AzTrials
AzTrials

Osteo Arthritis Knee and HipNCT06363643

Lower Limb Arthroplasty: Effects of a Tele Prehabilitation Program With Indirect Electrostimulation.

A study testing ELECTROSTIMULATION (ES) and EXERCISE (C) in people with Osteo Arthritis Knee and Hip and Lower Limb Arthroplasty, run by University of Pavia at 1 site in Italy.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Preoperative fitness is known to predict postoperative outcomes following lower limb arthroplasty, but many patients, especially the most fragile, arrive at surgery with reduced mobility and functional capacity. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 55 to 80 years
What is being tested?
ELECTROSTIMULATION (ES) and EXERCISE (C)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
44 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
22 Apr 2024to 26 Jul 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 55 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Elective Knee or Total Hip arthroplasty

Who cannot join

  • concomitant orthopaedic or neurological pathologies (other than the pathology for which arthroplasty has been indicated) that modify the ability to walk;
  • pathologies that modify the balance (neurological and/or vestibular);
  • contraindications to the use of medical equipment used in the study;
  • inability to understand and sign informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • "Città di Pavia Healthcare Institute"

    Pavia, 27100

    Luca Marin, 0382 433658 ext. +39, luca.marin@unipv.it

    Luca Marin

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Lower Limb Arthroplasty: Effects of a Tele Prehabilitation Program With Indirect Electrostimulation. Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Preoperative fitness is known to predict postoperative outcomes following lower limb arthroplasty, but many patients, especially the most fragile, arrive at surgery with reduced mobility and functional capacity.

Prehabilitation (Prehab) encompasses a series of interventions that are intended to help patients improve their physical state and psychological well-being pre-intervention to reduce the days of hospitalization and the number of post-operative complications. Patients who participate in Prehab require less postoperative care and consequently have less impact on the cost of the healthcare system. However, adherence to a face-to-face program is usually poor and presents both organizational and psychophysical barriers. In the last years, telerehabilitation has proven to be a viable alternative to face-to-face treatment and has already been adopted for the Prehab. Electrostimulation (ESM) is regularly used successfully in clinical settings for the recovery of muscle tone in patients with orthopedic pathologies. In addition, it has already been used for Prehab, showing an increase in muscle strength and a decrease in postoperative hospital stay following knee arthroplasty. Also Exercise offers benefits in the treatment of orthopedic patients because improve: strength, cardiovascular fitness, functional capacities and quality of life. Therefore, in a group of patients who are candidates for elective lower limb arthroplasty surgery, it was decided to evaluate the effects of a Tele Prehab program, based on the ESM, and compare them with those of an Tele Prehab exercise program, equal in dose and duration. The proposal differs from those present in the literature for complete administration in telerehabilitation, including evaluations.

Being tested
ELECTROSTIMULATION (ES), EXERCISE (C)

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ELECTROSTIMULATION (ES)Device

    ES will receive the electrostimulator directly at home and will do three weekly Tele supervised sessions of 30 minutes of indirect electrostimulation. The treatment will last 4 weeks.

  • EXERCISE (C)Other

    C will perform three weekly Tele supervised sessions of exercise. The treatment will last 4 weeks.

Study groups in NCT06363643
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ELECTROSTIMULATION (ESM)ExperimentalESM will perform the Tele Prehab program based on indirect electrostimulation.
Receives: Device: ELECTROSTIMULATION (ES)
EXERCISE (C)Active comparatorGroup C will perform the Tele Prehab program based on supervised exercise.
Receives: Other: EXERCISE (C)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline in functional capacities on 30 Seconds Chair Stand Test (30CST) at week 4

    30CST is a validated tool to assess strength and endurance of Lower limbs. The patient is seated in a 17" high chair. Count the number of times the patient comes to a full standing position in 30 seconds.

    Measured: Baseline and week 4

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Change from baseline in functional capacities on Timed Up and Go test (TUG) at week 4.

    TUG is a validated tool to assess dynamic balance and functional mobility. The patient getting up from a chair from the sitting to the bipedal position, walking three meters, turning, returning, and sitting on the chair again. The variable measured is the total time, in seconds, taken by the test.

    Measured: Baseline and week 4

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Apr 2024
  2. Study start22 Apr 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion26 Jul 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion26 Jul 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
44 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06363643
Sponsor's protocol ID
Prehab01
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
8 Apr 2024
Last updated
12 Apr 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The material will be shared as an attachment to the article. All the tools used in the study will be shared.

Publications

  • Bhave A, Marker DR, Seyler TM, Ulrich SD, Plate JF, Mont MA. Functional problems and treatment solutions after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007 Sep;22(6 Suppl 2):116-24. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.025. Epub 2007 Jul 26.

    PubMed 17823029
  • Coudeyre E, Jardin C, Givron P, Ribinik P, Revel M, Rannou F. Could preoperative rehabilitation modify postoperative outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty? Elaboration of French clinical practice guidelines. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2007 Apr;50(3):189-97. doi: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2007.02.002. Epub 2007 Feb 15.

    PubMed 17343953
  • Rooks DS, Huang J, Bierbaum BE, Bolus SA, Rubano J, Connolly CE, Alpert S, Iversen MD, Katz JN. Effect of preoperative exercise on measures of functional status in men and women undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Oct 15;55(5):700-8. doi: 10.1002/art.22223.

    PubMed 17013852
  • Snow R, Granata J, Ruhil AV, Vogel K, McShane M, Wasielewski R. Associations between preoperative physical therapy and post-acute care utilization patterns and cost in total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Oct 1;96(19):e165. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01285.

    PubMed 25274793
  • Desmeules F, Hall J, Woodhouse LJ. Prehabilitation improves physical function of individuals with severe disability from hip or knee osteoarthritis. Physiother Can. 2013 Spring;65(2):116-24. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2011-60.

    PubMed 24403671
  • Saw MM, Kruger-Jakins T, Edries N, Parker R. Significant improvements in pain after a six-week physiotherapist-led exercise and education intervention, in patients with osteoarthritis awaiting arthroplasty, in South Africa: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 May 27;17:236. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1088-6.

    PubMed 27233479
  • Karimijashni M, Yoo S, Barnes K, Poitras S. Pre- and Post-Operative Rehabilitation Interventions in Patients at Risk of Poor Outcomes Following Knee or Hip Arthroplasty: Protocol for Two Systematic Reviews. Adv Rehabil Sci Pract. 2023 May 10;12:27536351231170956. doi: 10.1177/27536351231170956. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

    PubMed 37188054
  • De Klerk TC, Dounavi DM, Hamilton DF, Clement ND, Kaliarntas KT. Effects of home-based prehabilitation on pre- and postoperative outcomes following total hip and knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt Open. 2023 May 5;4(5):315-328. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.45.BJO-2023-0021.

    PubMed 37142259
  • Walls RJ, McHugh G, O'Gorman DJ, Moyna NM, O'Byrne JM. Effects of preoperative neuromuscular electrical stimulation on quadriceps strength and functional recovery in total knee arthroplasty. A pilot study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jun 14;11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-119.

    PubMed 20540807
  • Talbot LA, Gaines JM, Ling SM, Metter EJ. A home-based protocol of electrical muscle stimulation for quadriceps muscle strength in older adults with osteoarthritis of the knee. J Rheumatol. 2003 Jul;30(7):1571-8.

    PubMed 12858461
  • Lyons CL, Robb JB, Irrgang JJ, Fitzgerald GK. Differences in quadriceps femoris muscle torque when using a clinical electrical stimulator versus a portable electrical stimulator. Phys Ther. 2005 Jan;85(1):44-51.

    PubMed 15623361
  • Jaggers JR, Simpson CD, Frost KL, Quesada PM, Topp RV, Swank AM, Nyland JA. Prehabilitation before knee arthroplasty increases postsurgical function: a case study. J Strength Cond Res. 2007 May;21(2):632-4. doi: 10.1519/R-19465.1.

    PubMed 17530958
  • Svinoy OE, Bergland A, Risberg MA, Pripp AH, Hilde G. Better before-better after: efficacy of prehabilitation for older patients with osteoarthritis awaiting total hip replacement-a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in South-Eastern Norway. BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 30;9(12):e031626. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031626.

    PubMed 31892650
  • World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053. No abstract available.

    PubMed 24141714
  • Patane P, Pellino VC, Manzoni F, Caldarella E, Febbi M, Pedrotti L, Vandoni M, Gatti A, de Caro F, Marin L. Effectiveness of three remote tele-prehabilitation strategies in patients awaiting lower limb arthroplasty: a three-arm randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2026 Jul 25;27(1):896. doi: 10.1186/s12891-026-10281-6.

    PubMed 42902309

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ELECTROSTIMULATION (ES) and EXERCISE (C) in people with Osteo Arthritis Knee and Hip and Lower Limb Arthroplasty, run by University of Pavia at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Luca Marin (347 2204734 ext. +39, luca.marin@unipv.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline in functional capacities on 30 Seconds Chair Stand Test (30CST) at week 4 (time frame: Baseline and week 4). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06363643, which also lists 15 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Apr 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in