedance/pH monitoring.
Read the detailed description

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) occurs when gastroduodenal content refluxes, causing bothersome symptoms and/or complications. 1 It is estimated that GERD affects 20-30% of the population in Western countries 2 (23% in Argentina), and it is associated with an impairment in the quality of life and significant healthcare costs. 3-5 Existing current tests for diagnosing GERD are suboptimal because they lack adequate sensitivity or specificity. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is highly specific for diagnosing GERD, particularly when erosive esophagitis is present (Los Angeles Classification B, C, or D). Nevertheless, its sensitivity is limited, as this scenario is only present in 30% of cases. Most patients will exhibit normal endoscopic findings, indicating Non-Erosive Reflux Disease (NERD). The 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring (MII) is currently considered the gold standard. However, its main limitation is that it can only measure reflux activity over a 24-hour period, in addition to the discomfort caused by the catheter. 6-8 The last Lyon Consensus considered GERD when erosive esophagitis is present (Los Angeles Classification B, C, or D) or acid exposure time (AET) is \>6% on ambulatory studies. Acid exposure time \<4% definitively rules out pathologic gastroesophageal acid reflux, while AET between 4-6% is considered borderline. 9,10 It is noteworthy that 50% of patients with NERD will have pathological reflux, and the other 50% will have a sensory disorder. The importance of making an accurate diagnosis lies in the treatment, which varies in each case.11 Recently, a minimally invasive device was developed and validated in the USA to assess changes in esophageal mucosal impedance. This serves as a tool for evaluating tissue changes associated with chronic reflux.12 However, this device has recently undergone improvements. This new technology has not been tested yet for GERD diagnosis. The primary benefit would be the ability to diagnose GERD in symptomatic patients with NERD during the initial endoscopy conducted under sedation.

Objectives

The Main objectives of this study are to:

  1. Evaluate the diagnostic performance of mucosal impedance measurement.
  2. Investigate the mucosal impedance pattern in patients with and without GERD.

Secondary objectives:

  1. Evaluate the correlation between the global mucosal impedance measurement vs the first 3cm measurement
  2. Evaluate the best probability score to distinguish between GERD and non-GERD Design Prospective, cross-sectional, and analytical study METHODS Participants, Interventions, and Outcomes. Study Setting Inclusion Criteria Patients \>18 years presenting symptoms of GERD that have not adequately responded to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treatment after 8 weeks and have undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) without erosive esophagitis.

Patients with a broad spectrum of severity, assessed through the GERDq score, will be included Exclusion Criteria

  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Esophageal disorders (esophageal motor disorders, eosinophilic esophagitis, neoplastic diseases)
  • Uncontrolled systemic diseases (diabetes mellitus, hypo- or hyperthyroidism, cancer, etc.)
  • Lack of informed consent
  • Severe psychiatric disorders Study Design and Procedures The study will be conducted in the Gastroenterology Department of the Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martin, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Following a 4-week screening period during which a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) washout will be performed, and baseline measurements will be taken, all patients will undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with mucosal impedance measurement and 24-hour impedance/pH monitoring.

Intervention All patients will undergo mucosal impedance (MI) measurement using the MiVu™ Mucosal Integrity Testing System (Diversatek Healthcare, Inc.). The MiVu™ Mucosal Integrity Testing System utilizes a device (MiVu™ Endo Cap) that attaches to the distal end of the endoscope, along with proprietary software to instantly detect changes in esophageal mucosal integrity during endoscopy. Patients are required to fast for 8 hours before the procedure. During an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy under anesthesia sedation, measurements are taken from direct contact of the sensors with the esophageal mucosa. Any luminal air or liquid between the sensors and mucosal tissue will be pressed away from the tissue being measured. After identifying the gastroesophageal junction, measurements will be initiated 2cm above it. The endoscopist will wait until all 3 sensors make stable contact with the mucosa, indicated by high-quality signals marked in green color by the software. The Study Metrics require data spanning 10 consecutive centimeters. Each measurement capture will span 3 cm, and a minimum of 4 measurements spanning 10 cm are required. Once measurements have been captured at 4 depths, the metrics will populate. MI measurements will be expressed in Ohms and analyzed using the ZVU software version 3.3 or greater (Diversatek Healthcare, Inc.). Once 10 centimeters worth of consecutive data have been acquired, the probabilities of disease will be displayed and patients will be categorized as: 1) NERD and 2) Non-NERD based on the measurement result. The results will be expressed in Ohms, and the interpretation will be based on the results from table 2 in the previous MI validation publication.14 Subsequently, a 24-hour impedance/pH monitoring without proton pump inhibitors (PPI), preceded by high-resolution esophageal manometry to identify the lower esophageal sphincter height, will be performed. Both assessments will be conducted by different operators in a blind and independent manner.

Patients will be divided into two groups: A) NERD: when the percentage of time of acid exposure is greater than 6%, B) Non-NERD: when the percentage of acid exposure is less than 4%. The Demeester score will be reported for both groups.

Treatment response evaluation

Based on the previously described categorization, the following treatment will be initiated:

  1. Dexlansoprazole 30mg per day in the GERD group
  2. Amitriptyline 10mg per day in the non-GERD group At 8 weeks post-treatment, a GerdQ assessment will be conducted. Sample Size Considering an estimated sensitivity of mucosal impedance measurement for the diagnosis of GERD of 70%, a sample size of 100 patients was calculated. Factoring in a 20% patient loss, a total of 120 patients will be screened.
Being tested
MiVu
Keywords
gastroesophageal reflux, mucosal impedance
Medical subject headings
Gastroesophageal Reflux

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MiVuDevice

    All patients will undergo mucosal impedance (MI) measurement using the MiVu™ Mucosal Integrity Testing System (Diversatek Healthcare, Inc.).

Study groups in NCT06339801
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
GERD groupPatients >18 years presenting symptoms of GERD that have not adequately responded to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treatment after 8 weeks and have undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) without erosive esophagitis. Patients with a broad spectrum of severity, assessed through the GERDq score, will be included
Receives: Device: MiVu

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. diagnostic performance

    diagnostic performance of mucosal impedance measurement

    Measured: immediately after the intervention/procedure

  2. mucosal impedance pattern

    mucosal impedance pattern in patients with and without GERD.

    Measured: immediately after the intervention/procedure

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Correlations

    correlation between the global mucosal impedance measurement vs the first 3cm measurement

    Measured: immediately after the intervention/procedure

  2. Probability score

    the best probability score to distinguish between GERD and non-GERD

    Measured: immediately after the intervention/procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Apr 2024
  2. Study start12 Dec 2024
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Aug 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case crossover
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06339801
Sponsor's protocol ID
HCJSM-24-193
Status last verified
Jan 2025
First submitted
19 Mar 2024
Last updated
3 Jan 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Martinez SD, Malagon IB, Garewal HS, Cui H, Fass R. Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)--acid reflux and symptom patterns. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Feb 15;17(4):537-45. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01423.x.

    PubMed 12622762
  • Gyawali CP, Yadlapati R, Fass R, Katzka D, Pandolfino J, Savarino E, Sifrim D, Spechler S, Zerbib F, Fox MR, Bhatia S, de Bortoli N, Cho YK, Cisternas D, Chen CL, Cock C, Hani A, Remes Troche JM, Xiao Y, Vaezi MF, Roman S. Updates to the modern diagnosis of GERD: Lyon consensus 2.0. Gut. 2024 Jan 5;73(2):361-371. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330616.

    PubMed 37734911

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Gastroesophageal Reflux, run by Hospital de Clinicas José de San Martín at 1 site in Argentina.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Argentina. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact MARIA M PISKORZ, MD (5491133192885, neurogastrohc@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

diagnostic performance (time frame: immediately after the intervention/procedure). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06339801, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jan 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in