Neck PainNCT06361472
Contextual Factors-Enriched Standard Care on Mechanical Neck Pain
A study testing Contextual Factors in people with Neck Pain, run by Universidad Nacional de la Matanza at 2 sites in Argentina.
Trial summary
The primary purpose of this study will be to determine if a CFs-Enriched Standard Care approach is an effective treatment for mechanical neck pain in terms of reducing pain and improving function. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Neck Pain
- What is being tested?
- Contextual Factors
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 94 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesArgentina
- Study dates
- 2 May 2024to Jul 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged >18.
- Neck pain for more than 4 weeks without signs or symptoms suggestive of major structural pathology.
- Read, write, and understand the Spanish language.
- Signed consent form.
Who cannot join
- Numeric Pain Reporting Scale (NPRS) < 3 points (to ensure the exclusion of patients with minor disorders).
- Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) < 10 points (to ensure the exclusion of patients with minor disorders).
- History of cervical spine trauma, fracture, or surgical procedures.
- Signs and symptoms of cervical myelopathy and/or cervical radiculopathy (to rule out cervical radicular pain, the Spurling Test, the Upper Limb Tension Test for the median nerve, and the Traction/Distraction test will be used).
- Red flags or serious pathologies, such as malignancy, inflammatory or rheumatic diseases, infections, and vascular conditions like cervical artery insufficiency.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Argentina2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Carlos G. Durand
Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, 1405
Santiago Soliño, PT, (+54) 11 3574-2362, lic.santiagosolino@gmail.com
Pablo O Policastro, PhD, (+54) 11 5596-4311, pablopolicastro@gmail.com
- Recruiting
Hospital Donación Francisco Santojanni
Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, 1408
Mauro F Andreu, PhD, (+54) 11 6878-8298, mfandreu@gmail.com
Federico J Villalba, PT, (+54) 11 3324-9413, federicojosevillalba@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: A Two-Center, Investigator-Blinded, Randomized, 4-Week, Parallel-Group, Superiority Study Comparing Contextual Factors-Enriched Standard Care Versus Standard Care Only for Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain (ContextualizAR Trial)
The primary purpose of this study will be to determine if a CFs-Enriched Standard Care approach is an effective treatment for mechanical neck pain in terms of reducing pain and improving function. We hypothesize that a 4-week CFs-Enriched Standard Care approach will be superior to Standard Care alone in terms of patient-reported disability and pain, with measurements conducted using the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, respectively.
This will be an assessor-blinded, 2-group (1:1) randomized clinical trial aiming to enroll 94 participants with neck pain persisting for more than 4 weeks. Both groups will undergo 4 weeks of standard care twice weekly, following established clinical practice guidelines. In the intervention group, CFs will be enhanced, encompassing the physical, psychological, and social elements inherent in the clinical encounter, based on existing evidence.
Read more
The primary outcomes will encompass changes in Pain and Disability after 4 weeks of treatment, with a follow-up reassessment at week 12 post-treatment. Secondary outcomes will include changes in Active Range of Motion, Global Rating of Change, and Satisfaction with treatment. The change between groups after treatment and at the 12-week follow-up will be reported for all outcomes, considering the difference from scores recorded at baseline.
This study will be conducted at two sites in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Randomization will be stratified by site to ensure balanced allocation across centers.
Read the detailed description
The primary aim of this study is to determine if a Contextual Factors-Enriched Standard Care (CFs+SC) approach is an effective treatment for MNP in terms of reducing pain and improving function. We hypothesize that a 4-week Contextual Factors-Enriched Standard Care will be superior to Standard Care alone in terms of patient-reported disability and pain, with measurements conducted using the Argentine version of the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ-AR) and the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), respectively.
The secondary aims are:
- To determine whether CFs+SC is more effective than SC in terms of active range of motion (ROM) enhancement, global perceived effect (GROC), and satisfaction with treatment after the 4-week intervention.
- To determine if a CFs+SC approach is effective in treating MNP in terms of disability improvement, pain reduction, active ROM enhancement, global perceived effect (GROC), and satisfaction with treatment 12 weeks after a 4-week treatment plan.
- To explore differences in treatment credibility and expectations between the CFs+SC group and the SC group at both the 2-week and 4-week intervals.
- To investigate whether individuals identified with at least one negative psychosocial condition (such as anxiety, fear of movement, stress, catastrophizing, and depression) will experience greater benefits from the CFs+SC intervention compared to those without negative psychosocial conditions.
Consecutive patients meeting all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the CFs+SC group or the SC alone group. Randomization will employ a blocked design with variable block lengths (2:4) and will be stratified based on recruitment site, baseline pain ('mild-moderate' or 'severe,' determined by whether they report between 3 and 7 points or ≥ 8 points on the baseline NPRS, respectively), and participants' expectations ('high' or 'low') regarding the effectiveness of standard care treatment.
The randomization process will be generated and conducted by personnel who will not be involved in data analysis or patient enrollment. The website www.randomization.com will be used for this process. To maintain allocation concealment during the study, sequential, numbered, and sealed opaque envelopes will be utilized. Patients will be allocated to one of two groups: a CFs+SC group and the SC group. Due to the nature of the study, blinding of both therapists and patients will not be feasible. The person in charge of data statistical analysis and the evaluators who will assess all participants' pre- and post-intervention assessments will be blinded to the allocated intervention.
Both groups will undergo 4 weeks of standard care twice weekly following established clinical practice guidelines, and including exercises, mobilization, manual therapy, education, and a neck wellness home care guide. In the intervention group, CFs will be enhanced, encompassing the physical, psychological, and social elements inherent in the clinical encounter, based on existing evidence.
At the onset of treatment, patients will receive a schedule outlining the dates of the next 8 visits. One day before each session, an individual not involved in the study will send a text message (SMS) reminder. Should a scheduled session be missed, it will be rescheduled. However, patients who miss two consecutive scheduled sessions will be deemed dropouts and analyzed using the intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with the last observed value taken into consideration. Additionally, participants will be asked to refrain from undergoing any other treatments until the end of the 12-week follow-up period. During this period, participants are only permitted to adhere to the NWHCG. If a participant reports undergoing any other treatments, they will be considered as dropouts and analyzed using the ITT approach.
Due to slower-than-anticipated recruitment at the original site, a second recruiting site was incorporated on July 1, 2026, to reach the target sample size. Both sites apply identical eligibility criteria, intervention protocols, and outcome assessments. Physiotherapists at both sites completed the same training program described below, and adherence to the Manual of Treatment (MOT) is monitored equally across sites through the procedures described below
Physiotherapists will undergo a comprehensive training program comprising 8 hours of formal instruction, tailored to provide the necessary skills and proficiency for both therapeutic contexts under investigation. To ensure treatment fidelity, a Manual of Treatment (MOT) was developed. Therapist adherence to the MOT will be evaluated through self-assessment ratings provided by the therapists themselves. After each session, therapists will rate their adherence to the manual using a form specifically designed for this study. Additionally, monthly audits will assess compliance with the MOT, and frequent meetings with providers will be held to mitigate any deviations in provider adherence to the MOT, ensuring its consistency over time.
The sample size for this study was determined using a linear mixed effects model to account for within-subject correlation arising from repeated measures over time. The model includes fixed effects, such as treatment group (CF+SC and SC groups) and time points (baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks after treatment), and recruitment site, along with the interaction between treatment group and time to assess potential changes in treatment effects over time. Random effects for individual subjects were also included to address repeated measures within the same subjects. Based on an assumed medium effect size (f2 = 0.15), 80% power, and a significance level of 0.05 (two-tailed), the estimated sample size required for this study was calculated to be 85 subjects. To accommodate a projected dropout rate of 10%, the sample size was adjusted, resulting in a final target sample size of 94 subjects (47 participants per group).
Outcomes will be analyzed on an ITT basis, with reporting of sample characteristics and descriptive statistics. Linear mixed models will be used for primary analysis to verify the differences between the average effects of interventions (CFs+SC and SC) in reassessments carried out 4 weeks after random allocation and 12 weeks after treatment, adjusting for recruitment site as a fixed effect given the stratified randomization. The differences between groups will be calculated by interaction terms of groups versus time. All statistical procedures will be performed using SPSS, developed by SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA.
Trial procedures and evaluations will be conducted by trained personnel using paper-based Case Report Forms (CRFs), with implemented quality control measures. Subsequently, the data will be entered into an electronic database using MAWE® Data Collection Tools (www.mawetools.com). An independent data monitoring committee will oversee the entire data collection process to ensure its quality and integrity. Monitoring of the study will be overseen by MFA and FV at the original site, and by SS and POP at the second site, encompassing verification of adherence to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, monitoring overall study progress, and ensuring accurate data recording in CRFs. Auditing responsibilities will be carried out weekly by the principal investigator to ensure completeness and accuracy across critical study components, including participant consent forms, paper forms, and recruitment rates.
The trial will be conducted in compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice, and all applicable regulatory requirements. Ethical approval has been obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) (#11695, approved on 15/03/2024). The principal investigator and researchers affirm no financial or other competing interests. Access to final trial data will be provided to designated individuals and authorized personnel, with any contractual restrictions transparently disclosed. Upon trial completion, results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, following authorship guidelines established by the ICMJE and CRediT framework.
- Conditions
- Neck Pain
- Being tested
- Standard Care, Contextual Factors
- Keywords
- neck pain, functional status, contextual factors, placebo, randomized controlled trial
- Medical subject headings
- Neck Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Standard CareOther
Also called SC
Standard Care includes exercises, mobilization, manual therapy, education, and Neck Wellness Home Care Guide (NWHCG). The rehabilitation program is based on current clinical practice guidelines aimed at reducing neck pain, improving range of motion, enhancing functionality, and promoting physical activity motivation. Each patient will receive active exercises and manual therapy techniques. Educational components will cover pain science, physical activity benefits, and return to normal activities , supplemented by a NWHCG. Treatment sessions will be conducted, featuring a one-to-one interaction between the participant and the physiotherapist. It will last 4 weeks, with two sessions per week, 45 minutes/session (8 treatment sessions).
Contextual FactorsBehavioural
Also called CFs
Bundle of contextual factors divided into three categories: professional, treatment, and healthcare setting features. Regarding the professional contextual factors, they include reputation, appearance, and positive attitudes. The treatment contextual factors encompass positive attitudes, verbal communication, non-verbal communication, empathetic therapeutic alliance, therapeutic touch, and the use of a mirror to show the patient what is being performed. Finally, the healthcare setting contextual factors feature a comfortable setting, adequate environmental conditions, and appropriate design.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Care (SC) | Active comparator | Treatment will be carried out based on the mechanical neck pain clinical practice guideline. Physiotherapists treating this group of patients will avoid enhancing the contextual factors mentioned in the intervention group. Receives: Other: Standard Care |
| Contextual Factors-Enriched Standard Care (CFs+SC) | Experimental | Treatment will be carried out based on the mechanical neck pain clinical practice guideline. Additionally, Contextual Factors, which include physical, psychological, and social elements involved in the clinical encounter between the patient and the physiotherapist, will be deliberately enhanced in this group. Receives: Other: Standard Care; Behavioral: Contextual Factors |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Neck Pain Intensity
Neck pain intensity will be measured using a Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) composed of an 11-point scale, ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("the "worst pain imaginable") (Hawker et al., 2011; Kahl \& Cleland, 2005). In this study patients will be asked about their average pain intensity in the last 7 days (Jensen 1999).
Measured: 4 weeks and 12 weeks after end of treatment
Neck Disability
Neck disability will be measured using the Argentinian version of the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ-AR) (Aguirre et al., 2013). The questionnaire has 9 items relating to daily activities (personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work status, driving, sleeping and recreation) and cervical spine pain. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, the total score is 36; higher scores represent higher pain or disability.
Measured: 4 weeks and 12 weeks after end of treatment
Secondary outcomes (5)
Active Range of Movement
AROM will be measured with the "clinometer" iPhone and/or Android app as described by Monreal (2021): Cervical flexion, extension, and lateral flexion measurements will be conducted with participants in a seated position
Measured: 4 weeks and 12 weeks after end of treatment
Global Rating of Change
The GROC is designed to quantify a patient's improvement or deterioration over time. It requires the subject to evaluate his or her current health status and compare it to his or her previous condition (Kamper et al., 2009). To assess this construct the 10th question of the NPQ will be used. This item has 5 categories: ''much worse'', "Slightly worse", "The same", "Slightly better" and ''much better'' (Aguirre 2013).
Measured: 4 weeks and 12 weeks after end of treatment
Satisfaction with treatment
Overall treatment satisfaction will be evaluated with question number 11 of the MedRisk questionnaire. (Beattie 2005) Patient will score from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), the following sentence: "Overall, I am completely satisfied with the services I receive from my therapist" (Beattie 2005).
Measured: 4 weeks and 12 weeks after end of treatment
Expectations
Four questions, each corresponding to the specific intervention in the therapeutic plan (active exercises, manual therapy, education, and 'Neck Wellness Home Care Guide'), will be used to assess participants' expectations for the effectiveness of treatment. Participants will respond to the statement: 'I believe [intervention] will significantly help to improve this episode of my neck pain,' using a five-point scale: 'definitely agree,' 'agree,' 'neutral,' 'disagree,' and 'definitely disagree,' with 'neutral' representing the midpoint response (Bishop et al., 2013b).
Measured: At baseline, at the end of week 2 (session 5), and at the conclusion of week 4 (session 9).
Credibility
The credibility regarding the treatment will be evaluated by the first three questions of the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (Devilly \& Borkovec, 2000). The three items addressing therapy credibility relate to: 1) the extent to which the treatment appears logical, 2) the extent to which the treatment appears useful, 3) the confidence with which the patient would recommend the treatment to a friend having the same problem.
Measured: At baseline, at the end of week 2 (session 5), and at the conclusion of week 4 (session 9).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Apr 2024
- Study start2 May 2024
- Primary completionApr 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (33)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neck PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The ContextualizAR trial is designed as a two-arm, randomized, controlled, and blinded assessor superiority trial conducted at two centers. Patients will be allocated to one of two groups: a CFs+SC group and the SC group.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 94 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Nacional de la Matanza
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mauro Federico Andreu, Universidad Nacional de la Matanza
- Investigators
- Mauro F Andreu, PhD, Principal investigator, Universidad Nacional de la Matanza
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06361472
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 11695
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 7 Apr 2024
- Last updated
- 8 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Rossettini G, Carlino E, Testa M. Clinical relevance of contextual factors as triggers of placebo and nocebo effects in musculoskeletal pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jan 22;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-1943-8.
PubMed 29357856Kamper SJ. Engaging With Research: Linking Evidence With Practice. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Jun;48(6):512-513. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.0701.
PubMed 29852839Cook CE, Bailliard A, Bent JA, Bialosky JE, Carlino E, Colloca L, Esteves JE, Newell D, Palese A, Reed WR, Vilardaga JP, Rossettini G. An international consensus definition for contextual factors: findings from a nominal group technique. Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 3;14:1178560. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1178560. eCollection 2023.
PubMed 37465492Testa M, Rossettini G. Enhance placebo, avoid nocebo: How contextual factors affect physiotherapy outcomes. Man Ther. 2016 Aug;24:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
PubMed 27133031Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, Georgiou A, Kleijnen J. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet. 2001 Mar 10;357(9258):757-62. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04169-6.
PubMed 11253970Rossettini G, Camerone EM, Carlino E, Benedetti F, Testa M. Context matters: the psychoneurobiological determinants of placebo, nocebo and context-related effects in physiotherapy. Arch Physiother. 2020 Jun 11;10:11. doi: 10.1186/s40945-020-00082-y. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32537245O'Keeffe M, Cullinane P, Hurley J, Leahy I, Bunzli S, O'Sullivan PB, O'Sullivan K. What Influences Patient-Therapist Interactions in Musculoskeletal Physical Therapy? Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis. Phys Ther. 2016 May;96(5):609-22. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150240. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
PubMed 26427530Hush JM, Cameron K, Mackey M. Patient satisfaction with musculoskeletal physical therapy care: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2011 Jan;91(1):25-36. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100061. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
PubMed 21071504Andreu M, Policastro PO. ¿Por qué son importantes los factores contextuales en el abordaje kinésico? [Why are contextual factors important in the physical therapy approach?]. AJRPT. 2020;2(3):1-3. doi: 10.58172/ajrpt.v2i3.125
Bialosky JE, George SZ, Bishop MD. How spinal manipulative therapy works: why ask why? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Jun;38(6):293-5. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.0118. Epub 2008 May 27. No abstract available.
PubMed 18515964Fuentes J, Armijo-Olivo S, Funabashi M, Miciak M, Dick B, Warren S, Rashiq S, Magee DJ, Gross DP. Enhanced therapeutic alliance modulates pain intensity and muscle pain sensitivity in patients with chronic low back pain: an experimental controlled study. Phys Ther. 2014 Apr;94(4):477-89. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130118. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
PubMed 24309616Hu T, Long Y, Wei L, Zheng Y, Tong Y, Yuan M, Liu C, Wang X, Lin Y, Guo Q, Huang J, Du L. The Underappreciated Placebo Effects and Responses in Randomized Controlled Trials on Neck Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Jul;104(7):1124-1131. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.10.013. Epub 2022 Nov 20.
PubMed 36417969Pedersen JR, Strijkers R, Gerger H, Koes B, Chiarotto A. Clinical improvements due to specific effects and placebo effects in conservative interventions and changes observed with no treatment in randomized controlled trials of patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2024 Jun 1;165(6):1217-1232. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003151. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
PubMed 38198235Tsutsumi Y, Tsujimoto Y, Tajika A, Omae K, Fujii T, Onishi A, Kataoka Y, Katsura M, Noma H, Sahker E, Ostinelli EG, Furukawa TA. Proportion attributable to contextual effects in general medicine: a meta-epidemiological study based on Cochrane reviews. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Feb;28(1):40-47. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2021-111861. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
PubMed 35853683Miciak M, Gross DP, Joyce A. A review of the psychotherapeutic 'common factors' model and its application in physical therapy: the need to consider general effects in physical therapy practice. Scand J Caring Sci. 2012 Jun;26(2):394-403. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00923.x. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
PubMed 21913950
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Two-Center, Investigator-Blinded, Randomized, 4-Week, Parallel-Group, Superiority Study Comparing Contextual Factors-Enriched Standard Care Versus Standard Care Only for Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain (ContextualizAR Trial)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06361472
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 11695
- Conditions
- Neck Pain
- Keywords
- neck pain, functional status, contextual factors, placebo, randomized controlled trial
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 94 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Nacional de la MatanzaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 May 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary purpose of this study will be to determine if a CFs-Enriched Standard Care approach is an effective treatment for mechanical neck pain in terms of reducing pain and improving function. We hypothesize that a 4-week CFs-Enriched Standard Care approach will be superior to Standard Care alone in terms of patient-reported disability and pain, with measurements conducted using the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, respectively.
This will be an assessor-blinded, 2-group (1:1) randomized clinical trial aiming to enroll 94 participants with neck pain persisting for more than 4 weeks. Both groups will undergo 4 weeks of standard care twice weekly, following established clinical practice guidelines. In the intervention group, CFs will be enhanced, encompassing the physical, psychological, and social elements inherent in the clinical encounter, based on existing evidence.
The primary outcomes will encompass changes in Pain and Disability after 4 weeks of treatment, with a follow-up reassessment at week 12 post-treatment. Secondary outcomes will include changes in Active Range of Motion, Global Rating of Change, and Satisfaction with treatment. The change between groups after treatment and at the 12-week follow-up will be reported for all outcomes, considering the difference from scores recorded at baseline.
This study will be conducted at two sites in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Randomization will be stratified by site to ensure balanced allocation across centers.
Detailed description
The primary aim of this study is to determine if a Contextual Factors-Enriched Standard Care (CFs+SC) approach is an effective treatment for MNP in terms of reducing pain and improving function. We hypothesize that a 4-week Contextual Factors-Enriched Standard Care will be superior to Standard Care alone in terms of patient-reported disability and pain, with measurements conducted using the Argentine version of the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ-AR) and the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), respectively.
The secondary aims are:
- To determine whether CFs+SC is more effective than SC in terms of active range of motion (ROM) enhancement, global perceived effect (GROC), and satisfaction with treatment after the 4-week intervention.
- To determine if a CFs+SC approach is effective in treating MNP in terms of disability improvement, pain reduction, active ROM enhancement, global perceived effect (GROC), and satisfaction with treatment 12 weeks after a 4-week treatment plan.
- To explore differences in treatment credibility and expectations between the CFs+SC group and the SC group at both the 2-week and 4-week intervals.
- To investigate whether individuals identified with at least one negative psychosocial condition (such as anxiety, fear of movement, stress, catastrophizing, and depression) will experience greater benefits from the CFs+SC intervention compared to those without negative psychosocial conditions.
Consecutive patients meeting all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the CFs+SC group or the SC alone group. Randomization will employ a blocked design with variable block lengths (2:4) and will be stratified based on recruitment site, baseline pain ('mild-moderate' or 'severe,' determined by whether they report between 3 and 7 points or ≥ 8 points on the baseline NPRS, respectively), and participants' expectations ('high' or 'low') regarding the effectiveness of standard care treatment.
The randomization process will be generated and conducted by personnel who will not be involved in data analysis or patient enrollment. The website www.randomization.com will be used for this process. To maintain allocation concealment during the study, sequential, numbered, and sealed opaque envelopes will be utilized. Patients will be allocated to one of two groups: a CFs+SC group and the SC group. Due to the nature of the study, blinding of both therapists and patients will not be feasible. The person in charge of data statistical analysis and the evaluators who will assess all participants' pre- and post-intervention assessments will be blinded to the allocated intervention.
Both groups will undergo 4 weeks of standard care twice weekly following established clinical practice guidelines, and including exercises, mobilization, manual therapy, education, and a neck wellness home care guide. In the intervention group, CFs will be enhanced, encompassing the physical, psychological, and social elements inherent in the clinical encounter, based on existing evidence.
At the onset of treatment, patients will receive a schedule outlining the dates of the next 8 visits. One day before each session, an individual not involved in the study will send a text message (SMS) reminder. Should a scheduled session be missed, it will be rescheduled. However, patients who miss two consecutive scheduled sessions will be deemed dropouts and analyzed using the intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with the last observed value taken into consideration. Additionally, participants will be asked to refrain from undergoing any other treatments until the end of the 12-week follow-up period. During this period, participants are only permitted to adhere to the NWHCG. If a participant reports undergoing any other treatments, they will be considered as dropouts and analyzed using the ITT approach.
Due to slower-than-anticipated recruitment at the original site, a second recruiting site was incorporated on July 1, 2026, to reach the target sample size. Both sites apply identical eligibility criteria, intervention protocols, and outcome assessments. Physiotherapists at both sites completed the same training program described below, and adherence to the Manual of Treatment (MOT) is monitored equally across sites through the procedures described below
Physiotherapists will undergo a comprehensive training program comprising 8 hours of formal instruction, tailored to provide the necessary skills and proficiency for both therapeutic contexts under investigation. To ensure treatment fidelity, a Manual of Treatment (MOT) was developed. Therapist adherence to the MOT will be evaluated through self-assessment ratings provided by the therapists themselves. After each session, therapists will rate their adherence to the manual using a form specifically designed for this study. Additionally, monthly audits will assess compliance with the MOT, and frequent meetings with providers will be held to mitigate any deviations in provider adherence to the MOT, ensuring its consistency over time.
The sample size for this study was determined using a linear mixed effects model to account for within-subject correlation arising from repeated measures over time. The model includes fixed effects, such as treatment group (CF+SC and SC groups) and time points (baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks after treatment), and recruitment site, along with the interaction between treatment group and time to assess potential changes in treatment effects over time. Random effects for individual subjects were also included to address repeated measures within the same subjects. Based on an assumed medium effect size (f2 = 0.15), 80% power, and a significance level of 0.05 (two-tailed), the estimated sample size required for this study was calculated to be 85 subjects. To accommodate a projected dropout rate of 10%, the sample size was adjusted, resulting in a final target sample size of 94 subjects (47 participants per group).
Outcomes will be analyzed on an ITT basis, with reporting of sample characteristics and descriptive statistics. Linear mixed models will be used for primary analysis to verify the differences between the average effects of interventions (CFs+SC and SC) in reassessments carried out 4 weeks after random allocation and 12 weeks after treatment, adjusting for recruitment site as a fixed effect given the stratified randomization. The differences between groups will be calculated by interaction terms of groups versus time. All statistical procedures will be performed using SPSS, developed by SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA.
Trial procedures and evaluations will be conducted by trained personnel using paper-based Case Report Forms (CRFs), with implemented quality control measures. Subsequently, the data will be entered into an electronic database using MAWE® Data Collection Tools (www.mawetools.com). An independent data monitoring committee will oversee the entire data collection process to ensure its quality and integrity. Monitoring of the study will be overseen by MFA and FV at the original site, and by SS and POP at the second site, encompassing verification of adherence to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, monitoring overall study progress, and ensuring accurate data recording in CRFs. Auditing responsibilities will be carried out weekly by the principal investigator to ensure completeness and accuracy across critical study components, including participant consent forms, paper forms, and recruitment rates.
The trial will be conducted in compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice, and all applicable regulatory requirements. Ethical approval has been obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) (#11695, approved on 15/03/2024). The principal investigator and researchers affirm no financial or other competing interests. Access to final trial data will be provided to designated individuals and authorized personnel, with any contractual restrictions transparently disclosed. Upon trial completion, results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, following authorship guidelines established by the ICMJE and CRediT framework.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The ContextualizAR trial is designed as a two-arm, randomized, controlled, and blinded assessor superiority trial conducted at two centers. Patients will be allocated to one of two groups: a CFs+SC group and the SC group.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Care (SC) | Active comparator | Other: Standard CareTreatment will be carried out based on the mechanical neck pain clinical practice guideline. Physiotherapists treating this group of patients will avoid enhancing the contextual factors mentioned in the intervention group. |
| Contextual Factors-Enriched Standard Care (CFs+SC) | Experimental | Other: Standard Care, Behavioral: Contextual FactorsTreatment will be carried out based on the mechanical neck pain clinical practice guideline. Additionally, Contextual Factors, which include physical, psychological, and social elements involved in the clinical encounter between the patient and the physiotherapist, will be deliberately enhanced in this group. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Aged >18.
- Neck pain for more than 4 weeks without signs or symptoms suggestive of major structural pathology.
- Read, write, and understand the Spanish language.
- Signed consent form.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Numeric Pain Reporting Scale (NPRS) < 3 points (to ensure the exclusion of patients with minor disorders).
- Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) < 10 points (to ensure the exclusion of patients with minor disorders).
- History of cervical spine trauma, fracture, or surgical procedures.
- Signs and symptoms of cervical myelopathy and/or cervical radiculopathy (to rule out cervical radicular pain, the Spurling Test, the Upper Limb Tension Test for the median nerve, and the Traction/Distraction test will be used).
- Red flags or serious pathologies, such as malignancy, inflammatory or rheumatic diseases, infections, and vascular conditions like cervical artery insufficiency.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Standard CareAlso: SCStandard Care includes exercises, mobilization, manual therapy, education, and Neck Wellness Home Care Guide (NWHCG). The rehabilitation program is based on current clinical practice guidelines aimed at reducing neck pain, improving range of motion, enhancing functionality, and promoting physical activity motivation. Each patient will receive active exercises and manual therapy techniques. Educational components will cover pain science, physical activity benefits, and return to normal activities , supplemented by a NWHCG. Treatment sessions will be conducted, featuring a one-to-one interaction between the participant and the physiotherapist. It will last 4 weeks, with two sessions per week, 45 minutes/session (8 treatment sessions). | Other | Contextual Factors-Enriched Standard Care (CFs+SC), Standard Care (SC) |
| Contextual FactorsAlso: CFsBundle of contextual factors divided into three categories: professional, treatment, and healthcare setting features. Regarding the professional contextual factors, they include reputation, appearance, and positive attitudes. The treatment contextual factors encompass positive attitudes, verbal communication, non-verbal communication, empathetic therapeutic alliance, therapeutic touch, and the use of a mirror to show the patient what is being performed. Finally, the healthcare setting contextual factors feature a comfortable setting, adequate environmental conditions, and appropriate design. | Behavioural | Contextual Factors-Enriched Standard Care (CFs+SC) |
Primary outcome
Neck Pain Intensity
Time frame: 4 weeks and 12 weeks after end of treatment
Neck pain intensity will be measured using a Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) composed of an 11-point scale, ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("the "worst pain imaginable") (Hawker et al., 2011; Kahl \& Cleland, 2005). In this study patients will be asked about their average pain intensity in the last 7 days (Jensen 1999).
Neck Disability
Time frame: 4 weeks and 12 weeks after end of treatment
Neck disability will be measured using the Argentinian version of the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ-AR) (Aguirre et al., 2013). The questionnaire has 9 items relating to daily activities (personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work status, driving, sleeping and recreation) and cervical spine pain. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, the total score is 36; higher scores represent higher pain or disability.
5 secondary outcomes
Active Range of Movement
Time frame: 4 weeks and 12 weeks after end of treatment
Global Rating of Change
Time frame: 4 weeks and 12 weeks after end of treatment
Satisfaction with treatment
Time frame: 4 weeks and 12 weeks after end of treatment
Expectations
Time frame: At baseline, at the end of week 2 (session 5), and at the conclusion of week 4 (session 9).
Credibility
Time frame: At baseline, at the end of week 2 (session 5), and at the conclusion of week 4 (session 9).
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jul 2026.
- Background: PubMed 29357856Rossettini G, Carlino E, Testa M. Clinical relevance of contextual factors as triggers of placebo and nocebo effects in musculoskeletal pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jan 22;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-1943-8.
- Background: PubMed 29852839Kamper SJ. Engaging With Research: Linking Evidence With Practice. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Jun;48(6):512-513. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.0701.
- Background: PubMed 37465492Cook CE, Bailliard A, Bent JA, Bialosky JE, Carlino E, Colloca L, Esteves JE, Newell D, Palese A, Reed WR, Vilardaga JP, Rossettini G. An international consensus definition for contextual factors: findings from a nominal group technique. Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 3;14:1178560. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1178560. eCollection 2023.
- Background: PubMed 27133031Testa M, Rossettini G. Enhance placebo, avoid nocebo: How contextual factors affect physiotherapy outcomes. Man Ther. 2016 Aug;24:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
- Background: PubMed 11253970Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, Georgiou A, Kleijnen J. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet. 2001 Mar 10;357(9258):757-62. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04169-6.
- Background: PubMed 32537245Rossettini G, Camerone EM, Carlino E, Benedetti F, Testa M. Context matters: the psychoneurobiological determinants of placebo, nocebo and context-related effects in physiotherapy. Arch Physiother. 2020 Jun 11;10:11. doi: 10.1186/s40945-020-00082-y. eCollection 2020.
- Background: PubMed 26427530O'Keeffe M, Cullinane P, Hurley J, Leahy I, Bunzli S, O'Sullivan PB, O'Sullivan K. What Influences Patient-Therapist Interactions in Musculoskeletal Physical Therapy? Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis. Phys Ther. 2016 May;96(5):609-22. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150240. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
- Background: PubMed 21071504Hush JM, Cameron K, Mackey M. Patient satisfaction with musculoskeletal physical therapy care: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2011 Jan;91(1):25-36. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100061. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
- BackgroundAndreu M, Policastro PO. ¿Por qué son importantes los factores contextuales en el abordaje kinésico? [Why are contextual factors important in the physical therapy approach?]. AJRPT. 2020;2(3):1-3. doi: 10.58172/ajrpt.v2i3.125
- Background: PubMed 18515964Bialosky JE, George SZ, Bishop MD. How spinal manipulative therapy works: why ask why? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Jun;38(6):293-5. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.0118. Epub 2008 May 27. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24309616Fuentes J, Armijo-Olivo S, Funabashi M, Miciak M, Dick B, Warren S, Rashiq S, Magee DJ, Gross DP. Enhanced therapeutic alliance modulates pain intensity and muscle pain sensitivity in patients with chronic low back pain: an experimental controlled study. Phys Ther. 2014 Apr;94(4):477-89. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130118. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
- Background: PubMed 36417969Hu T, Long Y, Wei L, Zheng Y, Tong Y, Yuan M, Liu C, Wang X, Lin Y, Guo Q, Huang J, Du L. The Underappreciated Placebo Effects and Responses in Randomized Controlled Trials on Neck Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Jul;104(7):1124-1131. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.10.013. Epub 2022 Nov 20.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Neck Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Recruiting
Strain Counter Strain and Conventional Stretching in School-aged Children With Mechanical Neck Pain Due to Prolong Screen Use
Mechanical Neck Pain
Recruiting
Effects of Alexander Technique Versus Feldenkrais Somatic Training in Patients With Text Neck Syndrome
Text Neck Syndrome
Recruiting
Longitudinal Stripping Massage vs. Percussion Device for Neck Pain: Ultrasound Study.
Chronic Neck Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
Effectiveness of Phenotype-based Pain Management Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer Related Pain: a Pilot Study
Cancer Pain, Orofacial Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Mauro F Andreu, PhD principal investigator
Universidad Nacional de la Matanza
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Contextual Factors in people with Neck Pain, run by Universidad Nacional de la Matanza at 2 sites in Argentina.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Argentina. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Mauro F Andreu, PhD ((+54) 11 6878-8298, mfandreu@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Neck Pain Intensity (time frame: 4 weeks and 12 weeks after end of treatment). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06361472, which also lists 33 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jul 2026.