Cancer ProstatePSMA-RADSNCT06359717
Prospective Validation of PSMA-RADS
An observational study of Cancer Prostate, run by Zagazig University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
This is a prospective, multicenter study aimed at evaluating the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Reporting and Data System (PSMA-RADS) version 1.0 in detecting prostate cancer using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer Prostate
- How many people
- 477 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2023to 20 Aug 2025
- How long will I take part?
- 1 Year
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: * A total of 477 consecutive patients were initially recruited from three institutions between January 2023 and August 2024. * After applying the exclusion criteria, the final study cohort comprised 443 patients. * The cohort included three groups of patients: 164 new diagnoses, 108 BCR, and 171 follow-up
Who may be able to join
- Patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer
- Patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer
- Ability to undergo 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging (e.g., no contraindications such as weight limitations, claustrophobia, inability to lie still)
- No allergy to contrast media used for the diagnostic CT component
- Adequate hepatic and renal function to receive the radiotracer
- Willingness to provide informed consent for participation in the study
Who cannot join
- Inability to undergo PET/CT scan due to weight (e.g., \>180 kg) (n=5)
- Claustrophobia or inability to lie still throughout the scanning duration (n=3)
- Allergy to contrast media (n=2)
- Hepatic impairment (n=5)
- Renal failure (n=2)
- Patients lost during follow-up (n=7)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Prostatic Specific Membrane Antigen Reporting and Data System (PSMA-RADS) Version 1.0: Prospective Validation and Comparison to Updated Version (v2.0)
This is a prospective, multicenter study aimed at evaluating the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Reporting and Data System (PSMA-RADS) version 1.0 in detecting prostate cancer using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging. The study also compared the performance of PSMA-RADS v1.0 with the updated version 2.0.
Key points:
- 477 patients with newly diagnosed, recurrent or follow up prostate cancer underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging.
- Three radiologists independently evaluated the scans and assigned PSMA-RADS scores using v1.0, then retrospectively using v2.0.
- Diagnostic accuracy was assessed against histopathology and follow-up imaging as reference standards.
- Inter-rater agreement was evaluated using Fleiss\' kappa statistic.
- The study aimed to validate the diagnostic utility of PSMA-RADS v1.0 and compare it to the updated v2.0.
Read the detailed description
Study Design and Patient Population:
Between January 2023 and August 2024, a total of 477 consecutive patients were recruited from four institutions. The study cohort included patients with newly diagnosed Pca referred for initial staging, patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR), and patients referred for follow-up. Patients were excluded based on the following criteria: inability to undergo PET/CT scan due to weight (e.g., >180 kg) (n= 4), claustrophobia or inability to lie still throughout the scanning duration (n= 6), allergy to contrast media (n= 3), hepatic impairment (n= 9), renal failure (n= 3), and patients lost during follow-up (n= 9). This resulted in a final cohort of 443 patients (164 new diagnoses, 108 BCR, and 171 follow-up). The flowchart of the study is illustrated in Fig. 1. Once enrolled; all patients underwent a 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scan. For each patient, we determined the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, Gleason score (GS), and disease stage according to the TNM classification (molecular imaging TM (miTNM)), as proposed by PROMISE criteria.
Imaging Protocol:
- All patients underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging on integrated PET/CT scanners.
- Detailed acquisition protocol is provided, including patient preparation, radiotracer dosing, low-dose CT, PET acquisition, and diagnostic contrast-enhanced CT.
Image Analysis:
- Three experienced nuclear medicine radiologists independently evaluated the anonymized PET/CT images in random order, blinded to clinical data.
- They underwent standardized training on PSMA-RADS criteria before the study.
- For each patient, the scan was divided into 4 regions: prostate/bed, lymph nodes, bones, soft tissues.
- Each region was assessed for uptake intensity, sites relevant for metastases, and CT lesion definition.
- Radiologists assigned PSMA-RADS categories (1-5) to each region and an overall patient score using v1.0 criteria.
- Retrospectively, they re-assigned scores using the updated PSMA-RADS v2.0 criteria after its publication in July 2023.
Reference Standard:
The primary endpoint was diagnostic accuracy on a per-patient basis. For newly diagnosed patients (n= 167), the definitive diagnosis was validated by histopathological results after biopsy. Biopsies were obtained through a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided procedure within two weeks before 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging. For patients with biochemical recurrence, and patients with follow-up, the final diagnosis was confirmed based on the following: (i) Histopathological findings after biopsy (n= 151 patients (55 locoregional, 96 lymph nodes, 45 bone lesions, and 42 visceral soft tissue lesions)). Biopsies were taken by ultrasound-guided (n=78) or CT-guided (n=73) procedure within two weeks before 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging. Two experienced pathologists evaluated all specimens, and the results were obtained by consensus. In patients with multiple lesions, the biopsy result of one lesion was considered representative of all lesions. Biopsies were performed to determine the lesion type as per the doctor's request. (ii) One year of clinical and imaging follow-up (n= 37). Follow-up imaging was completed every six months via 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT analysis. It was interpreted by a panel of expert readers who were informed of the locations of the lesions described by the blinded readers at initial imaging.
Statistical Analysis:
- Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using a 4-fold table against the reference standard.
- ROC analysis was performed to determine optimal cut-offs and AUCs.
- Inter-rater agreement was assessed using Fleiss\' kappa statistic.
- Performance of PSMA-RADS v1.0 and v2.0 were compared.
In summary, this prospective study rigorously evaluated the diagnostic performance and reliability of PSMA-RADS v1.0 on a multi-center cohort using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, and compared it head-to-head with the updated version 2.0, with thorough statistical analyses planned.
- Conditions
- Cancer Prostate
- Keywords
- gallium 68 PSMA-11, Prostatic Neoplasms, Positron Emission Tomography, Computed Tomography, Prospective Studies
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 164 new diagnoses, 108 BCR, and 171 follow-up | 1. 164 new diagnoses. 2.108 BCR. 3. 171 follow-up |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Diagnostic Accuracy of PSMA-RADS v1.0 and v2.0
The diagnostic accuracy of PSMA-RADS version 1.0 and version 2.0 for detecting prostate cancer lesions using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Diagnostic accuracy will be evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, calculated on a per-patient basis. Histopathological results from biopsy and/or clinical/imaging follow-up will serve as the reference standard
Measured: One year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Inter-rater Agreement of PSMA-RADS v1.0 and v2.0
The degree of agreement among the three nuclear medicine radiologists in assigning PSMA-RADS categories using version 1.0 and version 2.0 criteria. Inter-rater agreement will be evaluated using Fleiss' kappa statistics
Measured: One year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Apr 2024
- Study start1 Jan 2023
- Primary completion10 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion20 Aug 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cancer ProstateStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 477 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 1 Year
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Zagazig University
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mohammad Abd Alkhalik Basha, Zagazig University
- Investigators
- Mohammad A. Basha, MD, Principal investigator, Zagazig University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06359717
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ZU-10490
- Acronym
- PSMA-RADS
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 29 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 14 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Almalki YE, Basha MAA, Ali SA, Donkol RH, Hamed MAG, Metwally MI, Hassan RMA, Frere RAF, Abdul Rahman AAE, Libda YI, Mahmoud NEM, Radwan MHSS, Eladl IM, Elsheikh AM, Zaitoun MMA, Mohamed Mohamed AS, AbdelHamid GA, Tantawy HF, Badr SE, Mosallam W, Al-Shatouri M, S Abo Shanab W, Dawoud TM, Khater HM, Abouelkheir RT, Abdelhamed H, Obaya AA, Elshafaay BS, Basha AMA, Mohammad RMA, Ebaid NY. Comparison of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Reporting and Data System Version 1.0 versus 2.0 for Prostate Cancer Assessment. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2025 May;7(3):e240390. doi: 10.1148/rycan.240390.
PubMed 40377421
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prostatic Specific Membrane Antigen Reporting and Data System (PSMA-RADS) Version 1.0: Prospective Validation and Comparison to Updated Version (v2.0)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06359717
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PSMA-RADS / ZU-10490
- Conditions
- Cancer Prostate
- Keywords
- gallium 68 PSMA-11, Prostatic Neoplasms, Positron Emission Tomography, Computed Tomography, Prospective Studies
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 477 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Zagazig UniversityOther government
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 20 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective, multicenter study aimed at evaluating the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Reporting and Data System (PSMA-RADS) version 1.0 in detecting prostate cancer using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging. The study also compared the performance of PSMA-RADS v1.0 with the updated version 2.0.
Key points:
- 477 patients with newly diagnosed, recurrent or follow up prostate cancer underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging.
- Three radiologists independently evaluated the scans and assigned PSMA-RADS scores using v1.0, then retrospectively using v2.0.
- Diagnostic accuracy was assessed against histopathology and follow-up imaging as reference standards.
- Inter-rater agreement was evaluated using Fleiss\' kappa statistic.
- The study aimed to validate the diagnostic utility of PSMA-RADS v1.0 and compare it to the updated v2.0.
Detailed description
Study Design and Patient Population:
Between January 2023 and August 2024, a total of 477 consecutive patients were recruited from four institutions. The study cohort included patients with newly diagnosed Pca referred for initial staging, patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR), and patients referred for follow-up. Patients were excluded based on the following criteria: inability to undergo PET/CT scan due to weight (e.g., >180 kg) (n= 4), claustrophobia or inability to lie still throughout the scanning duration (n= 6), allergy to contrast media (n= 3), hepatic impairment (n= 9), renal failure (n= 3), and patients lost during follow-up (n= 9). This resulted in a final cohort of 443 patients (164 new diagnoses, 108 BCR, and 171 follow-up). The flowchart of the study is illustrated in Fig. 1. Once enrolled; all patients underwent a 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scan. For each patient, we determined the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, Gleason score (GS), and disease stage according to the TNM classification (molecular imaging TM (miTNM)), as proposed by PROMISE criteria.
Imaging Protocol:
- All patients underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging on integrated PET/CT scanners.
- Detailed acquisition protocol is provided, including patient preparation, radiotracer dosing, low-dose CT, PET acquisition, and diagnostic contrast-enhanced CT.
Image Analysis:
- Three experienced nuclear medicine radiologists independently evaluated the anonymized PET/CT images in random order, blinded to clinical data.
- They underwent standardized training on PSMA-RADS criteria before the study.
- For each patient, the scan was divided into 4 regions: prostate/bed, lymph nodes, bones, soft tissues.
- Each region was assessed for uptake intensity, sites relevant for metastases, and CT lesion definition.
- Radiologists assigned PSMA-RADS categories (1-5) to each region and an overall patient score using v1.0 criteria.
- Retrospectively, they re-assigned scores using the updated PSMA-RADS v2.0 criteria after its publication in July 2023.
Reference Standard:
The primary endpoint was diagnostic accuracy on a per-patient basis. For newly diagnosed patients (n= 167), the definitive diagnosis was validated by histopathological results after biopsy. Biopsies were obtained through a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided procedure within two weeks before 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging. For patients with biochemical recurrence, and patients with follow-up, the final diagnosis was confirmed based on the following: (i) Histopathological findings after biopsy (n= 151 patients (55 locoregional, 96 lymph nodes, 45 bone lesions, and 42 visceral soft tissue lesions)). Biopsies were taken by ultrasound-guided (n=78) or CT-guided (n=73) procedure within two weeks before 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging. Two experienced pathologists evaluated all specimens, and the results were obtained by consensus. In patients with multiple lesions, the biopsy result of one lesion was considered representative of all lesions. Biopsies were performed to determine the lesion type as per the doctor's request. (ii) One year of clinical and imaging follow-up (n= 37). Follow-up imaging was completed every six months via 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT analysis. It was interpreted by a panel of expert readers who were informed of the locations of the lesions described by the blinded readers at initial imaging.
Statistical Analysis:
- Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using a 4-fold table against the reference standard.
- ROC analysis was performed to determine optimal cut-offs and AUCs.
- Inter-rater agreement was assessed using Fleiss\' kappa statistic.
- Performance of PSMA-RADS v1.0 and v2.0 were compared.
In summary, this prospective study rigorously evaluated the diagnostic performance and reliability of PSMA-RADS v1.0 on a multi-center cohort using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, and compared it head-to-head with the updated version 2.0, with thorough statistical analyses planned.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 1 Year
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 164 new diagnoses, 108 BCR, and 171 follow-up | – | –1. 164 new diagnoses. 2.108 BCR. 3. 171 follow-up |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- * A total of 477 consecutive patients were initially recruited from three institutions between January 2023 and August 2024. * After applying the exclusion criteria, the final study cohort comprised 443 patients. * The cohort included three groups of patients: 164 new diagnoses, 108 BCR, and 171 follow-up
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer
- Patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer
- Ability to undergo 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging (e.g., no contraindications such as weight limitations, claustrophobia, inability to lie still)
- No allergy to contrast media used for the diagnostic CT component
- Adequate hepatic and renal function to receive the radiotracer
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Inability to undergo PET/CT scan due to weight (e.g., \>180 kg) (n=5)
- Claustrophobia or inability to lie still throughout the scanning duration (n=3)
- Allergy to contrast media (n=2)
- Hepatic impairment (n=5)
- Renal failure (n=2)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Diagnostic Accuracy of PSMA-RADS v1.0 and v2.0
Time frame: One year
The diagnostic accuracy of PSMA-RADS version 1.0 and version 2.0 for detecting prostate cancer lesions using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Diagnostic accuracy will be evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, calculated on a per-patient basis. Histopathological results from biopsy and/or clinical/imaging follow-up will serve as the reference standard
1 secondary outcome
Inter-rater Agreement of PSMA-RADS v1.0 and v2.0
Time frame: One year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Aug 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40377421Almalki YE, Basha MAA, Ali SA, Donkol RH, Hamed MAG, Metwally MI, Hassan RMA, Frere RAF, Abdul Rahman AAE, Libda YI, Mahmoud NEM, Radwan MHSS, Eladl IM, Elsheikh AM, Zaitoun MMA, Mohamed Mohamed AS, AbdelHamid GA, Tantawy HF, Badr SE, Mosallam W, Al-Shatouri M, S Abo Shanab W, Dawoud TM, Khater HM, Abouelkheir RT, Abdelhamed H, Obaya AA, Elshafaay BS, Basha AMA, Mohammad RMA, Ebaid NY. Comparison of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Reporting and Data System Version 1.0 versus 2.0 for Prostate Cancer Assessment. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2025 May;7(3):e240390. doi: 10.1148/rycan.240390.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cancer Prostate
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Hormone Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer
PSA Level Greater Than Two, Stage IV Prostate Adenocarcinoma AJCC v7
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
FTT PET/CT in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Prostate Cancer Metastatic
Enrolling by invitation
Use of Tracking Devices to Locate Abnormalities During Invasive Procedures
Adenocarcinoma, Prostate Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Terbinafine for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer (TerbinaPro)
Recurrent Prostate Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study to Test the Safety and Tolerability of PF-07220060 in Participants With Advance Solid Tumors
Liposarcoma, Prostate Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mohammad A. Basha, MD principal investigator
Zagazig University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cancer Prostate, run by Zagazig University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Diagnostic Accuracy of PSMA-RADS v1.0 and v2.0 (time frame: One year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06359717, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Aug 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.