AzTrials
AzTrials

Dermatitis, AtopicATTRACTNCT06353087

Abrocitinib Taiwan Treatment Pattern and Real World Study in ATopiC Dermatitis (ATTRACT Registry)

An observational study of Dermatitis, Atopic and Dermatitis, run by Pfizer at 8 sites in Taiwan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is to describe the real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in moderate-to-severe AD patients receiving abrocitinib over a 12-month observation period, and to describe patient demographic and baseline characteristics. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Dermatitis, Atopic, Dermatitis, Eczema
How many people
41 participants
Where
8 sitesTaiwan
Study dates
19 Jun 2024to 22 Jun 2026
How long will I take part?
12 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adult and pediatric AD patients ≥12 years with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis receiving abrocitinib.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for inclusion in the study:
  • Patients aged ≥12 years
  • Patients with confirmed diagnosis of moderate-to-severe AD as assessed by the physician
  • Patients for whom the physician's decision has been made to newly prescribe abrocitinib in usual clinical practice conditions
  • Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent/assent document indicating that the patient (or a legally acceptable representative) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study

Who cannot join

  • Patients meeting any of the following criteria will not be included in the study:
  • Any prior use of abrocitinib
  • Simultaneous participation in a study that includes administration of any investigational drug or procedure

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 1 country.

8 sites in 1 country

Taiwan8 sites
  • Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital

    Kaohsiung City, 807377

  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Kaohsiung

    Kaohsiung City, 83301

  • Taipei Medical University - Shuang Ho Hospital

    New Taipei City, 23561

  • NTUH

    Taipei, 100

  • MacKay Memorial Hospital

    Taipei, 10449

  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital

    Taipei, 11217

  • Tri-Service General Hospital

    Taipei, 11490, R.O.C.

  • Chang Gung Hospital Linkou

    Taoyuan, 333

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: THE REAL-WORLD TREATMENT PATTERNS AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN MODERATE-TO-SEVERE ATOPIC DERMATITIS (AD) PATIENTS RECEIVING ABROCITINIB

This study is to describe the real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in moderate-to-severe AD patients receiving abrocitinib over a 12-month observation period, and to describe patient demographic and baseline characteristics.

Keywords
Atopic Dermatitis, Abrocitinib, JAK inhibitors, Real world, Registry, Taiwan
Medical subject headings
Dermatitis, Atopic, Dermatitis, Eczema, Skin Diseases, Immune System Diseases

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving >= 75% Improvement From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) Response at Week 2, 12, 52

    EASI quantifies severity of AD based on severity of lesion clinical signs and percentage (%) of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) were scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk [including axillae and groin)] and lower limbs [including buttocks]) on a 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (>0 to <10%), 2 (10 to <30%), 3 (30 to <50%), 4 (50 to <70%), 5 (70 to <90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1*Ah*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2*Au*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3*At*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4*Al*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores indicating greater severity of AD.

    Measured: Week 2, 12, 52

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving >= 90% Improvement From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-90) Response at Week 2, 12, 52

    EASI quantifies severity of AD based on severity of lesion clinical signs and percentage (%) of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) were scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk [including axillae and groin)] and lower limbs [including buttocks]) on a 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (>0 to <10%), 2 (10 to <30%), 3 (30 to <50%), 4 (50 to <70%), 5 (70 to <90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1*Ah*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2*Au*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3*At*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4*Al*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores indicating greater severity of AD.

    Measured: Week 2, 12, 52

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and Greater Than or Equal to 2 Points Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 12, 52

    IGA assesses severity of AD on a 5 point scale (0 to 4, higher scores indicate more severity). Scores: 0= clear, no inflammatory signs of AD; 1= almost clear, AD not fully cleared- light pink residual lesions (except post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation), just perceptible erythema, papulation/induration lichenification, excoriation, and no oozing/crusting; 2= mild AD with light red lesions, slight but definite erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and no oozing/crusting; 3= moderate AD with red lesions, moderate erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and slight oozing/crusting; 4= severe AD with deep dark red lesions, severe erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and moderate to severe oozing/crusting. Assessment excluded sole, palms and scalp.

    Measured: Week 2, 12, 52

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Duration of Abrocitinib Treatment: All Participants

    Duration of treatment with abrocitinib was the time from date of start of abrocitinib treatment to date of end of abrocitinib treatment or of latest follow-up if not suspended.

    Measured: During post-index period (12 months duration post index date)

  2. Demographic and baseline characteristics

    Measured: During pre-index period

  3. Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Total Score at Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52

    EASI evaluates severity of participant's AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions(head and neck, upper limbs, trunk [including axillae and groin] and lower limbs [including buttocks]) on4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in each 4 body region: 0 (0%), 1 (>0 to <10%), 2 (10 to <30%), 3 (30 to <50%), 4 (50 to <70%), 5 (70 to <90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1*Ah*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2*Au*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3*At*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4*Al*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores = greater severity of AD.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52

  4. Change From Baseline in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) at Weeks 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52

    IGA assesses severity of participant's AD on a 5 point scale. 0= clear, no inflammatory signs of AD; 1= almost clear, AD not fully cleared- light pink residual lesions (except post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation), just perceptible erythema, papulation/induration lichenification, excoriation, and no oozing/crusting; 2= mild AD with light red lesions, slight but definite erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and no oozing/crusting; 3= moderate AD with red lesions, moderate erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and slight oozing/crusting and 4= severe AD with deep dark red lesions, severe erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and moderate to severe oozing/crusting. Higher scores indicating more severity of AD. Assessment excluded soles, palms and scalp.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52

  5. Change From Baseline in Percentage Body Surface Area at Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52

    4 body regions were evaluated: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk (including axillae and groin) and lower limbs (including buttocks). Scalp, palms and soles were excluded. BSA was calculated using handprint method. Number of handprints (size of participant's hand with fingers in a closed position) fitting in the affected area of a body region was estimated. Maximum number of handprints were 10 for head and neck, 20 for upper limbs, 30 for trunk and 40 for lower limbs. Surface area of body region equivalent to 1 handprint: 1 handprint was equal to 10% for head and neck, 5% for upper limbs, 3.33% for trunk and 2.5% for lower limbs. Percent BSA for a body region was calculated as = total number of handprints in a body region * % surface area equivalent to 1 handprint. Overall % BSA for an individual: arithmetic mean of % BSA of all 4 body regions, ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52

  6. Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 2, 4, 12, and 52

    POEM is a 7-item participant reported outcome (PRO) measure used to assess the impact of AD (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) over the past week. Each item is scored as "no days (0)", "1-2 days (1)", "3-4 days (2)", "5-6 days (3)" and "every day (4)". The score ranges from 0 to 28, where higher score indicated greater severity.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, and 52

  7. Change from baseline of Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT) score at Week 2, 4, 12, and 52

    The Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT) is a brief patient self-administered instrument designed and validated to assess patient-perceived AD control; AD symptoms and impacts are evaluated over the past week, including overall severity of symptoms, days with intense episodes of itching, intensity of bother, problem with sleep, impact on daily activities, and impact on mood or emotions

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, and 52

  8. Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score to Week 2, 4, 12, and 52

    The DLQI was a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on participant's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. The DLQI total score ranges from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much): 0-1 = no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-6 = small effect on the participant's life; 7-12 = moderate effect on the participant's life; 13-18 = very large effect on the participant's life; 19-30 = extremely large effect on the participant's life. Higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life of participants.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, and 52

  9. Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA)

    The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52

  10. Percentage Change From Baseline in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52

    The severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD was assessed using a horizontal NRS. Participants at specified time points were asked the following question: "How would you rate your itch due to AD at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?" The scale ranged from 0-10, where 0= no itch and 10= worst itch imaginable. Higher scores indicated worse itch.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52

  11. Percentage of Participants Achieving >=4 Points Reduction in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52

    The severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD was assessed using a horizontal NRS. Participants at specified time points were asked the following question: "How would you rate your itch due to AD at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?" The scale ranged from 0-10, where 0= no itch and 10= worst itch imaginable. Higher scores indicated worse itch.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52

  12. Percentage of Participants Achieving 0 or 1 in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52

    The severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD was assessed using a horizontal NRS. Participants at specified time points were asked the following question: "How would you rate your itch due to AD at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?" The scale ranged from 0-10, where 0= no itch and 10= worst itch imaginable. Higher scores indicated worse itch.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Apr 2024
  2. Study start19 Jun 2024
  3. Primary completion22 Jun 2026
  4. Study completion22 Jun 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
41 participants (actual)
Target duration
12 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06353087
Sponsor's protocol ID
B7451114
Other IDs
NCT06353087
Acronym
ATTRACT
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
21 Mar 2024
Last updated
18 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Dermatitis, Atopic and Dermatitis, run by Pfizer at 8 sites in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Achieving >= 75% Improvement From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) Response at Week 2, 12, 52 (time frame: Week 2, 12, 52). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Aug 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in