Pediatric Palliative CareNCT06362239
Prospective Home-Based Palliative Care and Hospice Study
An observational study of Pediatric Palliative Care, run by Steven Smith at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that the addition of home-based hospice and palliative care (HBHPC) will provide a reduction in health care utilization, improve quality of life, and facilitate goal-concordant care that is superior to inpatient and clinic pediatric palliative care (PPC) alone. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 19 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pediatric Palliative Care
- What is being tested?
- Study Surveys
- How many people
- 250 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2024to Oct 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 19 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Study population: Children and young adults between the ages of 0-19 years old. One cohort of those that receive HBHPC combined with inpatient/clinic based palliative care and the other cohort will be those that receive only inpatient/clinic based palliative care. The cohorts will not be random in assignment and will be determined by accessibility to HBHPC. The study will include three sites with high access to HBHPC and two sites with limited access to HBHPC. Patients will be allowed to transition between arms should they gain access to HBHPC.
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged 0-19
- Patients seen as new referral or follow up visit by PPC (Pediatric Palliative Care) team in either the inpatient or clinic context and expected to require at least twice-annual palliative care visits
Who cannot join
- Followed by PPC regardless of context for >6 months prior to enrollment
- Patient no longer clinically needs long term PPC follow up
- Child / young adult is in custody of state or county
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43082
About this study
Official title: Prospective Analysis of the Impact of Home-Based Palliative Care and Hospice Compared to Inpatient and Clinic Based Palliative Care
The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that the addition of home-based hospice and palliative care (HBHPC) will provide a reduction in health care utilization, improve quality of life, and facilitate goal-concordant care that is superior to inpatient and clinic pediatric palliative care (PPC) alone.
Read the detailed description
Identify difference in outcomes between those that receive home-based hospice and palliative care (HBHPC) in conjunction with inpatient and clinic based palliative care compared to those who receive only inpatient and clinic based palliative care. Outcomes analyzed will include hospital utilization including ICU days, inpatient hospital days, ED visits, quality of life as defined by the individual and/or primary caregivers through PEDSQL2 Family Impact Module survey, and delivery of goal concordant care by individual and family.
This is a prospective, multi-site, quasi-experimental design using an untreated comparison group with dependent pretest and posttest samples. This trial is being carried out at five sites including: Nationwide Children's Hospital (lead/primary site; Columbus, OH), Akron Children's Hospital (Akron, OH), Texas Children's Hospital (Houston, TX), Nemours Hospital (Wilmington, DE), and Medical University of South Carolina (Charleston, SC). The experimental group consists of all participants from sites with high-access HBHPC programs and the untreated comparison group consisting of all participants from sites with low-volume HBHPC. Protocols, consistent across all sites, are being submitted independently to the site's respective IRB for review and approval. The intent is to pool deidentified data for aggregate analysis by NCH.
This non-random design is selected because it is neither logistically feasible nor clinically ethical to conduct a randomized trial in which some participants would be allocated to not receive the intervention (HBHPC). Use of a pretest and comparison group minimizes threats to validity; the lack of randomization allows the potential for selection bias. However, we anticipate that given the diagnostic and clinical diversity of the sample, and the dearth of HBHPC access for pediatric patients, that clinical acuity will naturally be matched between both cohorts.
At or within the first few weeks of completing informed consent, participants will complete the study surveys. Study staff will recontact participants every three months to recomplete the surveys using a REDCap link, or paper surveys sent and returned via participant's preferred method (and entered into REDCap by study staff).
At or within the first few weeks of completing informed consent, participants will complete the study surveys (PEDSQL2 Family Impact Module Quality of Life survey and Goal Concordant Care survey). Study staff will recontact participants in three month intervals for a two year period or patient death if death occurs within study period to recomplete the surveys using a REDCap link, or paper surveys sent and returned, or completed by phone call via participant's preferred method (and entered into REDCap by study staff). NCH staff will create the REDCap, and give the template to each site for consistency purposes. Study staff will collect clinical and demographic information from the electronic medical record. Study staff will securely transfer site REDCap clinical, demographic, and survey data to the primary site (NCH) for analysis. Each site PI or CRC will complete their own patient follow up for survey completion. Any identifiable information will be stored separately from the study data and only PIs and coordinators at each site will have access to their own access to PHI. Aggregate data will be reviewed as a whole.
- Conditions
- Pediatric Palliative Care
- Being tested
- Study Surveys
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Study SurveysOther
Participants will complete study surveys as their participation in the research study. Study staff will collect clinical and demographic information from the electronic medical records. The enrollment in this intervention will not be decided by research enrollment, but would naturally occur regardless of enrollment in the study.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High-access home-based hospice and palliative care (HBHPC) | Patients with high-access to home-based hospice and palliative care (HBHPC) enrolled from three sites: Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH (NCH); Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, OH (ACH); and Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (MUSC). Receives: Other: Study Surveys | |
| Low-access home-based hospice and palliative care (HBHPC) | Patients with low-access to home-based hospice and palliative care (HBHPC) (i.e., primarily or exclusively hospital-based services) enrolled from two sites: Nemours Children's Hospital, Wilmington, DE (Nemours); and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX (TCH). Receives: Other: Study Surveys |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hospital Utilization Differences
Hospital utilization including ICU days, inpatient hospital days, ED visits, quality of life
Measured: At enrollment and every three months for a two year period for a maximum of 24 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Demographic Differences
Differences in demographics including but not limited to diagnosis, age, race/ethnicity
Measured: Identified at time of study enrollment and does not require ongoing measurement.
Location of death differences
Differences in location of death.
Measured: From date of enrollment to date of death (if occurred) over study enrollment for a maximum period of 24 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Apr 2024
- Study start1 Aug 2024
- Primary completionAug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionOct 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pediatric Palliative CareStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Steven Smith
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Akron Children's Hospital, Medical University of South Carolina, Nemours Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Steven Smith, Nationwide Children's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06362239
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00003853
- Status last verified
- Oct 2025
- First submitted
- 28 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 29 Oct 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Oct 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Analysis of the Impact of Home-Based Palliative Care and Hospice Compared to Inpatient and Clinic Based Palliative Care
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06362239
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY00003853
- Conditions
- Pediatric Palliative Care
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Steven SmithUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Akron Children's Hospital, Medical University of South Carolina, Nemours Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Oct 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that the addition of home-based hospice and palliative care (HBHPC) will provide a reduction in health care utilization, improve quality of life, and facilitate goal-concordant care that is superior to inpatient and clinic pediatric palliative care (PPC) alone.
Detailed description
Identify difference in outcomes between those that receive home-based hospice and palliative care (HBHPC) in conjunction with inpatient and clinic based palliative care compared to those who receive only inpatient and clinic based palliative care. Outcomes analyzed will include hospital utilization including ICU days, inpatient hospital days, ED visits, quality of life as defined by the individual and/or primary caregivers through PEDSQL2 Family Impact Module survey, and delivery of goal concordant care by individual and family.
This is a prospective, multi-site, quasi-experimental design using an untreated comparison group with dependent pretest and posttest samples. This trial is being carried out at five sites including: Nationwide Children's Hospital (lead/primary site; Columbus, OH), Akron Children's Hospital (Akron, OH), Texas Children's Hospital (Houston, TX), Nemours Hospital (Wilmington, DE), and Medical University of South Carolina (Charleston, SC). The experimental group consists of all participants from sites with high-access HBHPC programs and the untreated comparison group consisting of all participants from sites with low-volume HBHPC. Protocols, consistent across all sites, are being submitted independently to the site's respective IRB for review and approval. The intent is to pool deidentified data for aggregate analysis by NCH.
This non-random design is selected because it is neither logistically feasible nor clinically ethical to conduct a randomized trial in which some participants would be allocated to not receive the intervention (HBHPC). Use of a pretest and comparison group minimizes threats to validity; the lack of randomization allows the potential for selection bias. However, we anticipate that given the diagnostic and clinical diversity of the sample, and the dearth of HBHPC access for pediatric patients, that clinical acuity will naturally be matched between both cohorts.
At or within the first few weeks of completing informed consent, participants will complete the study surveys. Study staff will recontact participants every three months to recomplete the surveys using a REDCap link, or paper surveys sent and returned via participant's preferred method (and entered into REDCap by study staff).
At or within the first few weeks of completing informed consent, participants will complete the study surveys (PEDSQL2 Family Impact Module Quality of Life survey and Goal Concordant Care survey). Study staff will recontact participants in three month intervals for a two year period or patient death if death occurs within study period to recomplete the surveys using a REDCap link, or paper surveys sent and returned, or completed by phone call via participant's preferred method (and entered into REDCap by study staff). NCH staff will create the REDCap, and give the template to each site for consistency purposes. Study staff will collect clinical and demographic information from the electronic medical record. Study staff will securely transfer site REDCap clinical, demographic, and survey data to the primary site (NCH) for analysis. Each site PI or CRC will complete their own patient follow up for survey completion. Any identifiable information will be stored separately from the study data and only PIs and coordinators at each site will have access to their own access to PHI. Aggregate data will be reviewed as a whole.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| High-access home-based hospice and palliative care (HBHPC) | – | Other: Study SurveysPatients with high-access to home-based hospice and palliative care (HBHPC) enrolled from three sites: Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH (NCH); Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, OH (ACH); and Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (MUSC). |
| Low-access home-based hospice and palliative care (HBHPC) | – | Other: Study SurveysPatients with low-access to home-based hospice and palliative care (HBHPC) (i.e., primarily or exclusively hospital-based services) enrolled from two sites: Nemours Children's Hospital, Wilmington, DE (Nemours); and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX (TCH). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 19 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
- Study population
- Children and young adults between the ages of 0-19 years old. One cohort of those that receive HBHPC combined with inpatient/clinic based palliative care and the other cohort will be those that receive only inpatient/clinic based palliative care. The cohorts will not be random in assignment and will be determined by accessibility to HBHPC. The study will include three sites with high access to HBHPC and two sites with limited access to HBHPC. Patients will be allowed to transition between arms should they gain access to HBHPC.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients aged 0-19
- Patients seen as new referral or follow up visit by PPC (Pediatric Palliative Care) team in either the inpatient or clinic context and expected to require at least twice-annual palliative care visits
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Followed by PPC regardless of context for >6 months prior to enrollment
- Patient no longer clinically needs long term PPC follow up
- Child / young adult is in custody of state or county
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Study SurveysParticipants will complete study surveys as their participation in the research study. Study staff will collect clinical and demographic information from the electronic medical records. The enrollment in this intervention will not be decided by research enrollment, but would naturally occur regardless of enrollment in the study. | Other | High-access home-based hospice and palliative care (HBHPC), Low-access home-based hospice and palliative care (HBHPC) |
Primary outcome
Hospital Utilization Differences
Time frame: At enrollment and every three months for a two year period for a maximum of 24 months
Hospital utilization including ICU days, inpatient hospital days, ED visits, quality of life
2 secondary outcomes
Demographic Differences
Time frame: Identified at time of study enrollment and does not require ongoing measurement.
Location of death differences
Time frame: From date of enrollment to date of death (if occurred) over study enrollment for a maximum period of 24 months.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Oct 2025.
Related trials for Pediatric Palliative Care
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Integration of Palliative Care in Pediatric Onco-hematology
Pediatric Cancer, Palliative Care
Active, not recruiting
PACT Involvement in Cardiology Patients
Machine Learning, Cardiovascular Outcome
RecruitingObservational study
Complexity in Health, Education, and Social Support for Children and Young People With Life-limiting Conditions.
Complex Care, Medical Complexity
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Palliative Care Integration in Pediatric Oncology Phase 1 Clinical Trials
Quality of Life Outcomes
Recruiting
Video Inspired Discussions About Ethical Outcomes in Pediatrics
Pediatric Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pediatric Palliative Care, run by Steven Smith at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hospital Utilization Differences (time frame: At enrollment and every three months for a two year period for a maximum of 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Oct 2025.