Individual Variability in (Poly)Phenol MetabolismPRE-CARE-DIETNCT06347094
Precision Nutrition to Improve Cardiometabolic Health With Dietary (Poly)Phenols
A study testing Personalized Dietary Plan, Oral (Poly)phenol Challenge Test (OPCT) and General Dietary Advice in people with Individual Variability in (Poly)Phenol Metabolism and Cardiometabolic Health, run by University of Parma at 2 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
This chronic study aims at assessing whether the effects of a personalized, plant-based diet rich in (poly)phenols on cardiometabolic health depend on the capability to metabolize dietary (poly)phenols, creating predictive models able to explain, at individual level, the cardiometabolic response. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Individual Variability in (Poly)Phenol Metabolism, Cardiometabolic Health, Personalized Dietary Intervention
- What is being tested?
- Personalized Dietary Plan, Oral (Poly)phenol Challenge Test (OPCT) and General Dietary Advice
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 330 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- 22 Apr 2024to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults (40-80 y.o.)
- Non-clinically diagnosed for cardiometabolic diseases at baseline examination
- At least one of the following risk factors: overweight or obese, central obesity (waist:hip ratio > 0.90 in males and > 0.85 in females or waist circumference ≥ 94 cm in males and ≥ 80 cm in females), hypertension (systolic BP > 130 or diastolic BP > 85 mm Hg), low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (< 40 mg/dL (1.03 mmol/L) in males, < 50 mg/dL (1.29 mmol/L) in females), or elevated total cholesterol (≥ 200 mg/dL), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (≥ 130 mg/dL (4.1 mmol/L)), triglyceride (> 150 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L)), fasting glucose (> 100 mg/dL (5.6 mmol/L)) levels, or microalbuminuria (urinary albumin excretion ratio ≥ 20 μg/min or albumin:creatinine ratio ≥ 30 mg/g).
Who cannot join
- BMI < 18.5 or > 34.9 kg/m²
- Past cardiovascular events and metabolic diseases including diabetes
- Inflammatory bowel diseases or gastro-intestinal surgery (other than appendectomy)
- Cholecystectomy within the past 5 years
- Renal or hepatic diseases
- Levels of estimated Glomerular Filtration (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m²
Show all 15Show fewer
- Aspartate transaminase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 2.5 times the upper limits of normal
- Immunodeficiency or autoimmune diseases (other than well-compensated hypothyroidism)
- Mental disorders
- Hormone therapy (other than that used for hypothyroidism, birth-control or menopause symptoms)
- Antibiotic therapy within the last month before the study
- Food allergies associated with the consumption of plant foods or foods that will be provided in the study
- Difficulties or major inconveniences in changing dietary habits or adhering to a plant-based Mediterranean-type diet
- Presence of chewing or swallowing disorders
- Pregnancy or lactation
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Italy2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Parma - Plesso Biotecnologico Integrato
Parma, PR, 43125
Pedro M Mena Parreño, PhD, +39 0521 903970, pedromiguel.menaparreno@unipr.it
Joana M Santos Rebelo, MSc, +39 0521902043, joanamaria.santosrebelo@unipr.it
- Recruiting
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma
Parma, PR, 43126
Riccardo Bonadonna, MD, +39 0521 033307, riccardo.bonadonna@unipr.it
About this study
Official title: Precision Nutrition to Improve Cardiometabolic Health With Dietary (Poly)Phenols (PRE-CARE-DIET)
This chronic study aims at assessing whether the effects of a personalized, plant-based diet rich in (poly)phenols on cardiometabolic health depend on the capability to metabolize dietary (poly)phenols, creating predictive models able to explain, at individual level, the cardiometabolic response. This study presents an observational part, for targeted recruitment and volunteers characterization, and an experimental part for the dietary and deep phenotyping.
Read the detailed description
The recruitment will be carried out to prospectively include 330 subjects belonging to two aggregate phenolic metabotypes, that will be compared in the intervention part (1:1). To do so, a maximum of 500 subjects at cardiometabolic risk will be screened following an oral (poly)phenol challenge test (OPCT). In the observational phase, eating habits and lifestyle data will be collected, and these will serve as a run-in for the experimental phase. In the experimental phase, two-thirds of the participants within each metabotype will be randomly allocated to the treatment arm: 50% increase in the (poly)phenol intake, with a minimum daily intake of 500 mg. Treatment allocation shifts minimally the dietary habits of treated participants to allow causal explanations. No changes in the (poly)phenol intake will be asked to the control arm, composed of one-third of the subjects in each metabotype. Blood pressure and heart rate will also be measured and anthropometric data collected. Information will be accessed on cardiometabolic risk scores, cardiometabolic health biomarkers, inflammatory markers, hormones, metabolism of food components, genetic polymorphisms, gut and saliva microbiota profile, etc., through the collection of saliva, urine, blood, and stool samples.
- Conditions
- Individual Variability in (Poly)Phenol Metabolism, Cardiometabolic Health, Personalized Dietary Intervention, Obesity
- Being tested
- Personalized Dietary Plan, Oral (Poly)phenol Challenge Test (OPCT), General Dietary Advice
- Keywords
- nutritional intervention study, personalized nutrition, cardiometabolic risk, obesity, (poly)phenols, metabotypes, inter-individual variability, food-gut-host interactions, predictive models
- Medical subject headings
- Obesity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Personalized Dietary PlanOther
Prescription of dietary plans increasing the intake of (poly)phenols through consumption of foods rich in these compounds, in the context of a balanced, personalised diet
Oral (Poly)phenol Challenge Test (OPCT)Dietary supplement
Nutritional challenge with standardized (poly)phenol-rich tablets
General Dietary AdviceOther
Prescription of balanced dietary plans
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Metabotype X, Treatment | Experimental | Subjects belonging to a specific aggregate phenolic metabotype (X) to which a diet with an increase of 50% in the actual (poly)phenol intake will be given, through personalized dietary plans. Receives: Other: Personalized Dietary Plan; Dietary Supplement: Oral (Poly)phenol Challenge Test (OPCT) |
| Metabotype X, Control | Experimental | Subjects belonging to a specific aggregate phenolic metabotype (X) to which general dietary recommendations for a healthy diet will be given. Receives: Dietary Supplement: Oral (Poly)phenol Challenge Test (OPCT); Other: General Dietary Advice |
| Metabotype Y, Treatment | Experimental | Subjects belonging to a specific aggregate phenolic metabotype (Y) to which a diet with an increase of 50% in the actual (poly)phenol intake will be given, through personalized dietary plans. Receives: Other: Personalized Dietary Plan; Dietary Supplement: Oral (Poly)phenol Challenge Test (OPCT) |
| Metabotype Y, Control | Experimental | Subjects belonging to a specific aggregate phenolic metabotype (X) to which general dietary recommendations for a healthy diet will be given. Receives: Dietary Supplement: Oral (Poly)phenol Challenge Test (OPCT); Other: General Dietary Advice |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Assessing the effect of a (poly)phenol-rich diet on 10-year cardiovascular risk: Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation
Assessing the effect of a (poly)phenol-rich diet on 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease using the Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation (SCORE2) for volunteers aged between 40 and 69 years, considering different aggregate phenolic metabotypes. Interpretation of the result depends on the patient's age as the cut-off risk levels are numerically different for various age groups: low-moderate Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) risk (< 2.5% for < 50 years; < 5% for 50-69 years), high CVD risk (2.5% to < 7.5% for < 50 years; 5% to < 10% for 50-69 years), very high CVD risk (≥ 7.5% for < 50 years; ≥ 10% for 50-69 years).
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Assessing the effect of a (poly)phenol-rich diet on 10-year cardiovascular risk: Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation-Older Persons
Assessing the effect of a (poly)phenol-rich diet on 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease using the Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation-Older Persons (SCORE2-OP) for volunteers aged between 70 and 89 years, considering different aggregate phenolic metabotypes. Interpretation of the result depends on the patient's age as the cut-off risk levels are numerically different for various age groups: low-moderate CVD risk (< 7.5% for ≥ 70 years), high CVD risk (7.5% to < 15% for ≥ 70 years ), very high CVD risk (≥ 15% for ≥ 70 years).
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Secondary outcomes (52)
Anthropometric measurements: weight, height and body mass index
Weight (measured in kilograms) and height (measured in meters) will be assessed using a balance and a stadiometer, respectively. These measures will be combined to report the Body Mass Index (BMI) using the following formula: kg/m^2.
Measured: Visit 1 (at the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Anthropometric measurements: waist and hip circumferences detection
Waist circumference (measured in centimeters) and hip circumference (measured in centimeters) will be assessed using an inelastic meter. These measures will be combined to report waist-to-height ratio and waist-to-hip ratio using the following formulas: waist circumference (cm)/height (cm) and waist circumference (cm)/hip circumference (cm), respectively.
Measured: Visit 1 (at the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Body composition: bioelectrical impedance analysis
Body composition estimation will be assessed using a bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). It is a tool that provides an estimate of qualitative and quantitative analysis of body composition and distribution.
Measured: Visit 1 (at the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Blood pressure
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg) of each volunteer will be obtained after a 5-min rest in a seated position.
Measured: Visit 1 (at the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Heart rate
Heart rate, measured in beats per minute (bpm) of each volunteer will be obtained after a 5-min rest in a seated position.
Measured: Visit 1 (at the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Biomarkers of cardiometabolic health: hematochemical and urine analysis
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment, measured in milligrams per deciliter, of total cholesterol (mg/dL), HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL), triglycerides (mg/dL), glucose (mg/dL), lipoprotein a (mg/dL), apolipoprotein A1 (mg/dL), apolipoprotein B (mg/dL) and uric acid (mg/dL).
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Biomarkers of cardiometabolic health: alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and gamma glutamyl transferase
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment, measured in enzymatic unit activity per liter, of alanine aminotransferase (U/L), aspartate aminotransferase (U/L) and gamma glutamyl transferase (U/L).
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Biomarkers of cardiometabolic health: homocysteine
Homocysteine, measured in milligrams per liter, will be assessed from serum samples.
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Biomarkers of cardiometabolic health: insulin
Insulin, measured in micro Insulin Units per milliliter, will be assessed from plasma samples.
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Biomarkers of cardiometabolic health: glycated hemoglobin and glycated albumin
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment, measured in percentage of total hemoglobin, of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c (%)) and glycated albumin (%).
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Biomarkers of cardiometabolic health: quantitative insulin-sensitivity check index
Fasting insulin sensitivity will be estimated through the quantitative insulin-sensitivity check index (QUICKI) using the following formula: 1/log(fasting insulin (uUI/mL)) + log(fasting glucose (mg/dL)).
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Biomarkers of cardiometabolic health: homeostasis model assessment beta-cell function
Insulin secretion capacity will be estimated through the homeostasis model assessment beta-cell function (HOMA-β) index using the following formula: 360 * insulin (uUI/mL)/glucose (mg/dL) - 55.
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Biomarkers of cardiometabolic health: homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance
Insulin resistance will be estimated through the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index using the following formula: glucose (mg/dL) * insulin (uUI/mL)/82 * 7.
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Inflammatory status
Plasma samples will serve to determinate the inflammatory status monitoring specific cytokines (Tumor Necrosis Factor α, InterLeukin-1β, InterLeukin-6, InterLeukin-8, InterLeukin-10, and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1), adhesion molecules (Vascular cell adhesion protein-1, Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1, E-selectin), and high sensitivity C reactive protein (hsCRP), using a customized magnetic bead-based multiplex assays.
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: Framingham General Cardiovascular Risk Score - 10-years
The Framingham General Cardiovascular Risk Score (FRS) - 10 years will be assessed to understand the relationship with the aggregate phenolic metabotypes observed. The FRS estimates the 10-years risk of manifesting clinical CVD (CAD, Stroke, cardiac death). Risk is considered low if the FRS is less than 10%, moderate if it is 10% to 19%, and high if it is 20% or higher.
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: Framingham General Cardiovascular Risk Score - 30-years
The Framingham General Cardiovascular Risk Score (FRS) - 10 years will be assessed to understand the relationship with the aggregate phenolic metabotypes observed. The FRS estimates the 30-years risk of manifesting clinical CVD (CAD, Stroke, cardiac death). Risk is considered low if the FRS is less than 12%, moderate if it is 12% to 40%, and high if it is 40% or higher.
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: Hard Coronary Heart Disease - 10-years risk
The Framingham Heart Study Primary Risk Functions for Hard Coronary Heart Disease (HCHD) 10-year risk will be assessed to understand the relationship with the aggregate phenolic metabotypes observed. The HCHD estimates the 10-years risk of manifesting myocardial infarction or coronary death. Risk is considered low if the HCHD is less than 1%, moderate if it is 1%, and high if it is 2% to 11% for female; risk is considered low if the HCHD is less than 1%, moderate if it is 1%, and high if it is 2% to 25% for male.
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: First Coronary Heart Disease - 2-years risk
The Framingham Heart Study Primary Risk Functions for First Coronary Heart Disease (2-years risk) will be assessed to understand the relationship with the aggregate phenolic metabotypes observed. This risk score estimates the 2-years risk of manifesting a first event of myocardial infarction or coronary death. Risk is considered low if the score is less than 0%, moderate if it is 0% to 1%, and high if it is 1% or higher for female; risk is considered low if the score is less than 0%, moderate if it is 0% to 1%, and high if it is 1% to 6% for male.
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: Framingham Heart Study for Diabetes
The Framingham Heart Study Primary Risk Functions for Diabetes will be assessed to understand the relationship with the aggregate phenolic metabotypes observed. This risk score estimates the risk of manifesting type 2 diabetes mellitus (fasting blood glucose at or above 126 mg/dL) in 8 years. Risk is considered low if the score is less than 3% and high if it is 4% to 18%.
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: Framingham Heart Study for Hypertension
The Framingham Heart Study Primary Risk Functions for Hypertension will be assessed to understand the relationship with the aggregate phenolic metabotypes observed. This risk score estimates the risk of incidence of hypertension. Risk is considered low if the score is less than 5%, moderate if it is 5% to 10%, and high if it is higher than 10%.
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: Framingham Heart Study for Stroke
The Framingham Heart Study Primary Risk Functions for Stroke will be assessed to understand the relationship with the aggregate phenolic metabotypes observed. This risk score estimates the 10-year probability of stroke. The risk score is given as a percentage and higher percentage values correspond to an increased risk of stroke.
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: Framingham Heart Study for Fatty Liver Disease
The Framingham Heart Study Primary Risk Functions for Fatty Liver Disease will be assessed to understand the relationship with the aggregate phenolic metabotypes observed. This risk score estimates the 10-year risk of CVD events in individuals with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) The risk score is given as a percentage and higher percentage values correspond to an increased risk of CVD events.
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
The Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk will be assessed to understand the relationship with the aggregate phenolic metabotypes observed. It is an index of the 10-year risk of having a cardiovascular problem, such as a heart attack or stroke. The ASCVD risk score is given as a percentage and there are four groupings: a 0 to 4.9 percent risk is considered low; a 5 to 7.4 percent risk is considered borderline; a 7.5 to 20 percent risk is considered intermediate; a greater than 20 percent risk is considered high.
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: QRESEARCH risk estimator version 3
The QRESEARCH risk estimator version 3 (QRISK3®) will be assessed to understand their relationship with the aggregate phenolic metabotypes observed. It is an index of the 10-year risk of having a cardiovascular problem, such as a heart attack or stroke. The QRISK3® risk score is given as a percentage and there are three groupings: low risk if the QRISK3 score of less than 10%; moderate risk if the QRISK3 of 10-20%; high risk if the QRISK3 score of more than 20%.
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: QDiabetes Score
The QDiabetes Score® will be assessed to understand the relationship with the aggregate phenolic metabotypes observed. QDiabetes® is a validated tool which predicts the absolute risk of developing type 2 diabetes in the next 10 years. The QDiabetes Score® risk score is given as a percentage: high risk is defined for QDiabetes of 5.6% or greater, while it is low for lower values.
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: Finnish Diabetes Risk Score
The Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) will be assessed to understand the relationship with the aggregate phenolic metabotypes observed. FINDRISC is a prediction tool to identify patients at risk of developing diabetes. A risk score of 0-14 points indicates a low to moderate risk of diabetes (1-17% chance of diabetes over 10 years). A risk score of 15-20 points indicates a high risk of diabetes (33% chance of diabetes over 10 years). A risk score of >20 points indicates a very high risk of diabetes (50% chance of diabetes over 10 years).
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: Cuore Project - Calculating the individual risk score
The Calculating the individual risk score (Italian CVD risk score) will be assessed to understand the relationship with the aggregate phenolic metabotypes observed. Six cardiovascular risk categories were constructed, called MCV (from I to VI): the MCV risk category indicates how many persons out of 100 with the same characteristics will fall ill over next 10 years. Risk is considered: below 5% for MCV I; 5% to 10% for MCV II; 10% to 15% for MCV II; 15% to 20% for MCV IV; 20% to 30% for MCV V; over 30% for MCV VI
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Evaluation of adherence to healthy and sustainable dietary models: the Healthy Eating Index
Adherence to healthy dietary patterns will be assessed by the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), which is a measure of diet quality used to assess how well a set of foods aligns with key recommendations and dietary patterns. The HEI uses a scoring system from 0 to 100. There are two groupings: 1) "Adequacy components" represent the food groups, subgroups, and dietary elements that are encouraged and for these components, higher scores reflect higher intakes, because higher intakes are desirable; 2) "Moderation components" represent the food groups and dietary elements for which there are recommended limits to consumption and for moderation components, higher scores reflect lower intakes, because lower intakes are more desirable.
Measured: Visit 2 (after 4 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Evaluation of adherence to healthy and sustainable dietary models: Italian Mediterranean Index
Adherence to Italian Mediterranean diet will be assessed by the Italian Mediterranean Index. The score is calculated from intake of 11 items: high intakes of six typical Mediterranean foods (pasta, typical Mediterranean vegetables, fruit, legumes, olive oil and fish; low intakes of four "non-Mediterranean" foods (soft drinks, butter, red meat and potatoes); and alcohol. If consumption of typical Mediterranean foods is in the 3rd tertile of the distribution, the person receives 1 point; all other intakes receive 0 points. If consumption of non-Mediterranean foods is in the first tertile of the distribution the person receives 1 point. Alcohol receives 1 point for intake up to 12 g/day; abstainers and persons who consume >12 g/day receive 0. Possible scores range from 0 to 11.
Measured: Visit 2 (after 4 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Evaluation of adherence to healthy and sustainable dietary models: Greek Mediterranean Index
To evaluate the adherence to and healthy and sustainable dietary, the Greek Mediterranean Index will be assessed with a nine-point score for the consumption of vegetables, legumes, fruit and nuts, cereal, fish, meat,dairy, alcohol, and lipids. Using the sex-specific median, a value of 0 will be given to participants whose consumption of vegetables, legumes, fruits and nuts, cereals, and fish is below the median consumption, while a value of 1 will be assigned in the opposite case. Study participants with a below-median consumption of meat and dairy products will be assigned a value of 1, whereas a value of 0 will be given to those with an above-median consumption. For ethanol, men consuming 10-50 g/day and women consuming 5-25 g/day will be given a value of 1. The score is categorized into three categories: low adherence, including individuals with a total score of 0 to 3 points; intermediate adherence, with a score of 4 to 5 points; and high adherence,with a score of 6 to 9 points.
Measured: Visit 2 (after 4 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Evaluation of adherence to healthy and sustainable dietary models: DASH Index
Adherence to healthy dietary patterns will be assessed by the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Index.
The DASH Index is comprised of 8 components (7 food groups and one nutrient). The scoring system is based on quintile rankings; for intakes of fruit (includes fruit juice), vegetables (excludes potatoes), low-fat dairy products, whole grains, and nuts, seeds, and legumes, individuals receive a score from 1 (lowest quintile) to 5 (highest quintile). In contrast, individuals receive a score from 1 (highest quintile) to 5 (lowest quintile) for intakes of sodium, sugar-sweetened beverages, and red and processed meat. Men and women are classified into quintiles separately. Component scores are summed to a total DASH score that ranges from a minimum of 8 to a maximum of 40 points.
Measured: Visit 2 (after 4 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Evaluation of adherence to Mediterranean diet
Adherence to Mediterranean Diet will be assessed through the MEDI-Lite questionnaire.
Measured: Visit 2 (after 4 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Nutritional and energy assessment: LARN
Nutritional and energy requirements will be assessed considering the "Reference Intake Levels of Nutrients and Energy for the Italian Population for the Italian population" (LARN) recommendation using dietary records.
Measured: Visit 2 (after 4 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Nutritional and energy assessment: EPIC
Nutritional and energy requirements will be assessed through the food frequency questionnaire European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC).
Measured: Visit 2 (after 4 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Dietary intake assessment of plant bioactive compounds and dietary components related to gut microbiome
(Poly)phenol intake will be estimated using a food database. The same methodology will serve to calculate the intake of other plant bioactive compounds and dietary components associated with the gut microbiome, by matching food frequency questionnaires, and the dietary records data with databases.
Measured: Visit 2 (after 4 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Lifestyle factors assessment: general information
General information, such as age, sex, smoking habits, childbirth, breastfeeding, will be assessed through an enrollment questionnaire.
Measured: Visit 1 (beginning of the study), Visit 2 (4 weeks after the beginning of the study) Visit 3 (8 weeks after the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (16 weeks after the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (24 weeks after the beginning of the study)
Lifestyle factors assessment: sleep quality (PSQI)
Assessing the contribution of sleep quality through the questionnaire Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Scoring of answers is based on a 0 to 3 scale, whereby 3 reflects the negative extreme. A global sum of "5" or greater indicates a "poor" sleeper, while an overall sum of less than "5" indicates a "good" sleeper.
Measured: Visit 1 (beginning of the study), Visit 2 (4 weeks after the beginning of the study) Visit 3 (8 weeks after the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (16 weeks after the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (24 weeks after the beginning of the study)
Lifestyle factors assessment: sleep quality (ESS)
Assessing the contribution of sleep quality through the questionnaire Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). The test is a list of eight situations in which it is rate the tendency to become sleepy on a scale of 0 to 3: 0 (no chance of dozing), 1 (slight chance of dozing), 2 (moderate chance of dozing), and 3 (high chance of dozing). The total ESS score is based on a scale of 0 to 24 and can be interpreted as follows: 0-5 Lower Normal Daytime Sleepiness; 6-10 Higher Normal Daytime Sleepiness; 11-12 Mild Excessive Daytime Sleepiness; 13-15 Moderate Excessive Daytime Sleepiness; 16-24 Severe Excessive Daytime Sleepiness
Measured: Visit 1 (beginning of the study), Visit 2 (4 weeks after the beginning of the study) Visit 3 (8 weeks after the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (16 weeks after the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (24 weeks after the beginning of the study)
Lifestyle factors assessment: sleep quality (ISI)
Assessing the contribution of sleep quality through the questionnaire Insomnia Severity Index (ISI).
Measured: Visit 1 (beginning of the study), Visit 2 (4 weeks after the beginning of the study) Visit 3 (8 weeks after the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (16 weeks after the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (24 weeks after the beginning of the study)
Lifestyle factors assessment: physical activity (IPAQ)
Assessing the contribution of physical activity through the questionnaire International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).
Measured: Visit 1 (beginning of the study), Visit 2 (4 weeks after the beginning of the study) Visit 3 (8 weeks after the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (16 weeks after the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (24 weeks after the beginning of the study)
Lifestyle factors assessment: state of health (BDI)
Assessing the contribution of state of health through the questionnaire Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI).
Measured: Visit 1 (beginning of the study), Visit 2 (4 weeks after the beginning of the study) Visit 3 (8 weeks after the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (16 weeks after the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (24 weeks after the beginning of the study)
Lifestyle factors assessment: state of health (SF-36)
Assessing the contribution of state of health through the questionnaire Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36).
Measured: Visit 1 (beginning of the study), Visit 2 (4 weeks after the beginning of the study) Visit 3 (8 weeks after the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (16 weeks after the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (24 weeks after the beginning of the study)
(Poly)phenol metabolites and changes in the prevalence of aggregate phenolic metabotypes
True internal exposure to dietary (poly)phenols will be assessed by analysing the circulating metabolites of (poly)phenols in the plasma, urine, and faecal samples collected. Validated targeted ultra performance liquid chromatography method coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (UPLC-QqQ-MS/MS) and untargeted Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Ion Mobility Spectrometry-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-IMS-HRMS) methods will be used.
Measured: Visit 1 (at the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Other plant bioactive metabolites
True internal exposure to plant bioactive compounds will be assessed by analysing the circulating plant bioactive compounds (carotenoids, phytosterols, alkaloids (mainly purines and pyridines), thiosulfinates, and alkylresorcinols), in the plasma, urine, and faecal samples collected. Validated targeted ultra performance liquid chromatography method coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (UPLC-QqQ-MS/MS) and untargeted Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Ion Mobility Spectrometry-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-IMS-HRMS) methods will be used.
Measured: Visit 1 (at the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Food/gut/host-derived metabolites
Metabolites playing a role in the diet-gut microbiome-host interactions will be evaluated in plasma/urine/faeces samples using targeted ultra performance liquid chromatography method coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (UPLC-QqQ-MS/MS) and untargeted Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Ion Mobility Spectrometry-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-IMS-HRMS) methods. Main compounds to be targeted are short-chain fatty acids, L-carnitine, choline, phosphatidylcholine, trimethylamine, trimethylamine N-oxide, tryptophan and indole derivatives, phenylalanine and phenylacetate, tyrosine derivatives, 4-ethylphenylsulfate, p-cresol-sulfate, and primary and secondary bile acids.
Measured: Visit 1 (at the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Biomarkers of food intake and of healthy dietary patterns
Multiple metabolites associated with the consumption of food groups and foodstuffs will be analysed in urine samples and, in case, in plasma, using ultra performance liquid chromatography method coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (UPLC-QqQ-MS/MS) methods, to provide objective information on participants' diet. Moreover, a comprehensive panel of biomarkers related to healthy dietary patterns will be analysed in plasma/urine samples by using Ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS) methods procedures reported in literature.
Measured: Visit 1 (at the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Untargeted metabolomics
Urine/plasma/fecal samples will be subjected to untargeted Liquid Chromatography-Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry (LC-IMS-MS) metabolomics approach to assess potential differences among the metabolomes of individuals belonging to different aggregate phenolic metabotypes.
Measured: Visit 1 (at the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Genetic differences
Genotyping will be conducted using genome wide, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) array approach untargeted methodology, using commercially available SNPs. Genomic DNA will be prepared from blood samples.
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Gut microbiota composition
Microbial profiling in faeces samples will be carried out by an internal transcribed spacer (ITS)-based method for cataloguing of bacterial communities at (sub)species level.
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Oral microbiota composition
Microbial profiling in saliva samples will be carried out by an internal transcribed spacer (ITS)-based method for cataloguing of bacterial communities at (sub)species level.
Measured: Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Biomarkers of adipose tissue function
A panel of biomarkers related to the adipose tissue function (adiponectin, leptin, and resistin) will be evaluated in plasma samples.
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Biomarkers of food intake regulation
A panel of biomarkers related to food intake regulation (ghrelin, glucagon-like peptide 1, cholecystokinin, gastric inhibitory peptide) will be analysed in plasma samples.
Measured: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Apr 2024
- Study start22 Apr 2024
- Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Individual Variability in (Poly)Phenol MetabolismStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 330 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Parma
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, University of Milan, Foundation for Liver Research, National Research Council, Spain
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Pedro M. Mena Parreño, University of Parma
- Investigators
- Pedro M Mena Parreño, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Parma
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06347094
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 610/2023/SPER/UNIPR
- Acronym
- PRE-CARE-DIET
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 4 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 10 May 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Precision Nutrition to Improve Cardiometabolic Health With Dietary (Poly)Phenols (PRE-CARE-DIET)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06347094
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PRE-CARE-DIET / 610/2023/SPER/UNIPR
- Conditions
- Individual Variability in (Poly)Phenol Metabolism, Cardiometabolic Health, Personalized Dietary Intervention, Obesity
- Keywords
- nutritional intervention study, personalized nutrition, cardiometabolic risk, obesity, (poly)phenols, metabotypes, inter-individual variability, food-gut-host interactions
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 330 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ParmaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, University of Milan, Foundation for Liver Research, National Research Council, Spain
- Study start
- 22 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This chronic study aims at assessing whether the effects of a personalized, plant-based diet rich in (poly)phenols on cardiometabolic health depend on the capability to metabolize dietary (poly)phenols, creating predictive models able to explain, at individual level, the cardiometabolic response. This study presents an observational part, for targeted recruitment and volunteers characterization, and an experimental part for the dietary and deep phenotyping.
Detailed description
The recruitment will be carried out to prospectively include 330 subjects belonging to two aggregate phenolic metabotypes, that will be compared in the intervention part (1:1). To do so, a maximum of 500 subjects at cardiometabolic risk will be screened following an oral (poly)phenol challenge test (OPCT). In the observational phase, eating habits and lifestyle data will be collected, and these will serve as a run-in for the experimental phase. In the experimental phase, two-thirds of the participants within each metabotype will be randomly allocated to the treatment arm: 50% increase in the (poly)phenol intake, with a minimum daily intake of 500 mg. Treatment allocation shifts minimally the dietary habits of treated participants to allow causal explanations. No changes in the (poly)phenol intake will be asked to the control arm, composed of one-third of the subjects in each metabotype. Blood pressure and heart rate will also be measured and anthropometric data collected. Information will be accessed on cardiometabolic risk scores, cardiometabolic health biomarkers, inflammatory markers, hormones, metabolism of food components, genetic polymorphisms, gut and saliva microbiota profile, etc., through the collection of saliva, urine, blood, and stool samples.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Metabotype X, Treatment | Experimental | Other: Personalized Dietary Plan, Dietary Supplement: Oral (Poly)phenol Challenge Test (OPCT)Subjects belonging to a specific aggregate phenolic metabotype (X) to which a diet with an increase of 50% in the actual (poly)phenol intake will be given, through personalized dietary plans. |
| Metabotype X, Control | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Oral (Poly)phenol Challenge Test (OPCT), Other: General Dietary AdviceSubjects belonging to a specific aggregate phenolic metabotype (X) to which general dietary recommendations for a healthy diet will be given. |
| Metabotype Y, Treatment | Experimental | Other: Personalized Dietary Plan, Dietary Supplement: Oral (Poly)phenol Challenge Test (OPCT)Subjects belonging to a specific aggregate phenolic metabotype (Y) to which a diet with an increase of 50% in the actual (poly)phenol intake will be given, through personalized dietary plans. |
| Metabotype Y, Control | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Oral (Poly)phenol Challenge Test (OPCT), Other: General Dietary AdviceSubjects belonging to a specific aggregate phenolic metabotype (X) to which general dietary recommendations for a healthy diet will be given. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adults (40-80 y.o.)
- Non-clinically diagnosed for cardiometabolic diseases at baseline examination
- At least one of the following risk factors: overweight or obese, central obesity (waist:hip ratio > 0.90 in males and > 0.85 in females or waist circumference ≥ 94 cm in males and ≥ 80 cm in females), hypertension (systolic BP > 130 or diastolic BP > 85 mm Hg), low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (< 40 mg/dL (1.03 mmol/L) in males, < 50 mg/dL (1.29 mmol/L) in females), or elevated total cholesterol (≥ 200 mg/dL), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (≥ 130 mg/dL (4.1 mmol/L)), triglyceride (> 150 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L)), fasting glucose (> 100 mg/dL (5.6 mmol/L)) levels, or microalbuminuria (urinary albumin excretion ratio ≥ 20 μg/min or albumin:creatinine ratio ≥ 30 mg/g).
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- BMI < 18.5 or > 34.9 kg/m²
- Past cardiovascular events and metabolic diseases including diabetes
- Inflammatory bowel diseases or gastro-intestinal surgery (other than appendectomy)
- Cholecystectomy within the past 5 years
- Renal or hepatic diseases
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Personalized Dietary PlanPrescription of dietary plans increasing the intake of (poly)phenols through consumption of foods rich in these compounds, in the context of a balanced, personalised diet | Other | Metabotype X, Treatment, Metabotype Y, Treatment |
| Oral (Poly)phenol Challenge Test (OPCT)Nutritional challenge with standardized (poly)phenol-rich tablets | Dietary supplement | Metabotype X, Control, Metabotype X, Treatment, Metabotype Y, Control, Metabotype Y, Treatment |
| General Dietary AdvicePrescription of balanced dietary plans | Other | Metabotype X, Control, Metabotype Y, Control |
Primary outcome
Assessing the effect of a (poly)phenol-rich diet on 10-year cardiovascular risk: Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation
Time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Assessing the effect of a (poly)phenol-rich diet on 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease using the Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation (SCORE2) for volunteers aged between 40 and 69 years, considering different aggregate phenolic metabotypes. Interpretation of the result depends on the patient's age as the cut-off risk levels are numerically different for various age groups: low-moderate Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) risk (< 2.5% for < 50 years; < 5% for 50-69 years), high CVD risk (2.5% to < 7.5% for < 50 years; 5% to < 10% for 50-69 years), very high CVD risk (≥ 7.5% for < 50 years; ≥ 10% for 50-69 years).
Assessing the effect of a (poly)phenol-rich diet on 10-year cardiovascular risk: Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation-Older Persons
Time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Assessing the effect of a (poly)phenol-rich diet on 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease using the Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation-Older Persons (SCORE2-OP) for volunteers aged between 70 and 89 years, considering different aggregate phenolic metabotypes. Interpretation of the result depends on the patient's age as the cut-off risk levels are numerically different for various age groups: low-moderate CVD risk (< 7.5% for ≥ 70 years), high CVD risk (7.5% to < 15% for ≥ 70 years ), very high CVD risk (≥ 15% for ≥ 70 years).
52 secondary outcomes
Anthropometric measurements: weight, height and body mass index
Time frame: Visit 1 (at the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Anthropometric measurements: waist and hip circumferences detection
Time frame: Visit 1 (at the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Body composition: bioelectrical impedance analysis
Time frame: Visit 1 (at the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Blood pressure
Time frame: Visit 1 (at the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Heart rate
Time frame: Visit 1 (at the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Biomarkers of cardiometabolic health: hematochemical and urine analysis
Time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Biomarkers of cardiometabolic health: alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and gamma glutamyl transferase
Time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Biomarkers of cardiometabolic health: homocysteine
Time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Biomarkers of cardiometabolic health: insulin
Time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Biomarkers of cardiometabolic health: glycated hemoglobin and glycated albumin
Time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Biomarkers of cardiometabolic health: quantitative insulin-sensitivity check index
Time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Biomarkers of cardiometabolic health: homeostasis model assessment beta-cell function
Time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Biomarkers of cardiometabolic health: homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance
Time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Inflammatory status
Time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: Framingham General Cardiovascular Risk Score - 10-years
Time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: Framingham General Cardiovascular Risk Score - 30-years
Time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: Hard Coronary Heart Disease - 10-years risk
Time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: First Coronary Heart Disease - 2-years risk
Time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: Framingham Heart Study for Diabetes
Time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: Framingham Heart Study for Hypertension
Time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: Framingham Heart Study for Stroke
Time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: Framingham Heart Study for Fatty Liver Disease
Time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
Time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: QRESEARCH risk estimator version 3
Time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: QDiabetes Score
Time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: Finnish Diabetes Risk Score
Time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Risk prediction scores: Cuore Project - Calculating the individual risk score
Time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Evaluation of adherence to healthy and sustainable dietary models: the Healthy Eating Index
Time frame: Visit 2 (after 4 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Evaluation of adherence to healthy and sustainable dietary models: Italian Mediterranean Index
Time frame: Visit 2 (after 4 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Evaluation of adherence to healthy and sustainable dietary models: Greek Mediterranean Index
Time frame: Visit 2 (after 4 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Evaluation of adherence to healthy and sustainable dietary models: DASH Index
Time frame: Visit 2 (after 4 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Evaluation of adherence to Mediterranean diet
Time frame: Visit 2 (after 4 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Nutritional and energy assessment: LARN
Time frame: Visit 2 (after 4 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Nutritional and energy assessment: EPIC
Time frame: Visit 2 (after 4 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Dietary intake assessment of plant bioactive compounds and dietary components related to gut microbiome
Time frame: Visit 2 (after 4 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (after 16 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)
Lifestyle factors assessment: general information
Time frame: Visit 1 (beginning of the study), Visit 2 (4 weeks after the beginning of the study) Visit 3 (8 weeks after the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (16 weeks after the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (24 weeks after the beginning of the study)
Lifestyle factors assessment: sleep quality (PSQI)
Time frame: Visit 1 (beginning of the study), Visit 2 (4 weeks after the beginning of the study) Visit 3 (8 weeks after the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (16 weeks after the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (24 weeks after the beginning of the study)
Lifestyle factors assessment: sleep quality (ESS)
Time frame: Visit 1 (beginning of the study), Visit 2 (4 weeks after the beginning of the study) Visit 3 (8 weeks after the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (16 weeks after the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (24 weeks after the beginning of the study)
Lifestyle factors assessment: sleep quality (ISI)
Time frame: Visit 1 (beginning of the study), Visit 2 (4 weeks after the beginning of the study) Visit 3 (8 weeks after the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (16 weeks after the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (24 weeks after the beginning of the study)
Lifestyle factors assessment: physical activity (IPAQ)
Time frame: Visit 1 (beginning of the study), Visit 2 (4 weeks after the beginning of the study) Visit 3 (8 weeks after the beginning of the study), Visit 4 (16 weeks after the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (24 weeks after the beginning of the study)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 May 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Individual Variability in (Poly)Phenol Metabolism
Recruiting
Investigation of in Vivo Endogenous and/or Exogenous Production of Phenolic Metabolites Using (un)Targeted Metabolomics
Individual Variability in (Poly)Phenol Metabolism
Active, not recruiting
Interindividual Variation in Response to Green Coffee
Overweight and Obesity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pedro M Mena Parreño, PhD principal investigator
University of Parma
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Personalized Dietary Plan, Oral (Poly)phenol Challenge Test (OPCT) and General Dietary Advice in people with Individual Variability in (Poly)Phenol Metabolism and Cardiometabolic Health, run by University of Parma at 2 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Pedro M Mena Parreño, PhD (+39 0521 903970, pedromiguel.menaparreno@unipr.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Assessing the effect of a (poly)phenol-rich diet on 10-year cardiovascular risk: Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation (time frame: Visit 3 (after 8 weeks from the beginning of the study) and Visit 5 (after 24 weeks from the beginning of the study)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 May 2024.