AzTrials
AzTrials

Choledocholithiasis With Acute CholangitisNCT06349954

Effectiveness and Safety of Single-session Endoscopic Stone Extraction

A study testing single-session ERCP and two-session ERCP in people with Choledocholithiasis With Acute Cholangitis, run by Beijing Friendship Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a prospective study, including approximately 64 patients with acute cholangitis accompanied with choledocholithiasis at Beijing Friendship Hospital. All patients will be randomly allocate into single-session or two-session endoscopic stone extraction. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
What is being tested?
single-session ERCP and two-session ERCP
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
64 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
15 Apr 2024to 15 Jan 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 1. Age ≥18 years old and ≤90 years old
  • 2. Patients met the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) diagnosis of Grade I or Grade II acute cholangitis
  • 3. Imaging examination confirmed the presence of choledocholithiasis

Who cannot join

  • 1. Common bile duct with benign or malignant stenosis
  • 2. Changes in the anatomical structure of the stomach or duodenum
  • 3. Patients with common biliary duct or pancreatic duct stent
  • 4. Patients complicated with acute pancreatitis
  • 5. Patients who underwent endoscopic intervention, percutaneous transhepatic cholangio drainage (PTCD) or other invasive interventions before admission
  • 6. Patients with cardiac failure, respiratory failure or consciousness disorder can not tolerate endoscopic operation
  • 7. Patients who have coagulation dysfunction or are taking anticoagulation and antiplate drugs
  • 8. Imaging examination showed that the maximum diameter of choledocholithiasis was more than 1.5cm

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Beijing Friendship Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100050

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness and Safety of Single-session Endoscopic Stone Extraction for Acute Cholangitis Associated With Choledocholithiasis

This is a prospective study, including approximately 64 patients with acute cholangitis accompanied with choledocholithiasis at Beijing Friendship Hospital. All patients will be randomly allocate into single-session or two-session endoscopic stone extraction. The investigators assessed the outcomes of single-session and two-session endoscopic stone extraction.

Read the detailed description

Acute cholangitis is an acute inflammation caused by obstruction of the bile duct, of which choledocholithiasis is the most common cause. Without timely removal of the obstruction or control of the infection, cholangitis can get worse and even become life-threatening. Therefore, timely and effective treatment is essential for patients with acute cholangitis combined with choledocholithiasis. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) is used as the first-line treatment for choledocholithiasis-associated acute cholangitis. Previous guidelines recommended two-session endoscopic therapy. Endoscopic biliary drainage as the initial treatment, followed by endoscopic stone extraction after cholangitis improved. In recent years, studies have found that single-session endoscopic stone extraction is safe and effective for patients without serious organ function impairment. Meanwhile, single-session endoscopic lithotomy can avoid the second ERCP intervention, which can relieve the pain of patients, reduce medical costs and shorten the length of hospital stay. However, there is still insufficient evidence on the effectiveness and safety of early single-session ERCP lithotomy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-session endoscopic stone extraction for acute cholangitis associated with choledocholithiasis, so as to provide reference of clinical treatment.

In a prospective study, approximately 64 patients with acute cholangitis accompanied with choledocholithiasis will be involved. The investigators assessed the outcomes of single-session and two-session endoscopic stone extraction.

Being tested
single-session ERCP, two-session ERCP
Keywords
Acute Cholangitis, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography, Choledocholithiasis
Medical subject headings
Choledocholithiasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • single-session ERCPProcedure or surgery

    directly endoscopic stone extraction

  • two-session ERCPProcedure or surgery

    early endoscopic drainage followed by endoscopic stone extraction

Study groups in NCT06349954
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
single-session treatment groupExperimentalsingle-session ERCP
Receives: Procedure: single-session ERCP
two-session treatment groupExperimentaltwo-session ERCP
Receives: Procedure: two-session ERCP

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Success rate of complete stone removal

    Segmental angiography was performed by balloon closure to determine the presence or absence of negative stone shadow

    Measured: during the operation

  2. ERCP-related complication rate

    The complications include pancreatitis, hemorrhage, perforation, pneumonia, etc. The results of intraoperative endoscopic observation, postoperative symptoms and signs, blood routine examination, amylase, lipase, and imaging and endoscopic examination were measured.

    Measured: from the operation to 1 month after the operation

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Length of stay

    Total time from admission to discharge.

    Measured: perioperatively

  2. Hospital expenses

    Total expenses from admission to discharge.

    Measured: perioperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Apr 2024
  2. Study start15 Apr 2024
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2024
  4. Study completion15 Jan 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
All patients will be randomly allocated into single-session group or two-session group.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
64 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06349954
Sponsor's protocol ID
BFHHZS20240064
Status last verified
Jan 2025
First submitted
1 Apr 2024
Last updated
24 Jun 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing single-session ERCP and two-session ERCP in people with Choledocholithiasis With Acute Cholangitis, run by Beijing Friendship Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Success rate of complete stone removal (time frame: during the operation). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in