Gastroesophageal RefluxNCT06339801
Role of Mucosal Impedance Measurement for the Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
An observational study of Gastroesophageal Reflux, run by Hospital de Clinicas José de San Martín at 1 site in Argentina.
Trial summary
Existing current tests for diagnosing GERD are suboptimal because they lack adequate sensitivity or specificity. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is highly specific for diagnosing GERD, particularly when erosive esophagitis is present (Los Angeles Classification B, C, or D). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastroesophageal Reflux
- What is being tested?
- MiVu
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteArgentina
- Study dates
- 12 Dec 2024to 1 Aug 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients \>18 years presenting symptoms of GERD that have not adequately responded to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treatment after 8 weeks and have undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) without erosive esophagitis. Patients with a broad spectrum of severity, assessed through the GERDq score, will be included
Who may be able to join
- Patients \>18 years presenting symptoms of GERD that have not adequately responded to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treatment after 8 weeks and have undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) without erosive esophagitis.
- Patients with a broad spectrum of severity, assessed through the GERDq score, will be included
Who cannot join
- ● Pregnancy or lactation
- Esophageal disorders (esophageal motor disorders, eosinophilic esophagitis, neoplastic diseases)
- Uncontrolled systemic diseases (diabetes mellitus, hypo- or hyperthyroidism, cancer, etc.)
- Lack of informed consent
- Severe psychiatric disorders
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Argentina1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital de Clinicas
Buenos Aires, 1119
MARIA M PISKORZ, MD, 541159508794, neurogastrohc@gmail.com
About this study
Existing current tests for diagnosing GERD are suboptimal because they lack adequate sensitivity or specificity. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is highly specific for diagnosing GERD, particularly when erosive esophagitis is present (Los Angeles Classification B, C, or D). Nevertheless, its sensitivity is limited, as this scenario is only present in 30% of cases. Most patients will exhibit normal endoscopic findings, indicating Non-Erosive Reflux Disease (NERD). The 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring (MII) is currently considered the gold standard. However, its main limitation is that it can only measure reflux activity over a 24-hour period, in addition to the discomfort caused by the catheter. 6-8 It is noteworthy that 50% of patients with NERD will have pathological reflux, and the other 50% will have a sensory disorder. The importance of making an accurate diagnosis lies in the treatment, which varies in each case.11 Recently, a minimally invasive device was developed and validated in the USA to assess changes in esophageal mucosal impedance. This serves as a tool for evaluating tissue changes associated with chronic reflux. However, this device has recently undergone improvements. This new technology has not been tested yet for GERD diagnosis. The primary benefit would be the ability to diagnose GERD in symptomatic patients with NERD during the initial endoscopy conducted under sedation.
Objectives
Read more
The Main objectives of this study are to:
- Evaluate the diagnostic performance of mucosal impedance measurement.
- Investigate the mucosal impedance pattern in patients with and without GERD.
Secondary objectives:
- Evaluate the correlation between the global mucosal impedance measurement vs the first 3cm measurement
- Evaluate the best probability score to distinguish between GERD and non-GERD Design Prospective, cross-sectional, and analytical study Study Design and Procedures The study will be conducted in the Gastroenterology Department of the Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martin, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Following a 4-week screening period during which a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) washout will be performed, and baseline measurements will be taken, all patients will undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with mucosal impedance measurement and 24-hour impedance/pH monitoring.
Read the detailed description
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) occurs when gastroduodenal content refluxes, causing bothersome symptoms and/or complications. 1 It is estimated that GERD affects 20-30% of the population in Western countries 2 (23% in Argentina), and it is associated with an impairment in the quality of life and significant healthcare costs. 3-5 Existing current tests for diagnosing GERD are suboptimal because they lack adequate sensitivity or specificity. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is highly specific for diagnosing GERD, particularly when erosive esophagitis is present (Los Angeles Classification B, C, or D). Nevertheless, its sensitivity is limited, as this scenario is only present in 30% of cases. Most patients will exhibit normal endoscopic findings, indicating Non-Erosive Reflux Disease (NERD). The 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring (MII) is currently considered the gold standard. However, its main limitation is that it can only measure reflux activity over a 24-hour period, in addition to the discomfort caused by the catheter. 6-8 The last Lyon Consensus considered GERD when erosive esophagitis is present (Los Angeles Classification B, C, or D) or acid exposure time (AET) is \>6% on ambulatory studies. Acid exposure time \<4% definitively rules out pathologic gastroesophageal acid reflux, while AET between 4-6% is considered borderline. 9,10 It is noteworthy that 50% of patients with NERD will have pathological reflux, and the other 50% will have a sensory disorder. The importance of making an accurate diagnosis lies in the treatment, which varies in each case.11 Recently, a minimally invasive device was developed and validated in the USA to assess changes in esophageal mucosal impedance. This serves as a tool for evaluating tissue changes associated with chronic reflux.12 However, this device has recently undergone improvements. This new technology has not been tested yet for GERD diagnosis. The primary benefit would be the ability to diagnose GERD in symptomatic patients with NERD during the initial endoscopy conducted under sedation.
Objectives
The Main objectives of this study are to:
- Evaluate the diagnostic performance of mucosal impedance measurement.
- Investigate the mucosal impedance pattern in patients with and without GERD.
Secondary objectives:
- Evaluate the correlation between the global mucosal impedance measurement vs the first 3cm measurement
- Evaluate the best probability score to distinguish between GERD and non-GERD Design Prospective, cross-sectional, and analytical study METHODS Participants, Interventions, and Outcomes. Study Setting Inclusion Criteria Patients \>18 years presenting symptoms of GERD that have not adequately responded to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treatment after 8 weeks and have undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) without erosive esophagitis.
Patients with a broad spectrum of severity, assessed through the GERDq score, will be included Exclusion Criteria
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Esophageal disorders (esophageal motor disorders, eosinophilic esophagitis, neoplastic diseases)
- Uncontrolled systemic diseases (diabetes mellitus, hypo- or hyperthyroidism, cancer, etc.)
- Lack of informed consent
- Severe psychiatric disorders Study Design and Procedures The study will be conducted in the Gastroenterology Department of the Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martin, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Following a 4-week screening period during which a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) washout will be performed, and baseline measurements will be taken, all patients will undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with mucosal impedance measurement and 24-hour impedance/pH monitoring.
Intervention All patients will undergo mucosal impedance (MI) measurement using the MiVu™ Mucosal Integrity Testing System (Diversatek Healthcare, Inc.). The MiVu™ Mucosal Integrity Testing System utilizes a device (MiVu™ Endo Cap) that attaches to the distal end of the endoscope, along with proprietary software to instantly detect changes in esophageal mucosal integrity during endoscopy. Patients are required to fast for 8 hours before the procedure. During an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy under anesthesia sedation, measurements are taken from direct contact of the sensors with the esophageal mucosa. Any luminal air or liquid between the sensors and mucosal tissue will be pressed away from the tissue being measured. After identifying the gastroesophageal junction, measurements will be initiated 2cm above it. The endoscopist will wait until all 3 sensors make stable contact with the mucosa, indicated by high-quality signals marked in green color by the software. The Study Metrics require data spanning 10 consecutive centimeters. Each measurement capture will span 3 cm, and a minimum of 4 measurements spanning 10 cm are required. Once measurements have been captured at 4 depths, the metrics will populate. MI measurements will be expressed in Ohms and analyzed using the ZVU software version 3.3 or greater (Diversatek Healthcare, Inc.). Once 10 centimeters worth of consecutive data have been acquired, the probabilities of disease will be displayed and patients will be categorized as: 1) NERD and 2) Non-NERD based on the measurement result. The results will be expressed in Ohms, and the interpretation will be based on the results from table 2 in the previous MI validation publication.14 Subsequently, a 24-hour impedance/pH monitoring without proton pump inhibitors (PPI), preceded by high-resolution esophageal manometry to identify the lower esophageal sphincter height, will be performed. Both assessments will be conducted by different operators in a blind and independent manner.
Patients will be divided into two groups: A) NERD: when the percentage of time of acid exposure is greater than 6%, B) Non-NERD: when the percentage of acid exposure is less than 4%. The Demeester score will be reported for both groups.
Treatment response evaluation
Based on the previously described categorization, the following treatment will be initiated:
- Dexlansoprazole 30mg per day in the GERD group
- Amitriptyline 10mg per day in the non-GERD group At 8 weeks post-treatment, a GerdQ assessment will be conducted. Sample Size Considering an estimated sensitivity of mucosal impedance measurement for the diagnosis of GERD of 70%, a sample size of 100 patients was calculated. Factoring in a 20% patient loss, a total of 120 patients will be screened.
- Conditions
- Gastroesophageal Reflux
- Being tested
- MiVu
- Keywords
- gastroesophageal reflux, mucosal impedance
- Medical subject headings
- Gastroesophageal Reflux
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MiVuDevice
All patients will undergo mucosal impedance (MI) measurement using the MiVu™ Mucosal Integrity Testing System (Diversatek Healthcare, Inc.).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| GERD group | Patients >18 years presenting symptoms of GERD that have not adequately responded to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treatment after 8 weeks and have undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) without erosive esophagitis.
Patients with a broad spectrum of severity, assessed through the GERDq score, will be included Receives: Device: MiVu |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
diagnostic performance
diagnostic performance of mucosal impedance measurement
Measured: immediately after the intervention/procedure
mucosal impedance pattern
mucosal impedance pattern in patients with and without GERD.
Measured: immediately after the intervention/procedure
Secondary outcomes (2)
Correlations
correlation between the global mucosal impedance measurement vs the first 3cm measurement
Measured: immediately after the intervention/procedure
Probability score
the best probability score to distinguish between GERD and non-GERD
Measured: immediately after the intervention/procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Apr 2024
- Study start12 Dec 2024
- Primary completion1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Aug 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gastroesophageal RefluxStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case crossover
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital de Clinicas José de San Martín
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Maria Marta Piskorz, Hospital de Clinicas José de San Martín
- Investigators
- JORGE A OLMOS, MD, Principal investigator, HOSPITAL DE CLINICAS JOSE DE SAN MARTIN
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06339801
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HCJSM-24-193
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 19 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 3 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Martinez SD, Malagon IB, Garewal HS, Cui H, Fass R. Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)--acid reflux and symptom patterns. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Feb 15;17(4):537-45. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01423.x.
PubMed 12622762Gyawali CP, Yadlapati R, Fass R, Katzka D, Pandolfino J, Savarino E, Sifrim D, Spechler S, Zerbib F, Fox MR, Bhatia S, de Bortoli N, Cho YK, Cisternas D, Chen CL, Cock C, Hani A, Remes Troche JM, Xiao Y, Vaezi MF, Roman S. Updates to the modern diagnosis of GERD: Lyon consensus 2.0. Gut. 2024 Jan 5;73(2):361-371. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330616.
PubMed 37734911
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Role of Mucosal Impedance Measurement for the Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06339801
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HCJSM-24-193
- Conditions
- Gastroesophageal Reflux
- Keywords
- gastroesophageal reflux, mucosal impedance
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital de Clinicas José de San MartínUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 12 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Existing current tests for diagnosing GERD are suboptimal because they lack adequate sensitivity or specificity. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is highly specific for diagnosing GERD, particularly when erosive esophagitis is present (Los Angeles Classification B, C, or D). Nevertheless, its sensitivity is limited, as this scenario is only present in 30% of cases. Most patients will exhibit normal endoscopic findings, indicating Non-Erosive Reflux Disease (NERD). The 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring (MII) is currently considered the gold standard. However, its main limitation is that it can only measure reflux activity over a 24-hour period, in addition to the discomfort caused by the catheter. 6-8 It is noteworthy that 50% of patients with NERD will have pathological reflux, and the other 50% will have a sensory disorder. The importance of making an accurate diagnosis lies in the treatment, which varies in each case.11 Recently, a minimally invasive device was developed and validated in the USA to assess changes in esophageal mucosal impedance. This serves as a tool for evaluating tissue changes associated with chronic reflux. However, this device has recently undergone improvements. This new technology has not been tested yet for GERD diagnosis. The primary benefit would be the ability to diagnose GERD in symptomatic patients with NERD during the initial endoscopy conducted under sedation.
Objectives
The Main objectives of this study are to:
- Evaluate the diagnostic performance of mucosal impedance measurement.
- Investigate the mucosal impedance pattern in patients with and without GERD.
Secondary objectives:
- Evaluate the correlation between the global mucosal impedance measurement vs the first 3cm measurement
- Evaluate the best probability score to distinguish between GERD and non-GERD Design Prospective, cross-sectional, and analytical study Study Design and Procedures The study will be conducted in the Gastroenterology Department of the Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martin, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Following a 4-week screening period during which a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) washout will be performed, and baseline measurements will be taken, all patients will undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with mucosal impedance measurement and 24-hour impedance/pH monitoring.
Detailed description
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) occurs when gastroduodenal content refluxes, causing bothersome symptoms and/or complications. 1 It is estimated that GERD affects 20-30% of the population in Western countries 2 (23% in Argentina), and it is associated with an impairment in the quality of life and significant healthcare costs. 3-5 Existing current tests for diagnosing GERD are suboptimal because they lack adequate sensitivity or specificity. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is highly specific for diagnosing GERD, particularly when erosive esophagitis is present (Los Angeles Classification B, C, or D). Nevertheless, its sensitivity is limited, as this scenario is only present in 30% of cases. Most patients will exhibit normal endoscopic findings, indicating Non-Erosive Reflux Disease (NERD). The 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring (MII) is currently considered the gold standard. However, its main limitation is that it can only measure reflux activity over a 24-hour period, in addition to the discomfort caused by the catheter. 6-8 The last Lyon Consensus considered GERD when erosive esophagitis is present (Los Angeles Classification B, C, or D) or acid exposure time (AET) is \>6% on ambulatory studies. Acid exposure time \<4% definitively rules out pathologic gastroesophageal acid reflux, while AET between 4-6% is considered borderline. 9,10 It is noteworthy that 50% of patients with NERD will have pathological reflux, and the other 50% will have a sensory disorder. The importance of making an accurate diagnosis lies in the treatment, which varies in each case.11 Recently, a minimally invasive device was developed and validated in the USA to assess changes in esophageal mucosal impedance. This serves as a tool for evaluating tissue changes associated with chronic reflux.12 However, this device has recently undergone improvements. This new technology has not been tested yet for GERD diagnosis. The primary benefit would be the ability to diagnose GERD in symptomatic patients with NERD during the initial endoscopy conducted under sedation.
Objectives
The Main objectives of this study are to:
- Evaluate the diagnostic performance of mucosal impedance measurement.
- Investigate the mucosal impedance pattern in patients with and without GERD.
Secondary objectives:
- Evaluate the correlation between the global mucosal impedance measurement vs the first 3cm measurement
- Evaluate the best probability score to distinguish between GERD and non-GERD Design Prospective, cross-sectional, and analytical study METHODS Participants, Interventions, and Outcomes. Study Setting Inclusion Criteria Patients \>18 years presenting symptoms of GERD that have not adequately responded to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treatment after 8 weeks and have undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) without erosive esophagitis.
Patients with a broad spectrum of severity, assessed through the GERDq score, will be included Exclusion Criteria
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Esophageal disorders (esophageal motor disorders, eosinophilic esophagitis, neoplastic diseases)
- Uncontrolled systemic diseases (diabetes mellitus, hypo- or hyperthyroidism, cancer, etc.)
- Lack of informed consent
- Severe psychiatric disorders Study Design and Procedures The study will be conducted in the Gastroenterology Department of the Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martin, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Following a 4-week screening period during which a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) washout will be performed, and baseline measurements will be taken, all patients will undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with mucosal impedance measurement and 24-hour impedance/pH monitoring.
Intervention All patients will undergo mucosal impedance (MI) measurement using the MiVu™ Mucosal Integrity Testing System (Diversatek Healthcare, Inc.). The MiVu™ Mucosal Integrity Testing System utilizes a device (MiVu™ Endo Cap) that attaches to the distal end of the endoscope, along with proprietary software to instantly detect changes in esophageal mucosal integrity during endoscopy. Patients are required to fast for 8 hours before the procedure. During an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy under anesthesia sedation, measurements are taken from direct contact of the sensors with the esophageal mucosa. Any luminal air or liquid between the sensors and mucosal tissue will be pressed away from the tissue being measured. After identifying the gastroesophageal junction, measurements will be initiated 2cm above it. The endoscopist will wait until all 3 sensors make stable contact with the mucosa, indicated by high-quality signals marked in green color by the software. The Study Metrics require data spanning 10 consecutive centimeters. Each measurement capture will span 3 cm, and a minimum of 4 measurements spanning 10 cm are required. Once measurements have been captured at 4 depths, the metrics will populate. MI measurements will be expressed in Ohms and analyzed using the ZVU software version 3.3 or greater (Diversatek Healthcare, Inc.). Once 10 centimeters worth of consecutive data have been acquired, the probabilities of disease will be displayed and patients will be categorized as: 1) NERD and 2) Non-NERD based on the measurement result. The results will be expressed in Ohms, and the interpretation will be based on the results from table 2 in the previous MI validation publication.14 Subsequently, a 24-hour impedance/pH monitoring without proton pump inhibitors (PPI), preceded by high-resolution esophageal manometry to identify the lower esophageal sphincter height, will be performed. Both assessments will be conducted by different operators in a blind and independent manner.
Patients will be divided into two groups: A) NERD: when the percentage of time of acid exposure is greater than 6%, B) Non-NERD: when the percentage of acid exposure is less than 4%. The Demeester score will be reported for both groups.
Treatment response evaluation
Based on the previously described categorization, the following treatment will be initiated:
- Dexlansoprazole 30mg per day in the GERD group
- Amitriptyline 10mg per day in the non-GERD group At 8 weeks post-treatment, a GerdQ assessment will be conducted. Sample Size Considering an estimated sensitivity of mucosal impedance measurement for the diagnosis of GERD of 70%, a sample size of 100 patients was calculated. Factoring in a 20% patient loss, a total of 120 patients will be screened.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case crossover
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| GERD group | – | Device: MiVuPatients >18 years presenting symptoms of GERD that have not adequately responded to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treatment after 8 weeks and have undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) without erosive esophagitis. Patients with a broad spectrum of severity, assessed through the GERDq score, will be included |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients \>18 years presenting symptoms of GERD that have not adequately responded to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treatment after 8 weeks and have undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) without erosive esophagitis. Patients with a broad spectrum of severity, assessed through the GERDq score, will be included
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients \>18 years presenting symptoms of GERD that have not adequately responded to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treatment after 8 weeks and have undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) without erosive esophagitis.
- Patients with a broad spectrum of severity, assessed through the GERDq score, will be included
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- ● Pregnancy or lactation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MiVuAll patients will undergo mucosal impedance (MI) measurement using the MiVu™ Mucosal Integrity Testing System (Diversatek Healthcare, Inc.). | Device | GERD group |
Primary outcome
diagnostic performance
Time frame: immediately after the intervention/procedure
diagnostic performance of mucosal impedance measurement
mucosal impedance pattern
Time frame: immediately after the intervention/procedure
mucosal impedance pattern in patients with and without GERD.
2 secondary outcomes
Correlations
Time frame: immediately after the intervention/procedure
Probability score
Time frame: immediately after the intervention/procedure
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Jan 2025.
- Background: PubMed 12622762Martinez SD, Malagon IB, Garewal HS, Cui H, Fass R. Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)--acid reflux and symptom patterns. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Feb 15;17(4):537-45. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01423.x.
- Background: PubMed 37734911Gyawali CP, Yadlapati R, Fass R, Katzka D, Pandolfino J, Savarino E, Sifrim D, Spechler S, Zerbib F, Fox MR, Bhatia S, de Bortoli N, Cho YK, Cisternas D, Chen CL, Cock C, Hani A, Remes Troche JM, Xiao Y, Vaezi MF, Roman S. Updates to the modern diagnosis of GERD: Lyon consensus 2.0. Gut. 2024 Jan 5;73(2):361-371. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330616.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Gastroesophageal Reflux
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Long-term Administration of K-CAB Tab./K-CAB ODT(Tegoprazan) 25 mg as Maintenance Therapy Following the Treatment of GERD
Maintenance Therapy Following Treatment for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(GERD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
RETHINK REFLUX Registry
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Recruiting
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Symptomatic Mitral Regurgitation - APOLLO-EU Trial
Mitral Regurgitation
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Tirzepatide on Esophagogastric Junction Mechanics, Reflux Burden, and Gastric Physiology in Adults With Obesity
Obese Adults
Recruiting
Mesh Vs Pledgets for Repair of Paraesophageal Hernia
Paraesophageal Hernia, GERD
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
JORGE A OLMOS, MD principal investigator
HOSPITAL DE CLINICAS JOSE DE SAN MARTIN
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Gastroesophageal Reflux, run by Hospital de Clinicas José de San Martín at 1 site in Argentina.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Argentina. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact MARIA M PISKORZ, MD (5491133192885, neurogastrohc@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
diagnostic performance (time frame: immediately after the intervention/procedure). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06339801, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jan 2025.