AzTrials
AzTrials

Thyroid NeoplasmsNCT06362772

Clinical Efficacy of 125I Seed Implantation in the Treatment of Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

An observational study of Thyroid Neoplasms, run by Jiangxi Provincial Cancer Hospital.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A retrospective analysis was conducted on RAIR-DTC patients who underwent radioactive 125I seed implantation from January 2015 to February 2022 at Jiangxi Cancer Hospital. Prescription dose: 80~120 Gy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Thyroid Neoplasms
What is being tested?
Iodine-125 brachytherapy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
36 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jan 2015to 1 Apr 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: A retrospective analysis was conducted on Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer (RAIR-DTC) patients who underwent radioactive 125I seed implantation from January 2015 to February 2022 at Jiangxi Cancer Hospital.

Inclusion Criteria: Differentiated Thyroid Cancer (DTC) was confirmed by pathology, with local recurrence or distant metastasis of residual thyroid cancer and conforming to any of the following Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer (RAIR-DTC) criteria: (1) no uptake of 131I in the initial 131I treatment; (2) loss of iodine uptake capacity in previously functional iodine-avid lesions; (3) disease progression after 131I therapy, including gradual enlargement of the lesion and continuously increasing levels of serum thyroglobulin (Tg).

Exclusion Criteria: Patients with severe physical diseases, such as severe dysfunction of the cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, or renal systems, poor compliance, inability to tolerate 125I seed implantation, severe acute infectious or chronic infection with acute exacerbation, severe coagulopathy that may lead to serious complications like infection or bleeding, pregnant or lactating women affecting fetal and infant growth and development, patients with cachexia or expected survival of ≤3 Months and patients with positive serum anti-thyroglobulin antibodies (TgAb) that may impact the assessment of treatment efficacy.

About this study

Official title: The Clinical Value of Iodine-125 Seed Implantation in the Treatment of Iodine-refractory Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma

A retrospective analysis was conducted on RAIR-DTC patients who underwent radioactive 125I seed implantation from January 2015 to February 2022 at Jiangxi Cancer Hospital. Prescription dose: 80~120 Gy. All cases were followed up at 1, 3, and 5 months postoperatively to monitor changes in tumor size, serum thyroglobulin (Tg), and serum anti-thyroglobulin antibody levels in thyrotropin-inhibited states, pain scores, and postoperative adverse reactions. The data were processed and analyzed using IBM SPSS 26.0. Pairwise comparisons were conducted using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and a p-value of less than 0.05 indicated statistical significance.

Read the detailed description

Data from RAIR-DTC patients hospitalized at Jiangxi Cancer Hospital from January 2015 to February 2022 were retrospectively collected.

In advance of the surgery, patients were informed about their condition, the expected efficacy of 125I seed implantation therapy, alternative treatments such as external beam radiotherapy and chemotherapy, as well as potential side effects and toxic effects. The preoperative evaluation process includes assessments of coagulation function, liver and kidney function, cardiopulmonary function, and local CT scans.

A collaborative effort between physicians and physicists was undertaken to establish a treatment regimen with a prescription dose ranging from 80 to 120 Gy. The patient accepted the treatment plan and signed an informed consent form. The CT-guided 125I seed implantation procedure was conducted according to the prescribed treatment regimen. Efficacy evaluations were conducted at pre-surgery, 1-, 3-, and 5-month post-surgery. The evaluations focused on lesion dimensions, serum thyroglobulin (Tg), TG antibodies (TGAb), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels, pain levels, and adverse reactions.

Lesion size was determined using CT imaging. Lymph nodes were assessed based on their shortest diameter, while other target lesions were evaluated based on their longest diameter. Each measurable lesion underwent an average measurement derived from a minimum of three readings, with all measurements conducted by the same individual to minimize measurement discrepancies.

Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) [1] were used to assess treatment response. Use the Visual Analogue Scale to record patients' pain scores. Postoperative adverse reactions, including infection, bleeding, pneumothorax, bone marrow suppression, and seed displacement, were recorded. Radiation injury was graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) toxicity criteria [2].

The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 26.0. The count data (n%) and skewed measures [Md (Q1, Q3)] are presented. Group comparisons were conducted using the paired Wilcoxon rank-sum test, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05.

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Jiangxi Provincial Cancer Hospital.

Being tested
Iodine-125 brachytherapy
Keywords
Iodine-125 particles, Brachytherapy, Iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma, Thyroid Neoplasms
Medical subject headings
Thyroid Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Iodine-125 brachytherapyRadiation

    In advance of the surgery, patients were informed about their condition, the expected efficacy of 125I seed implantation therapy, alternative treatments such as external beam radiotherapy and chemotherapy, as well as potential side effects and toxic effects. The preoperative evaluation process includes assessments of coagulation function, liver and kidney function, cardiopulmonary function, and local CT scans.

    A collaborative effort between physicians and physicists was undertaken to establish a treatment regimen with a prescription dose ranging from 80 to 120 Gy. The patient accepted the treatment plan and signed an informed consent form. The CT-guided 125I seed implantation procedure was conducted according to the prescribed treatment regimen.

    Efficacy evaluations were conducted at pre-surgery, 1-, 3-, and 5-month post-surgery. The evaluations focused on lesion dimensions, serum Tg, TGAb, TSH levels, pain levels, and adverse reactions.

Study groups in NCT06362772
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
125I seed implantation treatment group125I seed implantation treatment group
Receives: Radiation: Iodine-125 brachytherapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Tumor size

    Lesion size was determined using CT imaging. Lymph nodes were assessed based on their shortest diameter, while other target lesions were evaluated based on their longest diameter. Each measurable lesion underwent an average measurement derived from a minimum of three readings, with all measurements conducted by the same individual to minimize measurement discrepancies. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) were used to assess treatment response[1].

    Measured: Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 5 months postoperatively.

  2. Serological assessment

    Including serum thyroglobulin (Tg) and serum anti-thyroglobulin antibody levels (TgAb) in thyrotropin-inhibited states, as well as tumor markers such as CEA.

    Measured: Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 5 months postoperatively.

  3. Pain score

    Use the Visual Analogue Scale to record patients' pain scores. The scale ranges from 0 to 10 points, with pain increasing incrementally. 0 indicates no pain, 1-3 indicate mild pain that is still tolerable and does not interfere with sleep or normal life, 4-6 indicate moderate pain that interferes with sleep and requires analgesic medication to alleviate it, and 7-10 show intense and intolerable pain that seriously interferes with sleep and diet and requires strong analgesic drugs.

    Measured: Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 5 months postoperatively.

  4. Adverse event

    Postoperative adverse reactions, including infection, bleeding, pneumothorax, bone marrow suppression, and seed displacement, were recorded. Radiation injury was graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) toxicity criteria [2].

    Measured: Assess within six months after surgery.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Apr 2024
  2. Study start1 Jan 2015
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2022
  4. Study completion1 Apr 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06362772
Sponsor's protocol ID
MR-36-24-010944
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
1 Apr 2024
Last updated
12 Apr 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Watanabe H, Okada M, Kaji Y, Satouchi M, Sato Y, Yamabe Y, Onaya H, Endo M, Sone M, Arai Y. [New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours-revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2009 Dec;36(13):2495-501. Japanese.

    PubMed 20009446
  • Cox JD, Stetz J, Pajak TF. Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Mar 30;31(5):1341-6. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00060-C. No abstract available.

    PubMed 7713792
  • Chen Z, Tang X, Tan L, Su Y, Wang W, Wu Z. Efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with 125I seed implantation for iodine-refractory thyroid cancer. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 22;16:1587412. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1587412. eCollection 2025.

    PubMed 40917344
  • Wan Q, Tan L, Tang X, Wang W, Su Y, Wu Z, Ke M, Chen Z. The clinical value of iodine-125 seed implantation in the treatment of iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 15;15:1327766. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1327766. eCollection 2024.

    PubMed 38686207

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Thyroid Neoplasms, run by Jiangxi Provincial Cancer Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Tumor size (time frame: Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 5 months postoperatively.). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06362772, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Apr 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in