Conduction DisorderNCT06371846
Comparative Study of the Surface Electrocardiogram Signals During the Implantation of Conduction System Pacing Devices
An observational study of Conduction Disorder and Pacemaker DDD, run by Parc de Salut Mar at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Introduction and objectives: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), is a novel modality of physiologic pacing that requires an adequate assessment of the endocardium as well as the body-surface electrocardiographic signals for a successful pacing-lead implantation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Conduction Disorder, Pacemaker DDD
- What is being tested?
- Selected signals from Pacing System Analyzers
- How many people
- 78 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 14 Mar 2023to 30 Jul 2024
- How long will I take part?
- 2 Days
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients over 18 years of age who underwent a left bundle branch area pacing system as first intention
Who may be able to join
- patients over 18 years of age who underwent a LBBAP system as first intention.
Who cannot join
- None
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Jesus Jiménez López
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08005
Jesus Jiménez López, 680714927, jejilo78@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Comparative Study of the Surface and Endocavitary Signals of Cardiac Pacing System Analyzers With Respect to the Conventional Polygraphy Systems Signals During Implantation of Conduction System Pacing Devices
Introduction and objectives: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), is a novel modality of physiologic pacing that requires an adequate assessment of the endocardium as well as the body-surface electrocardiographic signals for a successful pacing-lead implantation. The objective of the study consist of assessing if LBBAP criteria, specifically septal and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) criteria, can be satisfactory measured using the signals resulting from different cardiac pacing analyzers (PSAs) by comparing them to the 'conventional' signals obtained from multichannel polygraph systems (MPSs) during the implantation procedure.
Methods: Comparative observational, prospective, multicenter study between the signals obtained by PSA vs MPS of consecutive patients who underwent a LBBAP strategy as first intention.
Read the detailed description
METHODS All participants will provide written informed consent before undergoing the procedure. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hospital del Mar (Barcelona) and complied with the declaration of Helsinki.
Study protocol and data collection This was a non-randomized, prospective multicentric study. From july 2023 to may 2024 consecutive patients over 18 years of age who will undergo a LBBAP system as first intention, will be enrolled from five participating hospitals. Baseline characteristics including demography, pacing indication, basal QRS and left ventricular ejection fraction will be collected. For the implantation procedure analysis, total procedural time, total fluoroscopy time, total radiation dosage, pacing electrocardiogram parameters including the paced QRS morphology and duration, V6 R wave peak time (V6-RWPT), and changes between selective and non-selective LBBP will be recorded, as well as the pacing lead parameters including R-wave amplitude, threshold and impedance with unipolar and bipolar configurations. First 24hs complications will be all documented.
In a prephase of the study, a comparison between MPS and PSA surface signals, was performed. Medtronic and Biotronik PSAs' use a four-leads monitoring system, three of them detecting bipolar signals. The Right Arm (RA) lead was placed at the back of the patient, at the level of the heart, to diminish the distance between leads and generating two 'pseudomonopolar' signals together with the two other leads, (Left Arm (LA) and Left Foot (LF)) placed at "V1" and "V6" standard positions ("modified" leads position). Boston Scientific (BSC) and Abbott PSAs use a five-leads monitoring system, one of them (V1 lead) capable of detecting a monopolar signal. In this case, the V1 lead was placed at the standard "V1" position and the LA lead was moved to the "V6" position ("modified" lead position). The similarities on the QRS morphology compared to the MPS were confirmed in all PSAs.
Implantation procedure All patients received standard medical treatment according to their clinical conditions and underwent the LBBAP implantation in accordance with the standardized pacemaker implantation technique. Bipolar electrograms were filtered through a bandpass of 30-500 Hertz (Hz) and recorded on a MPS at a speed of 100milimeter/second (mm/s) and a gain of 0.1 miliVolt/centimeter (mV/cm). Before the implantation procedure, the PSA-leads will be placed as previously described. Signals will be optimized and displayed in each PSA screen at a speed range between [50-100] mm/sec and at gain of 0.05 mV/mm. The basal QRS morphology and duration corresponding to 'V1' and 'V6' PSA-leads will be compared to those of the MSP, to assess the correct position of the electrodes. In case of detecting a QRS morphology and/or duration on the PSA significantly different from the MSP (more than 2 deflections in opposite directions or a difference in QRS duration > 10 msec), repositioning of the leads wil be suggested to obtain a similar QRS morphology and duration between both recording systems. The sheath as well as the pacing-lead characteristics and final position (LVSP vs LBBP) will be left at operator's discretion.
Left bundle branch (LBB) capture was defined in the presence of a paced QRS with right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology in V1 (initial r wave in lead V1) and at least one of the following criteria:
- V6-RWPT < 80 msec.
- V1-V6 inter-peak interval > 33 msec.
- QRS transition from non-selective left bundle branch pacing (NS-LBBP) to selective left bundle branch pacing (S-LBBP) or NS-LBBP to left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) during pacing threshold.
- Sudden increase of V6-RWPT > 15 msec because of reducing pacing output.
- Left bundle potential-V6RWPT = stim-V6RWPT (±10 msec). For patients without initial r wave in V1, LBBP will be considered in the presence of QRS transition during pacing. LVSP will be defined by a paced QRS showing a typical terminal R-wave in V1, anatomical position of the lead in the left ventricular septum documented by fluoroscopy and not fulfilling the additional criteria previously described for LBBP.
During the implant procedure, initial septal unipolar pacing will be performed looking for an "W" morphology in V1 in the mid-septal area, and the last recommendations of international guidelines will be followed for placing the lead. Briefly, when the selected initial position at operator's discretion is fulfilled, the lead is deployed using rapid turns and lead depth within the septum is assessed using pacing QRS morphology, pacing impedance, unfiltered electrogram amplitude from lead tip, or using contrast through the sheath. The objective of the study is to validate and compare the criteria for the LBBAP in both recording systems. Specifically, paced QRS in V1 and V6, V6-RWPT, V1-V6 inter-peak interval, abrupt Δ V6-RWPT > 15 msec at decremental pacing output and QRS transitions between non-selective and selective capture of the conduction system during pacing were measured and confirmed in both, the PSA and the MSP, to assess the final lead position. Endocavitary signals from the lead tip will be evaluated and measured to detect congruent pre-ventricular signals from the conduction system as well.
Monitoring and discharge Patients will be in-hospital for a period of 24 hours. Before discharge, all patients will undergo a 12-lead electrocardiogram, an X-ray in postero-anterior and lateral views, as well as clinical monitoring to rule out acute complications.
- Conditions
- Conduction Disorder, Pacemaker DDD
- Being tested
- Selected signals from Pacing System Analyzers
- Keywords
- Conduction Pacing System, Program System Analyzers
- Medical subject headings
- Arrhythmias, Cardiac
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Selected signals from Pacing System AnalyzersOther
Comparative observational, prospective, multicenter study between the signals obtained by PSA vs MPS of consecutive patients who underwent a LBBAP strategy as first intention.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort one | This was a non-randomized, prospective multicentric study. From july 2023 to may 2024 consecutive patients over 18 years of age who underwent a LBBAP system as first intention, were enrolled from five participating hospitals. Baseline characteristics including demography, pacing indication, basal QRS and left ventricular ejection fraction were collected. For the implantation procedure analysis, total procedural time, total fluoroscopy time, total radiation dosage, pacing electrocardiogram parameters including the paced QRS morphology and duration, V6 R wave peak time (V6-RWPT), and changes between selective and non-selective LBBP were recorded, as well as the pacing lead parameters including R-wave amplitude, threshold and impedance with unipolar and bipolar configurations. First 24hs complications were all documented. Receives: Other: Selected signals from Pacing System Analyzers |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Similarity of signals between multichannel recording system and Pacing System Analyzers
To describe the similarity of signals between multichannel recording system and Pacing System Analyzers
Measured: First 24 hours
Secondary outcomes (1)
Security
To describe the incidence of pneumothorax, bleeding, electrode perforation and/or cardiac tamponade, lead dislodgement or infection.
Measured: First 24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Apr 2024
- Study start14 Mar 2023
- Primary completion30 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jul 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Conduction DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 2 Days
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Parc de Salut Mar
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jesus Jiménez López, MD, Principal investigator, Cardiac Electrophysiologist
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06371846
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2023 /10850/I
- Other IDs
- 2023
- Status last verified
- Apr 2024
- First submitted
- 10 Apr 2024
- Last updated
- 17 Apr 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Each researcher only have their own available data except for the main researcher, who have all data centers, but without any identity of the patient.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Apr 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Study of the Surface and Endocavitary Signals of Cardiac Pacing System Analyzers With Respect to the Conventional Polygraphy Systems Signals During Implantation of Conduction System Pacing Devices
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06371846
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2023 /10850/I
- Conditions
- Conduction Disorder, Pacemaker DDD
- Keywords
- Conduction Pacing System, Program System Analyzers
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Parc de Salut MarUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 14 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jul 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Introduction and objectives: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), is a novel modality of physiologic pacing that requires an adequate assessment of the endocardium as well as the body-surface electrocardiographic signals for a successful pacing-lead implantation. The objective of the study consist of assessing if LBBAP criteria, specifically septal and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) criteria, can be satisfactory measured using the signals resulting from different cardiac pacing analyzers (PSAs) by comparing them to the 'conventional' signals obtained from multichannel polygraph systems (MPSs) during the implantation procedure.
Methods: Comparative observational, prospective, multicenter study between the signals obtained by PSA vs MPS of consecutive patients who underwent a LBBAP strategy as first intention.
Detailed description
METHODS All participants will provide written informed consent before undergoing the procedure. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hospital del Mar (Barcelona) and complied with the declaration of Helsinki.
Study protocol and data collection This was a non-randomized, prospective multicentric study. From july 2023 to may 2024 consecutive patients over 18 years of age who will undergo a LBBAP system as first intention, will be enrolled from five participating hospitals. Baseline characteristics including demography, pacing indication, basal QRS and left ventricular ejection fraction will be collected. For the implantation procedure analysis, total procedural time, total fluoroscopy time, total radiation dosage, pacing electrocardiogram parameters including the paced QRS morphology and duration, V6 R wave peak time (V6-RWPT), and changes between selective and non-selective LBBP will be recorded, as well as the pacing lead parameters including R-wave amplitude, threshold and impedance with unipolar and bipolar configurations. First 24hs complications will be all documented.
In a prephase of the study, a comparison between MPS and PSA surface signals, was performed. Medtronic and Biotronik PSAs' use a four-leads monitoring system, three of them detecting bipolar signals. The Right Arm (RA) lead was placed at the back of the patient, at the level of the heart, to diminish the distance between leads and generating two 'pseudomonopolar' signals together with the two other leads, (Left Arm (LA) and Left Foot (LF)) placed at "V1" and "V6" standard positions ("modified" leads position). Boston Scientific (BSC) and Abbott PSAs use a five-leads monitoring system, one of them (V1 lead) capable of detecting a monopolar signal. In this case, the V1 lead was placed at the standard "V1" position and the LA lead was moved to the "V6" position ("modified" lead position). The similarities on the QRS morphology compared to the MPS were confirmed in all PSAs.
Implantation procedure All patients received standard medical treatment according to their clinical conditions and underwent the LBBAP implantation in accordance with the standardized pacemaker implantation technique. Bipolar electrograms were filtered through a bandpass of 30-500 Hertz (Hz) and recorded on a MPS at a speed of 100milimeter/second (mm/s) and a gain of 0.1 miliVolt/centimeter (mV/cm). Before the implantation procedure, the PSA-leads will be placed as previously described. Signals will be optimized and displayed in each PSA screen at a speed range between [50-100] mm/sec and at gain of 0.05 mV/mm. The basal QRS morphology and duration corresponding to 'V1' and 'V6' PSA-leads will be compared to those of the MSP, to assess the correct position of the electrodes. In case of detecting a QRS morphology and/or duration on the PSA significantly different from the MSP (more than 2 deflections in opposite directions or a difference in QRS duration > 10 msec), repositioning of the leads wil be suggested to obtain a similar QRS morphology and duration between both recording systems. The sheath as well as the pacing-lead characteristics and final position (LVSP vs LBBP) will be left at operator's discretion.
Left bundle branch (LBB) capture was defined in the presence of a paced QRS with right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology in V1 (initial r wave in lead V1) and at least one of the following criteria:
- V6-RWPT < 80 msec.
- V1-V6 inter-peak interval > 33 msec.
- QRS transition from non-selective left bundle branch pacing (NS-LBBP) to selective left bundle branch pacing (S-LBBP) or NS-LBBP to left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) during pacing threshold.
- Sudden increase of V6-RWPT > 15 msec because of reducing pacing output.
- Left bundle potential-V6RWPT = stim-V6RWPT (±10 msec). For patients without initial r wave in V1, LBBP will be considered in the presence of QRS transition during pacing. LVSP will be defined by a paced QRS showing a typical terminal R-wave in V1, anatomical position of the lead in the left ventricular septum documented by fluoroscopy and not fulfilling the additional criteria previously described for LBBP.
During the implant procedure, initial septal unipolar pacing will be performed looking for an "W" morphology in V1 in the mid-septal area, and the last recommendations of international guidelines will be followed for placing the lead. Briefly, when the selected initial position at operator's discretion is fulfilled, the lead is deployed using rapid turns and lead depth within the septum is assessed using pacing QRS morphology, pacing impedance, unfiltered electrogram amplitude from lead tip, or using contrast through the sheath. The objective of the study is to validate and compare the criteria for the LBBAP in both recording systems. Specifically, paced QRS in V1 and V6, V6-RWPT, V1-V6 inter-peak interval, abrupt Δ V6-RWPT > 15 msec at decremental pacing output and QRS transitions between non-selective and selective capture of the conduction system during pacing were measured and confirmed in both, the PSA and the MSP, to assess the final lead position. Endocavitary signals from the lead tip will be evaluated and measured to detect congruent pre-ventricular signals from the conduction system as well.
Monitoring and discharge Patients will be in-hospital for a period of 24 hours. Before discharge, all patients will undergo a 12-lead electrocardiogram, an X-ray in postero-anterior and lateral views, as well as clinical monitoring to rule out acute complications.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 2 Days
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort one | – | Other: Selected signals from Pacing System AnalyzersThis was a non-randomized, prospective multicentric study. From july 2023 to may 2024 consecutive patients over 18 years of age who underwent a LBBAP system as first intention, were enrolled from five participating hospitals. Baseline characteristics including demography, pacing indication, basal QRS and left ventricular ejection fraction were collected. For the implantation procedure analysis, total procedural time, total fluoroscopy time, total radiation dosage, pacing electrocardiogram parameters including the paced QRS morphology and duration, V6 R wave peak time (V6-RWPT), and changes between selective and non-selective LBBP were recorded, as well as the pacing lead parameters including R-wave amplitude, threshold and impedance with unipolar and bipolar configurations. First 24hs complications were all documented. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients over 18 years of age who underwent a left bundle branch area pacing system as first intention
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- patients over 18 years of age who underwent a LBBAP system as first intention.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Selected signals from Pacing System AnalyzersComparative observational, prospective, multicenter study between the signals obtained by PSA vs MPS of consecutive patients who underwent a LBBAP strategy as first intention. | Other | Cohort one |
Primary outcome
Similarity of signals between multichannel recording system and Pacing System Analyzers
Time frame: First 24 hours
To describe the similarity of signals between multichannel recording system and Pacing System Analyzers
1 secondary outcome
Security
Time frame: First 24 hours
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Apr 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Each researcher only have their own available data except for the main researcher, who have all data centers, but without any identity of the patient.
Related trials for Conduction Disorder
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Postural Control and Balance Performance in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), Postural Assessment
Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
RecruitingObservational study
Physical Impairments in Premature Ventricular Complex
Premature Ventricular Complexes
RecruitingObservational study
Leadless Pacemaker Registry: Outcomes and Follow-up From the University Hospital of St. Pölten
Pacemaker, Leadless Pacemaker
Recruiting
Systematic Ambulatory ECG Monitoring Following TAVI
Aortic Stenosis, Conduction Disturbances
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jesus Jiménez López, MD principal investigator
Cardiac Electrophysiologist
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Conduction Disorder and Pacemaker DDD, run by Parc de Salut Mar at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jesus Jiménez López, MD (680714927, jejilo78@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Similarity of signals between multichannel recording system and Pacing System Analyzers (time frame: First 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Apr 2024.