AzTrials
AzTrials

CataractNCT06354296

Comparison of the Accuracy of Different Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Cataract Patients With Prior Radial Keratotomy

An observational study of Cataract, run by He Eye Hospital.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The Web-based Barret True K formula with no history formula has been proven to be a good choice for cataract patients after RK in several studies. The American society of cataract and refractive surgeons provides several IOL formulas for cataract patients who have undergone previous corneal refractive surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Cataract
How many people
50 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
15 Apr 2024to 31 Aug 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with cataract after RK

Who may be able to join

  • Had a previous history of RK surgery
  • IOL-Master is available
  • There were no intraoperative and postoperative complications
  • Obvious refraction was performed 1 to 6 months after cataract surgery

Who cannot join

  • The investigator decided that it was not suitable for this study

About this study

The Web-based Barret True K formula with no history formula has been proven to be a good choice for cataract patients after RK in several studies. The American society of cataract and refractive surgeons provides several IOL formulas for cataract patients who have undergone previous corneal refractive surgery. In cases where only IOL-Master data are available, Holladay 1 (Double-K) [Holladay 1 (D-K)] can be used for IOL power calculation in cataract patients with a history of RK. The traditional Haigis formula has also been shown to be effective for cataract patients after RK. To compare the accuracy of four intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas in cataract patients after RK. They are Barrett True-K formula, Holladay 1(D-K) formula, Haigis formula, and MM formula.

Read the detailed description

Myopia is the most common cause of distance vision impairment. The prevalence of myopia has increased dramatically in the past few decades, especially in China. Corneal refractive surgery is an effective method to correct adult myopia. Radial keratotomy (RK) is one of the corneal refractive surgeries developed in the 1980s. Thirty years ago, many myopic patients underwent RK. As patients age, more and more patients have cataracts requiring cataract extraction and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. The selection of appropriate and accurate IOL is an important factor to improve patient satisfaction. Recent studies have compared the accuracy of the newly developed IOL formula in patients with previous RK cataract. However, as a country with myopia and myopia surgery, there is no similar study in China. In addition, most patients with cataract after RK had lost ocular data before RK surgery. For RK patients without previous ocular data, how to accurately calculate the IOL power is still a clinical challenge.

Conditions
Cataract
Keywords
cataract, RK surgery, formula
Medical subject headings
Cataract

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Accuracy of the IOL formula

    To compare the accuracy of four intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas in cataract patients after radial keratotomy (RK). They are Barrett True-K formula, Holladay 1(D-K) formula, Haigis formula, and MM formula

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Apr 2024
  2. Study start15 Apr 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion15 Aug 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06354296
Sponsor's protocol ID
CAF2024
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
3 Apr 2024
Last updated
9 Apr 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cataract, run by He Eye Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Accuracy of the IOL formula (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Apr 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in