AzTrials
AzTrials

Microbial ColonizationBIWENCT06353035

Biodiversity Interventions for Well-Being

A study testing Rewilding in people with Microbial Colonization and Immune System Diseases, run by Natural Resources Institute Finland at 1 site in Finland.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Biodiversity is essential for nature and human well-being. Land use has reduced biodiversity in cities, which weakens the functionality of the urban ecosystems and the well-being of citizens. This may also increase the risk of immune-mediated disorders among urban dwellers. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 72 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Rewilding
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteFinland
Study dates
30 Mar 2022to 30 Sep 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 72 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Living in a detached or terraced house in urban area

Who cannot join

  • Immunosuppressive medications
  • Immune deficiencies
  • a disease affecting immune response (e.g., colitis ulcerosa, rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, diabetes)
  • cancer diagnosis within the last year or on-going cancer treatment
  • Incompetency
  • Living outside city area.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Finland1 site
  • Natural Resources Institute Finland

    Helsinki, Uusimaa, 00970

Other trials in Finland

About this study

Official title: Biodiversity Interventions for Well-being, Neighborhood Rewilding

Biodiversity is essential for nature and human well-being. Land use has reduced biodiversity in cities, which weakens the functionality of the urban ecosystems and the well-being of citizens. This may also increase the risk of immune-mediated disorders among urban dwellers.

In Biodiversity interventions for well-being (BIWE), microbial biodiversity interventions are performed to increase biodiversity in urban built areas. Results from the intervention trials are combined with publicly available land cover and ecological data. These are analyzed from the viewpoint of shifts in ecosystems and human well-being and immune regulation, ecological quality, and urban planning.

The investigators set up an intervention study in which urban private yards are rewilded with diverse vegetation and decaying deadwood and plant residuals. The investigators aim to evaluate the effect of rewilding, and yard management practices on commensal microbiome, cortisol levels and well-being and salivary cytokine levels, and gene pathways.

Read the detailed description

Our specific aims are:

To assess if rewilding diversifies health-associated skin microbiota and is associated with salivary cytokine levels, gene pathways, cortisol levels and commensal microbiota.

Assess whether there are patterns in the microbiome associated with the salivary cytokine levels and hair cortisol levels.

Assess whether rewilding affects health and psychological measures, such as Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWS), Depression Scale (DEPS) and Nature Relatedness Scale (NR6).

The investigators will recruit approximately 42 (21 study subjects per treatment) subjects living in a detached house or terraced house in urban areas and aged between 18-72.

The medical exclusion criteria include immunosuppressive medications, immune deficiencies, a disease affecting immune response (e.g., colitis ulcerosa, rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, diabetes), cancer diagnosis within the last year or on-going cancer treatment. Other exclusion criteria include incompetency and living outside city area.

Being tested
Rewilding
Keywords
Commensal microbiome, Salivary cytokines, Planetary health, Well-being
Medical subject headings
Communicable Diseases, Immune System Diseases, Psychological Well-Being

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RewildingOther

    Private yards of the intervention study subjects will be modified with vegetation and deadwood.

Study groups in NCT06353035
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
RewildingExperimentalPrivate yards of the intervention study subjects will be modified with berry bushes, fruit trees, perennial yard plants, meadow flowers, cultivation boxes, organic mulch materials, decaying deadwood, leaf compost and organic plant growing media with high microbial diversity.
Receives: Other: Rewilding
ControlNo interventionThe control group's yards will not be modified. Control group receives inorganic fertilizers, moss remover and ant control insecticide (Myrr®; active ingredient imidacloprid 0.03 % w/w).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Skin Gammaproteobacteria

    Difference on skin gammaproteobacterial diversity between rewilding and control group

    Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year, 5 year

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Salivary cytokines

    Interleukin-6 and -10 measured from saliva

    Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year, 5 year

  2. Difference in diversity (Alpha and beta diversity) of skin, saliva and stool microbiota

    It will be analyzed if microbial communities are different between treatments

    Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year, 5 year

  3. Difference in observed species richness of skin, saliva and stool microbiota

    It will be analyzed if microbial communities are different between treatments

    Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year, 5 year

  4. Difference in taxonomies of skin, saliva and stool microbiota

    It will be analyzed if microbial communities are different between treatments

    Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year, 5 year

  5. Difference in microbial gene pathways of saliva and stool microbiota

    Will be analyzed with shotgun sequencing if gene pathways are different between treatments

    Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year, 5 year

  6. Cortisol levels

    Cortisol levels measured from hair samples

    Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year, 5 year

  7. Perceived Stress Scale

    Lower score on a perceived stress scale among intervention treatment compared to control that indicates lower perceived stress levels among intervention treatment. Minimum 0, maximum 40.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year, 5 year

  8. Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale

    Higher score on a Warwick-Edinburhg Mental Wellbeing scale among intervention treatment compared to control that indicates better mental well-being among intervention treatment. Minimum 14, maximum 70.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year, 5 year

  9. Depression Scale

    Lower score on a Depression scale among intervention treatment compared to control that indicates lower levels of depression symptoms among intervention treatment. Minimum 0, maximum 60.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year, 5 year

  10. Nature Relatedness Scale

    Higher score on a Nature Relatedness scale among intervention treatment compared to control that indicates stronger sense of connectedness to nature among intervention treatment. Minimum 6, maximum 30.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year, 5 year

  11. Metabolites in urine

    Metabolites of harmful substances are measured from the urine sample.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year, 5 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Apr 2024
  2. Study start30 Mar 2022
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Sep 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Intervention-control study in which intervention study subjects private yards are rewilded and control receives no treatment.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06353035
Sponsor's protocol ID
NaturalResourcesIFinland
Other IDs
346136, 346138
Acronym
BIWE
Status last verified
Mar 2024
First submitted
27 Mar 2024
Last updated
8 Apr 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Rewilding in people with Microbial Colonization and Immune System Diseases, run by Natural Resources Institute Finland at 1 site in Finland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Finland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Skin Gammaproteobacteria (time frame: Baseline, 3 month, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year, 5 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Apr 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in