Cesarean Sectionannie-marianaNCT06376058
Chloroprocaine 1% Versus Ropivacaine 0,75% During Cesarean Section
A study testing Chloroprocaine 1% Injectable Solution and Ropivacaine 0.75% Injectable Solution in people with Cesarean Section and Local Anesthetic, run by Aretaieion University Hospital at 1 site in Greece.
Trial summary
This will be a prospective randomized study, aiming at comparing an intrathecal fixed dose of chloroprocaine 1% versus an intrathecal fixed dose of ropivacaine 0.75% in elective cesarean sections Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 48 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cesarean Section, Local Anesthetic
- What is being tested?
- Chloroprocaine 1% Injectable Solution and Ropivacaine 0.75% Injectable Solution
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGreece
- Study dates
- 10 Jan 2024to 10 Jan 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 48 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- adult parturients, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II,
- singleton gestation>37 weeks
- elective cesarean section
Who cannot join
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) > III
- age < 18 years
- singleton gestation <37 weeks
- Body Mass Index (BMI) >40 kg/m2
- Body weight <50 kg
- Body weight>100 kg
Show all 16Show fewer
- height<150 cm
- height>180 cm
- multiple gestation
- emergency delivery
- fetal abnormality
- fetal distress
- pregnancy-induced pathology such as preeclampsia, eclampsia, premature labor, placental abnormalities
- pregnancy- induced diseases such as hepatic failure, pseudocholinesterase deficiency, neuromuscular diseases
- lack of informed consent
- contraindication for regional anesthesia such as thrombocytopenia, coagulation abnormalities, allergy to local anesthetics
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Marianna Mavromati, MD contact
Greece1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Aretaieion University Hospital
Athens, 11528
Kassiani Theodoraki, PhD, DESA, 6974634162, ktheodoraki@hotmail.com
Marianna Mavromati, MD, marimavr14@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Intrathecal Use of Chloroprocaine 1% and Ropivacaine 0,75% During Elective Cesarean Section. A Comparative Study
This will be a prospective randomized study, aiming at comparing an intrathecal fixed dose of chloroprocaine 1% versus an intrathecal fixed dose of ropivacaine 0.75% in elective cesarean sections
Read the detailed description
Neuraxial techniques are the anesthetic techniques of choice in contemporary obstetric anesthesia practice, with a definitive superiority as compared to general anesthesia, since, by their use, serious complications involving the airway can be avoided. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia has become the favorable technique for both elective and emergency cesarean sections. Various local anesthetics have been used, but ropivacaine is the drug of choice in most hospitals in Greece. However, chloroprocaine is a preferable local anesthetic in USA due to its quick and predictable onset of action. Chloroprocaine was initially used in 1980, but it became obsolete in those years due to neurological symptoms associated with its use caused mainly by the presence of sodium bisulfite and disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA) in the early formulations. Nowadays, new formulations of the drug without EDTA makes chloroprocaine safe for use.
The aim of the current randomized controlled trial will be to compare the effect of an intrathecal fixed dose of chloroprocaine versus an intrathecal fixed dose of ropivacaine in parturients subjected to elective cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.
- Conditions
- Cesarean Section, Local Anesthetic
- Being tested
- Chloroprocaine 1% Injectable Solution, Ropivacaine 0.75% Injectable Solution
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Chloroprocaine 1% Injectable SolutionDrug
- in parturients allocated to the chloroprocaine group, a fixed dose of chloroprocaine 1% will be administered intrathecally
Ropivacaine 0.75% Injectable SolutionDrug
- in parturients allocated to the ropivacaine group, a fixed dose of ropivacaine 0.75% will be administered intrathecally
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| chloroprocaine group | Active comparator | intrathecal fixed dose of chloroprocaine 1% Receives: Drug: Chloroprocaine 1% Injectable Solution |
| ropivacaine group | Active comparator | intrathecal fixed dose of ropivacaine 0.75% Receives: Drug: Ropivacaine 0.75% Injectable Solution |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time from spinal anesthesia to T10 block (min)
time required from spinal anesthetic injection to anesthetic block up to the 10th thoracic neurotome
Measured: intraoperative
Time from spinal anesthesia to T4 block (min)
time required from spinal anesthetic injection to anesthetic block up to the 4th thoracic neurotome
Measured: intraoperative
Time of spinal anesthesia to Bromage =3
time required from spinal anesthetic injection to complete motor block (Bromage scale=3, where Bromage=0, no block; Bromage=1, partial block; Bromage=2, almost complete block; Bromage=3, complete block
Measured: intraoperative
level of sensory block every 3 min
measurement of sensory block every 3 minutes after spinal anesthesia during the first 15 minutes
Measured: intraoperative
level of sensory block every 15 min
measurement of sensory block every 15 minutes from spinal anesthesia to the end of the surgery
Measured: intraoperative
highest level of sensory block
measurement of the highest level of sensory block after intrathecal infusion of local anesthetic
Measured: intraoperative
time from spinal anesthesia to highest level of sensory block
time from the performance of spinal anesthesia to the highest level of sensory block
Measured: intraoperative
duration of sensory block
measurement of time required for the sensory block to regress from sensory level T4 to sensory level T12/L2
Measured: intraoperative
pain at surgical incision
pain at skin incision using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), where VAS=0, no pain; VAS=10, worst pain imaginable
Measured: intraoperative
pain at neonatal delivery
pain at neonatal delivery using VAS scale, where VAS=0, no pain; VAS=10, worst pain imaginable
Measured: intraoperative
pain at peritoneal manipulation
pain at peritoneal manipulation using VAS scale, where VAS=0, no pain; VAS=10, worst pain imaginable
Measured: intraoperative
pain at Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) admission
pain at Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) admission using VAS scale, where VAS=0, no pain; VAS=10, worst pain imaginable
Measured: 1 hour postoperatively
pain at Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) discharge
pain at Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) discharge using VAS scale, where VAS=0, no pain; VAS=10, worst pain imaginable
Measured: 1 hour postoperatively
need for rescue analgesia intraoperatively
need for rescue analgesia during the operation, via epidural catheter or intravenously
Measured: intraoperative
Bromage scale every 3 min after spinal anesthesia
measurement of bromage scale every 3 minutes after spinal anesthesia during the first 15 minutes
Measured: intraoperative
Bromage scale every 15 min
measurement of bromage scale every 15 minutes from spinal anesthesia to the end of the surgery
Measured: intraoperative
duration of motor block
measurement of time required for bromage scale to regress from 3 to 0
Measured: 1 hour postoperatively
duration of staying in PACU
duration of parturient stay in PACU
Measured: 2 hours postoperatively
Secondary outcomes (21)
Neonatal Apgar score at 1 minute
Neonatal Apgar score will be recorded at 1 minute after delivery. The Apgar score is determined by evaluating the newborn baby on five simple criteria on a scale from zero to two, then summing up the five values thus obtained. The resulting Apgar score ranges from zero to 10. Scores 7 and above are generally normal; 4 to 6, fairly low; and 3 and below are generally regarded as critically low and cause for immediate resuscitative efforts
Measured: 1 minute post delivery
Neonatal Apgar score at 5 minutes
Neonatal Apgar score will be recorded at 5 minutes after delivery. The Apgar score is determined by evaluating the newborn baby on five simple criteria on a scale from zero to two, then summing up the five values thus obtained. The resulting Apgar score ranges from zero to 10. Scores 7 and above are generally normal; 4 to 6, fairly low; and 3 and below are generally regarded as critically low and cause for immediate resuscitative efforts
Measured: 1 minute post delivery
neonatal blood gases
fetal cord blood analysis will be performed immediately post-delivery
Measured: 1 minute post delivery
incidence of neonatal acidosis
incidence of neonatal acidosis (PH<7.2) will be recorded
Measured: 1 minute post delivery
incidence of hypotension
any occurence of hypotension (systolic blood pressure<80% of baseline) throughout the operation will be recorded
Measured: intraoperative
incidence of bradycardia
any incidence of maternal bradycardia (heart rate<60/min) will be recorded
Measured: intraoperative
need for vasoconstrictor
any need for vasoconstrictor during the operation will be recorded
Measured: intraoperative
need for atropine
any need for atropine during the operation because of bradycardia will be recorded
Measured: intraoperative
incidence of nausea/vomiting
any occurence of nausea and/or vomiting during the operation will be recorded
Measured: intraoperative
incidence of dizziness
any occurence of dizziness during the operation will be recorded
Measured: intraoperative
incidence of drowsiness
any occurence of drowsiness during the operation will be recorded
Measured: intraoperative
incidence of discomfort
any occurence of discomfort during the operation will be recorded
Measured: intraoperative
incidence of shivering
any occurence of shivering during the operation will be recorded
Measured: intraoperative
need for rescue analgesia in PACU
need for rescue analgesia in PACU when VAS scale >4 will be recorded
Measured: 2 hours postoperatively
time from spinal anesthesia to rescue analgesia in PACU
time from spinal anesthesia to rescue analgesia in PACU will be recorded
Measured: 2 hours postoperatively
incidence of neurological symptoms during hospital stay
incidence of neurological symptoms during hospitalization will be recorded
Measured: 5 days postoperatively
incidence of neurological symptoms 2 months after the operation
incidence of neurological symptoms 2 months after discharge from the hospital will be recorded by phone communication
Measured: 2 months after discharge
incidence of low back pain
incidence of low back pain 2 months after discharge from the hospital will be recorded by phone communication
Measured: 2 months after discharge
time from spinal anesthesia to mobilization
time from spinal anesthesia to mobilization of parturient will be recorded
Measured: 2 days postoperatively
mother's satisfaction from anesthesia
mother's satisfaction from anesthesia will be recorded using Likert scale. Likert scale ranges from 1 which is the minimum satisfaction to 4 which is the maximum satisfaction
Measured: 1 day postoperatively
gynecologist's satisfaction
gynecologist's satisfaction from anesthesia will be recorded using Likert scale. Likert scale ranges from 1 which is the minimum satisfaction to 4 which is the maximum satisfaction
Measured: 1 hour postoperatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Apr 2024
- Study start10 Jan 2024
- Primary completion10 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion10 Jan 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cesarean SectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aretaieion University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr Kassiani Theodoraki, Aretaieion University Hospital
- Investigators
- Kassiani Theodoraki, PhD, DESA, Principal investigator, Aretaieion University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06376058
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 434/06-06-2022
- Acronym
- annie-mariana
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 17 Apr 2024
- Last updated
- 22 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Maes S, Laubach M, Poelaert J. Randomised controlled trial of spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine or 2-chloroprocaine during caesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016 May;60(5):642-9. doi: 10.1111/aas.12665. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
PubMed 26608876Saporito A, Ceppi M, Perren A, La Regina D, Cafarotti S, Borgeat A, Aguirre J, Van De Velde M, Teunkens A. Does spinal chloroprocaine pharmacokinetic profile actually translate into a clinical advantage in terms of clinical outcomes when compared to low-dose spinal bupivacaine? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Feb;52:99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
PubMed 30237085Singariya G, Choudhary K, Kamal M, Bihani P, Pahuja H, Saini P. Comparison of analgesic efficacy of intrathecal 1% 2-chloroprocaine with or without fentanyl in elective caesarean section: A prospective, double-blind, randomised study. Indian J Anaesth. 2021 Feb;65(2):102-107. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_816_20. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
PubMed 33776083Baribeault T, Suss S. Spinal Anesthesia with 2-Chloroprocaine and Dexmedetomidine for Cesarean Section: A Case Report. AANA J. 2023 Jun;91(3):194-196.
PubMed 37227957
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Intrathecal Use of Chloroprocaine 1% and Ropivacaine 0,75% During Elective Cesarean Section. A Comparative Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06376058
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- annie-mariana / 434/06-06-2022
- Conditions
- Cesarean Section, Local Anesthetic
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Aretaieion University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 10 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This will be a prospective randomized study, aiming at comparing an intrathecal fixed dose of chloroprocaine 1% versus an intrathecal fixed dose of ropivacaine 0.75% in elective cesarean sections
Detailed description
Neuraxial techniques are the anesthetic techniques of choice in contemporary obstetric anesthesia practice, with a definitive superiority as compared to general anesthesia, since, by their use, serious complications involving the airway can be avoided. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia has become the favorable technique for both elective and emergency cesarean sections. Various local anesthetics have been used, but ropivacaine is the drug of choice in most hospitals in Greece. However, chloroprocaine is a preferable local anesthetic in USA due to its quick and predictable onset of action. Chloroprocaine was initially used in 1980, but it became obsolete in those years due to neurological symptoms associated with its use caused mainly by the presence of sodium bisulfite and disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA) in the early formulations. Nowadays, new formulations of the drug without EDTA makes chloroprocaine safe for use.
The aim of the current randomized controlled trial will be to compare the effect of an intrathecal fixed dose of chloroprocaine versus an intrathecal fixed dose of ropivacaine in parturients subjected to elective cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| chloroprocaine group | Active comparator | Drug: Chloroprocaine 1% Injectable Solutionintrathecal fixed dose of chloroprocaine 1% |
| ropivacaine group | Active comparator | Drug: Ropivacaine 0.75% Injectable Solutionintrathecal fixed dose of ropivacaine 0.75% |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 48 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- adult parturients, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II,
- singleton gestation>37 weeks
- elective cesarean section
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) > III
- age < 18 years
- singleton gestation <37 weeks
- Body Mass Index (BMI) >40 kg/m2
- Body weight <50 kg
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Chloroprocaine 1% Injectable Solution• in parturients allocated to the chloroprocaine group, a fixed dose of chloroprocaine 1% will be administered intrathecally | Drug | chloroprocaine group |
| Ropivacaine 0.75% Injectable Solution• in parturients allocated to the ropivacaine group, a fixed dose of ropivacaine 0.75% will be administered intrathecally | Drug | ropivacaine group |
Primary outcome
Time from spinal anesthesia to T10 block (min)
Time frame: intraoperative
time required from spinal anesthetic injection to anesthetic block up to the 10th thoracic neurotome
Time from spinal anesthesia to T4 block (min)
Time frame: intraoperative
time required from spinal anesthetic injection to anesthetic block up to the 4th thoracic neurotome
Time of spinal anesthesia to Bromage =3
Time frame: intraoperative
time required from spinal anesthetic injection to complete motor block (Bromage scale=3, where Bromage=0, no block; Bromage=1, partial block; Bromage=2, almost complete block; Bromage=3, complete block
level of sensory block every 3 min
Time frame: intraoperative
measurement of sensory block every 3 minutes after spinal anesthesia during the first 15 minutes
level of sensory block every 15 min
Time frame: intraoperative
measurement of sensory block every 15 minutes from spinal anesthesia to the end of the surgery
highest level of sensory block
Time frame: intraoperative
measurement of the highest level of sensory block after intrathecal infusion of local anesthetic
time from spinal anesthesia to highest level of sensory block
Time frame: intraoperative
time from the performance of spinal anesthesia to the highest level of sensory block
duration of sensory block
Time frame: intraoperative
measurement of time required for the sensory block to regress from sensory level T4 to sensory level T12/L2
pain at surgical incision
Time frame: intraoperative
pain at skin incision using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), where VAS=0, no pain; VAS=10, worst pain imaginable
pain at neonatal delivery
Time frame: intraoperative
pain at neonatal delivery using VAS scale, where VAS=0, no pain; VAS=10, worst pain imaginable
pain at peritoneal manipulation
Time frame: intraoperative
pain at peritoneal manipulation using VAS scale, where VAS=0, no pain; VAS=10, worst pain imaginable
pain at Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) admission
Time frame: 1 hour postoperatively
pain at Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) admission using VAS scale, where VAS=0, no pain; VAS=10, worst pain imaginable
pain at Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) discharge
Time frame: 1 hour postoperatively
pain at Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) discharge using VAS scale, where VAS=0, no pain; VAS=10, worst pain imaginable
need for rescue analgesia intraoperatively
Time frame: intraoperative
need for rescue analgesia during the operation, via epidural catheter or intravenously
Bromage scale every 3 min after spinal anesthesia
Time frame: intraoperative
measurement of bromage scale every 3 minutes after spinal anesthesia during the first 15 minutes
Bromage scale every 15 min
Time frame: intraoperative
measurement of bromage scale every 15 minutes from spinal anesthesia to the end of the surgery
duration of motor block
Time frame: 1 hour postoperatively
measurement of time required for bromage scale to regress from 3 to 0
duration of staying in PACU
Time frame: 2 hours postoperatively
duration of parturient stay in PACU
21 secondary outcomes
Neonatal Apgar score at 1 minute
Time frame: 1 minute post delivery
Neonatal Apgar score at 5 minutes
Time frame: 1 minute post delivery
neonatal blood gases
Time frame: 1 minute post delivery
incidence of neonatal acidosis
Time frame: 1 minute post delivery
incidence of hypotension
Time frame: intraoperative
incidence of bradycardia
Time frame: intraoperative
need for vasoconstrictor
Time frame: intraoperative
need for atropine
Time frame: intraoperative
incidence of nausea/vomiting
Time frame: intraoperative
incidence of dizziness
Time frame: intraoperative
incidence of drowsiness
Time frame: intraoperative
incidence of discomfort
Time frame: intraoperative
incidence of shivering
Time frame: intraoperative
need for rescue analgesia in PACU
Time frame: 2 hours postoperatively
time from spinal anesthesia to rescue analgesia in PACU
Time frame: 2 hours postoperatively
incidence of neurological symptoms during hospital stay
Time frame: 5 days postoperatively
incidence of neurological symptoms 2 months after the operation
Time frame: 2 months after discharge
incidence of low back pain
Time frame: 2 months after discharge
time from spinal anesthesia to mobilization
Time frame: 2 days postoperatively
mother's satisfaction from anesthesia
Time frame: 1 day postoperatively
gynecologist's satisfaction
Time frame: 1 hour postoperatively
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jul 2025.
- Background: PubMed 26608876Maes S, Laubach M, Poelaert J. Randomised controlled trial of spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine or 2-chloroprocaine during caesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016 May;60(5):642-9. doi: 10.1111/aas.12665. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
- Background: PubMed 30237085Saporito A, Ceppi M, Perren A, La Regina D, Cafarotti S, Borgeat A, Aguirre J, Van De Velde M, Teunkens A. Does spinal chloroprocaine pharmacokinetic profile actually translate into a clinical advantage in terms of clinical outcomes when compared to low-dose spinal bupivacaine? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Feb;52:99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
- Background: PubMed 33776083Singariya G, Choudhary K, Kamal M, Bihani P, Pahuja H, Saini P. Comparison of analgesic efficacy of intrathecal 1% 2-chloroprocaine with or without fentanyl in elective caesarean section: A prospective, double-blind, randomised study. Indian J Anaesth. 2021 Feb;65(2):102-107. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_816_20. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
- Background: PubMed 37227957Baribeault T, Suss S. Spinal Anesthesia with 2-Chloroprocaine and Dexmedetomidine for Cesarean Section: A Case Report. AANA J. 2023 Jun;91(3):194-196.
Related trials for Cesarean Section
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Effect of Two Different Doses of Intravenous Oxytocin on Patients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section
Postpartum Hemorrhage, Uterine Atony
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ultrasound Assessment Of Gastric Volume In Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), Obstetric Anesthesia
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Pain in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section at Assuit University Hospital
Cesarean Section
Active, not recruiting
Implementation of a Disparities in Labor Outcomes Dashboard
Labor Induction, Cesarean Birth
RecruitingPhase 1
Ketamine Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics for Postpartum Depression and Pain After Cesarean Delivery
Pain, Postpartum Depression
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Marianna Mavromati, MD contact
Kassiani Theodoraki, PhD, DESA principal investigator
Aretaieion University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Chloroprocaine 1% Injectable Solution and Ropivacaine 0.75% Injectable Solution in people with Cesarean Section and Local Anesthetic, run by Aretaieion University Hospital at 1 site in Greece.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Kassiani Theodoraki, PhD, DESA (6974634162, ktheodoraki@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time from spinal anesthesia to T10 block (min) (time frame: intraoperative). The study lists 18 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06376058, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2025.